Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 1995 May;103(Suppl 4):87–91. doi: 10.1289/ehp.95103s487

Defining the role of pollutants in the disruption of reproduction in wildlife.

J E Hose 1, L J Guillette 1
PMCID: PMC1519279  PMID: 7556030

Abstract

Although chemical exposure has been associated with reduced reproduction in certain North American fish, reptiles, and mammals, definitive cause-and-effect data are lacking in many instances. Because the increasing use and global transport of industrial chemicals pose significant risk to successful reproduction, methods should be developed that can define the geographic extent and magnitude of injury and risk to wildlife. Because industrial chemicals are articles of commerce, information about injury to wildlife has been contentious and too often ineffective in changing societal behavior. The following strategies are advocated for inferring causal relationships. First, a balanced and comprehensive assessment of the data is necessary to determine the geographic extent of exposure and reproductive effects associated with environmental pollution. Initial efforts to document reproductive injury should focus on specific ecosystems in which detrimental effects have been observed, but lack sufficient causal data. Model systems (including experimental mesocosms or field ecosystems) should be identified or designed that can adequately test multigenerational reproductive effects. Mechanistic data from supportive laboratory studies on reproductive toxicity, quantitative structure-activity relationships, and bioaccumulation can be used to predict effects of related pollutants and to determine risk. Such information is essential to prevent future injury to wildlife and to prioritize the numerous remediation decisions facing our society.

Full text

PDF
87

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bishop C. A., Brooks R. J., Carey J. H., Ng P., Norstrom R. J., Lean D. R. The case for a cause-effect linkage between environmental contamination and development in eggs of the common snapping turtle (Chelydra S.serpentina) from Ontario, Canada. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1991 Aug;33(4):521–547. doi: 10.1080/15287399109531539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boyd C. A., Weiler M. H., Porter W. P. Behavioral and neurochemical changes associated with chronic exposure to low-level concentration of pesticide mixtures. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1990 Jul;30(3):209–221. doi: 10.1080/15287399009531424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Colborn T. Epidemiology of Great Lakes bald eagles. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1991 Aug;33(4):395–453. doi: 10.1080/15287399109531537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Colborn T., vom Saal F. S., Soto A. M. Developmental effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in wildlife and humans. Environ Health Perspect. 1993 Oct;101(5):378–384. doi: 10.1289/ehp.93101378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ernst W., Doe K., Jonah P., Young J., Julien G., Hennigar P. The toxicity of chlorothalonil to aquatic fauna and the impact of its operational use on a pond ecosystem. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1991 Jul;21(1):1–9. doi: 10.1007/BF01055550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Evans M. S., Noguchi G. E., Rice C. P. The biomagnification of polychlorinated biphenyls, toxaphene, and DDT compounds in a Lake Michigan offshore food web. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1991 Jan;20(1):87–93. doi: 10.1007/BF01065333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fox G. A. Practical causal inference for ecoepidemiologists. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1991 Aug;33(4):359–373. doi: 10.1080/15287399109531535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gilbertson M., Kubiak T., Ludwig J., Fox G. Great Lakes embryo mortality, edema, and deformities syndrome (GLEMEDS) in colonial fish-eating birds: similarity to chick-edema disease. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1991 Aug;33(4):455–520. doi: 10.1080/15287399109531538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Guillette L. J., Jr, Gross T. S., Masson G. R., Matter J. M., Percival H. F., Woodward A. R. Developmental abnormalities of the gonad and abnormal sex hormone concentrations in juvenile alligators from contaminated and control lakes in Florida. Environ Health Perspect. 1994 Aug;102(8):680–688. doi: 10.1289/ehp.94102680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hose J. E., Cross J. N., Smith S. G., Diehl D. Reproductive impairment in a fish inhabiting a contaminated coastal environment off Southern California. Environ Pollut. 1989;57(2):139–148. doi: 10.1016/0269-7491(89)90006-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mac M. J., Edsall C. C. Environmental contaminants and the reproductive success of lake trout in the Great Lakes: an epidemiological approach. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1991 Aug;33(4):375–394. doi: 10.1080/15287399109531536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Peakall D. B. DDE: its presence in peregrine eggs in 1948. Science. 1974 Feb 15;183(4125):673–674. doi: 10.1126/science.183.4125.673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Porter W. P., Green S. M., Debbink N. L., Carlson I. Groundwater pesticides: interactive effects of low concentrations of carbamates aldicarb and methomyl and the triazine metribuzin on thyroxine and somatotropin levels in white rats. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1993 Sep;40(1):15–34. doi: 10.1080/15287399309531773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Safe S. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), dibenzofurans (PCDFs), and related compounds: environmental and mechanistic considerations which support the development of toxic equivalency factors (TEFs). Crit Rev Toxicol. 1990;21(1):51–88. doi: 10.3109/10408449009089873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Shirazi M. A., Dawson D. A. Developmental malformation of frog embryos: an analysis of teratogenicity of chemical mixtures. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1991 Aug;21(2):177–182. doi: 10.1007/BF01055334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Shirazi M. A., Linder G. A model of additive effects of mixtures of narcotic chemicals. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1991 Aug;21(2):183–189. doi: 10.1007/BF01055335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wren C. D. Cause-effect linkages between chemicals and populations of mink (Mustela vison) and otter (Lutra canadensis) in the Great Lakes basin. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1991 Aug;33(4):549–585. doi: 10.1080/15287399109531540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES