Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1976 Apr 1;69(1):144–158. doi: 10.1083/jcb.69.1.144

Quantitation of junctional and extrajunctional acetylcholine receptors by electron microscope autoradiography after (125)I-α-bungarotoxin binding at mouse neuromuscular junctions

HC Fertuck, MM Salpeter
PMCID: PMC2110977  PMID: 1254640

Abstract

The distribution and quantitation of (125)I-α-bungarotoxin (α- BTX) binding sites and thus acetylcholine receptor (AChR) were determined in mouse sternomastoid muscle by electron microscope autoradiography. We found that a valid criterion for receptor saturation at the neuromuscular junction was the complete elimination of neurally evoked tetantic muscle contractions, since, when such a criterion was used for the endpoint of toxin incubation, α-BTX was bound to approximately 90 percent of total available endplate sites. When, without implying localization, the presynaptic axonal membrane was used as a convenient reference structure, the concentration of α-BTX relative to this membrane was determined to be 46,000 +/- 27 percent sites/μm(2). By testing various hypothetical models the distribution of developed grains was found to be consistent with the hypothesis that the main acetylcholine-receptive surface coincides with the electron-dense, thickened portion of the junctional fold membrane situated at the juxtaneuronal region of the folds and dipping approximately 2,200 A be approximately 30,500 +/- 27 percent sites/μm(2) of this postsynaptic dense membrane. There was a sharp gradient in α-BTX binding extrajunctionally, with the concentration decreasing to approximately 4 percent of the subsynaptic value within 1μm from the edge of an axonal terminal (bouton) to <1 percent within 3μm and to <0.2 percent beyond 7 μm from that terminal. Below 4,000 A (i.e. half-way from the top of the junctional folds) the concentration of α-BTX was also about 3 percent of the peak subsynaptic value. The binding density at the bottom of the junctional folds is this comparable to extrajunctional sarcolemma at equal distance from a nerve terminal. The molecular organization at the neuromuscular junction relative to its function is discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AUGUSTINSSON K. B. Substrate concentration and specificity of choline ester-splitting enzymes. Arch Biochem. 1949 Aug;23(1):111–126. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Albuquerque E. X., Barnard E. A., Porter C. W., Warnick J. E. The density of acetylcholine receptors and their sensitivity in the postsynaptic membrane of muscle endplates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Jul;71(7):2818–2822. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.7.2818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BIRKS R., HUXLEY H. E., KATZ B. The fine structure of the neuromuscular junction of the frog. J Physiol. 1960 Jan;150:134–144. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barnard E. A., Wieckowski J., Chiu T. H. Cholinergic receptor molecules and cholinesterase molecules at mouse skeletal muscle junctions. Nature. 1971 Nov 26;234(5326):207–209. doi: 10.1038/234207a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Birks R. I. The fine structure of motor nerve endings at frog myoneural junctions. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1966 Jan 26;135(1):8–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1966.tb45458.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bourgeois J. -P., Ryter A., Menez A., Fromageot P., Boquet P., Changeux J. -P. Localization of the cholinergic receptor protein in Electrophorus electroplax by high resolution autoradiography. FEBS Lett. 1972 Sep 1;25(1):127–133. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(72)80469-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bourgeois J. P., Popot J. L., Ryter A., Changeux J. P. Consequences of denervation on the distribution of the cholinergic (nicotinic) receptor sites from Electrophorus electricus revealed by high resolution autoradiography. Brain Res. 1973 Nov 23;62(2):557–563. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(73)90722-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. CHANG C. C., LEE C. Y. ISOLATION OF NEUROTOXINS FROM THE VENOM OF BUNGARUS MULTICINCTUS AND THEIR MODES OF NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKING ACTION. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1963 Jul 1;144:241–257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ceccarelli B., Hurlbut W. P., Mauro A. Depletion of vesicles from frog neuromuscular junctions by prolonged tetanic stimulation. J Cell Biol. 1972 Jul;54(1):30–38. doi: 10.1083/jcb.54.1.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ceccarelli B., Hurlbut W. P., Mauro A. Turnover of transmitter and synaptic vesicles at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Cell Biol. 1973 May;57(2):499–524. doi: 10.1083/jcb.57.2.499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. David G. S. Solid state lactoperoxidase: a highly stable enzyme for simple, gentle iodination of proteins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1972 Jul 25;48(2):464–471. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(72)80074-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dreyer F., Peper K., Akert K., Sandri C., Moor H. Ultrastructure of the "active zone" in the frog neuromuscular junction. Brain Res. 1973 Nov 23;62(2):373–380. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(73)90699-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Eldefrawi M. E., Fertuck H. C. A rapid method for the preparation of (125I)alpha-bungarotoxin. Anal Biochem. 1974 Mar;58(1):63–70. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(74)90441-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fambrough D. M., Hartzell H. C. Acetylcholine receptors: number and distribution at neuromuscular junctions in rat diaphragm. Science. 1972 Apr 14;176(4031):189–191. doi: 10.1126/science.176.4031.189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fertuck H. C., Salpeter M. M. Localization of acetylcholine receptor by 125I-labeled alpha-bungarotoxin binding at mouse motor endplates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Apr;71(4):1376–1378. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.4.1376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fertuck H. C., Salpeter M. M. Sensitivity in electron microscope autoradiography for 125I. J Histochem Cytochem. 1974 Feb;22(2):80–87. doi: 10.1177/22.2.80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fertuck H. C., Woodward W., Salpeter M. M. In vivo recovery of muscle contraction after alpha-bungarotoxin binding. J Cell Biol. 1975 Jul;66(1):209–213. doi: 10.1083/jcb.66.1.209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Heuser J. E., Reese T. S., Landis D. M. Functional changes in frog neuromuscular junctions studied with freeze-fracture. J Neurocytol. 1974 Mar;3(1):109–131. doi: 10.1007/BF01111936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kuffler S. W., Yoshikami D. The distribution of acetylcholine sensitivity at the post-synaptic membrane of vertebrate skeletal twitch muscles: iontophoretic mapping in the micron range. J Physiol. 1975 Jan;244(3):703–730. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Miledi R., Potter L. T. Acetylcholine receptors in muscle fibres. Nature. 1971 Oct 29;233(5322):599–603. doi: 10.1038/233599a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Peper K., Dreyer F., Sandri C., Akert K., Moor H. Structure and ultrastructure of the frog motor endplate. A freeze-etching study. Cell Tissue Res. 1974 Jun 24;149(4):437–455. doi: 10.1007/BF00223024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Porter C. W., Barnard E. A., Chiu T. H. The ultrastructural localization and quantitation of cholinergic receptors at the mouse motor endplate. J Membr Biol. 1973;14(4):383–402. doi: 10.1007/BF01868086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Porter C. W., Barnard E. A. The density of cholinergic receptors at the endplate postsynaptic membrane: ultrastructural studies in two mammalian species. J Membr Biol. 1975;20(1-2):31–49. doi: 10.1007/BF01870626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Porter C. W., Chiu T. H., Wieckowski J., Barnard E. A. Types and locations of cholinergic receptor-like molecules in muscle fibres. Nat New Biol. 1973 Jan 3;241(105):3–7. doi: 10.1038/newbio241003a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Potter L. T. Synthesis, storage and release of [14C]acetylcholine in isolated rat diaphragm muscles. J Physiol. 1970 Jan;206(1):145–166. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. REGER J. F. Electron microscopy of the motor end-plate in rat intercostal muscle. Anat Rec. 1955 May;122(1):1–15. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091220102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. ROBERTSON J. D. The ultrastructure of a reptilian myoneural junction. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1956 Jul 25;2(4):381–394. doi: 10.1083/jcb.2.4.381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rash J. E., Ellisman M. H. Studies of excitable membranes. I. Macromolecular specializations of the neuromuscular junction and the nonjunctional sarcolemma. J Cell Biol. 1974 Nov;63(2 Pt 1):567–586. doi: 10.1083/jcb.63.2.567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Rosenbluth J. Substructure of amphibian motor end plate. Evidence for a granular component projecting from the outer surface of the receptive membrane. J Cell Biol. 1974 Sep;62(3):755–766. doi: 10.1083/jcb.62.3.755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. SALPETER M. M., BACHMANN L. AUTORADIOGRAPHY WITH THE ELECTRON MICROSCOPE. A PROCEDURE FOR IMPROVING RESOLUTION, SENSITIVITY, AND CONTRAST. J Cell Biol. 1964 Aug;22:469–477. doi: 10.1083/jcb.22.2.469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Salpeter M. M., Elderfrawi M. E. Sizes of end plate compartments, densities of acetylcholine receptor and other quantitative aspects of neuromuscular transmission. J Histochem Cytochem. 1973 Sep;21(9):769–778. doi: 10.1177/21.9.769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Salpeter M. M. Electron microscope radioautography as a quantitative tool in enzyme cytochemistry. I. The distribution of acetylcholinesterase at motor end plates of a vertebrate twitch muscle. J Cell Biol. 1967 Feb;32(2):379–389. doi: 10.1083/jcb.32.2.379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Salpeter M. M. Electron microscope radioautography as a quantitative tool in enzyme cytochemistry. II. The distribution of DFP-reactive sties at motor endplates of a vertebrate twitch muscle. J Cell Biol. 1969 Jul;42(1):122–134. doi: 10.1083/jcb.42.1.122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Salpeter M. M., McHenry F. A., Feng H. H. Myoneural junctions in the extraocular muscles of the mouse. Anat Rec. 1974 Jun;179(2):201–224. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091790205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Salpeter M. M., Plattner H., Rogers A. W. Quantitative assay of esterases in end plates of mouse diaphragm by electron microscope autoradiography. J Histochem Cytochem. 1972 Dec;20(12):1059–1068. doi: 10.1177/20.12.1059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES