Skip to main content
. 2006 Jun;168(6):1779–1792. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2006.051329

Table 1.

Antibodies to dsDNA, Nucleosomes, and α -Actinin and Their Relationship to Proteinuria in B/W Mice Studied over 33 Weeks

B/W mouse no. Age (weeks) at production of
Age at proteinuria* Antibody pattern prior to proteinuria Pattern example (see Figure 1)
Anti-dsDNA Anti-nuc Anti-α-actinin
2 30 30 30 2 (+3) Decreasing D
3 30 30 nd 32 (+3) Stable E
4 21 33 nd 29 (+3) Stable E
6 17 30 nd 26 (+3) Increasing F
9 21 17 nd 24 (+3) Low antibody levels
10 30 30 nd 32 (+3) Stable E
11 30 21 nd 32 (+3) Stable E
12 17 33 33 32 (+2) Increasing F
13 30 30 nd 32 (+3) Stable E
15 30 30 30 (+1) No proteinuria over 33 weeks G
16 21 21 nd 33 (+4) Decreasing D
18 30 21 nd 32 (+3) Increasing F
19 30 17 nd 17 (+1) Increasing F
20 21 30 nd 32 (+2) Decreasing D
Mean (±SD) 25.6 (±5.4) 26.6 (±5.8) Not determined 30.5 (±2.8)
*

Proteinuria was determined by stix from Bayer Diagnostics (Bridgend, United Kingdom): 0–1+, ≤0.3 g/l; 2+, ≤1 g/l; 3+, ≤3 g/l; 4+, ≥20 g/l. 

The antibody profiles, as determined by ELISA using 1/100 serum dilution on serial serum samples, possessed four principally different profiles linked to development of proteinuria, as demonstrated in Figure 1, D–G

nd, not detected.