Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1966 Mar 1;28(3):473–487. doi: 10.1083/jcb.28.3.473

THE LOSS OF PHENOTYPIC TRAITS BY DIFFERENTIATED CELLS

III. The Reversible Behavior of Chondrocytes in Primary Cultures

Joan Abbott 1, Howard Holtzer 1
PMCID: PMC2106945  PMID: 4163861

Abstract

Observations were made on the behavior of chondrocytes grown under various conditions in vitro. The chondrocytes in 10-day embryonic chick vertebrae were grown as cultures of intact vertebrae, as pellets of chondrocytes liberated from their matrix, and as monodispersed cells plated out on plasma clots. Cartilage matrix was stained metachromatically with toluidine blue. Radioautographs were made of incorporated H3-thymidine, H3-proline, and S35-sulfate to determine the extent of DNA synthesis, collagen synthesis, and chondroitin sulfate synthesis, respectively. Chondrocytes in intact vertebrae or in pellets are rounded and actively synthesizing chondroitin sulfate and collagen. There is little DNA synthesis by cells in either vertebrae or pellets. Chondrocytes grown as monodisperse cells rapidly cease synthesizing cytologically detectable chondroitin sulfate and are induced to synthesize DNA and divide. There is a change in the shape of these chondrocytes from a rounded to a more stellate condition which accompanies the shift in metabolic activity. Conversely, when the cells attain a certain cell density, they reacquire a rounded shape, cease dividing, and again synthesize chondroitin sulfate. Clusters of chondrocytes synthesize more chondroitin sulfate than isolated chondrocytes. It is concluded that most chondrocytes synthesizing chondroitin sulfate do not concurrently synthesize DNA. Interaction between associated chondrocytes is important in inducing and maintaining chondroitin sulfate synthesis in genetically determined chondrocytes. Failure of interaction between chondrocytes leads to DNA synthesis and cell multiplication.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ABERCROMBIE M., HEAYSMAN J. E. Observations on the social behaviour of cells in tissue culture. II. Monolayering of fibroblasts. Exp Cell Res. 1954 May;6(2):293–306. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(54)90176-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. CASTOR C. W., MUIRDEN K. D. COLLAGEN FORMATION IN MONOLAYER CULTURES OF HUMAN FIBROBLASTS. THE EFFECTS OF HYDROCORTISONE. Lab Invest. 1964 Jun;13:560–574. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. EBNER K. E., HAGEMAN E. C., LARSON B. L. Functional biochemical changes in bovine mammary cell cultures. Exp Cell Res. 1961 Dec;25:555–570. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(61)90190-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. GODMAN G. C., LANE N. ON THE SITE OF SULFATION IN THE CHONDROCYTE. J Cell Biol. 1964 Jun;21:353–366. doi: 10.1083/jcb.21.3.353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. GOLDBERG B., GREEN H. AN ANALYSIS OF COLLAGEN SECRETION BY ESTABLISHED MOUSE FIBROBLAST LINES. J Cell Biol. 1964 Jul;22:227–258. doi: 10.1083/jcb.22.1.227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. KURODA Y. STUDIES ON CARTILAGE CELLS IN VITRO. I. MORPHOLOGY AND GROWTH OF CARTILAGE CELLS IN MONOLAYER CULTURES. Exp Cell Res. 1964 Jul;35:326–336. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(64)90099-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. KURODA Y. STUDIES ON CARTILAGE CELLS IN VITRO. II. CHANGES IN AGGREGATION AND IN CARTILAGE-FORMING ACTIVITY OF CELLS MAINTAINED IN MONOLAYER CULTURES. Exp Cell Res. 1964 Jul;35:337–348. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(64)90100-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. MESSIER B., LEBLOND C. P. Preparation of coated radioautographs by dipping sections in fluid emulsion. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1957 Oct;96(1):7–10. doi: 10.3181/00379727-96-23380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. MOORE G. E. IN VITRO CULTURES OF A PIGMENTED HAMSTER MELANOMA CELL LINE. Exp Cell Res. 1964 Nov;36:422–423. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(64)90224-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Masters M., Pardee A. B. Sequence of enzyme synthesis and gene replication during the cell cycle of Bacillus subtilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1965 Jul;54(1):64–70. doi: 10.1073/pnas.54.1.64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. NOWELL P. C. Phytohemagglutinin: an initiator of mitosis in cultures of normal human leukocytes. Cancer Res. 1960 May;20:462–466. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Okazaki K., Holtzer H. An analysis of myogenesis in vitro using fluorescein-labeled antimyosin. J Histochem Cytochem. 1965 Nov-Dec;13(8):726–739. doi: 10.1177/13.8.726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. PELC S. R., GLUCKSMANN A. Sulphate metabolism in the cartilage of the trachea, pinna and xiphoid process of the adult mouse as indicated by autoradiographs. Exp Cell Res. 1955 Apr;8(2):336–344. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(55)90145-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. PROCKOP D. J., PETTENGILL O., HOLTZER H. INCORPORATION OF SULFATE AND THE SYNTHESIS OF COLLAGEN BY CULTURES OF EMBRYONIC CHONDROCYTES. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1964 Jul 7;83:189–196. doi: 10.1016/0926-6526(64)90034-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. REVEL J. P., HAY E. D. AN AUTORADIOGRAPHIC AND ELECTRON MICROSCOPIC STUDY OF COLLAGEN SYNTHESIS IN DIFFERENTIATING CARTILAGE. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1963 Oct 8;61:110–144. doi: 10.1007/BF00341524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. ROBBINS E., GONATAS N. K. THE ULTRASTRUCTURE OF A MAMMALIAN CELL DURING THE MITOTIC CYCLE. J Cell Biol. 1964 Jun;21:429–463. doi: 10.1083/jcb.21.3.429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. STEVENS L. C. EXPERIMENTAL PRODUCTION OF TESTICULAR TERATOMAS IN MICE. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1964 Sep;52:654–661. doi: 10.1073/pnas.52.3.654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. STOCKDALE F. E., HOLTZER H. DNA synthesis and myogenesis. Exp Cell Res. 1961 Sep;24:508–520. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(61)90450-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. TAKATA C., ALBRIGHT J. F., YAMADA T. LENS FIBER DIFFERENTIATION AND GAMMA CRYSTALLINS: IMMUNOFLUORESCENT STUDY OF WOLFFIAN REGENERATION. Science. 1965 Mar 12;147(3663):1299–1301. doi: 10.1126/science.147.3663.1299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. WEISS P. Perspectives in the field of morphogenesis. Q Rev Biol. 1950 Jun;25(2):177–198. doi: 10.1086/397540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. WESSELLS N. K. DNA SYNTHESIS, MITOSIS, AND DIFFERENTIATION IN PANCREATIC ACINAR CELLS IN VITRO. J Cell Biol. 1964 Mar;20:415–433. doi: 10.1083/jcb.20.3.415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. WHITTAKER J. R. CHANGES IN MELANOGENESIS DURING THE DEDIFFERENTIATION OF CHICK RETINAL PIGMENT CELLS IN CELL CULTURE. Dev Biol. 1963 Aug;8:99–127. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(63)90028-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES