Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1971 Sep 1;50(3):762–773. doi: 10.1083/jcb.50.3.762

SEROLOGICAL SIMILARITY OF FLAGELLAR AND MITOTIC MICROTUBULES

Chandler Fulton 1, R E Kane 1, R E Stephens 1
PMCID: PMC2108292  PMID: 4106543

Abstract

An antiserum to flagellar axonemes from sperm of Arbacia punctulata contains antibodies which react both with intact flagellar outer fibers and with purified tubulin from the outer fibers. Immunodiffusion tests indicate the presence of similar antigenic determinants on outer-fiber tubulins from sperm flagella of five species of sea urchins and a sand dollar, but not a starfish. The antibodies also react with extracts containing tubulins from different classes of microtubules, including central-pair fibers and both A- and B-subfibers from outer fibers of sperm flagella, an extract from unfertilized eggs, mitotic apparatuses from first cleavage embryos, and cilia from later embryos. Though most tubulins tested share similar antigenic determinants, some clear differences have been detected, even, in Pseudoboletia indiana, between the outer-fiber tubulins of sperm flagella and blastular cilia. Though tubulins are "actin-like" proteins, antitubulin serum does not react with actin from sea urchin lantern muscle. On the basis of these observations, we suggest that various echinoid microtubules are built of similar, but not identical, tubulins.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arnon R., Neurath H. An immunological approach to the study of evolution of trypsins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969 Dec;64(4):1323–1328. doi: 10.1073/pnas.64.4.1323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Asakura S., Eguchi G., Iino T. Unidirectional growth of Salmonella flagella in vitro. J Mol Biol. 1968 Jul 14;35(1):227–236. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(68)80050-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Auclair W., Siegel B. W. Cilia regeneration in the sea urchin embryo: evidence for a pool of ciliary proteins. Science. 1966 Nov 18;154(3751):913–915. doi: 10.1126/science.154.3751.913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Behnke O., Forer A. Evidence for four classes of microtubules in individual cells. J Cell Sci. 1967 Jun;2(2):169–192. doi: 10.1242/jcs.2.2.169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bibring T., Baxandall J. Immunochemical studies of 22S protein from isolated mitotic apparatus. J Cell Biol. 1969 May;41(2):577–590. doi: 10.1083/jcb.41.2.577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Borisy G. G., Taylor E. W. The mechanism of action of colchicine. Colchicine binding to sea urchin eggs and the mitotic apparatus. J Cell Biol. 1967 Aug;34(2):535–548. doi: 10.1083/jcb.34.2.535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. CARSTEN M. E., KATZ A. M. ACTIN: A COMPARATIVE STUDY. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1964 Sep 4;90:534–541. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(64)90232-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cohen W. D., Rebhun L. I. An estimate of the amount of microtubule protein in the isolated mitotic apparatus. J Cell Sci. 1970 Jan;6(1):159–176. doi: 10.1242/jcs.6.1.159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gibbons I. R. Chemical dissection of cilia. Arch Biol (Liege) 1965;76(2):317–352. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Grimstone A. V., Klug A. Observations on the substructure of flagellar fibres. J Cell Sci. 1966 Sep;1(3):351–362. doi: 10.1242/jcs.1.3.351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. HARRIS P. Some structural and functional aspects of the mitotic apparatus in sea urchin embryos. J Cell Biol. 1962 Sep;14:475–487. doi: 10.1083/jcb.14.3.475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Iwaikawa Y. Regeneration of cilia in the sea urchin embryo. Embryologia (Nagoya) 1967 Mar;9(4):287–294. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-169x.1967.tb00231.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. KANE R. E. THE MITOTIC APPARATUS. PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL FACTORS CONTROLLING STABILITY. J Cell Biol. 1965 Apr;25:SUPPL–SUPPL:144. doi: 10.1083/jcb.25.1.137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. KANE R. E. The mitotic apparatus: isolation by controlled pH. J Cell Biol. 1962 Jan;12:47–55. doi: 10.1083/jcb.12.1.47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kane R. E., Forer A. The mitotic apparatus. Structural changes after isolation. J Cell Biol. 1965 Jun;25(3 Suppl):31–39. doi: 10.1083/jcb.25.3.31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kane R. E. The mitotic apparatus. Identification of the major soluble component of the glycol-isolated mitotic apparatus. J Cell Biol. 1967 Feb;32(2):243–253. doi: 10.1083/jcb.32.2.243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Keckes S., Krajnović M. Some immunochemical characteristics of sea urchin gametes. Z Naturforsch B. 1967 Oct;22(10):1032–1034. doi: 10.1515/znb-1967-1010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kiefer B., Sakai H., Solari A. J., Mazia D. The molecular unit of the microtubules of the mitotic apparatus. J Mol Biol. 1966 Sep;20(1):75–79. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(66)90118-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mohri H. Amino-acid composition of "Tubulin" constituting microtubules of sperm flagella. Nature. 1968 Mar 16;217(5133):1053–1054. doi: 10.1038/2171053a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. OUCHTERLONY O. Diffusion-in-gel methods for immunological analysis. II. Prog Allergy. 1962;6:30–154. doi: 10.1159/000313795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Olmsted J. B., Carlson K., Klebe R., Ruddle F., Rosenbaum J. Isolation of microtubule protein from cultured mouse neuroblastoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1970 Jan;65(1):129–136. doi: 10.1073/pnas.65.1.129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. PERLMANN P. Soluble antigens in sea urchin gametes and developmental stages. Exp Cell Res. 1953 Dec;5(2):394–399. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(53)90223-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. PRINGLE B. H., WILSON M. W. Cross-reactions in the Ouchterlony plant: analysis of native and halogenated bovine serum albumins. J Immunol. 1956 Nov;77(5):324–331. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Shelanski M. L., Taylor E. W. Isolation of a protein subunit from microtubules. J Cell Biol. 1967 Aug;34(2):549–554. doi: 10.1083/jcb.34.2.549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Shelanski M. L., Taylor E. W. Properties of the protein subunit of central-pair and outer-doublet microtubules of sea urchin flagella. J Cell Biol. 1968 Aug;38(2):304–315. doi: 10.1083/jcb.38.2.304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Stephens R. E., Kane R. E. Some properties of hyalin: the calcium-insoluble protein of the hyaline layer of the sea urchin egg. J Cell Biol. 1970 Mar;44(3):611–617. doi: 10.1083/jcb.44.3.611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Stephens R. E., Linck R. W. Comparison of muscle actin and ciliary microtubule protein in the mollusk Pecten irradians. J Mol Biol. 1969 Mar 28;40(3):497–501. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(69)90168-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Stephens R. E. On the apparent homology of actin and tubulin. Science. 1970 May 15;168(3933):845–847. doi: 10.1126/science.168.3933.845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Stephens R. E. Reassociation of microtubule protein. J Mol Biol. 1968 Apr 28;33(2):517–519. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(68)90210-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Stephens R. E., Renaud F. L., Gibbons I. R., Stevens R. E. Guanine nucleotide associated with the protein of the outer fibers of flagella and cilia. Science. 1967 Jun 23;156(3782):1606–1608. doi: 10.1126/science.156.3782.1606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Stephens R. E. The mitotic apparatus. Physical chemical characterization of the 22S protein component and its subunits. J Cell Biol. 1967 Feb;32(2):255–275. doi: 10.1083/jcb.32.2.255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Tilney L. G., Gibbins J. R. Differential effects of antimitotic agents on the stability and behavior of cytoplasmic and ciliary microtubules. Protoplasma. 1968;65(1):167–179. doi: 10.1007/BF01666377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. WENT H. A. Studies on the mitotic apparatus of the sea urchin by means of antigen-antibody reactions in agar. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1959 Dec;6:447–455. doi: 10.1083/jcb.6.3.447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. WILSON M. W., PRINGLE B. H. Interpretation of the Ouchterlony precipitin test. J Immunol. 1955 Dec;75(6):460–469. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Weisenberg R. C., Borisy G. G., Taylor E. W. The colchicine-binding protein of mammalian brain and its relation to microtubules. Biochemistry. 1968 Dec;7(12):4466–4479. doi: 10.1021/bi00852a043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES