Table 4. Model Results for Men’s Psychological Aggression Outcome.
| Model | Baseline | Final | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antisocial Behavior | Depressive Symptoms | |||||
| Predictor | Coeff. (SE) | p | Coeff. (SE) | p | Coeff. (SE) | p |
| Level 1 Effects | ||||||
| Men’s Risk | .16 (.04) | < .001 | .006 (.003) | .02 | ||
| Women’s Risk | .22 (.03) | < .001 | .01 (.002) | < .001 | ||
| Men x Women Risk | -.07 (.02) | .002 | 1×10-4 (2×10-4) | .67 | ||
| Men’s DAS | -.009 (.002) | < .001 | -.01 (.002) | < .001 | ||
| Women’s DAS | -.007 (.001) | < .001 | -.006 (.001) | < .001 | ||
| Relationship status | .22 (.03) | < .001 | .22 (.03) | < .001 | ||
| Level 2 Parameters | ||||||
| Intercept (T1 Level) | 2.05 (.05) | < .001 | 2.13 (.04) | < .001 | 2.11 (.04) | < .001 |
| Slope (T1-T5) | -.04 (.01) | .006 | -.06 (.01) | < .001 | -.06 (.01) | < .001 |
Note: DAS = relationship satisfaction measured by the Dyadic Adjustment Scale.