Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1999 Mar;71(2):121–143. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1999.71-121

Delay or probability discounting in a model of impulsive behavior: effect of alcohol.

J B Richards 1, L Zhang 1, S H Mitchell 1, H de Wit 1
PMCID: PMC1284697  PMID: 10220927

Abstract

Little is known about the acute effects of drugs of abuse on impulsivity and self-control. In this study, impulsivity was assessed in humans using a computer task that measured delay and probability discounting. Discounting describes how much the value of a reward (or punisher) is decreased when its occurrence is either delayed or uncertain. Twenty-four healthy adult volunteers ingested a moderate dose of ethanol (0.5 or 0.8 g/kg ethanol: n = 12 at each dose) or placebo before completing the discounting task. In the task the participants were given a series of choices between a small, immediate, certain amount of money and $10 that was either delayed (0, 2, 30, 180, or 365 days) or probabilistic (i.e., certainty of receipt was 1.0, .9, .75, .5, or .25). The point at which each individual was indifferent between the smaller immediate or certain reward and the $10 delayed or probabilistic reward was identified using an adjusting-amount procedure. The results indicated that (a) delay and probability discounting were well described by a hyperbolic function; (b) delay and probability discounting were positively correlated within subjects; (c) delay and probability discounting were moderately correlated with personality measures of impulsivity; and (d) alcohol had no effect on discounting.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (210.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ainslie G. Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychol Bull. 1975 Jul;82(4):463–496. doi: 10.1037/h0076860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Doty P., Kirk J. M., Cramblett M. J., de Wit H. Behavioral responses to ethanol in light and moderate social drinkers following naltrexone pretreatment. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1997 Aug 25;47(2):109–116. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(97)00094-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Doty P., Zacny J.P., de Wit H. Effects of ondansetron pretreatment on acute responses to ethanol in social drinkers. Behav Pharmacol. 1994 Aug;5(4-5):461–469. doi: 10.1097/00008877-199408000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Doty P., de Wit H. Effect of setting on the reinforcing and subjective effects of ethanol in social drinkers. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1995 Mar;118(1):19–27. doi: 10.1007/BF02245245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Duffy J. D. The neurology of alcoholic denial: implications for assessment and treatment. Can J Psychiatry. 1995 Jun;40(5):257–263. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ericksen K. P., Trocki K. F. Behavioral risk factors for sexually transmitted diseases in American households. Soc Sci Med. 1992 Apr;34(8):843–853. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90254-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Eysenck S. B., Eysenck H. J. Impulsiveness and venturesomeness: their position in a dimensional system of personality description. Psychol Rep. 1978 Dec;43(3 Pt 2):1247–1255. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1978.43.3f.1247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fendrich M., Mackesy-Amiti M. E., Goldstein P., Spunt B., Brownstein H. Substance involvement among juvenile murderers: comparisons with older offenders based on interviews with prison inmates. Int J Addict. 1995 Sep;30(11):1363–1382. doi: 10.3109/10826089509055838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fromme K., Katz E., D'Amico E. Effects of alcohol intoxication on the perceived consequences of risk taking. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 1997 Feb;5(1):14–23. doi: 10.1037//1064-1297.5.1.14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hingson R., Strunin L., Berlin B. Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome transmission: changes in knowledge and behaviors among teenagers, Massachusetts statewide surveys, 1986 to 1988. Pediatrics. 1990 Jan;85(1):24–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lau M. A., Pihl R. O., Peterson J. B. Provocation, acute alcohol intoxication, cognitive performance, and aggression. J Abnorm Psychol. 1995 Feb;104(1):150–155. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.104.1.150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Martin W. R., Sloan J. W., Sapira J. D., Jasinski D. R. Physiologic, subjective, and behavioral effects of amphetamine, methamphetamine, ephedrine, phenmetrazine, and methylphenidate in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1971 Mar-Apr;12(2):245–258. doi: 10.1002/cpt1971122part1245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. McCusker J., Koblin B., Lewis B. F., Sullivan J. Demographic characteristics, risk behaviors, and HIV seroprevalence among intravenous drug users by site of contact: results from a community-wide HIV surveillance project. Am J Public Health. 1990 Sep;80(9):1062–1067. doi: 10.2105/ajph.80.9.1062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mischel W., Grusec J. Waiting for rewards and punishments: effects of time and probability on choice. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1967 Jan;5(1):24–31. doi: 10.1037/h0024180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Myerson J., Green L. Discounting of delayed rewards: Models of individual choice. J Exp Anal Behav. 1995 Nov;64(3):263–276. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.64-263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rachlin H., Castrogiovanni A., Cross D. Probability and delay in commitment. J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Nov;48(3):347–353. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.48-347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rachlin H., Green L. Commitment, choice and self-control. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Jan;17(1):15–22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rachlin H., Raineri A., Cross D. Subjective probability and delay. J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Mar;55(2):233–244. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Richards J. B., Mitchell S. H., de Wit H., Seiden L. S. Determination of discount functions in rats with an adjusting-amount procedure. J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 May;67(3):353–366. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1997.67-353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Steele C. M., Southwick L. Alcohol and social behavior I: The psychology of drunken excess. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1985 Jan;48(1):18–34. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.48.1.18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Virkkunen M., Linnoila M. Serotonin in early onset, male alcoholics with violent behaviour. Ann Med. 1990;22(5):327–331. doi: 10.3109/07853899009147915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Welte J. W., Abel E. L. Homicide: drinking by the victim. J Stud Alcohol. 1989 May;50(3):197–201. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1989.50.197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. de Wit H., Doty P. Preference for ethanol and diazepam in light and moderate social drinkers: a within-subjects study. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1994 Aug;115(4):529–538. doi: 10.1007/BF02245577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES