Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1994 Sep;138(1):191–202. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.1.191

Selection on Silent Sites in the Rodent H3 Histone Gene Family

R W DeBry 1, W F Marzluff 1
PMCID: PMC1206130  PMID: 8001786

Abstract

Selection promoting differential use of synonymous codons has been shown for several unicellular organisms and for Drosophila, but not for mammals. Selection coefficients operating on synonymous codons are likely to be extremely small, so that a very large effective population size is required for selection to overcome the effects of drift. In mammals, codon-usage bias is believed to be determined exclusively by mutation pressure, with differences between genes due to large-scale variation in base composition around the genome. The replication-dependent histone genes are expressed at extremely high levels during periods of DNA synthesis, and thus are among the most likely mammalian genes to be affected by selection on synonymous codon usage. We suggest that the extremely biased pattern of codon usage in the H3 genes is determined in part by selection. Silent site G + C content is much higher than expected based on flanking sequence G + C content, compared to other rodent genes with similar silent site base composition but lower levels of expression. Dinucleotide-mediated mutation bias does affect codon usage, but the affect is limited to the choice between G and C in some fourfold degenerate codons. Gene conversion between the two clusters of histone genes has not been an important force in the evolution of the H3 genes, but gene conversion appears to have had some effect within the cluster on chromosome 13.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aota S., Ikemura T. Diversity in G + C content at the third position of codons in vertebrate genes and its cause. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986 Aug 26;14(16):6345–6355. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.16.6345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Artishevsky A., Wooden S., Sharma A., Resendez E., Jr, Lee A. S. Cell-cycle regulatory sequences in a hamster histone promoter and their interactions with cellular factors. 1987 Aug 27-Sep 2Nature. 328(6133):823–827. doi: 10.1038/328823a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aïssani B., D'Onofrio G., Mouchiroud D., Gardiner K., Gautier C., Bernardi G. The compositional properties of human genes. J Mol Evol. 1991 Jun;32(6):493–503. doi: 10.1007/BF02102651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bernardi G., Olofsson B., Filipski J., Zerial M., Salinas J., Cuny G., Meunier-Rotival M., Rodier F. The mosaic genome of warm-blooded vertebrates. Science. 1985 May 24;228(4702):953–958. doi: 10.1126/science.4001930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bulmer M. A statistical analysis of nucleotide sequences of introns and exons in human genes. Mol Biol Evol. 1987 Jul;4(4):395–405. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bulmer M. Coevolution of codon usage and transfer RNA abundance. Nature. 1987 Feb 19;325(6106):728–730. doi: 10.1038/325728a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bulmer M. Neighboring base effects on substitution rates in pseudogenes. Mol Biol Evol. 1986 Jul;3(4):322–329. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bulmer M. The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage. Genetics. 1991 Nov;129(3):897–907. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.3.897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. D'Onofrio G., Mouchiroud D., Aïssani B., Gautier C., Bernardi G. Correlations between the compositional properties of human genes, codon usage, and amino acid composition of proteins. J Mol Evol. 1991 Jun;32(6):504–510. doi: 10.1007/BF02102652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. DeLange R. J., Fambrough D. M., Smith E. L., Bonner J. Calf and pea histone IV. 3. Complete amino acid sequence of pea seedling histone IV; comparison with the homologous calf thymus histone. J Biol Chem. 1969 Oct 25;244(20):5669–5679. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dover G. Molecular drive: a cohesive mode of species evolution. Nature. 1982 Sep 9;299(5879):111–117. doi: 10.1038/299111a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Engel J. D., Dodgson J. B. Histone genes are clustered but not tandemly repeated in the chicken genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 May;78(5):2856–2860. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.5.2856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Eyre-Walker A. C. An analysis of codon usage in mammals: selection or mutation bias? J Mol Evol. 1991 Nov;33(5):442–449. doi: 10.1007/BF02103136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Eyre-Walker A. Recombination and mammalian genome evolution. Proc Biol Sci. 1993 Jun 22;252(1335):237–243. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1993.0071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Feinberg A. P., Vogelstein B. A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Anal Biochem. 1983 Jul 1;132(1):6–13. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(83)90418-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gouy M., Gautier C. Codon usage in bacteria: correlation with gene expressivity. Nucleic Acids Res. 1982 Nov 25;10(22):7055–7074. doi: 10.1093/nar/10.22.7055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Graves R. A., Wellman S. E., Chiu I. M., Marzluff W. F. Differential expression of two clusters of mouse histone genes. J Mol Biol. 1985 May 25;183(2):179–194. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90211-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gruber A., Streit A., Reist M., Benninger P., Böhni R., Schümperli D. Structure of a mouse histone-encoding gene cluster. Gene. 1990 Nov 15;95(2):303–304. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90377-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hentschel C. C., Birnstiel M. L. The organization and expression of histone gene families. Cell. 1981 Aug;25(2):301–313. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90048-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hillis D. M., Dixon M. T. Ribosomal DNA: molecular evolution and phylogenetic inference. Q Rev Biol. 1991 Dec;66(4):411–453. doi: 10.1086/417338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hood L., Campbell J. H., Elgin S. C. The organization, expression, and evolution of antibody genes and other multigene families. Annu Rev Genet. 1975;9:305–353. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.09.120175.001513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hurt M. M., Chodchoy N., Marzluff W. F. The mouse histone H2a.2 gene from chromosome 3. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989 Nov 11;17(21):8876–8876. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.21.8876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Huynen M. A., Konings D. A., Hogeweg P. Equal G and C contents in histone genes indicate selection pressures on mRNA secondary structure. J Mol Evol. 1992 Apr;34(4):280–291. doi: 10.1007/BF00160235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ikemura T. Codon usage and tRNA content in unicellular and multicellular organisms. Mol Biol Evol. 1985 Jan;2(1):13–34. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Liskay R. M., Letsou A., Stachelek J. L. Homology requirement for efficient gene conversion between duplicated chromosomal sequences in mammalian cells. Genetics. 1987 Jan;115(1):161–167. doi: 10.1093/genetics/115.1.161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu T. J., Liu L., Marzluff W. F. Mouse histone H2A and H2B genes: four functional genes and a pseudogene undergoing gene conversion with a closely linked functional gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Apr 10;15(7):3023–3039. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.7.3023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Maxson R., Mohun T., Gormezano G., Childs G., Kedes L. Distinct organizations and patterns of expression of early and late histone gene sets in the sea urchin. Nature. 1983 Jan 13;301(5896):120–125. doi: 10.1038/301120a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Moriyama E. N., Hartl D. L. Codon usage bias and base composition of nuclear genes in Drosophila. Genetics. 1993 Jul;134(3):847–858. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.3.847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mowry K. L., Steitz J. A. Identification of the human U7 snRNP as one of several factors involved in the 3' end maturation of histone premessenger RNA's. Science. 1987 Dec 18;238(4834):1682–1687. doi: 10.1126/science.2825355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sharp P. M., Devine K. M. Codon usage and gene expression level in Dictyostelium discoideum: highly expressed genes do 'prefer' optimal codons. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989 Jul 11;17(13):5029–5039. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.13.5029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sharp P. M., Li W. H. Codon usage in regulatory genes in Escherichia coli does not reflect selection for 'rare' codons. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986 Oct 10;14(19):7737–7749. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.19.7737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sharp P. M., Li W. H. The rate of synonymous substitution in enterobacterial genes is inversely related to codon usage bias. Mol Biol Evol. 1987 May;4(3):222–230. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sharp P. M., Tuohy T. M., Mosurski K. R. Codon usage in yeast: cluster analysis clearly differentiates highly and lowly expressed genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986 Jul 11;14(13):5125–5143. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.13.5125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Shields D. C., Sharp P. M., Higgins D. G., Wright F. "Silent" sites in Drosophila genes are not neutral: evidence of selection among synonymous codons. Mol Biol Evol. 1988 Nov;5(6):704–716. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Smith G. P. Evolution of repeated DNA sequences by unequal crossover. Science. 1976 Feb 13;191(4227):528–535. doi: 10.1126/science.1251186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Stephenson E. C., Erba H. P., Gall J. G. Characterization of a cloned histone gene cluster of the newt Notophthalamus viridescens. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 May 25;9(10):2281–2295. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.10.2281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Taylor J. D., Wellman S. E., Marzluff W. F. Sequences of four mouse histone H3 genes: implications for evolution of mouse histone genes. J Mol Evol. 1986;23(3):242–249. doi: 10.1007/BF02115580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wolfe K. H., Sharp P. M., Li W. H. Mutation rates differ among regions of the mammalian genome. Nature. 1989 Jan 19;337(6204):283–285. doi: 10.1038/337283a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Zernik M., Heintz N., Boime I., Roeder R. G. Xenopus laevis histone genes: variant H1 genes are present in different clusters. Cell. 1980 Dec;22(3):807–815. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90557-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Zimmer E. A., Martin S. L., Beverley S. M., Kan Y. W., Wilson A. C. Rapid duplication and loss of genes coding for the alpha chains of hemoglobin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Apr;77(4):2158–2162. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.4.2158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES