Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Medical Genetics logoLink to Journal of Medical Genetics
. 2001 Mar;38(3):145–150. doi: 10.1136/jmg.38.3.145

Clinical studies on submicroscopic subtelomeric rearrangements: a checklist

B B A de Vries 1, S White 1, S Knight 1, R Regan 1, T Homfray 1, I Young 1, M Super 1, C McKeown 1, M Splitt 1, O Quarrell 1, A Trainer 1, M Niermeijer 1, S Malcolm 1, J Flint 1, J Hurst 1, R Winter 1
PMCID: PMC1734836  PMID: 11238680

Abstract

BACKGROUND—Submicroscopic subtelomeric chromosome defects have been found in 7.4% of children with moderate to severe mental retardation and in 0.5% of children with mild retardation. Effective clinical preselection is essential because of the technical complexities and cost of screening for subtelomere deletions.
METHODS—We studied 29 patients with a known subtelomeric defect and assessed clinical variables concerning birth history, facial dysmorphism, congenital malformations, and family history. Controls were 110 children with mental retardation of unknown aetiology with normal G banded karyotype and no detectable submicroscopic subtelomeric abnormalities.
RESULTS—Prenatal onset of growth retardation was found in 37% compared to 9% of the controls (p<0.0005). A higher percentage of positive family history for mental retardation was reported in the study group than the controls (50% v 21%, p=0.002). Miscarriage(s) were observed in only 8% of the mothers of subtelomeric cases compared to 30% of controls (p=0.028) which was, however, not significant after a Bonferroni correction. Common features (>30%) among subtelomeric deletion cases were microcephaly, short stature, hypertelorism, nasal and ear anomalies, hand anomalies, and cryptorchidism. Two or more facial dysmorphic features were observed in 83% of the subtelomere patients. None of these features was significantly different from the controls. Using the results, a five item checklist was developed which allowed exclusion from further testing in 20% of the mentally retarded children (95% CI 13-28%) in our study without missing any subtelomere cases. As our control group was selected for the "chromosomal phenotype", the specificity of the checklist is likely to be higher in an unselected group of mentally retarded subjects.
CONCLUSIONS—Our results suggest that good indicators for subtelomeric defects are prenatal onset of growth retardation and a positive family history for mental retardation. These clinical criteria, in addition to features suggestive of a chromosomal phenotype, resulted in the development of a five item checklist which will improve the diagnostic pick up rate of subtelomeric defects among mentally retarded subjects.


Keywords: submicroscopic subtelomeric rearrangements; clinical preselection; checklist; chromosome deletion.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (136.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. De Vries B. B., Knight S. J., Homfray T., Smithson S. F., Flint J., Winter R. M. Submicroscopic subtelomeric 1qter deletions: a recognisable phenotype? J Med Genet. 2001 Mar;38(3):175–178. doi: 10.1136/jmg.38.3.175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Doheny K. F., McDermid H. E., Harum K., Thomas G. H., Raymond G. V. Cryptic terminal rearrangement of chromosome 22q13.32 detected by FISH in two unrelated patients. J Med Genet. 1997 Aug;34(8):640–644. doi: 10.1136/jmg.34.8.640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Flint J., Wilkie A. O., Buckle V. J., Winter R. M., Holland A. J., McDermid H. E. The detection of subtelomeric chromosomal rearrangements in idiopathic mental retardation. Nat Genet. 1995 Feb;9(2):132–140. doi: 10.1038/ng0295-132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Knight S. J., Horsley S. W., Regan R., Lawrie N. M., Maher E. J., Cardy D. L., Flint J., Kearney L. Development and clinical application of an innovative fluorescence in situ hybridization technique which detects submicroscopic rearrangements involving telomeres. Eur J Hum Genet. 1997 Jan-Feb;5(1):1–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Knight S. J., Regan R., Nicod A., Horsley S. W., Kearney L., Homfray T., Winter R. M., Bolton P., Flint J. Subtle chromosomal rearrangements in children with unexplained mental retardation. Lancet. 1999 Nov 13;354(9191):1676–1681. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)03070-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Matthijs G., Schollen E., Cassiman J. J., Cormier-Daire V., Jaeken J., van Schaftingen E. Prenatal diagnosis in CDG1 families: beware of heterogeneity. Eur J Hum Genet. 1998 Mar-Apr;6(2):99–104. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Precht K. S., Lese C. M., Spiro R. P., Huttenlocher P. R., Johnston K. M., Baker J. C., Christian S. L., Kittikamron K., Ledbetter D. H. Two 22q telomere deletions serendipitously detected by FISH. J Med Genet. 1998 Nov;35(11):939–942. doi: 10.1136/jmg.35.11.939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Riegel M., Castellan C., Balmer D., Brecevic L., Schinzel A. Terminal deletion, del(1)(p36.3), detected through screening for terminal deletions in patients with unclassified malformation syndromes. Am J Med Genet. 1999 Jan 29;82(3):249–253. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19990129)82:3<249::aid-ajmg10>3.0.co;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Roeleveld N., Zielhuis G. A., Gabreëls F. The prevalence of mental retardation: a critical review of recent literature. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997 Feb;39(2):125–132. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1997.tb07395.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Slavotinek A., Shaffer L. G., Shapira S. K. Monosomy 1p36. J Med Genet. 1999 Sep;36(9):657–663. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Yeargin-Allsopp M., Murphy C. C., Cordero J. F., Decouflé P., Hollowell J. G. Reported biomedical causes and associated medical conditions for mental retardation among 10-year-old children, metropolitan Atlanta, 1985 to 1987. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997 Mar;39(3):142–149. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1997.tb07401.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. de Vries B. B., Bitner-Glindzicz M., Knight S. J., Tyson J., MacDermont K. D., Flint J., Malcolm S., Winter R. M. A boy with a submicroscopic 22qter deletion, general overgrowth and features suggestive of FG syndrome. Clin Genet. 2000 Dec;58(6):483–487. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2000.580610.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. de Vries B. B., van den Ouweland A. M., Mohkamsing S., Duivenvoorden H. J., Mol E., Gelsema K., van Rijn M., Halley D. J., Sandkuijl L. A., Oostra B. A. Screening and diagnosis for the fragile X syndrome among the mentally retarded: an epidemiological and psychological survey. Collaborative Fragile X Study Group. Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Sep;61(3):660–667. doi: 10.1086/515496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Genetics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES