Figure 2.
Increased infiltration of inflammatory cells into the lungs of OVA-challenged Nrf2 −/− mice. Lung tissues from the saline- and OVA-challenged (third challenge) Nrf2 + / + and Nrf2 − / − mice (n = 6) were stained with H&E and examined by light microscope (20×). (A) OVA challenge caused a marked infiltration of inflammatory cells into the lungs of Nrf2 − / − OVA compared with Nrf2 + / + OVA mice. Immunohistochemical staining showed the presence of numerous eosinophils around the blood vessels and airways (B) and in the parenchyma (C) of OVA-challenged (third challenge) Nrf2 − / − compared with Nrf2 + / + mice. The figure is representative of three experiments (n = 6). AW, airways; BV, blood vessels. H&E staining of the lung sections from the saline-or NAC-treated (7 d before first OVA challenge) Nrf2-deficient mice. The arrows indicate cells staining positively with anti-MBP antibody. (D) Widespread peribronchial and perivascular inflammatory infiltrates were observed in OVA-sensitized mice after antigen provocation (bottom right). Pretreatment of Nrf2-deficient mice with NAC resulted in substantial reduction in the infiltration of inflammatory cells in the peribronchial and perivascular region (bottom left).