Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1995 Aug;140(4):1413–1419. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.4.1413

Testing Heterozygote Excess and Deficiency

F Rousset 1, M Raymond 1
PMCID: PMC1206704  PMID: 7498780

Abstract

Currently used tests of Hardy-Weinberg proportions do not take into account the nature of the alternative hypothesis, which is generally a heterozygote deficiency. Different exact tests, appropriate for small sample size and large number of alleles, are proposed in this perspective, and their properties are evaluated by power comparisons. Some tests are found to be close to optimal for the detection of inbreeding or heterozygote excess, one of which is a score test closely related to Robertson and Hill's estimator of the inbreeding coefficient. This test is also easily applied to multiple samples. Such tests are not always the most appropriate if alternative hypotheses differ from those considered here.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (610.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Curie-Cohen M. Estimates of inbreeding in a natural population: a comparison of sampling properties. Genetics. 1982 Feb;100(2):339–358. doi: 10.1093/genetics/100.2.339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Di Rienzo A., Peterson A. C., Garza J. C., Valdes A. M., Slatkin M., Freimer N. B. Mutational processes of simple-sequence repeat loci in human populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Apr 12;91(8):3166–3170. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.8.3166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hernández J. L., Weir B. S. A disequilibrium coefficient approach to Hardy-Weinberg testing. Biometrics. 1989 Mar;45(1):53–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. LI C. C., HORVITZ D. G. Some methods of estimating the inbreeding coefficient. Am J Hum Genet. 1953 Jun;5(2):107–117. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Louis E. J., Dempster E. R. An exact test for Hardy-Weinberg and multiple alleles. Biometrics. 1987 Dec;43(4):805–811. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Morin P. A., Moore J. J., Chakraborty R., Jin L., Goodall J., Woodruff D. S. Kin selection, social structure, gene flow, and the evolution of chimpanzees. Science. 1994 Aug 26;265(5176):1193–1201. doi: 10.1126/science.7915048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Robertson A., Hill W. G. Deviations from Hardy-Weinberg proportions: sampling variances and use in estimation of inbreeding coefficients. Genetics. 1984 Aug;107(4):703–718. doi: 10.1093/genetics/107.4.703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. TOCHER K. D. Extension of the Neyman-Pearson theory of tests to discontinuous variates. Biometrika. 1950 Jun;37(1-2):130–144. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Yasuda N. Estimation of the inbreeding coefficient from phenotype frequencies by a method of maximum likelihood scoring. Biometrics. 1968 Dec;24(4):915–935. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES