Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1978 Apr 1;71(4):397–410. doi: 10.1085/jgp.71.4.397

Selectivity of cations and nonelectrolytes for acetylcholine-activated channels in cultured muscle cells

PMCID: PMC2215733  PMID: 566305

Abstract

The selectivity of acetylcholine (A-Ch)-activated channels for alkali cations, organic cations, and nonelectrolytes in cultured muscle cells has been studied. To test the effect of size, charge, and hydrogen- binding capacity of permeant molecules on their permeability, we have obtained the selectivity sequences of alkali cations, compared the permeability of pairs of permeant molecules with similar size and shape but differing in charge, and studied the permeability of amines of different hydrogen bonding capacity. ACh-activated channels transport alkali cations of small hydration radii and high mobility. The molecules with positive charge and (or) a hydrogen-bond donating moiety are more permeable than the ones without. On the other hand, several nonelectrolytes, i.e., ethylene glycol, formamide, and urea, do have a small, but measurable, permeability through the channels. These results are consistent with a model that ACh-activated channel is a water- filled pore containing dipoles or hydrogen bond accepting groups and a negative charged site with a pK of 4.8.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (759.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson C. R., Stevens C. F. Voltage clamp analysis of acetylcholine produced end-plate current fluctuations at frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1973 Dec;235(3):655–691. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cahalan M., Begenisich T. Sodium channel selectivity. Dependence on internal permeant ion concentration. J Gen Physiol. 1976 Aug;68(2):111–125. doi: 10.1085/jgp.68.2.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chandler W. K., Meves H. Voltage clamp experiments on internally perfused giant axons. J Physiol. 1965 Oct;180(4):788–820. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Colquhoun D., Dionne V. E., Steinbach J. H., Stevens C. F. Conductance of channels opened by acetylcholine-like drugs in muscle end-plate. Nature. 1975 Jan 17;253(5488):204–206. doi: 10.1038/253204a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dionne V. E., Ruff R. L. Endplate current fluctuations reveal only one channel type at frog neuromuscular junction. Nature. 1977 Mar 17;266(5599):263–265. doi: 10.1038/266263a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ebert G. A., Goldman L. The permeability of the sodium channel in Myxicola to the alkali cations. J Gen Physiol. 1976 Sep;68(3):327–340. doi: 10.1085/jgp.68.3.327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. FATT P., KATZ B. An analysis of the end-plate potential recorded with an intracellular electrode. J Physiol. 1951 Nov 28;115(3):320–370. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1951.sp004675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. FURUKAWA T., FURUKAWA A. Effects of methyl- and ethyl-derivatives of NH4 on the neuromuscular junction. Jpn J Physiol. 1959 Jun 25;9(2):130–142. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.9.130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fischbach G. D. Synapse formation between dissociated nerve and muscle cells in low density cell cultures. Dev Biol. 1972 Jun;28(2):407–429. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(72)90023-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Guy H. R., Dekin M. S., Morello R. Effect of denervation on the permeability of acetylcholine-activated channels to organic cations. J Neurobiol. 1977 Sep;8(5):491–506. doi: 10.1002/neu.480080509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. HODGKIN A. L., KATZ B. The effect of sodium ions on the electrical activity of giant axon of the squid. J Physiol. 1949 Mar 1;108(1):37–77. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1949.sp004310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hille B. The permeability of the sodium channel to metal cations in myelinated nerve. J Gen Physiol. 1972 Jun;59(6):637–658. doi: 10.1085/jgp.59.6.637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. JENKINSON D. H., NICHOLLS J. G. Contractures and permeability changes produced by acetylcholine in depolarized denervated muscle. J Physiol. 1961 Nov;159:111–127. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. KOKETSU K., NISHI S. Restoration of neuromuscular transmission in sodium-free hydrazinium solution. J Physiol. 1959 Sep 2;147:239–252. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lass Y., Fischbach G. D. A discontinuous relationship between the acetylcholine-activated channel conductance and temperature. Nature. 1976 Sep 9;263(5573):150–151. doi: 10.1038/263150a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lassignal N. L., Martin A. R. Effect of acetylcholine on postjunctional membrane permeability in eel electroplaque. J Gen Physiol. 1977 Jul;70(1):23–36. doi: 10.1085/jgp.70.1.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Maeno T., Edwards C., Anraku M. Permeability of the endplate membrane activated by acetylcholine to some organic cations. J Neurobiol. 1977 Mar;8(2):173–184. doi: 10.1002/neu.480080208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mebs D., Narita K., Iwanaga S., Samejima Y., Lee C. Y. Amino acid sequence of -bungarotoxin from the venom of Bungarus multicinctus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1971 Aug 6;44(3):711–716. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(71)80141-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nastuk W. L., Parsons R. L. Factors in the inactivation of postjunctional membrane receptors of frog skeletal muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1970 Aug;56(2):218–249. doi: 10.1085/jgp.56.2.218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Neher E., Sakmann B. Single-channel currents recorded from membrane of denervated frog muscle fibres. Nature. 1976 Apr 29;260(5554):799–802. doi: 10.1038/260799a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ritchie A. K., Fambrough D. M. Ionic properties of the acetylcholine receptor in cultured rat myotubes. J Gen Physiol. 1975 Jun;65(6):751–767. doi: 10.1085/jgp.65.6.751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sachs F., Lecar H. Acetylcholine noise in tissue culture muscle cells. Nat New Biol. 1973 Dec 19;246(155):214–216. doi: 10.1038/newbio246214a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sachs F., Lecar H. Acetylcholine-induced current fluctuations in tissue-cultured muscle cells under voltage clamp. Biophys J. 1977 Feb;17(2):129–143. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(77)85631-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. TAKEUCHI N. Some properties of conductance changes at the end-plate membrane during the action of acetylcholine. J Physiol. 1963 Jun;167:128–140. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Vogel Z., Sytkowski A. J., Nirenberg M. W. Acetylcholine receptors of muscle grown in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Nov;69(11):3180–3184. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.11.3180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES