Skip to main content
. 2006 Dec 20;1(1):e43. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000043

Table 1. Detection of M. tuberculosis DNA in adipose tissue from Mexican autopsy samplesa .

graphic file with name pone.0000043.t001.jpg

Patients' characteristics Presence of mycobacterial DNA (PRAT/PAT/PNAT)b
Patient # Sex Age at death (Years) Cause of death In situ PCR Conventional PCR
1 F 69 Sepsis −/−/− −/−/−
2 F 18 Sepsis −/−/− −/−/−
3 M 35 Hypovolemic shock +/−/+ +/−/−
4 M 64 Lung cancer −/+/− −/+/−
5 M 42 Malignant glioma −/−/− −/−/−
6 F 57 Sepsis −/−/− −/−/−
7 M 89 Pneumonia +/+/− −/−/−
8 M 29 Myeloblastic leukemia −/−/− −/−/−
9 F 29 Kidney cancer −/−/+ −/−/−
10 M 80 Emphysema −/−/+ −/−/+
11 F 29 Hypovolemic shock −/−/− −/−/−
12 F 83 Stroke +/−/+ −/−/−
13 F 22 Diabetes −/−/− −/−/−
14 M 36 Stroke −/−/− −/−/−
15 F 70 Breast cancer −/−/− −/−/−
16 F 50 Heart failure −/−/− −/−/−
17 M 76 Heart failure −/−/− −/−/−
18 F 59 Chronic kidney failure −/−/− −/−/−
19 F 14 Sepsis −/−/− −/−/−
a

Nine samples were positive for mycobacterial DNA by in-situ PCR, and three by conventional PCR. Three of these nine were positive by both methods. Six samples were positive only by in-situ PCR, and no sample was positive only by conventional PCR. Thus 51 of 57 samples were concordant by the two methods

b

PRAT, peri-renal adipose tissue; PAT, peritoneal adipose tissue; PNAT, peri-nodal adipose tissue