Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1987 Nov 1;105(5):2359–2372. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.5.2359

Expression sequences and distribution of two primary cell adhesion molecules during embryonic development of Xenopus laevis

PMCID: PMC2114832  PMID: 3680386

Abstract

Studies of chicken embryos have demonstrated that cell adhesion molecules are important in embryonic induction and are expressed in defined sequences during embryogenesis and histogenesis. To extend these observations and to provide comparable evidence for heterochronic changes in such sequences during evolution, the local distributions of the neural cell adhesion molecule (N-CAM) and of the liver cell adhesion molecule (L-CAM) were examined in Xenopus laevis embryos by immunohistochemical and biochemical techniques. Because of the technical difficulties presented by the existence of multiple polypeptide forms of CAMs and by autofluorescence of yolk-containing cells, special care was taken in choosing and characterizing antibodies, fluorophores, and embedding procedures. Both N-CAM and L- CAM were found at low levels in pregastrulation embryos. During gastrulation, N-CAM levels increased in the presumptive neural epithelium and decreased in the endoderm, but L-CAM continued to be expressed in all cells including endodermal cells. During neurulation, the level of N-CAM expression in the neural ectoderm increased considerably, while remaining constant in non-neural ectoderm and diminishing in the somites; in the notochord, N-CAM was expressed transiently. Prevalence modulation was also seen at all sites of secondary induction: both CAMs increased in the sensory layer of the ectoderm during condensation of the placodes. During organogenesis, the expression of L-CAM gradually diminished in the nervous system while N- CAM expression remained high. In all other organs examined, the amount of one or the other CAM decreased, so that by stage 50 these two molecules were expressed in non-overlapping territories. Embryonic and adult tissues were compared to search for concordance of CAM expression at later stages. With few exceptions, the tissue distributions of N-CAM and L-CAM were similar in the frog and in the chicken from early times of development. In contrast to previous observations in the chicken and in the mouse, N-CAM expression was found to be high in the adult liver of Xenopus, whereas L-CAM expression was low. In the adult brain, N-CAM was expressed as three components of apparent molecular mass 180, 140, and 120 kD, respectively; in earlier stages of development only the 140- kD component could be detected. In the liver, a single N-CAM band appears at 160 kD, raising the possibility that this band represents an unusual N-CAM polypeptide. L-CAM appeared at all stages as a 124-kD molecule.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (4.8 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Balak K., Jacobson M., Sunshine J., Rutishauser U. Neural cell adhesion molecule expression in Xenopus embryos. Dev Biol. 1987 Feb;119(2):540–550. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(87)90057-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bertolotti R., Rutishauser U., Edelman G. M. A cell surface molecule involved in aggregation of embryonic liver cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Aug;77(8):4831–4835. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.8.4831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chuong C. M., Edelman G. M. Expression of cell-adhesion molecules in embryonic induction. I. Morphogenesis of nestling feathers. J Cell Biol. 1985 Sep;101(3):1009–1026. doi: 10.1083/jcb.101.3.1009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chuong C. M., Edelman G. M. Expression of cell-adhesion molecules in embryonic induction. II. Morphogenesis of adult feathers. J Cell Biol. 1985 Sep;101(3):1027–1043. doi: 10.1083/jcb.101.3.1027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Crossin K. L., Chuong C. M., Edelman G. M. Expression sequences of cell adhesion molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Oct;82(20):6942–6946. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.20.6942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cunningham B. A., Hemperly J. J., Murray B. A., Prediger E. A., Brackenbury R., Edelman G. M. Neural cell adhesion molecule: structure, immunoglobulin-like domains, cell surface modulation, and alternative RNA splicing. Science. 1987 May 15;236(4803):799–806. doi: 10.1126/science.3576199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cunningham B. A., Hoffman S., Rutishauser U., Hemperly J. J., Edelman G. M. Molecular topography of the neural cell adhesion molecule N-CAM: surface orientation and location of sialic acid-rich and binding regions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 May;80(10):3116–3120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.10.3116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. D'Eustachio P., Owens G. C., Edelman G. M., Cunningham B. A. Chromosomal location of the gene encoding the neural cell adhesion molecule (N-CAM) in the mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Nov;82(22):7631–7635. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.22.7631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Edelman G. M. Cell adhesion and morphogenesis: the regulator hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Mar;81(5):1460–1464. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.5.1460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Edelman G. M. Cell adhesion molecules in the regulation of animal form and tissue pattern. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1986;2:81–116. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.02.110186.000501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Edelman G. M., Gallin W. J., Delouvée A., Cunningham B. A., Thiery J. P. Early epochal maps of two different cell adhesion molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Jul;80(14):4384–4388. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.14.4384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fraser S. E., Murray B. A., Chuong C. M., Edelman G. M. Alteration of the retinotectal map in Xenopus by antibodies to neural cell adhesion molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Jul;81(13):4222–4226. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.13.4222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gallin W. J., Chuong C. M., Finkel L. H., Edelman G. M. Antibodies to liver cell adhesion molecule perturb inductive interactions and alter feather pattern and structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Nov;83(21):8235–8239. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.21.8235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gallin W. J., Edelman G. M., Cunningham B. A. Characterization of L-CAM, a major cell adhesion molecule from embryonic liver cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Feb;80(4):1038–1042. