Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1973 Apr;230(2):331–357. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010191

The formation of synapses in reinnervated and cross-reinnervated adult avian muscle

M R Bennett, A G Pettigrew, R S Taylor
PMCID: PMC1350366  PMID: 4350769

Abstract

1. A study has been made of the formation of synapses in spontaneously reinnervated and cross-reinnervated anterior latissimus dorsi (ALD) and posterior latissimus dorsi (PLD) muscles of adult fowls.

2. Denervated ALD and PLD muscle fibres have a uniform and high sensitivity to iontophoretically applied acetylcholine (ACh). During early reinnervation the sensitivity distribution to ACh of the ALD muscle fibres begins to return to normal before synaptic potentials can be evoked. The normal ACh sensitivity distribution of PLD muscle fibres is also restored after reinnervation. After cross-reinnervation of the ALD and PLD muscles the ACh sensitivity distribution of many of the muscle fibres is again restored to normal.

3. Reinnervating and cross-reinnervating ALD nerve terminals showed a greater than normal degree of facilitation of transmitter release when a test impulse was applied at various intervals after a conditioning impulse. Cross-reinnervating PLD nerve terminals showed facilitation of transmitter release rather than the normal depression in a conditioning-test impulse sequence.

4. The distribution of nerve terminals over the surface of spontaneously reinnervated and cross-reinnervated ALD and PLD muscle fibres has been determined from an examination of the sensitivity distribution to applied ACh, the graded versus all-or-none nature of the evoked potential and the distribution of cholinesterase stained synapses.

5. The results suggest that the innervation pattern of individual ALD and PLD muscle fibres is restored both after spontaneous reinnervation and cross-reinnervation.

Full text

PDF
331

Images in this article

354-1Plate 1
on p.354-1
354-2Plate 2
on p.354-2

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AXELSSON J., THESLEFF S. A study of supersensitivity in denervated mammalian skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1959 Jun 23;147(1):178–193. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aitken J. T. Growth of nerve implants in voluntary muscle. J Anat. 1950 Jan;84(Pt 1):38–49. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Albuquerque E. X., McIsaac R. J. Fast and slow mammalian muscles after denervation. Exp Neurol. 1970 Jan;26(1):183–202. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(70)90099-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. CSILLIK B., SAVAY G. Die Regeneration der subneuralen Apparate der motorischen Endplatten. Acta Neuroveg (Wien) 1958;19(1-2):41–52. doi: 10.1007/BF01226504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dennis M., Miledi R. Lack of correspondence between the amplitudes of spontaneous potentials and unit potentials evoked by nerve impulses at regenerating neuromuscular junctions. Nat New Biol. 1971 Jul 28;232(30):126–128. doi: 10.1038/newbio232126a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fedde M. R. Electrical properties and acetylcholine sensitivity of singly and multiply innervated avian muscle fibers. J Gen Physiol. 1969 May;53(5):624–637. doi: 10.1085/jgp.53.5.624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Feltz A., Mallart A. Differences in the action of acetylcholine on the denervated muscle fiber and on the normal end-plate. Brain Res. 1970 Aug 27;22(2):264–267. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(70)90014-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fex S., Jirmanová I. Innervation by nerve implants of "fast" and "slow" skeletal muscles of the rat. Acta Physiol Scand. 1969 Jul;76(3):257–269. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1969.tb04469.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. GINSBORG B. L. Some properties of avian skeletal muscle fibres with multiple neuromuscular junctions. J Physiol. 1960 Dec;154:581–598. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. GINSBORG B. L. Spontaneous activity in muscle fibres of the chick. J Physiol. 1960 Mar;150:707–717. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gwyn D. G., Aitken J. T. The formation of new motor endplates in mammalian skeletal muscle. J Anat. 1966 Jan;100(Pt 1):111–126. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. HESS A. Structural differences of fast and slow extrafusal muscle fibres and their nerve endings in chickens. J Physiol. 1961 Jul;157:221–231. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hník P., Jirmanová I., Vyklický L., Zelená J. Fast and slow muscles of the chick after nerve cross-union. J Physiol. 1967 Nov;193(2):309–325. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Iwayama T. Relation of regenerating nerve terminals to original endplates. Nature. 1969 Oct 4;224(5214):81–82. doi: 10.1038/224081a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jirmanová I., Hník P., Zelená J. Implantation of "fast" nerve into slow muscle in young chickens. Physiol Bohemoslov. 1971;20(3):199–204. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jirmanová I., Zelená J. Effect of denervation and tenotomy on slow and fast muscles of the chicken. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1970;106(3):333–347. doi: 10.1007/BF00335777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. KARNOVSKY M. J., ROOTS L. A "DIRECT-COLORING" THIOCHOLINE METHOD FOR CHOLINESTERASES. J Histochem Cytochem. 1964 Mar;12:219–221. doi: 10.1177/12.3.219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. KATZ B., MILEDI R. THE DEVELOPMENT OF ACETYLCHOLINE SENSITIVITY IN NERVE-FREE SEGMENTS OF SKELETAL MUSCLE. J Physiol. 1964 Mar;170:389–396. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. KOENIG J. [Experimental motor innervation of a portion of striated muscle normally devoid of motor plates in the rat]. C R Hebd Seances Acad Sci. 1963 Mar 25;256:2918–2920. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Koenig J. Contribution a l'étude de la morphologie des plaques motrices des grands dorsaux antérieur et postérieur du poulet après innervation croisée. Arch Anat Microsc Morphol Exp. 1970 Oct-Dec;59(4):403–425. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Koenig J. Structure et distribution des plaques motrices d'un muscle lent innervé expérimentalement par le nerf moteur d'un muscle rapide. C R Seances Soc Biol Fil. 1967;161(6):1276–1279. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kuno M., Turkanis S. A., Weakly J. N. Correlation between nerve terminal size and transmitter release at the neuromuscular junction of the frog. J Physiol. 1971 Mar;213(3):545–556. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. LILEY A. W., NORTH K. A. An electrical investigation of effects of repetitive stimulation on mammalian neuromuscular junction. J Neurophysiol. 1953 Sep;16(5):509–527. doi: 10.1152/jn.1953.16.5.509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Landmesser L. Contractile and electrical responses of vagus-innervated frog sartorius muscles. J Physiol. 1971 Mar;213(3):707–725. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Landmesser L. Pharmacological properties, cholinesterase activity and anatomy of nerve-muscle junctions in vagus-innervated frog sartorius. J Physiol. 1972 Jan;220(1):243–256. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lomo T., Rosenthal J. Control of ACh sensitivity by muscle activity in the rat. J Physiol. 1972 Mar;221(2):493–513. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lüllmann-Rauch R. The regeneration of neuromuscular junctions during spontaneous re-innervation of the rat diaphragm. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1971;121(4):593–603. doi: 10.1007/BF00560162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. MARTIN A. R. A further study of the statistical composition on the end-plate potential. J Physiol. 1955 Oct 28;130(1):114–122. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1955.sp005397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. MILEDI R. Properties of regenerating neuromuscular synapses in the frog. J Physiol. 1960 Nov;154:190–205. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. MILEDI R. The acetylcholine sensitivity of frog muscle fibres after complete or partial devervation. J Physiol. 1960 Apr;151:1–23. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mallart A., Martin A. R. An analysis of facilitation of transmitter release at the neuromuscular junction of the frog. J Physiol. 1967 Dec;193(3):679–694. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mallart A., Martin A. R. The relation between quantum content and facilitation at the neuromuscular junction of the frog. J Physiol. 1968 Jun;196(3):593–604. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Marotte L. R., Mark R. F. The mechanism of selective reinnervation of fish eye muscle. I. Evidence from muscle function during recovery. Brain Res. 1970 Apr 1;19(1):41–51. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(70)90235-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Redfern P. A. Neuromuscular transmission in new-born rats. J Physiol. 1970 Aug;209(3):701–709. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. SILVER A. A HISTOCHEMICAL INVESTIGATION OF CHOLINESTERASES AT NEUROMUSCULAR JUNCTIONS IN MAMMALIAN AND AVIAN MUSCLE. J Physiol. 1963 Nov;169:386–393. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Saito A., Zacks S. I. Fine structure of neuromuscular junctions after nerve section and implantation of nerve in denervated muscle. Exp Mol Pathol. 1969 Jun;10(3):256–273. doi: 10.1016/0014-4800(69)90056-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Weddell G., Glees P. The early stages in the degeneration of cutaneous nerve fibres. J Anat. 1941 Oct;76(Pt 1):65–93. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Zelená J., Vyklický L., Jirmanová I. Motor end-plates in fast and slow muscles of the chick after cross-union of their nerves. Nature. 1967 Jun 3;214(5092):1010–1011. doi: 10.1038/2141010a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES