Abstract
The production of gamma interferon (IFN-γ) is a key step in the protective innate immune response to Francisella tularensis. Natural killer cells and T cells in the liver are important sources of this cytokine during primary F. tularensis infections, and interleukin-12 (IL-12) appears to be an essential coactivating cytokine for hepatic IFN-γ expression. The present study was undertaken to determine whether or not macrophages (Mφ) or dendritic cells (DC) provide coactivating signals for the liver IFN-γ response in vitro, whether IL-12 mediates these effects, and whether Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling is essential to induce this costimulatory activity. Both bone marrow-derived Mφ and DC significantly augmented the IFN-γ response of F. tularensis-challenged liver lymphocytes in vitro. While both cell types produced IL-12p40 in response to F. tularensis challenge, only DC secreted large quantities of IL-12p70. DC from both IL-12p35-deficient and TLR2-deficient mice failed to produce IL-12p70 and did not costimulate liver lymphocytes for IFN-γ production in response to viable F. tularensis organisms. Conversely, liver lymphocytes from TLR2-deficient mice cocultured with wild-type accessory cells produced IFN-γ at levels comparable to those for wild-type hepatic lymphocytes. These findings indicate that TLR2 controls hepatic lymphocyte IFN-γ responses to F. tularensis by regulating DC IL-12 production. While Mφ also coinduced hepatic IFN-γ production in response to F. tularensis, they did so in a fashion less dependent on TLR2.
Francisella tularensis is a highly infectious, gram-negative, facultative intracellular bacterium and the etiological agent of tularemia. Transmission of this zoonotic infection to human beings can occur through insect bites (ticks, flies, and mosquitoes), cutaneous contact with infected animal carcasses, ingestion of contaminated food and water, or inhalation of aerosolized viable organisms (21, 32). Over 50 years ago, an attenuated live vaccine strain (LVS) of the bacterium was developed by serial passage of a type B F. tularensis (subsp. holarctica) strain (18, 35), but the vaccine is no longer licensed for general use. Despite being attenuated for humans, the LVS strain is virulent in mice and causes pneumonia and systemic disease in mice that closely resembles that seen in human tularemia (2, 19). For this reason, infection of mice with F. tularensis LVS has been the preferred animal model for characterizing the pathophysiological processes that accompany infection and identifying correlates of protective immunity to the pathogen (19). Regardless of the route of infection in mice, F. tularensis LVS establishes secondary infections in the liver, lungs, and spleen, where the organism appears to infect and replicate within macrophages (Mφ), hepatocytes, dendritic cells (DC), and type II lung epithelial cells (3, 5, 12, 14, 24). In immunologically naïve and immune mice, several mediators of immune protection against F. tularensis LVS have been consistently identified in various infection models. In particular, the production of the Th1 cytokines interleukin-12 (IL-12), gamma interferon (IFN-γ), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) appears to be important for limiting the growth of the organism and resolving infections (2, 6, 11, 13, 15, 20, 22, 27).
Pattern recognition is a common feature of innate immunity to microbial pathogens. Among the known cell surface pattern recognition receptors, members of the Toll-like receptor (TLR) family play a central role in sensing the presence of infectious pathogens. Individual TLR family members vary, not only in their cellular distribution and ligand specificity but also in the nature of the intracellular signaling pathways they use to activate transcription of specific subsets of host genes (37). An important adapter protein, MyD88, mediates intracellular signaling by many of the TLRs and is indispensable for initiating protective innate immune responses in mice following primary intradermal challenge with F. tularensis LVS (11, 26, 28, 31). There is less certainty about which specific TLRs play essential roles in the recognition of F. tularensis LVS in the mouse. The lipopolysaccharides of F. tularensis LVS and other F. tularensis subspecies show relatively weak endotoxic activity (1, 16, 23, 33) and fail to act as either TLR agonists or antagonists (1, 16, 23). Altered receptor binding probably explains the relatively minor role TLR4 plays in initiating inflammatory responses to a number of F. tularensis stains (7, 8, 11, 26, 28). Indeed, most investigators now agree that TLR4-mediated signaling is not a major pathway for inducing immune and inflammatory responses to F. tularensis LVS.
Increasing evidence suggests that TLR2 is involved in the recognition of F. tularensis LVS by cells of the mouse innate immune system. TLR2 appears to mediate the induction of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, Mφ inflammatory protein 1α, and Mφ inflammatory protein 2 by mouse bone marrow-derived Mφ and DC that have been challenged with F. tularensis LVS in vitro (26, 28, 31), and peritoneal Mφ from TLR2-deficient mice are unresponsive to F. tularensis LVS compared to wild-type Mφ (10). Increased expression of costimulatory molecules on mouse DC after exposure to F. tularensis LVS also appears to be TLR2 dependent (26). Despite these observations, the role of TLR2 in determining the overall course of infection is less clear. Malik et al. (31) reported that TLR2-deficient mice showed impaired bacterial clearance from their livers, lungs, and spleens after intranasal challenge with a sublethal dose of F. tularensis LVS and succumbed to a 10-fold lower challenge dose than wild-type mice. By contrast, Collazo et al. (11) reported that TLR2-deficient mice were no more susceptible than wild-type mice to intradermal challenge with F. tularensis LVS, even though MyD88-deficient mice were extremely susceptible to intradermal infection with the pathogen. Thus, the role of individual TLR in initiating essential responses to F. tularensis LVS may vary depending on the route of infection and the nature of host cells mediating protective immune responses at a particular site.
The mouse liver is consistently colonized with F. tularensis LVS regardless of the route of infection and is the dominant site for many of the innate immune responses to the pathogen (9). For these reasons, we have recently begun a systematic study of hepatic innate immunity to F. tularensis LVS in mice. Large numbers of hepatic natural killer (NK) cells are activated for IFN-γ expression during infection with F. tularensis LVS by the intraperitoneal route, and hepatic mononuclear cells (HMC) produce IFN-γ in response to F. tularensis LVS challenge in vitro (38). The IFN-γ response that is elicited in lymphocyte cultures is mediated, in large part, by NK cells. This response requires the production of IL-12, as evidenced by the inability of HMC from IL-12p35-deficient mice to produce IFN-γ following challenge with F. tularensis LVS (38).
The present study was designed to address several features of the hepatic lymphocyte IFN-γ response to F. tularensis LVS. First, we wished to know to what extent Mφ or DC could provide coactivating signals for liver lymphocyte IFN-γ responses to the pathogen and whether IL-12 mediated the effects of either of these accessory cell populations. Second, we asked whether or not TLR2 mediates the recognition of F. tularensis LVS in this context and in which cell type the receptor functions. The results of this study suggest that TLR2 plays an essential role in the recognition of F. tularensis LVS by DC and regulates the production of IFN-γ in the liver by controlling IL-12 and IL-18 production.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Reagents.
Recombinant mouse IL-12 and granulocyte-Mφ colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) were purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Recombinant mouse IL-18 was from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). Neutralizing rat anti-mouse IL-12p40/p70 was obtained from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA), and rat anti-mouse IL-18 was purchased from MBL International (Woburn, MA). Normal rat immunoglobulin G2a kappa (BD Biosciences) was used as a negative control for the antibody neutralization studies. Paired OptEIA antibody sets and cytokine standards for the detection of mouse IFN-γ, IL-12p40, and IL-12p70 were purchased from BD Biosciences. The paired antibodies for measuring IL-18 were from MBL International.
Mice.
Six-week-old female C57BL/6J (B6) mice purchased from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME) were used from 7 to 12 weeks of age throughout this study. Immunodeficient mutants on the B6 background (Jackson Laboratories) included the IL-12p35-deficient B6.129-IL12atm1Jm/J and the TLR2-deficient B6.129-Tlr2tmiKir/J strains. All mice were maintained on a 12-h-light, 12-h-dark cycle with food and water ad libitum. Animal care and use protocols were approved by the University of Kansas Medical Center Animal Care and Use Committee.
Bacteria.
The LVS of F. tularensis subsp. holarctica (referred to here as F. tularensis LVS) was obtained from Jeannine Petersen (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Ft. Collins, CO) and grown in supplemented Mueller-Hinton broth as previously described (38). Frozen aliquots were stored at −70°C, thawed rapidly prior to use, washed once in Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline, and resuspended in antibiotic-free RPMI medium containing 2 mM l-glutamine and 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS). Multiplicities of infection (MOI) were determined by serial dilution of bacterial suspensions and inoculation onto chocolate agar plates.
Bone marrow-derived Mφ and DC.
Mouse bone marrow-derived Mφ and DC were prepared by slight modifications of previously published techniques (30, 38). To prepare Mφ, bone marrow cells were flushed from the femurs of wild-type or mutant mice, counted, and grown in 75-cm2 tissue culture flasks in Mφ growth medium (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, 3.7 g/liter NaHC03, 10 mM HEPES, 7% L-cell-conditioned medium, 10% FBS, penicillin, and streptomycin). The cells were grown for 12 days in an atmosphere of 10% CO2, with the Mφ growth medium being replaced after 7 days. Over 95% of the resulting Mφ expressed F4/80, as determined by flow cytometry. The adherent Mφ were dislodged from the flasks by treatment with 0.25% trypsin-EDTA for 5 min, resuspended in Mφ growth medium, and transferred to 96-well plates. After overnight incubation to allow attachment of the cells, Mφ growth medium was replaced with antibiotic-free complete tissue culture medium (RPMI 1640, 10 mM HEPES, 10% FBS), and the cultures were transferred to an atmosphere of 5% CO2. Some cultures then also received HMC and F. tularensis LVS, while other Mφ cultures were challenged directly with bacteria.
For the preparation of DC, bone marrow cells were grown in DC medium (RPMI 1640, 10 mM HEPES, 10% FBS, 10 μM 2-mercaptoethanol, 20 ng/ml GM-CSF, penicillin, and streptomycin) in 60-mm-diameter bacteriological dishes in an atmosphere of 5% CO2. After the initial 2 days of culture, an equal volume of fresh DC medium was added. On days 4, 6, and 8, most of the medium was removed from each culture and centrifuged at 300 × g for 8 min. The cell pellet was then resuspended in fresh DC medium, and the cells were returned to their original dishes. On day 10, the nonadherent DC were again removed, washed, resuspended in fresh DC medium containing 10 ng of GM-CSF per ml, and returned to their original dishes. Incubation was continued for an additional 2 days. The resulting nonadherent DC were 75 to 95% CD11c+ B220−, as determined by flow cytometry. Nonadherent DC were washed once to remove DC medium and resuspended in antibiotic-free complete tissue culture medium prior to their addition to 96-well plates on the morning of the experiment. The plates were then incubated at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2.
Lymphocyte and accessory cell cultures.
HMC were prepared as previously described (38), by digesting mouse livers with a mixture of Liberase (Roche, Indianapolis, IN) and DNase and centrifuging the resulting cell suspension through 28% Percoll (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ). The erythrocytes that passed through the Percoll were lysed with ACK lysis buffer (Cambrex, Walkersville, MD). The washed HMC preparation contained lymphocytes, Mφ, DC, and an occasional hepatocyte and was resuspended in antibiotic-free complete tissue culture medium. The cells were then plated at a concentration of 200,000 cells per well in flat-bottom 96-well tissue culture plates and incubated at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2. To assess the ability of accessory cells to coactivate HMC for IFN-γ production, the HMC were added to wells that already contained bone marrow-derived Mφ or DC. To assess their ability to produce IL-12, cultures of Mφ or DC were challenged with bacteria in the absence of HMC.
Thawed aliquots of F. tularensis LVS were washed in phosphate-buffered saline and resuspended in antibiotic-free medium. They were then added to HMC, Mφ, or DC cultures in the absence of antibiotics. After 2 h of incubation, gentamicin (50 μg/ml) was added to the cultures and incubation was continued without removal of the bacteria for an additional 22 h. In control experiments, comparable IFN-γ responses were observed when HMC cultures were instead stimulated with gentamicin-treated F. tularensis LVS or when no antibiotic was added to cultures challenged with live bacteria.
In experiments in which neutralizing anti-cytokine antibodies were tested, these antibodies were added immediately prior to the addition of the bacteria. By contrast, coactivating cytokines were added at the end of the initial 2-h challenge period with F. tularensis LVS. Culture supernatant fluids were collected 24 h later and stored at −70°C until assayed.
Cytokine immunoassays.
Paired antibody sets and standards (BD Pharmingen) were used in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) to detect IFN-γ, IL-12p40, IL-12p70, and IL-18 in culture fluids. Absorbance was measured using a Biotek EL340 plate reader, and means and standard deviations for triplicate samples were calculated from concentrations extrapolated from standard curves by DeltaSOFT II software. The limit of detection of each ELISA was approximately 5 pg/ml. According to the manufacturer, the assay for IL-12p40 detected all cytokines containing the p40 subunit, whereas the IL-12p70 assay was specific only for the p35p40 IL-12 heterodimer. The ELISA for IL-12p70 did not show a reaction with the IL-12p40 standard from the p40 ELISA kit. Likewise, cells from p35-deficient mice produced cytokines detectable by the IL-12p40 but not the IL-12p70 ELISA.
Statistical analysis.
Each experiment was performed three times, and the most representative results are shown. Values shown are means and standard deviations. Analysis of variance (P < 0.05) was used to examine the differences between groups for all figures. For Fig. 8A, the comparison of responses in the presence of 30,000 cells was conducted by the two-sample t test.
FIG. 8.
TLR2-dependent coactivation of HMC for the IFN-γ response to F. tularensis LVS. (A) Wild-type, p35-deficient, or TLR2-deficient Mφ and DC were cultured with p35-deficient HMC and stimulated with F. tularensis LVS. The responses observed in the presence of the each population of mutant accessory cells were significantly less than those induced by wild-type accessory cells (P < 0.05). The IFN-γ response in the presence of 30,000 TLR2-deficient Mφ was significantly greater (P < 0.05) than that of cultures without additional accessory cells or cultures containing 30,000 IL-12p35-deficient Mφ. (B) In a separate experiment, HMC from p35-deficient mice were cocultured with 30,000 DC from p35-deficient, TLR2-deficient, or wild-type DC and stimulated with F. tularensis LVS. An additional set of identical cultures also received recombinant IL-12 at a concentration of 20 pg per ml. IFN-γ responses in the presence of the mutant DC plus IL-12 were significantly greater than those in the presence of the mutant DC alone.
RESULTS
HMC responses to F. tularensis LVS are augmented by Mφ and DC.
Mononuclear cells prepared from the livers of naïve B6 mice produced IFN-γ in vitro when challenged with F. tularensis LVS organisms, and these responses were augmented by the addition of low concentrations (<10 pg/ml) of recombinant mouse IL-12 (Fig. 1A). In a similar fashion, both bone marrow-derived Mφ and DC provided coactivating signals for the IFN-γ response to this pathogen. Significant augmentation was seen when as few as 10,000 Mφ or DC were added to cultures containing 200,000 HMC. Both accessory cell populations decreased the number of bacteria that were necessary to activate HMC for IFN-γ production and increased the magnitude of the response (Fig. 1B). These properties are typical of coactivating cytokines, such as IL-12 and IL-18 (38).
FIG. 1.
(A) Mφ and DC coactivate HMC for IFN-γ responses to F. tularensis LVS. HMC (200,000 per well) were added to cultures containing the indicated numbers of bone marrow-derived Mφ or DC, and the cultures were challenged with F. tularensis LVS (MOI = 80). Recombinant IL-12 was added to control cultures at the time of addition of gentamicin. In the absence of bacteria, the HMC produced 49 pg IFN-γ per ml. IFN-γ was not produced in cultures containing F. tularensis LVS-challenged Mφ or DC in the absence of HMC. Responses in the presence of at least 10,000 accessory cells or 3 pg of recombinant IL-12 (rIL-12) per ml were significantly greater than responses in the absence of coactivating signals (P < 0.05). (B) Mφ and DC decrease the number of bacteria necessary to induce optimum IFN-γ responses to F. tularensis LVS. At MOI of >20, the responses in the presence of Mφ or DC (30,000 per well) were significantly greater than those of HMC cultures in the absence of accessory cells (P < 0.05).
IL-12 mediates the coactivating properties of Mφ and DC.
To determine whether IL-12 or related cytokines played an essential role in the induction of IFN-γ by Mφ or DC, anti-IL-12 was added prior to challenging the cultures with F. tularensis LVS. As shown in Fig. 2, anti-IL-12 inhibited the production of IFN-γ by hepatic lymphocytes supplemented with bone marrow-derived Mφ or DC, suggesting that IL-12 mediated the coactivating functions of these two accessory cell populations. In support of this finding, DC derived from p35-deficient mice showed a marked decrease in their ability to coactivate HMC for high-level IFN-γ production (Fig. 3), whereas p35-deficient Mφ were indistinguishable from wild-type Mφ in this regard. Differences between DC and Mφ were also observed when their production of individual IL-12 subunits was measured (Fig. 4). Both unstimulated Mφ and DC constitutively produced relatively high levels of the IL-12p40 subunit, and this activity was increased following challenge with F. tularensis LVS (P < 0.05). By contrast, DC produced considerably higher levels of the IL-12p70 heterodimer than did Mφ when both cell types were challenged with bacteria. The quantities of IL-12p70 produced by Mφ varied from undetectable levels to several hundred picograms per ml but were always considerably less than the amounts produced by DC.
FIG. 2.
Neutralizing anti-IL-12 inhibits the hepatic lymphocyte IFN-γ response to F. tularensis LVS. HMC from wild-type B6 mice were activated with F. tularensis LVS (MOI = 75) in the presence of anti-IL-12 or control immunoglobulin G (10 μg/ml).
FIG. 3.
IL-12p35-deficient DC show impaired coactivation of wild-type HMC for IFN-γ production. All cultures were challenged with F. tularensis LVS at an MOI of 55. The responses induced by p35-deficient DC were significantly less than those induced in the presence of wild-type accessory cells (P < 0.05). Cultures containing p35-deficient Mφ showed responses equivalent to cultures containing wild type Mφ.
FIG. 4.
Production of IL-12 subunits by Mφ and DC cultures stimulated with F. tularensis LVS. Either Mφ or DC (50,000 per well) were challenged with F. tularensis LVS at the indicated MOI, and cytokine production was measured 24 h later. Both activated DC and Mφ produced significantly greater levels of IL-12p40 than did unstimulated cells (P < 0.05). DC produced large quantities of IL-12p70 when stimulated with the pathogen.
Because the wild-type HMC used in the experiments whose results are shown in Fig. 3 could themselves produce IL-12p70 (38), we next evaluated IL-12 as a coactivating accessory cell signal, using HMC prepared from p35-deficient mice. In this fashion, only the accessory cells (i.e., Mφ or DC) that were added to these HMC cultures could serve as a source of IL-12. When accessory cell function was evaluated in this manner, it was clear that both Mφ and DC from wild-type mice strongly coactivated p35-deficient HMC for IFN-γ production (Fig. 5). By contrast, neither Mφ nor DC from p35-deficient mice augmented the F. tularensis LVS-induced response. These observations established that the costimulatory activities of both Mφ and DC were IL-12 dependent.
FIG. 5.
Coactivation of p35-deficient HMC with wild-type or p35-deficient DC or Mφ. This experiment differed from that whose results are shown in Fig. 3 only in the sense that the HMC were from p35-deficient rather than wild-type mice. All cultures were challenged at an MOI of 55. Responses in the presence of p35-deficient accessory cells were significantly less than those seen with the wild-type accessory cells under all conditions tested.
TLR2 mediates the recognition of F. tularensis LVS by DC and Mφ but not the IFN-γ-producing cells.
A number of studies indicate that TLR2 is an important pattern recognition receptor mediating the recognition of F. tularensis LVS in mice (26, 28, 31). As an initial approach to determining whether TLR2 similarly controlled the liver IFN-γ response to this pathogen, HMC were prepared from wild-type, p35-deficient, and TLR2-deficient B6 mice and challenged with F. tularensis LVS in vitro. As can be seen in Fig. 6A, cells from mice deficient in either IL-12p35 or TLR2 failed to produce IFN-γ when activated with viable bacteria. The addition of exogenous recombinant IL-12 restored the IFN-γ responses of HMC from the two mutant strains and also enhanced the response by wild-type cells (Fig. 6B), as was seen in Fig. 1A. These findings suggested that TLR2-deficient HMC lack the ability to produce sufficient quantities of IL-12 or cytokines with similar functions when stimulated with F. tularensis LVS.
FIG. 6.
Effect of TLR2 expression on the induction of IFN-γ by F. tularensis LVS. (A) HMC from wild-type, p35-deficient, or TLR2-deficient mice were stimulated with F. tularensis LVS at an MOI of 40, and IFN-γ in the culture fluids was measured 24 h later. The responses of stimulated HMC from both mutant strains were significantly different from those of wild-type HMC (P < 0.05). (B) The addition of recombinant IL-12 to cultures of IL-12p35-deficient and TLR2-deficient HMC restored the IFN-γ responses (P < 0.05). rIL-12, recombinant IL-12.
To test this hypothesis, both Mφ and DC were prepared from wild-type and TLR2-deficient mice and stimulated with bacteria. The production of IL-12p70, IL-12p40, and IL-18 was measured in culture fluids 24 h later. Similar to what was observed in Fig. 4, wild-type DC, but not Mφ, produced high levels of IL-12p70 (Fig. 7A). However, DC prepared from TLR2-deficient mice produced only small amounts of the cytokine, indicating that TLR2 regulates the IL-12 response of DC to F. tularensis LVS. When the same culture fluids were analyzed for IL-12p40 as a control, both cell types from each strain of mice produced the subunit and did so over a wide range of MOI. Both wild-type DC and Mφ produced IL-18 when activated with F. tularensis LVS (Fig. 7C), but TLR2 appeared to regulate this response differently in the two cell types. Whereas TLR2-deficient DC showed greatly diminished IL-18 production, the absence of TLR2 did not significantly decrease IL-18 production by Mφ.
FIG. 7.
Role of TLR2 in the induction of IL-12 subunits by F. tularensis LVS-stimulated Mφ or DC. Wild-type or TLR2-deficient Mφ or DC were stimulated with F. tularensis LVS at the indicated MOI, and culture fluids were assayed for either IL-12p70 (A), IL-12p40 (B), or IL-18 (C). The production of IL-12p70 and IL-18 by TLR2-deficient DC, but not TLR2-deficient Mφ, was significantly less than that by wild-type DC at all MOI tested (P < 0.05).
Overall, these findings established a link between TLR2 on DC and the production of both IL-12 and IL-18 and suggested that TLR2 might regulate the IFN-γ response by this mechanism. To test this hypothesis, TLR2-deficient Mφ and DC were compared to wild-type accessory cells for their abilities to coactivate p35-deficient HMC that had been challenged with F. tularensis LVS. Whereas TLR2-deficient Mφ showed a significantly decreased ability to coactivate HMC for IFN-γ production (Fig. 8A), they were significantly more active than IL-12p35-deficient Mφ in this regard. By contrast, TLR2-deficient DC were nearly inactive and appeared functionally equivalent to DC from IL-12p35-deficient mice. The defects of both p35-deficient and TLR2-deficient DC in these cultures could be completely restored by adding exogenous recombinant IL-12 to the cultures (Fig. 8B). These findings support the conclusion that TLR2 regulates DC costimulatory activity by controlling IL-12p70 production. The data also indicate that TLR2-deficient Mφ produce IL-18 in response to F. tularensis LVS (Fig. 7C) and show costimulatory activity for the IFN-γ response (Fig. 8A).
Another potential mechanism for explaining the function of TLR2 in the IFN-γ response was considered, namely, that TLR2 mediates the recognition of F. tularensis LVS by the IFN-γ-producing cells themselves. However, TLR2-deficient HMC produced levels of IFN-γ that were comparable to those for wild-type HMC when either of these types of cells was cocultured with wild-type Mφ or DC and activated with F. tularensis LVS (Fig. 9). Thus, TLR2 appeared to control IFN-γ production by regulating IL-12 and IL-18 production rather than by controlling the ability of IFN-γ-producing cells to recognize the pathogen using TLR2.
FIG. 9.
TLR2 does not directly control the activation of the IFN-γ-producing cells in F. tularensis LVS-challenged cultures. Either wild-type or TLR2-deficient HMC were cocultured with wild-type Mφ or DC and stimulated with F. tularensis LVS. The IFN-γ responses of the two HMC populations were not significantly different from each other (P > 0.05) in the presence of wild-type Mφ or more than 3,000 wild type DC.
DISCUSSION
Regardless of the route of infection with F. tularensis, the liver is a common site of secondary bacterial colonization, which is thought to result from the hematogenous spread of the organism. The greatest expression of proinflammatory mRNA for cytokines and chemokines during infections with F. tularensis LVS in mice also occurs in the liver (9). mRNA for some of these mediators appears in the mouse liver within hours after systemic challenge with F. tularensis LVS (9). Because IFN-γ-deficient mice are highly susceptible to F. tularensis LVS challenge by the intradermal and intrapulmonary routes (7, 11, 17) and have difficulty clearing the organism from their livers (7), we have performed a number of experiments designed to elucidate the cellular requirements for hepatic IFN-γ production in response to infection. The livers of uninfected mice contain large numbers of NK, NKT, and T cells, and each of these lymphocyte populations becomes activated for IFN-γ expression following intranasal (S. M. Bokhari, K.-J. Kim, D. M. Pinson, J. Slusser, J. R. Wickstrum, H.-W. Yeh, and M. J. Parmely, submitted for publication) or intraperitoneal (38) challenge with F. tularensis LVS. Likewise, the same responding lymphocyte subsets can be activated with F. tularensis LVS in vitro (data not shown). In infected mice lacking a functional IL-12p35 gene, IFN-γ expression was not seen in any of the lymphocyte subsets that are activated in wild-type mice (38).
Mononuclear cells prepared by enzymatic digestion of the liver include large numbers of mononuclear phagocytes (Kupffer cells) and several subsets of DC (25, 29). However, prior to this study it was not known whether Mφ or DC promoted hepatic IFN-γ responses to F. tularensis and whether they did so by secreting IL-12. IL-12 is a 70-kDa heterodimer composed of p40 and p35 subunits and can coactivate both NK cells and T cells for IFN-γ production (4, 36). Previous studies conducted in our laboratory (38) have shown that IL-12 coactivates F. tularensis LVS-stimulated hepatic lymphocytes for IFN-γ production in vitro and that the IL-12p35 subunit is essential for this response. Mouse recombinant IL-18 also promoted IFN-γ production and acted synergistically with IL-12. Remarkably low concentrations of IL-12 (1 to 10 pg/ml) were sufficient to increase significantly the F. tularensis LVS-induced IFN-γ response in vitro. The mouse liver appears to be the predominant site of IL-12p35 expression during systemic infections with F. tularensis LVS (9), and HMC from uninfected mice express IL-12p70 when activated with F. tularensis LVS in vitro (38).
Although activated bone marrow-derived DC in the present study produced large amounts of the IL-12p70 heterodimer when stimulated with F. tularensis LVS, similarly activated Mφ did not consistently produce equivalent amounts of IL-12. This raises the question of why Mφ-mediated coactivation was found to be IL-12 dependent (Fig. 3 and 8). As noted above, some IFN-γ-inducing cytokines, such as IL-18, synergize with IL-12 (34, 39). Indeed, while recombinant mouse IL-18 coactivates F. tularensis LVS-stimulated wild-type HMC for IFN-γ production, IL-18 does not coactivate IL-12p35-deficient HMC (J. Wickstrum, unpublished). Thus, the ability of IL-18 to promote HMC IFN-γ production is IL-12p35 dependent. Conversely, in the presence of IL-18 production, Mφ may need to produce only small quantities of IL-12 to show strong coactivating properties. Thus, Mφ may derive their costimulatory activity not by producing large amounts of IL-12 but by producing IL-18 or a similar cytokine that synergizes with IL-12. Consistent with this conclusion is the finding that neutralizing concentrations of either anti-IL-12 or anti-IL-18 reversed the coactivating effects of Mφ on the HMC IFN-γ response to F. tularensis LVS (Fig. 2) (38). Whatever the mechanism, it is clear from the current studies that, unlike DC, Mφ do not require TLR2 to produce IL-18 or coactivate F. tularensis LVS-stimulated HMC cultures for IFN-γ production.
Previous reports have indicated that F. tularensis LVS-activated mouse DC populations express costimulatory properties. Katz et al. (26) noted that bone marrow-derived mouse DC produced IL-12p40, TNF-α, and IL-6 when stimulated in vitro with F. tularensis LVS, and the induction of both these cytokines and cell surface costimulatory molecules (e.g., CD86) were TLR2 dependent. Similarly, Ben Nasr et al. (3) reported that human monocyte-derived DC produced TNF-α and IL-12p70 when activated with F. tularensis LVS in vitro, and Li et al. (28) showed that F. tularensis LVS stimulated the expression of IL-1β and TNF-α mRNA by mouse bone marrow-derived DC. By contrast, Bosio and Dow (5) did not detect TNF-α, IL-6, or IL-10 production in mouse bone marrow-derived DC cultures that had been stimulated with F. tularensis LVS, despite an increase in the expression of CD86 and MHC class II molecules induced by these cells. One explanation for the differences between this report and our current findings is the level of maturation of the DC populations in the two studies. We have found that the ability of bone marrow-derived DC to produce IL-12p70 and coactivate the IFN-γ response to F. tularensis LVS required at least 12 days of DC differentiation from bone marrow cells. The DC studied by Bosio and Dow (5) were derived after only 8 days of culture.
Malik et al. (31) reported that TLR2-deficient mice, when infected with F. tularensis LVS by the intranasal route, showed significantly elevated levels of IFN-γ in lung homogenates compared to wild-type-infected mice. This result would seem inconsistent with our finding that cells from the livers of naïve uninfected mice do not produce the cytokine when activated with F. tularensis LVS in vitro. Two potential explanations exist for this apparent discrepancy. First, it may be that cells that are essential to the IFN-γ response but are not present in the uninfected liver are attracted to the liver during infection. Second, key coactivating cytokines that arrive via the blood and promote the hepatic IFN-γ response may be produced at tissue sites distant from the liver in TLR2-deficient mice.
The current study suggests that the nature of the responding cell determines the role, if any, of a particular microbial pattern recognition receptor. Whereas TLR2 plays a significant role in the recognition of F. tularensis LVS by a number of mouse DC and Mφ populations (10, 26, 28, 31), TLR2-independent pathways for activating Mφ with this pathogen have also been identified here.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R21 AI062939 and P20 RR0164443).
Editor: J. L. Flynn
Footnotes
Published ahead of print on 4 September 2007.
REFERENCES
- 1.Ancuta, P., T. Pedron, R. Girard, G. Sandstrom, and R. Chaby. 1996. Inability of the Francisella tularensis lipopolysaccharide to mimic or to antagonize the induction of cell activation by endotoxins. Infect. Immun. 64:2041-2046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Anthony, L. S., and P. A. Kongshavn. 1987. Experimental murine tularemia caused by Francisella tularensis, live vaccine strain: a model of acquired cellular resistance. Microb. Pathog. 2:3-14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ben Nasr, A., J. Haithcoat, J. E. Masterson, J. S. Gunn, T. Eaves-Pyles, and G. R. Klimpel. 2006. Critical role for serum opsonins and complement receptors CR3 (CD11b/CD18) and CR4 (CD11c/CD18) in phagocytosis of Francisella tularensis by human dendritic cells (DC): uptake of Francisella leads to activation of immature DC and intracellular survival of the bacteria. J. Leukoc. Biol. 80:774-786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Biron, C. A., K. B. Nguyen, G. C. Pien, L. P. Cousens, and T. P. Salazar-Mather. 1999. Natural killer cells in antiviral defense: function and regulation by innate cytokines. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 17:189-220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bosio, C. M., and S. W. Dow. 2005. Francisella tularensis induces aberrant activation of pulmonary dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 175:6792-6801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bosio, C. M., and K. L. Elkins. 2001. Susceptibility to secondary Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain infection in B-cell-deficient mice is associated with neutrophilia but not with defects in specific T-cell-mediated immunity. Infect. Immun. 69:194-203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chen, W., R. KuoLee, H. Shen, M. Busa, and J. W. Conlan. 2004. Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) does not confer a resistance advantage on mice against low-dose aerosol infection with virulent type A Francisella tularensis. Microb. Pathog. 37:185-191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chen, W., R. Kuolee, H. Shen, M. Busa, and J. W. Conlan. 2005. Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) plays a relatively minor role in murine defense against primary intradermal infection with Francisella tularensis LVS. Immunol. Lett. 97:151-154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cole, L. E., K. L. Elkins, S. M. Michalek, N. Qureshi, L. J. Eaton, P. Rallabhandi, N. Cuesta, and S. N. Vogel. 2006. Immunologic consequences of Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain infection: role of the innate immune response in infection and immunity. J. Immunol. 176:6888-6899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cole, L. E., K. A. Shirey, E. Barry, A. Santiago, P. Rallabhandi, K. L. Elkins, A. Puche, S. M. Michalek, and S. N. Vogel. 2007. Toll-like receptor 2-mediated signaling requirements for Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain infection of murine macrophages. Infect. Immun. 75:4127-4137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Collazo, C. M., A. Sher, A. I. Meierovics, and K. L. Elkins. 2006. Myeloid differentiation factor-88 (MyD88) is essential for control of primary in vivo Francisella tularensis LVS infection, but not for control of intra-macrophage bacterial replication. Microbes Infect. 8:779-790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Conlan, J. W., W. Chen, H. Shen, A. Webb, and R. KuoLee. 2003. Experimental tularemia in mice challenged by aerosol or intradermally with virulent strains of Francisella tularensis: bacteriologic and histopathologic studies. Microb. Pathog. 34:239-248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Conlan, J. W., R. KuoLee, H. Shen, and A. Webb. 2002. Different host defences are required to protect mice from primary systemic vs pulmonary infection with the facultative intracellular bacterial pathogen, Francisella tularensis LVS. Microb. Pathog. 32:127-134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Conlan, J. W., and R. J. North. 1992. Early pathogenesis of infection in the liver with the facultative intracellular bacteria Listeria monocytogenes, Francisella tularensis, and Salmonella typhimurium involves lysis of infected hepatocytes by leukocytes. Infect. Immun. 60:5164-5171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cowley, S. C., and K. L. Elkins. 2003. Multiple T cell subsets control Francisella tularensis LVS intracellular growth without stimulation through macrophage interferon gamma receptors. J. Exp. Med. 198:379-389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dreisbach, V. C., S. Cowley, and K. L. Elkins. 2000. Purified lipopolysaccharide from Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain (LVS) induces protective immunity against LVS infection that requires B cells and gamma interferon. Infect. Immun. 68:1988-1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Duckett, N. S., S. Olmos, D. M. Durrant, and D. W. Metzger. 2005. Intranasal interleukin-12 treatment for protection against respiratory infection with the Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain. Infect. Immun. 73:2306-2311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Eigelsbach, H. T., and C. M. Downs. 1961. Prophylactic effectiveness of live and killed tularemia vaccines. I. Production of vaccine and evaluation in the white mouse and guinea pig. J. Immunol. 87:415-425. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Elkins, K. L., S. C. Cowley, and C. M. Bosio. 2003. Innate and adaptive immune responses to an intracellular bacterium, Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain. Microbes Infect. 5:135-142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Elkins, K. L., T. R. Rhinehart-Jones, S. J. Culkin, D. Yee, and R. K. Winegar. 1996. Minimal requirements for murine resistance to infection with Francisella tularensis LVS. Infect. Immun. 64:3288-3293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ellis, J., P. C. Oyston, M. Green, and R. W. Titball. 2002. Tularemia. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 15:631-646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fortier, A. H., S. J. Green, T. Polsinelli, T. R. Jones, R. M. Crawford, D. A. Leiby, K. L. Elkins, M. S. Meltzer, and C. A. Nacy. 1994. Life and death of an intracellular pathogen: Francisella tularensis and the macrophage. Immunol. Ser. 60:349-361. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hajjar, A. M., M. D. Harvey, S. A. Shaffer, D. R. Goodlett, A. Sjostedt, H. Edebro, M. Forsman, M. Bystrom, M. Pelletier, C. B. Wilson, S. I. Miller, S. J. Skerrett, and R. K. Ernst. 2006. Lack of in vitro and in vivo recognition of Francisella tularensis subspecies lipopolysaccharide by Toll-like receptors. Infect. Immun. 74:6730-6738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hall, J. D., R. R. Craven, J. R. Fuller, R. J. Pickles, and T. H. Kawula. 2007. Francisella tularensis replicates within alveolar type II epithelial cells in vitro and in vivo following inhalation. Infect. Immun. 75:1034-1039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Jomantaite, I., N. Dikopoulos, A. Kroger, F. Leithauser, H. Hauser, R. Schirmbeck, and J. Reimann. 2004. Hepatic dendritic cell subsets in the mouse. Eur. J. Immunol. 34:355-365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Katz, J., P. Zhang, M. Martin, S. N. Vogel, and S. M. Michalek. 2006. Toll-like receptor 2 is required for inflammatory responses to Francisella tularensis LVS. Infect. Immun. 74:2809-2816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Leiby, D. A., A. H. Fortier, R. M. Crawford, R. D. Schreiber, and C. A. Nacy. 1992. In vivo modulation of the murine immune response to Francisella tularensis LVS by administration of anticytokine antibodies. Infect. Immun. 60:84-89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Li, H., S. Nookala, X. R. Bina, J. E. Bina, and F. Re. 2006. Innate immune response to Francisella tularensis is mediated by TLR2 and caspase-1 activation. J. Leukoc. Biol. 80:766-773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lian, Z. X., T. Okada, X. S. He, H. Kita, Y. J. Liu, A. A. Ansari, K. Kikuchi, S. Ikehara, and M. E. Gershwin. 2003. Heterogeneity of dendritic cells in the mouse liver: identification and characterization of four distinct populations. J. Immunol. 170:2323-2330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lutz, M. B., N. Kukutsch, A. L. Ogilvie, S. Rossner, F. Koch, N. Romani, and G. Schuler. 1999. An advanced culture method for generating large quantities of highly pure dendritic cells from mouse bone marrow. J. Immunol. Methods 223:77-92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Malik, M., C. S. Bakshi, B. Sahay, A. Shah, S. A. Lotz, and T. J. Sellati. 2006. Toll-like receptor 2 is required for control of pulmonary infection with Francisella tularensis. Infect. Immun. 74:3657-3662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Oyston, P. C., A. Sjostedt, and R. W. Titball. 2004. Tularaemia: bioterrorism defence renews interest in Francisella tularensis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2:967-978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sandström, G., A. Sjöstedt, T. Johansson, K. Kuoppa, and J. C. Williams. 1992. Immunogenicity and toxicity of lipopolysaccharide from Francisella tularensis LVS. FEMS Microbiol. Immunol. 5:201-210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sareneva, T., I. Julkunen, and S. Matikainen. 2000. IFN-α and IL-12 induce IL-18 receptor gene expression in human NK and T cells. J. Immunol. 165:1933-1938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Saslaw, S., H. T. Eigelsbach, H. E. Wilson, J. A. Prior, and S. Carhart. 1961. Tularemia vaccine study. I. Intracutaneous challenge. Arch. Intern. Med. 107:689-701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Trinchieri, G. 2003. Interleukin-12 and the regulation of innate resistance and adaptive immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 3:133-146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.West, A. P., A. A. Koblansky, and S. Ghosh. 2006. Recognition and signaling by toll-like receptors. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 22:409-437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wickstrum, J. R., K. J. Hong, S. Bokhari, N. Reed, N. McWilliams, R. T. Horvat, and M. J. Parmely. 2007. Coactivating signals for the hepatic lymphocyte gamma interferon response to Francisella tularensis. Infect. Immun. 75:1335-1342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yoshimoto, T., K. Takeda, T. Tanaka, K. Ohkusu, S. Kashiwamura, H. Okamura, S. Akira, and K. Nakanishi. 1998. IL-12 up-regulates IL-18 receptor expression on T cells, Th1 cells, and B cells: synergism with IL-18 for IFN-γ production. J. Immunol. 161:3400-3407. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]