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.4.1038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gallin W. J., Sorkin B. C., Edelman G. M., Cunningham B. A. Sequence analysis of a cDNA clone encoding the liver cell adhesion molecule, L-CAM. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 May;84(9):2808–2812. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.9.2808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gurdon J. B., Partington G. A., De Robertis E. M. Injected nuclei in frog oocytes:RNA synthesis and protein exchange. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1976 Dec;36(3):541–553. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hemperly J. J., Edelman G. M., Cunningham B. A. cDNA clones of the neural cell adhesion molecule (N-CAM) lacking a membrane-spanning region consistent with evidence for membrane attachment via a phosphatidylinositol intermediate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Dec;83(24):9822–9826. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.24.9822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hemperly J. J., Murray B. A., Edelman G. M., Cunningham B. A. Sequence of a cDNA clone encoding the polysialic acid-rich and cytoplasmic domains of the neural cell adhesion molecule N-CAM. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 May;83(9):3037–3041. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.9.3037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hoffman S., Chuong C. M., Edelman G. M. Evolutionary conservation of key structures and binding functions of neural cell adhesion molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Nov;81(21):6881–6885. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.21.6881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hoffman S., Edelman G. M. Kinetics of homophilic binding by embryonic and adult forms of the neural cell adhesion molecule. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Sep;80(18):5762–5766. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.18.5762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hoffman S., Sorkin B. C., White P. C., Brackenbury R., Mailhammer R., Rutishauser U., Cunningham B. A., Edelman G. M. Chemical characterization of a neural cell adhesion molecule purified from embryonic brain membranes. J Biol Chem. 1982 Jul 10;257(13):7720–7729. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jacobson M., Rutishauser U. Induction of neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) in Xenopus embryos. Dev Biol. 1986 Aug;116(2):524–531. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(86)90153-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Keller R. E., Danilchik M., Gimlich R., Shih J. The function and mechanism of convergent extension during gastrulation of Xenopus laevis. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1985 Nov;89 (Suppl):185–209. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Keller R. E. Vital dye mapping of the gastrula and neurula of Xenopus laevis. I. Prospective areas and morphogenetic movements of the superficial layer. Dev Biol. 1975 Feb;42(2):222–241. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(75)90331-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Keller R. E. Vital dye mapping of the gastrula and neurula of Xenopus laevis. II. Prospective areas and morphogenetic movements of the deep layer. Dev Biol. 1976 Jul 1;51(1):118–137. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(76)90127-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kintner C. R., Melton D. A. Expression of Xenopus N-CAM RNA in ectoderm is an early response to neural induction. Development. 1987 Mar;99(3):311–325. doi: 10.1242/dev.99.3.311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Murray B. A., Hemperly J. J., Prediger E. A., Edelman G. M., Cunningham B. A. Alternatively spliced mRNAs code for different polypeptide chains of the chicken neural cell adhesion molecule (N-CAM). J Cell Biol. 1986 Jan;102(1):189–193. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.1.189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Murray B. A., Owens G. C., Prediger E. A., Crossin K. L., Cunningham B. A., Edelman G. M. Cell surface modulation of the neural cell adhesion molecule resulting from alternative mRNA splicing in a tissue-specific developmental sequence. J Cell Biol. 1986 Oct;103(4):1431–1439. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.4.1431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Newport J., Kirschner M. A major developmental transition in early Xenopus embryos: II. Control of the onset of transcription. Cell. 1982 Oct;30(3):687–696. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90273-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Owens G. C., Edelman G. M., Cunningham B. A. Organization of the neural cell adhesion molecule (N-CAM) gene: alternative exon usage as the basis for different membrane-associated domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Jan;84(1):294–298. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.1.294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Peyriéras N., Hyafil F., Louvard D., Ploegh H. L., Jacob F. Uvomorulin: a nonintegral membrane protein of early mouse embryo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Oct;80(20):6274–6277. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.20.6274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Richardson G. P., Crossin K. L., Chuong C. M., Edelman G. M. Expression of cell adhesion molecules during embryonic induction. III. Development of the otic placode. Dev Biol. 1987 Jan;119(1):217–230. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(87)90223-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Shirayoshi Y., Hatta K., Hosoda M., Tsunasawa S., Sakiyama F., Takeichi M. Cadherin cell adhesion molecules with distinct binding specificities share a common structure. EMBO J. 1986 Oct;5(10):2485–2488. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04525.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Shirayoshi Y., Okada T. S., Takeichi M. The calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion system regulates inner cell mass formation and cell surface polarization in early mouse development. Cell. 1983 Dec;35(3 Pt 2):631–638. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90095-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Thiery J. P., Delouvée A., Gallin W. J., Cunningham B. A., Edelman G. M. Ontogenetic expression of cell adhesion molecules: L-CAM is found in epithelia derived from the three primary germ layers. Dev Biol. 1984 Mar;102(1):61–78. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(84)90175-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Thiery J. P., Duband J. L., Rutishauser U., Edelman G. M. Cell adhesion molecules in early chicken embryogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Nov;79(21):6737–6741. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.21.6737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Towbin H., Staehelin T., Gordon J. Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Sep;76(9):4350–4354. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.9.4350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES