Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1993 Sep;135(1):135–147. doi: 10.1093/genetics/135.1.135

A Combined Classical Genetic and High Resolution Two-Dimensional Electrophoretic Approach to the Assessment of the Number of Genes Affecting Hybrid Male Sterility in Drosophila Simulans and Drosophila Sechellia

L W Zeng 1, R S Singh 1
PMCID: PMC1205613  PMID: 8224814

Abstract

We have attempted to estimate the number of genes involved in postzygotic reproductive isolation between two closely related species, Drosophila simulans and Drosophila sechellia, by a novel approach that involves the use of high resolution two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2DE) to examine testis proteins in parents, hybrids and fertile and sterile backcross progenies. The important results that have emerged from this study are as follows: (1) about 8% of about 1000 proteins examined showed divergence (presence/absence) between the two species; (2) by tracing individual proteins in parental, hybrid and backcross males, we were able to associate the divergent proteins with different chromosomes and found that most divergent proteins are associated with autosomes and very few with X chromosome, Y chromosome and cytoplasm; (3) when proteins showing both quantitative and qualitative differences between the two species were examined in F(1) hybrid males, most (97.4%) proteins were expressed at levels between the two parents and no sign of large scale changes in spot density was observed. All the proteins observed in the two parental species were present in F(1) hybrid males except two species-specific proteins that may be encoded (or regulated) by sex chromosomes; (4) when different fertile and sterile backcross male testes were compared, a few D. sechellia-specific proteins were identified to be consistently associated with male sterility. These results along with the observation that a large proportion (23.6%) of first generation backcross males were fertile show that hybrid male sterility between D. simulans and D. sechellia involves a relatively small number of genes. Role of large scale genetic changes due to general genome incompatibility is not supported. The results also suggest that the large effect of X chromosome on hybrid male sterility is not due to higher divergence of X chromosome than autosomes.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.9 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aquadro C. F., Avise J. C. Genetic divergence between rodent species assessed by using two-dimensional electrophoresis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jun;78(6):3784–3788. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.6.3784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cariou M. L. Biochemical phylogeny of the eight species in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup, including D. sechellia and D. orena. Genet Res. 1987 Dec;50(3):181–185. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300023673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Coulthart M. B., Singh R. S. Low genic variation in male-reproductive-tract proteins of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Mol Biol Evol. 1988 Mar;5(2):167–181. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Coyne J. A., Charlesworth B. Genetic analysis of X-linked sterility in hybrids between three sibling species of Drosophila. Heredity (Edinb) 1989 Feb;62(Pt 1):97–106. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1989.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Coyne J. A., Charlesworth B. Location of an X-linked factor causing sterility in male hybrids of Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. Heredity (Edinb) 1986 Oct;57(Pt 2):243–246. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1986.114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Coyne J. A. Genetic basis of male sterility in hybrids between two closely related species of Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Jul;81(14):4444–4447. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.14.4444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Coyne J. A. Genetic studies of three sibling species of Drosophila with relationship to theories of speciation. Genet Res. 1985 Oct;46(2):169–192. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300022643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Coyne J. A. Genetics and speciation. Nature. 1992 Feb 6;355(6360):511–515. doi: 10.1038/355511a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Coyne J. A., Rux J., David J. R. Genetics of morphological differences and hybrid sterility between Drosophila sechellia and its relatives. Genet Res. 1991 Apr;57(2):113–122. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300029177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dobzhansky T. Genetic analysis of hybrid sterility within the species Drosophila pseudoobscura. Hereditas. 1974;77(1):81–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1974.tb01356.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dobzhansky T. Studies on Hybrid Sterility. II. Localization of Sterility Factors in Drosophila Pseudoobscura Hybrids. Genetics. 1936 Mar;21(2):113–135. doi: 10.1093/genetics/21.2.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Goldman D., Giri P. R., O'Brien S. J. A molecular phylogeny of the hominoid primates as indicated by two-dimensional protein electrophoresis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 May;84(10):3307–3311. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.10.3307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Guénet J. L., Nagamine C., Simon-Chazottes D., Montagutelli X., Bonhomme F. Hst-3: an X-linked hybrid sterility gene. Genet Res. 1990 Oct-Dec;56(2-3):163–165. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300035254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hanash S. M., Strahler J. R. Advances in two-dimensional electrophoresis. Nature. 1989 Feb 2;337(6206):485–486. doi: 10.1038/337485a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hochstrasser D. F., Harrington M. G., Hochstrasser A. C., Miller M. J., Merril C. R. Methods for increasing the resolution of two-dimensional protein electrophoresis. Anal Biochem. 1988 Sep;173(2):424–435. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(88)90209-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Janczewski D. N., Goldman D., O'Brien S. J. Molecular genetic divergence of orang utan (Pongo pygmaeus) subspecies based on isozyme and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. J Hered. 1990 Sep-Oct;81(5):375–387. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Johnson N. A., Perez D. E., Cabot E. L., Hollocher H., Wu C. I. A test of reciprocal X-Y interactions as a cause of hybrid sterility in Drosophila. Nature. 1992 Aug 27;358(6389):751–753. doi: 10.1038/358751a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Khadem M., Krimbas C. B. Studies of the species barrier between Drosophila subobscura and D. madeirensis. I. The genetics of male hybrid sterility. Heredity (Edinb) 1991 Oct;67(Pt 2):157–165. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1991.75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Merril C. R., Dunau M. L., Goldman D. A rapid sensitive silver stain for polypeptides in polyacrylamide gels. Anal Biochem. 1981 Jan 1;110(1):201–207. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(81)90136-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. O'Farrell P. H. High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins. J Biol Chem. 1975 May 25;250(10):4007–4021. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Orr H. A., Coyne J. A. The genetics of postzygotic isolation in the Drosophila virilis group. Genetics. 1989 Mar;121(3):527–537. doi: 10.1093/genetics/121.3.527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Orr H. A. Genetics of male and female sterility in hybrids of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Genetics. 1987 Aug;116(4):555–563. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.4.555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Orr H. A. Localization of genes causing postzygotic isolation in two hybridizations involving Drosophila pseudoobscura. Heredity (Edinb) 1989 Oct;63(Pt 2):231–237. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1989.96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Orr H. A. Mapping and characterization of a 'speciation gene' in Drosophila. Genet Res. 1992 Apr;59(2):73–80. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300030275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pantazidis A. C., Galanopoulos V. K., Zouros E. An autosomal factor from Drosophila arizonae restores normal spermatogenesis in Drosophila mojavensis males carrying the D. arizonae Y chromosome. Genetics. 1993 May;134(1):309–318. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.1.309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pantazidis A. C., Zouros E. Location of an autosomal factor causing sterility in Drosophila mojavensis males carrying the Drosophila arizonensis Y chromosome. Heredity (Edinb) 1988 Apr;60(Pt 2):299–304. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1988.46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Perez D. E., Wu C. I., Johnson N. A., Wu M. L. Genetics of reproductive isolation in the Drosophila simulans clade: DNA marker-assisted mapping and characterization of a hybrid-male sterility gene, Odysseus (Ods). Genetics. 1993 May;134(1):261–275. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.1.261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Prakash S., Lewontin R. C., Hubby J. L. A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. IV. Patterns of genic variation in central, marginal and isolated populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1969 Apr;61(4):841–858. doi: 10.1093/genetics/61.4.841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Prakash S. Origin of reproductive isolation in the absence of apparent genic differentiation in a geographic isolate of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1972 Sep;72(1):143–155. doi: 10.1093/genetics/72.1.143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Spicer G. S., Fleming J. E. Genetic differentiation of Drosophila melanogaster populations as assessed by two-dimensional electrophoresis. Biochem Genet. 1991 Aug;29(7-8):389–401. doi: 10.1007/BF00554145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Spicer G. S. Molecular evolution among some Drosophila species groups as indicated by two-dimensional electrophoresis. J Mol Evol. 1988;27(3):250–260. doi: 10.1007/BF02100081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Spicer G. S. Molecular evolution and phylogeny of the Drosophila virilis species group as inferred by two-dimensional electrophoresis. J Mol Evol. 1991 Oct;33(4):379–394. doi: 10.1007/BF02102868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Thomas S., Singh R. S. A comprehensive study of genic variation in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. VII. Varying rates of genic divergence as revealed by two-dimensional electrophoresis. Mol Biol Evol. 1992 May;9(3):507–525. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wu C. I., Beckenbach A. T. Evidence for Extensive Genetic Differentiation between the Sex-Ratio and the Standard Arrangement of DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA and D. PERSIMILIS and Identification of Hybrid Sterility Factors. Genetics. 1983 Sep;105(1):71–86. doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.1.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zeng L. W., Singh R. S. The genetic basis of Haldane's rule and the nature of asymmetric hybrid male sterility among Drosophila simulans, Drosophila mauritiana and Drosophila sechellia. Genetics. 1993 May;134(1):251–260. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.1.251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES