Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Jan 19.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA. 2005 Feb 23;293(8):970–978. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.8.970

Table 2.

Methodological Quality of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Randomized Controlled Trials*

No.(%) of Trials(n = 57)
Variable Actual Reported
Expected difference in outcomes prespecified
  Yes 45 (79) 7 (12)
  No 8 (14) . . .
  Unclear or missing data 4 (7) 50 (88)
Expected α error prespecified
  Yes 45 (79) 6 (11)
  No 8 (14) . . .
  Unclear or missing 4 (7) 51 (89)
β Error prespecified
  Yes 44 (77) 6 (11)
  No 9 (16) . . .
  Unclear or missing data 4 (7) . . .
Sample size prespecified
  Yes 45 (79) 9 (16)
  No 8 (14) . . .
  Unclear or missing data 4 (7) 48 (84)
Adequate allocation concealment (randomization done through central office)
  Yes 57 (100) 24 (42)
  Unclear or missing . . . 33 (58)
Dropouts described
  Yes 52 (91) 52 (91)
  No 5 (9) 5 (9)
Intention-to-treat analysis
  Yes 48 (84) 41 (72)
  No 7 (12) 6 (11)
  Unclear 2 (4) 10 (17)
*

Quality of reporting vs actual methodological quality is based on information from research protocols and verification by the radiation therapy oncology group statistical headquarter.