Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1988 Sep;88(1):26–29. doi: 10.1104/pp.88.1.26

Factors Influencing Protoplast Viability of Suspension-Cultured Rice Cells during Isolation Process 1

Shigetaka Ishii 1
PMCID: PMC1055519  PMID: 16666273

Abstract

Callus cells of rice (Oryza sativa L.) that were actively dividing in suspension culture had lost the ability to divide during the isolation process of protoplasts. Factors influencing the protoplast viability were examined using highly purified preparations of cellulase C1, xylanase, and pectin lyase, which were essential enzymes for the isolation of protoplasts from the rice cells. The treatment of the cells with xylanase and pectin lyase, both of which are macerating enzymes, caused cellular damage. Xylanase treatment was more detrimental to the cells. Osmotic stress, cell wall fragments solubilized by xylanase, and disassembly of cortical microtubules were not the primary factors which damaged the rice cells and protoplasts. The addition of AgNO3, an inhibitor of ethylene action, to the protoplast isolation medium increased the number of colonies formed from the cultured protoplasts, although the yield of protoplasts was reduced by the addition. Superoxide radical (O2-) was generated from the cells treated with xylanase or pectin lyase. The addition of superoxide dismutase and catalase to the protoplast isolation medium resulted in a marked improvement in protoplast viability especially when the non-additive control protoplasts formed colonies with a low frequency. The addition of glutathione peroxidase and phospholipase A2, which have been known to reduce and detoxify lipid hydroperoxides in membranes, to the protoplast culture medium significantly increased the frequency of colony formation. These results suggested that some of the damage to rice protoplasts may be caused by oxygen toxicity.

Full text

PDF
26

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beyer E. M. A potent inhibitor of ethylene action in plants. Plant Physiol. 1976 Sep;58(3):268–271. doi: 10.1104/pp.58.3.268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fuchs Y., Anderson J. D. Purification and characterization of ethylene inducing proteins from cellulysin. Plant Physiol. 1987 Jul;84(3):732–736. doi: 10.1104/pp.84.3.732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hahne G., Hoffmann F. Dimethyl sulfoxide can initiate cell divisions of arrested callus protoplasts by promoting cortical microtubule assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Sep;81(17):5449–5453. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.17.5449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Halliwell B., Gutteridge J. M. Oxygen toxicity, oxygen radicals, transition metals and disease. Biochem J. 1984 Apr 1;219(1):1–14. doi: 10.1042/bj2190001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ishii S. Cell wall cementing materials of grass leaves. Plant Physiol. 1984 Dec;76(4):959–961. doi: 10.1104/pp.76.4.959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ishii S., Mogi Y. Identification of enzymes that are effective for isolating protoplasts from grass leaves. Plant Physiol. 1983 Jul;72(3):641–644. doi: 10.1104/pp.72.3.641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Misra H. P., Fridovich I. The role of superoxide anion in the autoxidation of epinephrine and a simple assay for superoxide dismutase. J Biol Chem. 1972 May 25;247(10):3170–3175. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Slocum R. D., Kaur-Sawhney R., Galston A. W. The physiology and biochemistry of polyamines in plants. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1984 Dec;235(2):283–303. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(84)90201-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Smith B. A., Reider M. L., Fletcher J. S. Relationship between Vital Staining and Subculture Growth during the Senescence of Plant Tissue Cultures. Plant Physiol. 1982 Oct;70(4):1228–1230. doi: 10.1104/pp.70.4.1228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ursini F., Maiorino M., Valente M., Ferri L., Gregolin C. Purification from pig liver of a protein which protects liposomes and biomembranes from peroxidative degradation and exhibits glutathione peroxidase activity on phosphatidylcholine hydroperoxides. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1982 Feb 15;710(2):197–211. doi: 10.1016/0005-2760(82)90150-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Walker-Simmons M., Holländer-Czytko H., Andersen J. K., Ryan C. A. Wound signals in plants: A systemic plant wound signal alters plasma membrane integrity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Jun;81(12):3737–3741. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.12.3737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Yamazaki N., Fry S. C., Darvill A. G., Albersheim P. Host-Pathogen Interactions : XXIV. Fragments Isolated from Suspension-Cultured Sycamore Cell Walls Inhibit the Ability of the Cells to Incorporate [C]Leucine into Proteins. Plant Physiol. 1983 Jul;72(3):864–869. doi: 10.1104/pp.72.3.864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES