Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1996 May;143(1):557–570. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.1.557

New Statistical Tests of Neutrality for DNA Samples from a Population

Y X Fu 1
PMCID: PMC1207287  PMID: 8722804

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to develop statistical tests of the neutral model of evolution against a class of alternative models with the common characteristic of having an excess of mutations that occurred a long time ago or a reduction of recent mutations compared to the neutral model. This class of population genetics models include models for structured populations, models with decreasing effective population size and models of selection and mutation balance. Four statistical tests were proposed in this paper for DNA samples from a population. Two of these tests, one new and another a modification of an existing test, are based on EWENS' sampling formula, and the other two new tests make use of the frequencies of mutations of various classes. Using simulated samples and regression analyses, the critical values of these tests can be computed from regression equations. This approach for computing the critical values of a test was found to be appropriate and quite effective. We examined the powers of these four tests using simulated samples from structured populations, populations with linearly decreasing sizes and models of selection and mutation balance and found that they are more powerful than existing statistical tests of the neutral model of evolution.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chakraborty R., Weiss K. M. Genetic variation of the mitochondrial DNA genome in American Indians is at mutation-drift equilibrium. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1991 Dec;86(4):497–506. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330860405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ewens W. J. The sampling theory of selectively neutral alleles. Theor Popul Biol. 1972 Mar;3(1):87–112. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(72)90035-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fu Y. X. A phylogenetic estimator of effective population size or mutation rate. Genetics. 1994 Feb;136(2):685–692. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.2.685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fu Y. X. Estimating effective population size or mutation rate using the frequencies of mutations of various classes in a sample of DNA sequences. Genetics. 1994 Dec;138(4):1375–1386. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.4.1375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fu Y. X., Li W. H. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics. 1993 Mar;133(3):693–709. doi: 10.1093/genetics/133.3.693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fu Y. X. Statistical properties of segregating sites. Theor Popul Biol. 1995 Oct;48(2):172–197. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.1995.1025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Griffiths R. C., Tavaré S. Sampling theory for neutral alleles in a varying environment. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1994 Jun 29;344(1310):403–410. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1994.0079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hudson R. R., Boos D. D., Kaplan N. L. A statistical test for detecting geographic subdivision. Mol Biol Evol. 1992 Jan;9(1):138–151. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kaplan N. L., Darden T., Hudson R. R. The coalescent process in models with selection. Genetics. 1988 Nov;120(3):819–829. doi: 10.1093/genetics/120.3.819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kuhner M. K., Yamato J., Felsenstein J. Estimating effective population size and mutation rate from sequence data using Metropolis-Hastings sampling. Genetics. 1995 Aug;140(4):1421–1430. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.4.1421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Li W. H. Distribution of nucleotide differences between two randomly chosen cistrons in a subdivided population: the finite island model. Theor Popul Biol. 1976 Dec;10(3):303–308. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(76)90021-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Simonsen K. L., Churchill G. A., Aquadro C. F. Properties of statistical tests of neutrality for DNA polymorphism data. Genetics. 1995 Sep;141(1):413–429. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.1.413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Slatkin M. Testing neutrality in subdivided populations. Genetics. 1982 Mar;100(3):533–545. doi: 10.1093/genetics/100.3.533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Strobeck C. Expected linkage disequilibrium for a neutral locus linked to a chromosomal arrangement. Genetics. 1983 Mar;103(3):545–555. doi: 10.1093/genetics/103.3.545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tajima F. Evolutionary relationship of DNA sequences in finite populations. Genetics. 1983 Oct;105(2):437–460. doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.2.437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989 Nov;123(3):585–595. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.3.585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Workman P. L., Niswander J. D. Population studies on southwestern Indian tribes. II. Local genetic differentiation in the Papago. Am J Hum Genet. 1970 Jan;22(1):24–49. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wright S. Evolution in Mendelian Populations. Genetics. 1931 Mar;16(2):97–159. doi: 10.1093/genetics/16.2.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Zouros E. Mutation rates, population sizes and amounts of electrophoretic variation of enzyme loci in natural populations. Genetics. 1979 Jun;92(2):623–646. doi: 10.1093/genetics/92.2.623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES