Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Public Health Reports logoLink to Public Health Reports
. 2005 Jan-Feb;120(1):39–45. doi: 10.1177/003335490512000108

Socioeconomic factors and the risk of anencephaly in a Mexican population: a case-control study.

Julia Blanco Muñoz 1, Marina Lacasaña 1, Victor Hugo Borja Aburto 1, Luisa Elvira Torres Sánchez 1, Ana María García García 1, Lizbeth López Carrillo 1
PMCID: PMC1497685  PMID: 15736330

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The study was designed to evaluate the association between socioeconomic level (as measured by maternal education, maternal occupation, and monthly family income) and anencephaly. METHODS: The authors conducted a case-control study using data from the Epidemiological Surveillance System Register for Neural Tube Defects for three states of the Mexican Republic: Puebla, Guerrero and the State of Mexico. Mothers of 151 cases of infants born with anencephaly and mothers of 151 control infants born during the period March 2000 to February 2001 were interviewed about their socioeconomic characteristics and other factors including reproductive history, use of prenatal care, use of tobacco and alcohol, fever during pregnancy, and folic acid supplementation. RESULTS: After adjustment for potential confounders, a risk gradient was seen with decreasing maternal education. Women with less than a primary school education (adjusted odds ratio [OR]=3.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2, 7.6) and women who had completed primary school but had not completed junior high school (adjusted OR=2.2; 95% CI 0.9, 5.7) had higher risks of giving birth to an infant with anencephaly, compared to women with a higher educational level. A monthly income < or = 1,000 pesos (approximately dollars 100 U.S.) was also associated with a higher risk of anencephaly (OR=2.5; 95% CI 1.2, 5.1). Women employed in industry or agriculture during the acute risk period (three months prior to conception to one month after conception) had a risk 6.5 times (95% CI 1.4, 29.6) that of professional and business women. CONCLUSIONS: This study helps to identify groups that may be especially vulnerable to this type of congenital malformation so that primary and secondary preventive strategies can be targeted to these groups.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (79.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Balarajan R., McDowall M. Congenital malformations and agricultural workers. Lancet. 1983 May 14;1(8333):1112–1113. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)91955-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brender J. D., Suarez L. Paternal occupation and anencephaly. Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Mar;131(3):517–521. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. De Sherbinin A. Mexico. Popul Today. 1990 Feb;18(2):5–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Elwood J. H., Elwood J. M. Investigation of area differences in the prevalence at birth of anencephalus in Belfast. Int J Epidemiol. 1984 Mar;13(1):45–52. doi: 10.1093/ije/13.1.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Farley T. F., Hambidge S. J., Daley M. F. Association of low maternal education with neural tube defects in Colorado, 1989-1998. Public Health. 2002 Mar;116(2):89–94. doi: 10.1038/sj.ph.1900821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gray A. M. Inequalities in health. The Black Report: a summary and comment. Int J Health Serv. 1982;12(3):349–380. doi: 10.2190/XXMM-JMQU-2A7Y-HX1E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Holmes L. B., Driscoll S. G., Atkins L. Etiologic heterogeneity of neural-tube defects. N Engl J Med. 1976 Feb 12;294(7):365–369. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197602122940704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Khoury M. J., Erickson J. D., James L. M. Etiologic heterogeneity of neural tube defects: clues from epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol. 1982 Apr;115(4):538–548. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kristensen P., Irgens L. M. Maternal reproductive history: a registry based comparison of previous pregnancy data derived from maternal recall and data obtained during the actual pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000 Jun;79(6):471–477. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Leon D. A. Influence of birth weight on differences in infant mortality by social class and legitimacy. BMJ. 1991 Oct 19;303(6808):964–967. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6808.964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Liberatos P., Link B. G., Kelsey J. L. The measurement of social class in epidemiology. Epidemiol Rev. 1988;10:87–121. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mutchinick O., Orozco E., Lisker R., Babinsky V., Núez C. Factores de riesgo asociados a los defectos de cierre del tubo neural: exposición durante el primer trimester de la gestación. Gac Med Mex. 1990 May-Jun;126(3):227–234. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Reading R., Raybould S., Jarvis S. Deprivation, low birth weight, and children's height: a comparison between rural and urban areas. BMJ. 1993 Dec 4;307(6917):1458–1462. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6917.1458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schlaepfer-Pedrazzini L., Bobadilla J. L. Relación entre patrones reproductivos y mortalidad infantil: interpretaciones alternativas. Salud Publica Mex. 1990 Jul-Aug;32(4):381–394. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sever L. E. An epidemiologic study of neural tube defects in Los Angeles County II. Etiologic factors in an area with low prevalence at birth. Teratology. 1982 Jun;25(3):323–334. doi: 10.1002/tera.1420250309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Strassburg M. A., Greenland S., Portigal L. D., Sever L. E. A population-based case-control study of anencephalus and spina bifida in a low-risk area. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1983 Oct;25(5):632–641. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1983.tb13823.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Suarez L., Hendricks K. A., Cooper S. P., Sweeney A. M., Hardy R. J., Larsen R. D. Neural tube defects among Mexican Americans living on the US-Mexico border: effects of folic acid and dietary folate. Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Dec 1;152(11):1017–1023. doi: 10.1093/aje/152.11.1017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Velie E. M., Shaw G. M. Impact of prenatal diagnosis and elective termination on prevalence and risk estimates of neural tube defects in California, 1989-1991. Am J Epidemiol. 1996 Sep 1;144(5):473–479. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Vrijheid M., Dolk H., Stone D., Abramsky L., Alberman E., Scott J. E. Socioeconomic inequalities in risk of congenital anomaly. Arch Dis Child. 2000 May;82(5):349–352. doi: 10.1136/adc.82.5.349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wasserman C. R., Shaw G. M., Selvin S., Gould J. B., Syme S. L. Socioeconomic status, neighborhood social conditions, and neural tube defects. Am J Public Health. 1998 Nov;88(11):1674–1680. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.11.1674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zurayk H., Halabi S., Deeb M. Measures of social class based on education for use in health studies in developing countries. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1987 Jun;41(2):173–179. doi: 10.1136/jech.41.2.173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. de Walle H. E., van der Pal K. M., de Jong-van den Berg L. T., Schouten J., de Rover C. M., Buitendijk S. E., Cornel M. C. Periconceptional folic acid in The Netherlands in 1995. Socioeconomic differences. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Dec;52(12):826–827. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.12.826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Public Health Reports are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES