Table 2.
Randomized Trials on Postoperative Analgesic Consumption Reduction and Other Effects Produced by Acupuncture Analgesia.
Authors | Study design | Surgery and anesthesia | Acupuncture points | Method of stimulation | Postoperative analgesic consumption | P | Postoperative pain and other outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ekblom et al.50 | Pre and Post-surgery acupuncture “No acupuncture” control, no blinding | Oral surgery Local anesthesia N=110 | LI 4, ST 6, ST 7, SJ 5, SI 19, | Manual | Significantly increased in both acupuncture groups | P<0.03 | Significantly increased in preoperative acupuncture group |
Lao et al.72 | Placebo controlled, Double-blind | Oral surgery Local anesthesia N=39 | LI 4, ST 6, ST 7, SJ 17 | Manual | Significantly decreased in acupuncture group | P=0.05 | No significant difference in the pain score between two groups |
Christensen et al.71 | No “acupuncture” control Single-blind | Abdominal hysterectomy General anesthesia N=50 | GV 4, Bl 32, SP 6, ST 36 | Electroacupuncture initiated after induction | No difference in analgesic consumption between acupuncture and control groups | P=0.48 | No difference in the pain score between two groups |
Lin et al.60 | “No acupuncture”, “sham” acupuncture control Double-blind | Abdominal hysterectomy General anesthesia N=100 | ST 36 | Low- and high frequency electro-acupuncture | Significantly lower in both electro-acupuncture and “sham” groups | P<0.05 | No significant difference in the pain score between control, “sham”, and both acupuncture groups Significantly longer time for first pain medicine request in both electroacupuncture groups |
Kotani et al.59 | “No acupuncture” control Double-blind | Upper and lower abdominal surgery General and epidural morphine postoperatively N=165 | Back shu points | Intradermal needle insertion without stimulation | Significantly lower morphine consumption in acupuncture groups | P<0.01 | Significantly lower in acupuncture group Decreased PONV in acupuncture group |
Chen et al. 77 | “Sham” and placebo control Single blind | Abdominal hysterectomy Myomectomy General anesthesia N=100 | ST 36, at dermatomal distribution of incisional site | Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) | Reduced in both acupoint and dermatomal group vs “sham” and control groups | P<0.5 | Pain treatment satisfaction was better in acupoint group and dermatomal group |
Sim et al.58 | Placebo control Single-blind | Abdominal hysterectomy General anesthesia N=90 | ST 36, P 6, along skin incision | Electroacupuncture before induction or after surgery | Reduced in acupuncture group within 6-12 postoperative hours | P<0.015 | No difference in VAS score or PONV |
VAS = visual analog scale (0 = none, 100 = worse imaginable), PONV = postoperative nausea and vomiting