Abstract
We have used copper-64-pyruvaldehyde-bis(N4-methylthiosemicarbazone) (64Cu–PTSM) to radiolabel cells ex vivo for in vivo positron-emission tomography (PET) imaging studies of cell trafficking in mice and for eventual application in patients. 2-[18F]-Fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) cell labeling also was evaluated for comparison. 64Cu–PTSM uptake by C6 rat glioma (C6) cells increased for 180 min and then stabilized. The labeling efficiency was directly proportional to 64Cu–PTSM concentration and influenced negatively by serum. Label uptake per cell was greater with 64Cu–PTSM than with FDG. However, both 64Cu–PTSM- and FDG-labeled cells showed efflux of cell activity into supernatant. The 64Cu–PTSM labeling procedure did not interfere significantly with C6 cell viability and proliferation rate. MicroPET images of living mice indicate that tail-vein-injected labeled C6 cells traffic to the lungs and liver. In addition, transient splenic accumulation of radioactivity was clearly detectable in a mouse scanned at 3.33 h postinfusion of 64Cu–PTSM-labeled lymphocytes. In contrast, the liver was the principal organ of tracer localization after tail-vein administration of 64Cu–PTSM alone. These results indicate that in vivo imaging of cell trafficking is possible with 64Cu–PTSM-labeled cells. Given the longer t1/2 of 64Cu (12.7 h) relative to 18F (110 min), longer cell-tracking periods (up to 24–36 h) should be possible now with PET.
Keywords: cell tracking‖Cu–PTSM‖PET‖cell labeling
Tracking the selective recruitment and time of arrival and departure of specific immune cells during the pathogenesis of disease states is imperative to understanding their role and critical to devising rational therapeutic strategies. Therefore, in vivo imaging of cell trafficking has been the goal of many immunological and oncological studies. For instance, imaging of leukocyte homing is a clinical procedure used to pinpoint probable infectious and inflammatory foci (1). Because the systemic biodistribution and trafficking of transferred immune cells in vivo is a critical measure for assessing the efficacy of adoptive immune therapy, researchers also have tested several cell-labeling agents on immunologically active cells (2, 3). Investigators in the field of neoplastic disease also have used in vivo imaging of cell trafficking to elucidate the pathophysiology governing tumor cell migration, adhesion, and metastatic potential (4–6).
Tracking the migration of cells in living small animals requires an imaging modality to be noninvasive, sensitive, quantitative, high-resolution, tomographic, and nonhazardous to the cells and the animal. Optical and magnetic resonance (MR) are some of the nonradionuclide imaging modalities that can be used to track cell migration in small animals. Substantial photon attenuation in the deep tissue of larger, nontransparent animals limits quantitative imaging and clinical use of optical approaches. Small-animal and clinical MR imaging devices offer micrometer resolution and anatomic detail. The migration of 3 × 107 superparamagnetically labeled T cells through the spleen of a mouse during a 24-h period has been reported recently with MR (7).
Radionuclide imaging technologies such as single-photon emission computed tomography and positron-emission tomography (PET) are highly sensitive systems that can detect trace amounts of γ- and β+-emitting radionuclides, respectively, within the body. Thus, radionuclide imaging modalities are well suited for tracking and mapping the systemic biodistribution of cells. In fact, single-photon imaging of leukocytes labeled with 111In or 99mTc is the “gold-standard” clinical procedure for detection of occult infectious and inflammatory sites (1). Although γ emitters currently are available more readily and have longer physical half-lives (t1/2, hours to days) relative to β+ emitters (t1/2, minutes to days), many β+-emitting radionuclides (11C, 13N, 15O, and 64Cu) are elements naturally present in biological molecules. Furthermore, PET cameras allow electronic rather than mechanical collimation of incoming photons by recording the coincidence of simultaneous pairs of annihilation photons (511 keV per photon) at opposite detectors (8). Consequently, the sensitivity of PET (10−11–10−12 M) is at least 1–2 orders of magnitude better than single-photon imaging systems (10−10 M). The acquisition of higher count statistics is particularly valuable for detecting the fewest possible cells per unit volume with the least amount of radioactivity. Researchers at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) have developed a prototype PET-imaging device tailored specifically for imaging small animals, microPET. This scanner has an ≈1.8-mm isotropic resolution and an 11.5-cm (transaxial) by 1.8-cm (axial) field of view (8). A commercial microPET device is available also through Concorde Microsystems (Knoxville, TN).
Current cell-trafficking approaches with PET use 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) or 11CH3I. As cell-labeling agents, both of these radiotracers have reasonably high labeling efficiencies and limited immediate cytotoxicities. However, because of the short t1/2 of 18F (110 min) and 11C (20 min), PET cell-tracking studies are limited to 6 h or less (3–6). Recently, a research resource grant from the National Institutes of Health has made 64Cu, an intermediate-lived β+ emitter (t1/2 = 12.7 h), widely available to many institutions. 64Cu can be delivered into cells via a lipophilic redox-active carrier molecule pyruvaldehyde-bis(N4-methylthiosemicarbazone) (PTSM; Fig. 1; ref. 9). Preliminary studies tested 67Cu–PTSM (67Cu, t1/2 = 62 h, nonpositron emitter) as a potential leukocyte label.‡‡ Given the 12.7-h t1/2 of 64Cu, we hypothesized that the in vivo trafficking of 64Cu–PTSM-labeled cells can be followed with PET for 24–36 h.
Figure 1.
Schematic of Cu–PTSM uptake and retention by cells. PTSM has a high binding affinity for divalent rather than monovalent copper. Cu(II)–PTSM is very stable as a complex (Ka = 1018, pH 7.4). Cu(II)-PTSM acts as a lipophilic, redox-active transporter of Cu(II) ions that passively diffuses across the cell membrane and delivers copper into the cells. The retention of copper is governed by the reduction of the stable Cu(II)–PTSM complex to a labile Cu(I)–PTSM complex, trapping the dissociated Cu(I) ion in the cell because of charge. Intracellular macromolecules capture the monovalent copper, and the neutral PTSM molecule is able to diffuse back out. The bioreductive mechanism of Cu–PTSM trapping varies with cell type (9).
To assess the feasibility of labeling cells with 64Cu–PTSM, we evaluated its cell uptake and efflux along with cell viability and proliferation rate postlabeling. 64Cu–PTSM diffuses rapidly into C6 rat glioma (C6) cells but is trapped slowly. In comparison with FDG, 64Cu–PTSM has a higher cell-labeling efficiency but a similar efflux rate. 64Cu–PTSM labeling did not significantly alter the viability and proliferation rate of cells. In this study, we were able to track 4–12 × 104 C6 cells and 7.2 × 106 lymphocytes [0.05–11.2 μCi (1 Ci = 37 GBq)] for up to 20 h in living mice. These results suggest that labeling cells with 64Cu–PTSM should provide a potential method for monitoring in vivo cell migration with PET.
Materials and Methods
Radiotracer Synthesis.
64Cu was produced at Washington University by cyclotron irradiation of an enriched 64Ni target by using methods reported (10). 64Cu–PTSM was prepared according to literature methods (9). In brief, a 10-μl aliquot of PTSM (1 mg/ml DMSO) was mixed with 150 μl of 64Cu (1 M NaOAc, pH 5.5) and vortexed briefly. After 3–5 min, the mixture was added to an ethanol-preconditioned C-18 SepPak Light column. 64Cu–PTSM was eluted off with 500 μl of ethanol after the initial 150-μl fraction. Approximately 1 mCi of 64Cu–PTSM arrived at UCLA (specific activity, ≈4,000 Ci/mmol). Cell culture experiments, cell labeling for in vivo transfer, and imaging studies were initiated 1–3, 14–16, and 24–28 h after tracer arrival, respectively. FDG was synthesized at UCLA as described by Hamacher et al. (ref. 11; specific activity, ≈5,000 Ci/mmol).
Cell Preparation.
C6 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection and cultured in high-glucose, deficient DMEM (def-DMEM). Unless otherwise noted, the growth medium was supplemented with penicillin (100 μg/ml), streptomycin (292 μg/ml), glutamine (100 mM), histidinol (27 μg/ml), and 5% FBS by volume. In all FDG studies, glucose-free medium was used starting 30 min before the experiment. C6 cells (10–18 × 104 cells per ml) were seeded in 10-cm, 6-, 12-, or 24-well culture dishes the day before labeling study. PBS and medium volumes of 10, 3, 1, and 0.5 ml correspond to 10-cm, 6-, 12-, and 24-well culture plates, respectively. Lymphocytes for labeling were collected from spleens of Swiss–Webster mice. Splenocytes were dislodged from homogenized spleen tissue into PBS. Lymphocytes were isolated by density centrifugation with Histopaque-1077 (Sigma) and cultured in high-glucose DMEM supplemented similar to def-DMEM except with heat-inactivated FBS and without histidinol. The cells were always cultured in a humidified atmosphere at 37°C with 5% CO2.
Analysis of 64Cu–PTSM and FDG Uptake by C6 Cells.
Cells were labeled with 64Cu–PTSM in medium (≈5 μCi/ml) supplemented with FBS for 5–480 min or without FBS for 5–90 min. To optimize labeling conditions, the uptake of 64Cu–PTSM by C6 cells was evaluated also at 3, 6, and 11 h of incubation. In parallel experiments, cells were labeled for 5, 20, 35, and 90 min with 1.5–12.4 μCi of FDG in 1 ml of medium. Radiotracer uptake into cells was terminated by the removal of labeling medium followed by two PBS washes. Cells were lysed with 0.1% SDS, and protein was assayed with Bradford reagent (Bio-Rad). Aliquots of cell lysate and supernatant were counted for 1 min with a Cobra II γ counter (Packard, model 5003). The decay-corrected counts in lysate and supernatant totaled the initial labeling activity. Label uptake was expressed as radioactivity in lysate divided by total activity and normalized to micrograms of protein to correct for cell loss during an experiment.
Analysis of 64Cu–PTSM and FDG Efflux from C6 Cells.
C6 cells growing in 12-well plates were labeled for 90 min with ≈5 μCi of 64Cu–PTSM or ≈15 μCi of FDG. Labeled cells were washed twice (PBS) and then incubated in tracer-free medium. 64Cu–PTSM efflux was assayed at 0, 0.5, 2, 5, 20, and 24 h, whereas FDG release was measured only at 0, 0.5, 2, and 4 h because of its short t1/2. Afterward, efflux supernatant was removed, and cells were washed with PBS. Those cells remaining adherent to plate were lysed with 0.1% SDS. The counts in cell lysate and labeling and efflux supernatants were decay-corrected. The percentage of label retention was calculated by dividing the counts in lysate by total counts in lysate and efflux supernatant × 100.
Measurement of C6 Cell Viability and Proliferation.
The relative survival of cells exposed to different experimental conditions was evaluated by using trypan blue dye (0.4%) exclusion assay in preliminary experiments and colorimetric 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) reduction assays in later experiments (Sigma). Exclusion of trypan blue dye by viable C6 cells was evaluated under a light microscope by using a hemocytometer after 35- and 270-min exposures to 64Cu–PTSM or FDG (5 μCi in 1 ml of medium). All other conditions were identical to uptake studies. Unexposed and UV-exposed cells were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. Trypan blue also was used to determine C6 cell viability 20 h after 64Cu–PTSM labeling. The percentage viability equaled viable over total cell count × 100. The MTT assay is based on the ability of living cells to reduce MTT into a blue-colored formazan product. C6 cells preseeded into 24-well plates were incubated either with or without ≈10 μCi of 64Cu–PTSM (1 × 105 cells in 0.5 ml of medium) for 5 h. Cells exposed to ethanol were used as positive controls. After 0, 1, 5, 20, and 24 h of efflux, cells were washed with PBS. Cells then were incubated with 50 μl of MTT stock solution (5 mg/ml in PBS) in 0.5 ml of medium at 37°C, and 2 h later acid-isopropyl alcohol (0.5 ml, 0.04 M HCl in isopropyl alcohol) was added. After 0.5 h, wells were mixed to dissolve the blue formazan salt crystals. The intensity of the resulting color changes was measured by reading the spectrophotometric absorbance of 1-ml samples at 570 nm. The effect of 64Cu–PTSM labeling on the C6 cell viability and proliferation rate was evaluated by comparing the absorbance of labeled to unlabeled cells over time. Trypan blue and MTT assays were done in 3 and 5 replicate wells, respectively. The two-tailed Student's t test was used for statistical analysis of differences in the viability and metabolic activity of 64Cu–PTSM-labeled and unlabeled replicates for each of the indicated time points. The differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.
64Cu–PTSM Labeling of Cells for in Vivo Transfer.
The C6 cell-labeling procedure for in vivo studies was similar to the protocol used to examine 64Cu–PTSM efflux. In brief, cells were seeded in 6-well plates 1 day before labeling. Cells were labeled for 5 h with 64Cu–PTSM (110 μCi in 3 ml of medium), washed twice (PBS), and incubated with tracer-free medium for 5 h. After the efflux period, labeled cells were PBS-washed and trypsinized (0.8 ml) at 37°C for 2–3 min. Detached cells were collected with medium (3.2 ml) and pelleted by centrifugation (5 min, 4°C, 1,600 × g). The pellet was resuspended in PBS (0.5 ml). Because lymphocytes require cytokine stimulation to prolong viability in culture, the labeling procedure was shortened to 1 h of uptake with no efflux period. Lymphocytes (28 × 106 cells) were labeled with 72 μCi of 64Cu–PTSM in 1 ml of medium for 55 min. The labeling period was terminated by the addition of tracer-free medium (3 ml). Lymphocyte suspension was pelleted by centrifugation (10 min at room temperature, 300 × g), and the pellet was resuspended in 0.5 ml of PBS. Before in vivo transfer, cell concentration and viability were measured by trypan blue exclusion. Typically, 80–90% of cells were viable.
MicroPET Studies and Data Analysis.
All animal handling was performed in accordance with UCLA Animal Research Committee guidelines. Male nu/nu were anesthetized by i.p. administration of ketamine (100 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg) either before or after injection of radioactivity. Mice were injected via tail vein (±5–10% injection accuracy) with one of the following in ≈200 μl of PBS: (i) 4–12 × 104 C6 cells, 0.05–4.27 μCi, (ii) 64Cu–PTSM, 2–4 μCi, (iii) 7.2 × 106 splenic lymphocytes, 11.3 μCi. All injected cells were labeled with 64Cu–PTSM. Unless otherwise noted, day-1 scans were initiated within 1 h of i.v. injection, and day-2 scans at ≈20 h. All mice were whole body (WB)-scanned in a supine position by using a microPET scanner (11). All WB microPET scans consisted of 7 bed positions with 8 min of data acquisition per bed. Of the 10 mice injected with C6 cells, three were prepared for digital WB autoradiography (DWBA) immediately after the day-1 scan and two after the day-2 scan. The mice injected with 64Cu–PTSM were used as control. Two control mice were scanned on days 1 and 2, and DWBA was performed on one of them after the second scan. The organs of the additional mice were harvested, weighed, and counted either on day 1 or 2 after the injection of C6 cells or 64Cu–PTSM. The mouse injected with splenic lymphocytes was scanned at 0.12, 3.33, and 18.9 h and then prepared for DWBA. Figs. 4–6 show averaged coronal planes (each plane is ≈0.4 mm thick) from WB microPET images reconstructed with the MAP algorithm (12). Filtered back-projection reconstruction was used for image quantification. MicroPET scans were standardized to phantom scans but were not corrected for photon attenuation (11). The percentage of injected dose per gram of tissue (%ID/g) color scale reflects the signal intensity at a region of interest. A mouse-sized cylinder scan with a known concentration of 64Cu in water (μCi/cm3) was used to obtain a calibration factor for converting regions of interest from counts/sec/voxel to μCi/cm3 or μCi/g assuming equal water (1 g/cm3) and tissue density. The %ID/g was calculated by normalizing converted regions of interest (μCi/g) to the injected dose (μCi) × 100. The %ID/g for each organ was expressed as the mean of three regions of interest ± SE.
Figure 4.
In vivo microPET imaging of 64Cu–PTSM-labeled C6 cells post i.v. injection into a mouse. This mouse was microPET-scanned at 0.45 h postinjection of C6 cells (4.27 μCi). Immediately after the scan, the mouse was killed (at 1.45 h) for DWBA. (A) The average of nine coronal planes from the WB microPET image. (B) Photo of the DWBA section shown in C. Concordance between location of activity in the microPET image and DWBA section demonstrates that cells are trapped initially in the lungs. The %ID/g scale is shown for quantification of the microPET signal.
Figure 6.
In vivo microPET imaging of 64Cu–PTSM-labeled lymphocytes post i.v. injection into a mouse. The mouse was microPET-scanned 0.12 h (A, 11.2 μCi), 3.12 h (B, 9.48 μCi), and 18.9 h (C, 4.01 μCi) postinjection of lymphocytes. Each microPET image shown here (A–C) is an average of 5–6 coronal slices. After the last microPET scan, this mouse was killed for DWBA (20.7 h). The location of activity in the last microPET image (C) clearly correlates with the DWBA image (E). The photo (D) provides the anatomic map necessary to resolve the source of activity in the microPET image from the DWBA section. Note that splenic lymphocytes initially traffic through lungs (A) and then accumulate in liver and spleen (B and C). The %ID/g scale quantifies the magnitude of signal observed in each microPET image. Lu, lungs; Li, liver; Sp, spleen; In, intestine.
DWBA.
Immediately after microPET scanning, mice were killed via i.v. injection of ketamine/xylazine (100 μl), and DWBA was performed by methods described previously (13). Coronal WB mouse sections (45 μm thick) were developed digitally with a final image resolution of 100 μm. In Figs. 4–6, a single autoradiogram section and its corresponding photo are shown for the adjacent microPET image (several averaged planes) to link radioactive signal with anatomy.
Results
C6 Cell-Labeling Efficiency Is Greater with 64Cu–PTSM Than with FDG.
The 64Cu–PTSM extraction efficiency by C6 cells as a function of time, serum, and dose was evaluated to determine the optimal labeling conditions for in vivo studies. 64Cu–PTSM passively diffuses into or out of cells by moving down its concentration gradient. Therefore, the C6 cell-labeling efficiency (percentage uptake/microgram of protein) improves with increasing 64Cu–PTSM concentration but declines with increasing cell number (data not shown). The labeling procedure with 64Cu–PTSM is very efficient (70–85% uptake at 5 h) for C6 cells. The results shown in Fig. 2 indicate that 64Cu–PTSM is extracted rapidly into C6 cells during the first 3 h, and influx stabilizes between 3 and 8 h, suggesting a period of equal intra- and extracellular 64Cu–PTSM concentration. Longer labeling studies under similar conditions revealed that uptake of 64Cu–PTSM declines between 6 and 11 h of incubation (data not shown). This decrease in uptake could be caused by reversal of the 64Cu–PTSM concentration gradient. Removing serum from medium increased C6 cell uptake (percentage per microgram of protein) of 64Cu–PTSM by 32.8 ± 3.34% (data not shown), which is consistent with published data (14). For comparison, FDG cell-labeling efficiency was evaluated also; however, FDG studies were limited by the short t1/2 of 18F. Fig. 2 clearly illustrates that the C6 cell-labeling efficiency (percentage uptake/microgram of protein) of 64Cu–PTSM is greater than FDG. Because FDG is transported actively into cells, its labeling efficiency (percentage uptake/microgram of protein) depends on the number of available glucose transporters. As expected, FDG uptake by C6 cells was inhibited potently (≈100-fold lower) in high-glucose medium (data not shown). Therefore, glucose-free medium was used in FDG experiments. At the FDG concentrations tested (1.5–12.4 μCi/ml), labeling efficiency was not dose-dependent, suggesting saturation of transporters (data not shown).
Figure 2.
C6 cell-labeling efficiency of 64Cu–PTSM and FDG as a function of time. C6 cells were labeled with 64Cu–PTSM for up to 480 min or with FDG for up to 90 min in 1 ml of serum-supplemented medium. Note the influx of 64Cu–PTSM plateaus after 3 h. The graph shows the mean percentage uptake per microgram of protein (±SE) of triplicates.
Both 64Cu–PTSM and FDG Efflux from C6 Cells.
To evaluate the efflux rate of 64Cu–PTSM and FDG, leakage of radioactivity into tracer-free medium from labeled C6 cells was measured. As shown by the diminishing cell-associated activity in Fig. 3, both tracers rapidly efflux from C6 cells. Serum did not influence the rate of 64Cu–PTSM release, but glucose accelerated FDG efflux. 64Cu–PTSM retention was examined numerous times (n = 20) because of considerable variance after 5 h of efflux (±20% retention). Visual inspection of cells under a light microscope revealed that there was a substantial and progressive loss of cell adherence to plate over time. The cell detachment from plate may be a result of repeated washes, inadvertent aspiration, increasing confluence, and/or cell death and would overestimate 64Cu–PTSM efflux and account for the experimental variance observed at later time points in Fig. 3.
Figure 3.
64Cu–PTSM and FDG retention by labeled C6 cells as a function of time. This graph reflects the intracellular stability of 64Cu–PTSM and FDG as a function of time. FDG efflux was measured at 4 rather than 5 h on this graph. Rapid tracer efflux indicates slow trapping. Each bar represents the mean percentage label retained ± SE of triplicate wells.
64Cu–PTSM Labeling Procedure Imposed Minimal Cytotoxicity.
The trypan blue dye exclusion and MTT assays evaluate living cells based on intact plasma membrane and metabolic activity, respectively. As measured by trypan blue, C6 cells labeled with 64Cu–PTSM for 35 and 270 min, showed 85 and 80% viability, respectively, with no significant difference in viability of cells similarly labeled with FDG (data not shown). Unexposed controls had an average viability of 92–94%. In contrast, only 2–5% of cells exposed to UV light for 35 and 270 min remained viable. The percent viability of C6 cells at 20 h postlabeling was 80–85%. Living cells convert the tetrazolium component of the MTT dye (yellow) into a formazan product (blue). Because intensity of the resulting color change is proportional to the number of living cells, tetrazolium salt reduction can be used both as a measure of cell viability and proliferation. There was no significant difference in MTT reduction by 64Cu–PTSM-labeled C6 cells and unlabeled controls, neither immediately nor up to 24 h after the 5-h labeling period, indicating 64Cu–PTSM labeling does not alter cellular proliferation (data not shown).
64Cu–PTSM-Labeled Cells Can Be Imaged Noninvasively in a Living Mouse by Using a MicroPET Scanner.
To demonstrate that the microPET scanner can detect the presence of cells in association with 64Cu, mice were injected via tail vein with 94,500 64Cu–PTSM-labeled C6 cells (Fig. 4A). Because the location of activity in the microPET image (Fig. 4A) correlates with the autoradiogram (Fig. 4C), the anatomic origin of activity can be determined by matching the autoradiogram with its corresponding photo (Fig. 4B). Thus, Fig. 4 demonstrates that 0.45 h after injection of 64Cu–PTSM-labeled C6 cells, most of the activity is in the lungs (97.2 ± 3.37%ID/g), and some is present also in the liver (6.96 ± 0.81%ID/g) and gut (1.31 ± 0.04%ID/g). MicroPET images of mice at 0.23 h after injection of labeled C6 cells show distribution of activity in the lungs (99.2 ± 6.31%ID/g) and the liver (4.82 ± 0.90%ID/g). By 18.8 h, activity redistributes from the lungs (4.78 ± 0.49%ID/g) to the liver (13.6 ± 1.69%ID/g) (data not shown). Gut activity increases slightly from 0.56 ± 0.02%ID/g (0.23 h) to 1.64 ± 0.65%ID/g (18.8 h). DWBA verified that the liver was the primary anatomic origin of the radioactivity at 18.8 h.
To compare the biodistribution of 64Cu–PTSM-labeled C6 cells to free 64Cu–PTSM, mice were imaged also after injection of 64Cu–PTSM. Extensive studies on the tissue-specific mechanisms of Cu–PTSM extraction and retention have revealed that Cu–PTSM is predominantly metabolized and cleared by hepatocytes, which is reviewed in detail by Blower et al. (9). Accordingly, microPET images of mice i.v.-injected with free 64Cu–PTSM showed primarily hepatic clearance of radiocopper at 0.10 h (10.7 ± 0.50%ID/g) and 20.3 h (10.3 ± 1.94%ID/g) (Fig. 5 A and B). In contrast to 64Cu–PTSM-labeled C6 cells, injection of free 64Cu–PTSM results in minimal activity in the lungs both at 0.10 h (3.30 ± 0.41%ID/g) and 20.3 h (2.34 ± 0.51%ID/g). Organ biodistribution measurements in additional mice injected with either free or C6 cell-labeled 64Cu–PTSM corroborates the microPET results (data not shown).
Figure 5.
In vivo microPET imaging of 64Cu–PTSM biodistribution post i.v. injection into a mouse. The mouse was microPET-scanned once on day 1 at 0.10 h (3.48 μCi) and then on day 2 at 20.3 h (1.16 μCi) after tail-vein injection of free 64Cu–PTSM. The mouse was killed at 21.8 h for DWBA. A and B show the average of five coronal planes from the day 1 and 2 WB microPET images, respectively. (C) Photo of the DWBA section shown in D. Location of activity in the last microPET image (B) correlates with the DWBA image (D). Comparison with the photo shown in C reveals that liver is the primary organ of radiocopper accumulation as seen in the corresponding DWBA section and microPET image. The %ID/g scale quantifies the magnitude of signal observed in each microPET image. Lu, lungs; Li, liver.
As shown in Fig. 6, 64Cu–PTSM also can be used to track the systemic migration of lymphocytes. Similar to C6 cells (Fig. 4), injection of 64Cu–PTSM-labeled lymphocytes initially (0.12 and 3.33 h) leads to lung localization of activity (51.8 ± 1.15 and 13.1 ± 0.23%ID/g). By 18.9 h, very little activity remains in the lungs (2.41 ± 0.19%ID/g; Fig. 6). As the lung activity decreases, liver activity increases (9.94 ± 0.25, 18.4 ± 0.64, and 16.7 ± 0.95%ID/g at 0.12, 3.33, and 18.9 h, respectively). In contrast to C6 cells, after injection of lymphocytes activity clearly localizes to the spleen (11.8 ± 0.91, 32.9 ± 0.91, and 9.93 ± 0.42%ID/g at 0.12, 3.33, and 18.9 h, respectively). Activity also is present initially in the kidneys (4.27 ± 0.23 and 4.94 ± 0.18%ID/g at 0.12 and 3.33 h, respectively) but becomes indiscernible by 18.9 h. The gut activity progressively increases (0.44 ± 0.13, 1.85 ± 0.25, and 3.03 ± 1.90%ID/g at 0.12, 3.33, and 18.9 h, respectively). DWBA reveals that activity is present also in the bone marrow (Fig. 6E). This finding suggests that the unidentified signal, seen in the neck and thoracic regions of the third microPET scan, is likely caused by lymphocyte accumulation in the bone marrow.
Discussion
Greater resolution and sensitivity are major incentives for developing a PET model that is equivalent to the cell-tracking approach with single-photon imaging. However, useful application of PET imaging in cell-trafficking research has been hampered by the short t1/2 of many β+ emitters, thus limiting data acquisition to 6 h or less (3–6). In this study, we examined the feasibility of labeling cells with 64Cu–PTSM for subsequent in vivo tracking in mice by using microPET imaging and report that the migration of i.v.-injected cells can be followed with PET for longer than 6 h.
As a β+-emitting radionuclide, there are three features that make 64Cu an attractive candidate for labeling cells. First, the intermediate t1/2 of 64Cu allows longer cell-tracking periods and provides adequate time for regional distribution of 64Cu from satellite biomedical cyclotrons/reactors. Second, a lipophilic copper chelator, PTSM, can be used to ferry 64Cu into cells. Third, the same bioreductive mechanisms responsible for trapping endogenous copper can be exploited for trapping the redox-active 64Cu–PTSM complex (redox potential, −208 mV). The lipophilicity of this copper complex dictates its initial extraction efficiency, whereas its reduction potential governs the rate of intracellular trapping (9).
Cellular uptake of Cu–PTSM is based on passive diffusion and thereby driven by the concentration gradient between extra- and intracellular compartments. Cell-associated 64Cu–PTSM can be separated into the membrane-bound and intracellular compartments. The intracellular compartment can be subdivided further into reduced 64Cu (trapped) and unreduced 64Cu–PTSM (not trapped). 64Cu–PTSM rapidly diffuses into C6 cells during the first 3 h, and influx appears to equilibrate thereafter. However, labeling optimization experiments revealed that after a 5-h efflux period, C6 cells that had been labeled for 5 h retained more radioactivity than those labeled for 3 h. Because C6 cells continue to reduce 64Cu–PTSM between 3 and 5 h of uptake prior to in vivo transfer, cells were labeled for 5 instead of 3 h to maximize the amount of 64Cu trapped in C6 cells.
Because lipophilicity and reduction potential of copper-bis(thiosemicarbazone) complexes are inversely related, highly lipophilic analogues exhibit rapid diffusion into cells but poor retention due to slow intracellular retention. As expected, 64Cu–PTSM was extracted by C6 cells rapidly, but it was trapped slowly. Efflux studies on C6 cells labeled with 64Cu–PTSM for 90 min showed an ≈50% label loss by 5 h. FDG also exhibited rapid efflux from C6 cells, which is consistent with previous results (2). At 24 h, 64Cu–PTSM efflux from labeled C6 cells (≈80% loss) was similar to published data with 111In-oxine-labeled lymphocytes (≈70% loss) (15). Several factors contribute to poor label retention including slow or inefficient intracellular trapping, saturated uptake, or active cellular elimination. In the case of 64Cu–PTSM, lengthening the labeling period improved radiocopper retention, presumably by giving cells more time to trap 64Cu. To further minimize nonspecific signal caused by 64Cu–PTSM efflux from C6 cells after in vivo transfer, labeled cells were incubated in tracer-free medium for 5 h before i.v. injection. According to earlier Cu–PTSM biodistribution studies, Cu–PTSM is converted rapidly (80% within ≈1 min) to a nonextractable hydrophilic form in blood, metabolized by the liver, and excreted through hepatobiliary and renal pathways (9). Therefore, nonspecific signal caused by in vivo efflux of 64Cu–PTSM should not be a major concern outside the liver and kidneys.
Because nonradioactive Cu–PTSM was tested initially as an antineoplastic agent, the viability and proliferation rate of C6 cells after 64Cu–PTSM labeling was a concern. MTT assays demonstrated that 64Cu–PTSM labeling did not interfere with the MTT reduction by C6 cells relative to unlabeled controls. It is important to note that the health of cells, particularly lymphocytes, can be measured by many parameters. Future studies may evaluate the consequences of 64Cu–PTSM labeling on lymphocytes in the context of lymphocyte function, activation, and proliferation. It would be prudent to establish optimal 64Cu–PTSM-labeling parameters for each cell type, because metabolic activity and other factors can affect uptake, efflux, and cytotoxicity of label substantially.
64Cu–PTSM-labeled C6 cells presumably migrated to the lungs (≈97%ID/g) after i.v. injection. In mice injected with free 64Cu–PTSM, the activity predominantly accumulated in the liver (≈13%ID/g) with little lung uptake (≈3%ID/g). The results described here clearly demonstrate that the initial C6 cell biodistribution differs from that of free 64Cu–PTSM, indicating that we are in fact following 64Cu trapped in C6 cells and not cell-dissociated activity. Our findings on the early pulmonary accumulation of C6 cells are consistent also with a previous study reporting lungs as the first-pass organs for tail-vein-injected cells (16). At 18.8 h after injection of C6 cells the activity accumulated in the liver (≈14%ID/g). Because liver is also the major organ of copper metabolism and clearance, a similar hepatic signal (≈11%ID/g) was observed also at 20.3 h after injection of 64Cu–PTSM alone. Therefore, C6 cell-tracking results on day 2 were rendered inconclusive, because free 64Cu–PTSM would produce the same hepatic signal. Future histological studies should help to clarify these results.
Differential homing patterns of lymphocyte subsets after an immune response is of interest to immunologists and cancer biologists. Therefore, we adapted a model based on current clinical protocols that image autologous radiolabeled leukocytes homing to the spleen of the patient as well as any infectious/inflammatory foci (1). We found that within minutes of lymphocyte injection into healthy mice, activity accumulated in the lungs (≈52%ID/g, 0.12 h) similar to C6 cells (≈97%ID/g, 0.45 h). By 3.33 h, lymphocyte homing to the spleen was apparent as indicated by the presence of activity (≈33%ID/g), and by 18.9 h lymphocytes had redistributed between the liver (≈17%ID/g) and spleen (≈10%ID/g). Detection of the normal lymphocyte homing pattern to the spleen provided further evidence in support of in vivo 64Cu retention by injected cells and clearly demonstrated that cells with extrahepatic homing patterns could be followed with 64Cu–PTSM.
Cell migration is an integral aspect of immune response and tumor metastasis. Although much has been learned about cell trafficking by using techniques such as immunohistochemistry and autoradiography, the invasive nature of these techniques has prevented dynamic assessment of cell redistribution within the same animal. The pursuit of noninvasive cell tracking methodologies is supported also by potential economic and animal welfare incentives as well as the improved statistical accuracy associated with using the same animal to gather longitudinal data. The dedicated small-animal PET-imaging device with a sensitivity of ≈10−11 M has provided the technology necessary to noninvasively detect a few hundred 64Cu–PTSM-labeled cells (≈10−17 mol of 64Cu per cell) in a volume of 10 μl at millimeter resolution in vivo.
In the present report, we show that 64Cu–PTSM can be used to label cells. In comparison with FDG, uptake of 64Cu–PTSM is more efficient, although both tracers efflux from C6 cells rapidly. 64Cu–PTSM labeling does not alter the viability or proliferation rate of C6 cells relative to unlabeled controls. The in vivo results described here support the conclusion that 64Cu–PTSM can be used as a cell label for imaging the migration of immune and nonimmune cells with PET. Although we did not show in vivo experiments beyond 20 h, on the basis of the 12.7-h t1/2 of 64Cu, we predict that 64Cu–PTSM-labeled cells would remain detectable for at least 24–36 h after injection. Therefore, this cell-tracking technique has promise for use in infection and inflammation models and models in which a 24–36 h cell-tracking period is sufficient. The present study also lays the foundation for the use of PET for detection of occult infectious/inflammatory foci in human studies as an alternative to γ-camera imaging with 111In- and 99mTc-labeled autologous leukocytes.
Acknowledgments
We thank W. Ladno, J. Edwards, and R. Sumida for technical assistance with animal studies and H. M. Bigott, J. S. Lewis, and M. J. Welch for radiotracer synthesis. 64Cu–PTSM synthesis was funded by National Institutes of Health Research Resource Grant 1R24 CA86307. This work was supported by Department of Energy Contract DEFC03-87ER60615, Small Animal Imaging Resource Program Grant R24 CA92865 (S.S.G.), National Institutes of Health Grants P50 CA86306 and R0-1 CA82214 (S.S.G.), and CapCure (S.S.G.). N.A. was supported by the National Institutes of Health Research Training in Pharmacological Sciences Grant T32 GM08652-04.
Abbreviations
- PET
positron-emission tomography
- FDG
2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose
- PTSM
pyruvaldehyde-bis(N4-methylthiosemicarbazone)
- C6
C6 rat glioma
- MTT
3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide
- WB
whole body
- DWBA
digital WB autoradiography
- %ID/g
percentage of injected dose per gram of tissue
Footnotes
Yu, M. D., Green, M. A., Mock, B. H. & Shaw, S. M., Society for Nuclear Medicine, Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting, June 13–16, 1989, St. Louis (abstr.).
References
- 1.Rennen H J, Boerman O C, Oyen W J, Corstens F H. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001;28:241–252. doi: 10.1007/s002590000447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Botti C, Negri D R, Seregni E, Ramakrishna V, Arienti F, Maffioli L, Lombardo C, Bogni A, Pascali C, Crippa F, et al. Eur J Nucl Med. 1997;24:497–504. doi: 10.1007/BF01267680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Melder R J, Elmaleh D, Brownell A L, Brownell G L, Jain R K. J Immunol Methods. 1994;175:79–87. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(94)90333-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Koike C, Oku N, Watanabe M, Tsukada H, Kakiuchi T, Irimura T, Okada S. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1995;1238:99–106. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(95)00123-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Koike C, Watanabe M, Oku N, Tsukada H, Irimura T, Okada S. Cancer Res. 1997;57:3612–3619. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Oku N, Koike C, Sugawara M, Tsukada H, Irimura T, Okada S. Cancer Res. 1994;54:2573–2576. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dodd C H, Hsu H C, Chu W J, Yang P, Zhang H G, Mountz J D, Jr, Zinn K, Forder J, Josephson L, Weissleder R, Mountz J M, Mountz J D. J Immunol Methods. 2001;256:89–105. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1759(01)00433-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Shao Y, Cherry S R, Farahani K, Meadors K, Siegel S, Silverman R W, Marsden P K. Phys Med Biol. 1997;42:1965–1970. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/42/10/010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Blower P J, Lewis J S, Zweit J. Nucl Med Biol. 1996;23:957–980. doi: 10.1016/s0969-8051(96)00130-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.McCarthy D W, Shefer R E, Klinkowstein R E, Bass L A, Margeneau W H, Cutler C S, Anderson C J, Welch M J. Nucl Med Biol. 1997;24:35–43. doi: 10.1016/s0969-8051(96)00157-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hamacher K, Coenen H H, Stöcklin G. J Nucl Med. 1986;27:235–238. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Qi J, Leahy R M, Cherry S R, Chatziioannou A, Farquhar T H. Phys Med Biol. 1998;43:1001–1013. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/43/4/027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gambhir S S, Barrio J R, Wu L, Iyer M, Namavari M, Satyamurthy N, Bauer E, Parrish C, MacLaren D C, Borghei A R, et al. J Nucl Med. 1998;39:2003–2011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mathias C J, Bergmann S R, Green M A. J Nucl Med. 1995;36:1451–1455. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kuyama J, McCormack A, George A J, Heelan B T, Osman S, Batchelor J R, Peters A M. Eur J Nucl Med. 1997;24:488–496. doi: 10.1007/BF01267679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kjaergaard J, Hokland M E, Agger R, Skovbo A, Nannmark U, Basse P H. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2000;48:550–560. doi: 10.1007/PL00006673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]