Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1990 Mar;57(3):533–545. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82569-8

Rapid activation, desensitization, and resensitization of synaptic channels of crayfish muscle after glutamate pulses.

J Dudel 1, C Franke 1, H Hatt 1
PMCID: PMC1280747  PMID: 1968348

Abstract

Completely desensitizing excitatory channels were activated in outside-out patches of crayfish muscle membrane by applying glutamate pulses with switching times of approximately 0.2 ms for concentration changes. Channels were almost completely activated with 10 mM glutamate. Maximum activation was reached within 0.4 ms with greater than or equal to 1 mM glutamate. Channel open probability decayed with a time constant of desensitization of 2 ms with 10 mM glutamate and more rapidly at lower glutamate concentrations. The rate of beginnings of bursts (average number of beginnings of bursts per time bin) decayed even faster but approximately in proportion to the glutamate concentration. The dose-response curve for the channel open probability and for the rate of bursts had a maximum double-logarithmic slope of 5.1 and 4.2, respectively. Channels desensitized completely without opening at very low or slowly rising glutamate concentrations. Desensitization thus originates from a closed channel state. Resensitization was tested by pairs of completely desensitizing glutamate pulses. Sensitivity to the second pulse returned rapidly at pulse intervals between 1 and 2 ms and was almost complete with an interval of 3 ms. Schemes of channel activation by up to five glutamate binding steps, with desensitization by glutamate binding from closed states, are discussed. At high agonist concentrations bursts are predominantly terminated by desensitization. Quantal currents are generated by pulses of greater than 1 mM glutamate, and their decay is determined by the duration of presence of glutamate and possibly by desensitization.

Full text

PDF
533

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brett R. S., Dilger J. P., Adams P. R., Lancaster B. A method for the rapid exchange of solutions bathing excised membrane patches. Biophys J. 1986 Nov;50(5):987–992. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(86)83539-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Clark R. B., Gration K. A., Usherwood P. N. Desensitization of glutamate receptors on innervated and denervated locust muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1979 May;290(2):551–568. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Colquhoun D., Hawkes A. G. On the stochastic properties of bursts of single ion channel openings and of clusters of bursts. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1982 Dec 24;300(1098):1–59. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1982.0156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Colquhoun D., Hawkes A. G. On the stochastic properties of single ion channels. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1981 Mar 6;211(1183):205–235. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1981.0003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Colquhoun D. Mechanisms of drug action at the voluntary muscle endplate. Annu Rev Pharmacol. 1975;15:307–325. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pa.15.040175.001515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Colquhoun D., Ogden D. C. Activation of ion channels in the frog end-plate by high concentrations of acetylcholine. J Physiol. 1988 Jan;395:131–159. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp016912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Colquhoun D., Sakmann B. Fast events in single-channel currents activated by acetylcholine and its analogues at the frog muscle end-plate. J Physiol. 1985 Dec;369:501–557. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1985.sp015912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cull-Candy S. G., Miledi R., Parker I. Single glutamate-activated channels recorded from locust muscle fibres with perfused patch-clamp electrodes. J Physiol. 1981 Dec;321:195–210. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cull-Candy S. G., Parker I. Rapid kinetics of single glutamate-receptor channels. Nature. 1982 Feb 4;295(5848):410–412. doi: 10.1038/295410a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. DEL CASTILLO J., KATZ B. Interaction at end-plate receptors between different choline derivatives. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1957 May 7;146(924):369–381. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1957.0018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dekin M. S. Permeability changes induced by L-glutamate at the crayfish neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1983 Aug;341:105–125. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dreyer F., Peper K., Sterz R. Determination of dose-response curves by quantitative ionophoresis at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1978 Aug;281:395–419. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dudel J. Dose-response curve of glutamate applied by superfusion to crayfish muscle synapses. Pflugers Arch. 1977 Mar 11;368(1-2):49–54. doi: 10.1007/BF01063454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dudel J., Franke C., Hatt H., Ramsey R. L., Usherwood P. N. Rapid activation and desensitization by glutamate of excitatory, cation-selective channels in locust muscle. Neurosci Lett. 1988 May 16;88(1):33–38. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(88)90311-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dudel J., Franke C. Single glutamate-gated synaptic channels at the crayfish neuromuscular junction. II. Dependence of channel open time on glutamate concentration. Pflugers Arch. 1987 Mar;408(3):307–314. doi: 10.1007/BF02181474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dudel J. Kinetics of postsynaptic action of glutamate pulses applied iontophoretically through high resistance micropipettes. Pflugers Arch. 1975;356(4):329–346. doi: 10.1007/BF00580006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Feltz A., Trautmann A. Desensitization at the frog neuromuscular junction: a biphasic process. J Physiol. 1982 Jan;322:257–272. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Franke C., Dudel J., Finger W. Single synaptic channels recorded at glutamate sensitive patches on a crayfish muscle. Neurosci Lett. 1983 Nov 21;42(1):7–12. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(83)90413-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Franke C., Dudel J. Single glutamate-gated synaptic channels at the crayfish neuromuscular junction. I. The effect of enzyme treatment. Pflugers Arch. 1987 Mar;408(3):300–306. doi: 10.1007/BF02181473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Franke C., Hatt H., Dudel J. Liquid filament switch for ultra-fast exchanges of solutions at excised patches of synaptic membrane of crayfish muscle. Neurosci Lett. 1987 Jun 15;77(2):199–204. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(87)90586-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hamill O. P., Marty A., Neher E., Sakmann B., Sigworth F. J. Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches. Pflugers Arch. 1981 Aug;391(2):85–100. doi: 10.1007/BF00656997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hatt H., Franke C., Dudel J. Calcium dependent gating of the L-glutamate activated, excitatory synaptic channel on crayfish muscle. Pflugers Arch. 1988 Jan;411(1):17–26. doi: 10.1007/BF00581641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hatt H., Franke C., Dudel J. Ionic permeabilities of L-glutamate activated, excitatory synaptic channel in crayfish muscle. Pflugers Arch. 1988 Jan;411(1):8–16. doi: 10.1007/BF00581640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jackson M. B. Perfection of a synaptic receptor: kinetics and energetics of the acetylcholine receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Apr;86(7):2199–2203. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.7.2199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. KATZ B., THESLEFF S. A study of the desensitization produced by acetylcholine at the motor end-plate. J Physiol. 1957 Aug 29;138(1):63–80. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kawagoe R., Onodera K., Takeuchi A. The uptake and release of glutamate at the crayfish neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1984 Sep;354:69–78. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kerry C. J., Kits K. S., Ramsey R. L., Sansom M. S., Usherwood P. N. Single channel kinetics of a glutamate receptor. Biophys J. 1987 Jan;51(1):137–144. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(87)83318-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kerry C. J., Ramsey R. L., Sansom M. S., Usherwood P. N. Glutamate receptor channel kinetics: the effect of glutamate concentration. Biophys J. 1988 Jan;53(1):39–52. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(88)83064-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Land B. R., Salpeter E. E., Salpeter M. M. Kinetic parameters for acetylcholine interaction in intact neuromuscular junction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Nov;78(11):7200–7204. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.11.7200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Maconochie D. J., Knight D. E. A method for making solution changes in the sub-millisecond range at the tip of a patch pipette. Pflugers Arch. 1989 Sep;414(5):589–596. doi: 10.1007/BF00580996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Magleby K. L., Pallotta B. S. A study of desensitization of acetylcholine receptors using nerve-released transmitter in the frog. J Physiol. 1981 Jul;316:225–250. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Magleby K. L., Stevens C. F. A quantitative description of end-plate currents. J Physiol. 1972 May;223(1):173–197. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mathers D. A., Usherwood P. N. The sensitivity of locust skeletal muscle fibres to L-glutamate following denervation and injury. Comp Biochem Physiol C. 1978;60(1):7–10. doi: 10.1016/0306-4492(78)90019-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Mayer M. L., Vyklicky L., Jr Concanavalin A selectively reduces desensitization of mammalian neuronal quisqualate receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Feb;86(4):1411–1415. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.4.1411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Maynard D. M., Dando M. R. The structure of the stomatogastric neuromuscular system in Callinectes sapidus, Homarus americanus and Panulirus argus (Decapoda Crustacea). Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1974 Aug 1;268(892):161–220. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1974.0024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ogden D. C., Colquhoun D. Ion channel block by acetylcholine, carbachol and suberyldicholine at the frog neuromuscular junction. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1985 Sep 23;225(1240):329–355. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1985.0065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Parnas H., Flashner M., Spira M. E. Sequential model to describe the nicotinic synaptic current. Biophys J. 1989 May;55(5):875–884. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(89)82886-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Patlak J. B., Gration K. A., Usherwood P. N. Single glutamate-activated channels in locust muscle. Nature. 1979 Apr 12;278(5705):643–645. doi: 10.1038/278643a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sakmann B., Patlak J., Neher E. Single acetylcholine-activated channels show burst-kinetics in presence of desensitizing concentrations of agonist. Nature. 1980 Jul 3;286(5768):71–73. doi: 10.1038/286071a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Tang C. M., Dichter M., Morad M. Quisqualate activates a rapidly inactivating high conductance ionic channel in hippocampal neurons. Science. 1989 Mar 17;243(4897):1474–1477. doi: 10.1126/science.2467378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Trussell L. O., Thio L. L., Zorumski C. F., Fischbach G. D. Rapid desensitization of glutamate receptors in vertebrate central neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Apr;85(8):2834–2838. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.8.2834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Werman R. An electrophysiological approach to drug-receptor mechanisms. Comp Biochem Physiol. 1969 Sep 15;30(6):997–1017. doi: 10.1016/0010-406x(69)91038-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES