Table 2.
Sport and injury metrics addressed by AI techniques.
Sport | AI Method | Author (Year) | Application | Sample Size | Data Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Athletics | ML | Rahlf A.L. (2022) [34] |
Identification of risk factors for running-related injuries using ML techniques. |
120 runners | Private, collected via surveys and biomechanical measurements |
Connor M. (2022) [35] |
Adaptive training plan generation using control systems and AI. |
Simulation (N = 1800) |
Simulated data, no real data collected | ||
Alpine Skiing | ML | Hermann A. (2021) [36] |
Knee injury prevention in alpine skiing using mechatronic ski bindings. |
Not specified | Research-based, design, and biomechanical assessment |
Basketball Handball |
ML (ANN, SVM, Markov 1) | Claudino J.G (2019) [37] |
Evaluation of performance and injury risk in basketball, handball, and volleyball. |
6456 athletes (various sports) |
Public, data from academic research |
Baseball | CNN | Koseler K. (2017) [38] |
Statistical analysis and injury risk prediction in baseball. |
Not specified | Public, systematic literature review |
Volleyball Beach Volleyball |
Deep CNN | Kautz T. (2017) [39] |
Activity recognition and performance analysis in beach volleyball. |
30 participants (11 women and 19 men) |
Private, collected via wearable sensors attached to the wrist |
Futsal | RF, XGBoost 2 | Ruiz-Pérez I. (2021) [40] |
Predicting lower-extremity soft tissue injuries in elite futsal players. |
139 players | Private, preseason screening and monitoring |
Football | ML | Rico-González M. (2023) [41] |
Focused on a common injury type. |
Not specified | Public, systematic literature review |
ML (XGBoost) | Rommers N. (2020) [42] |
Systematic review of ML applications in football for injury risk prediction. |
734 players | Private, data from football academy monitoring | |
ML | Kolodziej M. (2021) [43] |
Injury risk assessment in elite youth football players. | 62 players | Private, collected from neuromuscular performance tests | |
Nassis GP. (2023) [5] |
Identification of neuromuscular performance parameters as risk factors for non-contact injuries. | Not specified | Public, literature Review |
||
Hecksteden A. (2023) [44] |
Review of ML applications in football with an emphasis on injury risk. |
84 players | Private, screening and monitoring with ML methods | ||
Rossi A. (2018) [6] |
Combining screening and monitoring data with ML for injury prediction. |
Not specified | Private, GPS data from training sessions and games |
||
Windsor J. (2022) [45] |
Effective injury forecasting in football using GPS training data and ML techniques. |
77 players | Private, biomechanical assessments and medical history | ||
Ayala F. (2019) [46] |
Analysis of foot biomechanics and injury history in varsity football athletes. |
96 players | Private, preseason screening | ||
KNN, ANN | Calderón-Díaz M. (2023) [47] |
Development of preventive models for hamstring injuries in professional soccer. |
Not specified | Private, biomechanical analysis with sensors | |
Hockey | RF, Neural Networks | Schickendantz M.S. (2020) [48] |
Injury risk prediction and management in NHL hockey players. |
2322 players | Public, data from publicly reported NHL injury databases |
1 A Markov model is a type of statistical model that predicts future states based only on the current state, without requiring knowledge of the sequence of events that preceded it. 2 Extreme Gradient Boosting is a powerful ML algorithm based on decision trees. It builds multiple trees sequentially, with each new tree correcting errors from the previous ones.