Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1992 Mar;448:321–337. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019044

Electrical coupling between cells of the insect Aedes albopictus.

F Bukauskas 1, C Kempf 1, R Weingart 1
PMCID: PMC1176202  PMID: 1593470

Abstract

1. Cell pairs of an insect cell line (Aedes albopictus, clone C6/36) were used to study the electrical properties of intercellular junctions. A double voltage-clamp approach was adopted to control the voltage gradient between the cells and measure the intracellular current flow. 2. Determinations of junctional conductance (gj) revealed two types of intercellular contacts, gap junctions and cytoplasmic bridges. Identification occurred by means of functional criteria, i.e. the dependency of gj on (i) junctional membrane potential, (ii) non-junctional membrane potential, and (iii) heptanol. 3. In cell pairs with putative gap junctions, gj was dependent on the junctional membrane potential (Vj). When determined at the beginning of voltage pulses, gj was insensitive to Vj; when determined at the end of 15 s pulses, it depended on Vj in a bell-shaped manner (70% decrease for a change in Vj of +/- 75 mV). 4. These cell pairs also showed a dependency of gj on the non-junctional membrane potential (Vm). When determined immediately after changing the non-junctional membrane potential in both cells, gj was not affected by Vm; when determined 30 s later, gj was modified by Vm in a S-shaped fashion (100% decrease when Vm was depolarized to +50 mV). 5. Exposure to 3 mM-heptanol gave rise to complete and reversible block of gj in cell pairs with putative gap junctions. 6. Cell pairs susceptible to uncoupling by heptanol revealed junctional currents indicative of the operation of gap junction channels. The single-channel conductance, determined at a Vm of -50 to -70 mV, was 133 pS. 7. In the case of putative cytoplasmic bridges, gj was insensitive to the junctional and non-junctional membrane potential. In addition, it was not affected by 3 mM-heptanol. 8. While most cell pairs showed functional properties characteristic of gap junctions or cytoplasmic bridges, few cell pairs exhibited junctional currents compatible with the co-existence of both junctional structures.

Full text

PDF
321

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beams H. W., Kessel R. G. Cytokinesis: a comparative study of cytoplasmic division in animal cells. Am Sci. 1976 May-Jun;64(3):279–290. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brink P. R., Fan S. F. Patch clamp recordings from membranes which contain gap junction channels. Biophys J. 1989 Sep;56(3):579–593. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(89)82705-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burt J. M., Spray D. C. Single-channel events and gating behavior of the cardiac gap junction channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 May;85(10):3431–3434. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.10.3431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Flagg-Newton J. L., Dahl G., Loewenstein W. R. Cell junction and cyclic AMP: 1. Upregulation of junctional membrane permeability and junctional membrane particles by administration of cyclic nucleotide or phosphodiesterase inhibitor. J Membr Biol. 1981;63(1-2):105–121. doi: 10.1007/BF01969452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Flagg-Newton J., Simpson I., Loewenstein W. R. Permeability of the cell-to-cell membrane channels in mammalian cell juncton. Science. 1979 Jul 27;205(4404):404–407. doi: 10.1126/science.377490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Igarashi A. Isolation of a Singh's Aedes albopictus cell clone sensitive to Dengue and Chikungunya viruses. J Gen Virol. 1978 Sep;40(3):531–544. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-40-3-531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Imanaga I. Cell-to-cell coupling studied by diffusional methods in myocardial cells. Experientia. 1987 Oct 15;43(10):1080–1083. doi: 10.1007/BF01956043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jaslove S. W., Brink P. R. The mechanism of rectification at the electrotonic motor giant synapse of the crayfish. Nature. 1986 Sep 4;323(6083):63–65. doi: 10.1038/323063a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Loewenstein W. R. Junctional intercellular communication: the cell-to-cell membrane channel. Physiol Rev. 1981 Oct;61(4):829–913. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1981.61.4.829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Moreno A. P., de Carvalho A. C., Verselis V., Eghbali B., Spray D. C. Voltage-dependent gap junction channels are formed by connexin32, the major gap junction protein of rat liver. Biophys J. 1991 Apr;59(4):920–925. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82305-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mullins J. M., Biesele J. J. Terminal phase of cytokinesis in D-98s cells. J Cell Biol. 1977 Jun;73(3):672–684. doi: 10.1083/jcb.73.3.672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Niggli E., Rüdisüli A., Maurer P., Weingart R. Effects of general anesthetics on current flow across membranes in guinea pig myocytes. Am J Physiol. 1989 Feb;256(2 Pt 1):C273–C281. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1989.256.2.C273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Obaid A. L., Socolar S. J., Rose B. Cell-to-cell channels with two independently regulated gates in series: analysis of junctional conductance modulation by membrane potential, calcium, and pH. J Membr Biol. 1983;73(1):69–89. doi: 10.1007/BF01870342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rook M. B., Jongsma H. J., van Ginneken A. C. Properties of single gap junctional channels between isolated neonatal rat heart cells. Am J Physiol. 1988 Oct;255(4 Pt 2):H770–H782. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1988.255.4.H770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rose B. Junctional membrane permeability: restoration by repolarizing current. Science. 1970 Aug 7;169(3945):607–609. doi: 10.1126/science.169.3945.607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rüdisüli A., Weingart R. Electrical properties of gap junction channels in guinea-pig ventricular cell pairs revealed by exposure to heptanol. Pflugers Arch. 1989 Oct;415(1):12–21. doi: 10.1007/BF00373136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schwarzmann G., Wiegandt H., Rose B., Zimmerman A., Ben-Haim D., Loewenstein W. R. Diameter of the cell-to-cell junctional membrane channels as probed with neutral molecules. Science. 1981 Jul 31;213(4507):551–553. doi: 10.1126/science.7244653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Simpson I., Rose B., Loewenstein W. R. Size limit of molecules permeating the junctional membrane channels. Science. 1977 Jan 21;195(4275):294–296. doi: 10.1126/science.831276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Socolar S. J., Politoff A. L. Uncoupling cell junctions in a glandular epithelium by depolarizing current. Science. 1971 Apr 30;172(3982):492–494. doi: 10.1126/science.172.3982.492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Spray D. C., Bennett M. V. Physiology and pharmacology of gap junctions. Annu Rev Physiol. 1985;47:281–303. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.47.030185.001433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Spray D. C., Cherbas L., Cherbas P., Morales E. A., Carrow G. M. Ionic coupling and mitotic synchrony of siblings in a Drosophila cell line. Exp Cell Res. 1989 Oct;184(2):509–517. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(89)90348-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Spray D. C., Harris A. L., Bennett M. V. Equilibrium properties of a voltage-dependent junctional conductance. J Gen Physiol. 1981 Jan;77(1):77–93. doi: 10.1085/jgp.77.1.77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Spray D. C., White R. L., de Carvalho A. C., Harris A. L., Bennett M. V. Gating of gap junction channels. Biophys J. 1984 Jan;45(1):219–230. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(84)84150-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Veenstra R. D. Voltage-dependent gating of gap junction channels in embryonic chick ventricular cell pairs. Am J Physiol. 1990 Apr;258(4 Pt 1):C662–C672. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1990.258.4.C662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Verselis V. K., Bennett M. V., Bargiello T. A. A voltage-dependent gap junction in Drosophila melanogaster. Biophys J. 1991 Jan;59(1):114–126. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82204-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Weingart R. Electrical properties of the nexal membrane studied in rat ventricular cell pairs. J Physiol. 1986 Jan;370:267–284. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp015934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Zimmerman A. L., Rose B. Permeability properties of cell-to-cell channels: kinetics of fluorescent tracer diffusion through a cell junction. J Membr Biol. 1985;84(3):269–283. doi: 10.1007/BF01871390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES