Skip to main content
. 1998 Jan 1;111(1):7–37. doi: 10.1085/jgp.111.1.7

Table IV.

Parameters of Dim Flash Responses in Ringer's and Prediction of Recovery Shift Due to Cyclase Activation

Rod τc τ′nd B Ca,rest ΔT 0.8 ΔT cyclase ΔT residual
s s s s s
a 1.4 0.43 15 6.6 5.5 1.1
b 1.8 0.37 18 6.0 5.5 1.5
c 1.3 0.73 28 7.7 5.7 2.0
d 1.7 0.31 10 7.6 4.8 2.8
e 1.4 0.33 13 6.5 4.4 2.1
f 1.4 0.32 14 5.7 4.3 1.4
g 1.2 0.27  7 4.0 4.5 −0.5
h 1.2 0.35 18 5.7 4.5 1.2
i 1.7 0.41 25 7.8* 5.7 2.1
j 1.7 0.35 27 5.5* 4.6 0.9
1.5 ± 0.2 0.39 ± 0.12 17.5 ± 7.2 6.2 ± 1.2 5.0 ± 0.6 1.5 ± 0.9

Column 1 identifies the rod. Columns 2–4 give the parameters of the model used to fit the low intensity responses in Ringer's, as illustrated in Figs. 1113; the value of the amplification constant used is given in Table II, and in all cases the Hill coefficient was set to n H = 2. τc′ is the value of the larger time constant of the disc-associated reactions, and τ′nd the shorter time constant (Eq. 5). Column 4 gives the value of α′max = αmax/cG dark, the maximal rate of guanylyl cyclase activity divided by the concentration of cGMP in the dark (see ii). Column 5 gives the observed shift at the point of 80% recovery (20% response amplitude) between saturating responses obtained in choline and in Ringer's. Column 6 gives the shift predicted on the assumption that cyclase activation alone is responsible, calculated with Eq. 16. Column 7 gives the residual shift; i.e., the observed minus the predicted shift.  

*

 Rods i and j were recorded from in 0-Ca2+ choline, and for the reasons given in the notes to Table II, we were unable to measure ΔT 0.8 and have instead substituted ΔT 0.5.