Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2008 Aug;18(6):224–228. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2008.11.003

Foxc2 transcription factor: a newly described regulator of angiogenesis

Tsutomu Kume 1
PMCID: PMC2674371  NIHMSID: NIHMS95781  PMID: 19185813

Abstract

Angiogenesis is a critical process to form new blood vessels from pre-existing vessels under physiological and pathological conditions and involves cellular and morphological changes such as endothelial cell proliferation, migration, and vascular tube formation. Despite evidence that angiogenic factors, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and Notch, control various aspects of angiogenesis, the molecular mechanisms underlying gene regulation in blood vessels and surrounding tissues are not fully understood. Importantly, recent studies demonstrate that Forkhead transcription factor Foxc2 directly regulates expression of various genes involved in angiogenesis, CXCR4, integrin β3, Delta-like 4 (Dll4) and angiopoietin (Ang)-2, thereby controlling angiogenic processes. Thus, Foxc2 is now recognized as a novel regulator of vascular formation and remodeling. This review summarizes current knowledge about the function of Foxc2 in angiogenesis and discusses prospects for future research in Foxc2-mediated pathological angiogenesis in cardiovascular disease.

Introduction

Vascular network formation is vital for embryonic development as well as postnatal life. While endothelial progenitor cells coalesce and undergo vasculogenesis to form the primitive capillary plexus, angiogenesis, the subsequent process of vascular sprouting and remodeling, gives rise to a mature network of blood vessels, including arteries and veins (Coultas et al. 2005). While angiogenesis occurs in almost all tissues under pathological and physiological conditions, elucidation of the mechanisms for pathological angiogenesis such as tumor growth and ischemic heart disease is clearly of great importance to therapeutic development (Carmeliet 2005, Holderfield and Hughes 2008, Siekmann et al. 2008). Signaling pathways that control angiogenesis such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and Notch have been identified, and regulation of angiogenesis is thought to be largely dependent on a balance between pro- and anti-angiogenic factors during the vascular network formation. For instance, Notch-Delta-like 4 (Dll4) ligand signaling is a newly recognized pathway in angiogenic sprouting and acts as a negative regulator of this process induced by VEGF (Kerbel 2008, Siekmann et al. 2008). Remarkably, despite extensive research in the field, the molecular mechanisms by which endothelial gene regulation is associated with angiogenic signaling pathways remain largely unknown and need further investigation (Minami and Aird 2005). Here I discuss the rapidly accumulating evidence that the transcription factor Foxc2 is a key regulator associated with multiple angiogenic pathways during vascular network formation.

Role of Foxc2 in Vascular Development

Foxc2 is a member of the Forkhead transcription factor family and has recently been implicated in vascular development and disease (Papanicolaou et al. 2008). During embryonic development, Foxc2 is required for the remodeling of the branchial arch arteries to form the aortic arch (Iida et al. 1997, Winnier et al. 1999). In addition, Foxc2 plays a critical role in the lymphatic vasculature. Of note, mutations in human FOXC2 are responsible for the autosomal dominant syndrome, lymphedema-distichiasis (Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man [OMIM] #153400), characterized by the obstruction of lymphatic drainage of the limbs and the growth of an extra set of eyelashes (distichiasis) (Fang et al. 2000). Deficiency of FOXC2/Foxc2 in human and mouse leads to abnormal lymphatic patterning, failure of lymphatic valve formation and lymphatic dysfunction (Kriederman et al. 2003, Dagenais et al. 2004, Petrova et al. 2004). Interestingly, in addition to lymphatic valve failure, mutations of human FOXC2 are also associated with venous valve failure (Mellor et al. 2007).

Although it has previously been reported that compound null mouse mutant embryos for Foxc2 and a related Foxc, Foxc1, fail to remodel the primary vascular plexus into a highly organized vascular network (Kume et al. 2001), the precise function of Foxc2 in angiogenesis has yet to be defined. Indeed, until recently, direct downstream targets of Foxc2 in this process were unknown. New studies have now provided evidence that Foxc2 is an important transcriptional regulator to control expression of multiple genes in critical aspects of angiogenesis.

Foxc2 Function in Angiogenesis

Recent studies have demonstrated that Foxc2 directly induces the transcription of two cell surface molecules in vascular endothelial cells, the chemokine receptor CXCR4 and integrin β3, by activating their promoters via Foxc-binding elements (Hayashi and Kume 2008a, Hayashi et al. 2008) (Figure 1A). These proteins are essential for endothelial cell migration, a key aspect of angiogenesis (Petit et al. 2007, Avraamides et al. 2008). Upon binding of the CXCL12 ligand, CXCR4 activates downstream components to induce cell migration, while the integrin β3 subunit forms a heterodimeric complex with the integrin αv subunit to allow interaction with extracellular matrix components such as vitronectin. The integrin β3 subunit also functionally interacts with VEGF receptor 2 (VEGF-R2) in endothelial cells. Although Foxc2 has no effect on the proliferation of endothelial cells, Foxc2 enhances endothelial cell migration in wound closure and transwell migration assays in vitro, as well as sprouting and microvessel formation in ex vivo aortic ring assay (Figure 1B) (Hayashi et al. 2008). Foxc2 can also induce the migration of Maden-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) epithelial cells by upregulating matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2, 9 (Mani et al. 2007). Taken together, these findings provided the first demonstration that Foxc2 is directly involved in angiogenesis.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Foxc2 regulates integrin β3 expression and microvessel outgrowth. (A) Surface levels of integrin β3 protein in pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells isolated from wild-type and Foxc2+/- mice measured by flow cytometry. Replicate analyses of independently isolated cells for each genotype are shown. (B) Aortic ring assay using adult aortas wild-type and Foxc2+/- mice. Data are presented as the relative number of microvessels sprouting from aortic rings. Results are presented as the means ± S.D. (n = 9 or more). P values were determined by the corresponding sample indicated using Student's t test. *, P < 0.05 versus the corresponding control. Adapted from Hayashi et al. (2008).

Foxc2 and a related Fox protein, Foxc1, play a critical role in determining an arterial cell fate by acting upstream of Notch signaling during embryonic development (Seo et al. 2006, Red-Horse et al. 2007, Hong et al. 2008). Foxc1 and Foxc2 directly activate the promoter of Dll4, a novel ligand for Notch receptors that is specifically expressed in arterial endothelial cells. Moreover, Dll4 is also involved in the process of angiogenesis (Thurston et al. 2007, Holderfield and Hughes 2008, Siekmann et al. 2008). While VEGF guides sprouting capillaries through the filopodia of endothelial tip cells at the beginning of angiogenic sprouting, Dll4 expression is induced in the tip cells and precisely controls vessel branching. It remains to be determined whether the expression and activity of Foxc2 are localized in these cells during sprouting of endothelial cells. Further analysis has recently elucidated details of the molecular mechanism by which Foxc2 interacts with VEGF signaling to induce Dll4 expression (Hayashi and Kume 2008b). Significantly, two VEGF-mediated signaling pathways, the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and the extracellular signal-regulated kinase/mitogen-activated protein kinase (ERK/MAPK) pathways, modulate the transcriptional activity of Foxc2 in regulating arterial gene expression, including Dll4 (Hayashi and Kume 2008b, Hong et al. 2008). In the compound null mutant embryos, VEGF expression is significantly upregulated compared with the wild-type (Seo et al. 2006), suggesting upregulation of a feedback response to impaired VEGF signaling.

Foxc2-dependent Paracrine Effects on Angiogenesis

Angiogenesis is modulated by various factors secreted from tissues surrounding blood vessels. For instance, while the expansion and regression of adipose tissue in adult life largely depend on blood vessel formation to meet the metabolic demand of the body, adipocytes in turn express known angiogenic factors, including VEGF, angiopoietin (Ang) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF), and control vessel growth and remodeling in a paracrine manner (Cao 2007). Xue et al. have shown that Foxc2 is a critical regulator of the close relationship between adipogenesis and angiogenesis (Xue et al. 2008). Given evidence that Ang-2, a ligand for the tyrosine kinase receptor Tie2 on endothelial cells, stimulates angiogenesis in the presence of VEGF (Tait and Jones 2004), Foxc2 indirectly controls angiogenesis as well as remodeling and maturation of the vasculature by inducing Ang-2 expression in adipocytes (Xue et al. 2008). Interestingly, both Foxc2 and Ang-2 mutant mice exhibit a similar lymphatic phenotype, the lack of lymphatic valves and improper recruitment of smooth muscle cells into lymphatic vessels (Gale et al. 2002, Petrova et al. 2004, Shimoda et al. 2007, Dellinger et al. 2008). However, the nature of functional interactions between Foxc2 and Ang-2 in the remodeling and maturation of the lymphatic vasculature is currently unclear.

Conclusion and Future Perspectives

Recent studies have now provided new insights into the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying Foxc2-mediated transcriptional control during vascular network formation. As illustrated in Figure 2, Foxc2 is central to the regulation of critical signaling pathways in a highly coordinated process of angiogenesis, including endothelial cell migration and vascular remodeling and maturation.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Mechanisms of Foxc2 function in vascular network formation. In vascular endothelial cells, Foxc2 directly regulates expression of integrin β3, CXCR4 and Dll4 by activating their promoters. While integrin αvβ3 interacts with extracellular matrix (ECM), CXCR4 binds to the CXCL12 ligand to induce endothelial cell migration and tube formation. Upon binding to Notch receptors, Dll4 regulates arterial cell identity and angiogenic sprouting. In contrast, Foxc2 induces Ang-2 expression in adipocytes thereby modulating angiogenesis and vascular maturation via activation of the Tie2 tyrosine kinase receptor on endothelial cells.

Although the significance of the role of Foxc2 under adult pathological conditions such as cardiovascular disease and tumor angiogenesis remains to be elucidated, recent gene expression profiling using adipose tissue revealed that in addition to Ang-2, Foxc2 can upregulate potent angiogenic factors such as placental growth factor (PlGF), ephrinB2 and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) (Xue et al. 2008). These results raise the possibility that Foxc2 simultaneously controls various angiogenic signaling pathways under pathological conditions. Notably, it has recently been shown that Foxc2 expression is increased in peri-infarcted zones of the adult rat left ventricle (Philip-Couderc et al. 2008) and that Foxc2 expression is associated with human heart failure (Hannenhalli et al. 2006).

Another perspective regarding cardiovascular disease is a possible involvement of Foxc2 in the development and function of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs). Since the identification of EPCs in human peripheral blood in 1997, substantial progress has been made in understanding EPC-mediated postnatal neovascularization (Hirschi et al. 2008, Kawamoto and Losordo 2008). The mobilization of EPCs from bone marrow and recruitment of these cells into the sites of neovascularization are critical for vascular regeneration in patients with peripheral vascular and coronary artery disease. Significantly, the recently reported signaling pathways associated with Foxc2 such as VEGF, Notch and CXCR4 are all involved in these processes (Gehling et al. 2000, Walter et al. 2005, Kwon et al. 2008). While the definition of EPCs is still a matter of debate because of the lack of unique cell surface molecules that specifically recognize EPCs (Prater et al. 2007, Hirschi et al. 2008), very little is known about transcriptional regulation in these cells. Given evidence that another Fox protein, FoxO4, plays a role in EPC apoptosis (Urbich et al. 2005), investigation of gene regulatory networks involving Foxc2 in EPCs is likely to lead to the advancement of cell-based therapies for cardiovascular regeneration. Taken together, further analysis of a possible role of Foxc2 in therapeutic angiogenesis may promote a new treatment approach for ischemic heart disease in the future.

Acknowledgments

The author is supported by the National Institutes of Health (HL074121).

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  1. Avraamides CJ, Garmy-Susini B, Varner JA. Integrins in angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:604–617. doi: 10.1038/nrc2353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cao Y. Angiogenesis modulates adipogenesis and obesity. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:2362–2368. doi: 10.1172/JCI32239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carmeliet P. Angiogenesis in life, disease and medicine. Nature. 2005;438:932–936. doi: 10.1038/nature04478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Coultas L, Chawengsaksophak K, Rossant J. Endothelial cells and VEGF in vascular development. Nature. 2005;438:937–945. doi: 10.1038/nature04479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dagenais SL, Hartsough RL, Erickson RP, Witte MH, Butler MG, Glover TW. Foxc2 is expressed in developing lymphatic vessels and other tissues associated with lymphedema-distichiasis syndrome. Gene Expr Patterns. 2004;4:611–619. doi: 10.1016/j.modgep.2004.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dellinger M, Hunter R, Bernas M, Gale N, Yancopoulos G, Erickson R, et al. Defective remodeling and maturation of the lymphatic vasculature in Angiopoietin-2 deficient mice. Dev Biol. 2008;319:309–320. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.04.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fang J, Dagenais SL, Erickson RP, Arlt MF, Glynn MW, Gorski JL, et al. Mutations in FOXC2 (MFH-1), a forkhead family transcription factor, are responsible for the hereditary lymphedema-distichiasis syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;67:1382–1388. doi: 10.1086/316915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gale NW, Thurston G, Hackett SF, Renard R, Wang Q, McClain J, et al. Angiopoietin-2 is required for postnatal angiogenesis and lymphatic patterning, and only the latter role is rescued by Angiopoietin-1. Dev Cell. 2002;3:411–423. doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(02)00217-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gehling UM, Ergun S, Schumacher U, Wagener C, Pantel K, Otte M, et al. In vitro differentiation of endothelial cells from AC133-positive progenitor cells. Blood. 2000;95:3106–3112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hannenhalli S, Putt ME, Gilmore JM, Wang J, Parmacek MS, Epstein JA, et al. Transcriptional genomics associates FOX transcription factors with human heart failure. Circulation. 2006;114:1269–1276. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.632430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hayashi H, Kume T. Forkhead transcription factors regulate expression of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 in endothelial cells and CXCL12-induced cell migration. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008a;367:584–589. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.12.183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hayashi H, Kume T. Foxc transcription factors directly regulate Dll4 and Hey2 expression by interacting with the VEGF-Notch signaling pathways in endothelial cells. PLoS ONE. 2008b;3:e2401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hayashi H, Sano H, Seo S, Kume T. The Foxc2 transcription factor regulates angiogenesis via induction of integrin beta 3 expression. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:23791–23800. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M800190200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hirschi KK, Ingram DA, Yoder MC. Assessing identity, phenotype, and fate of endothelial progenitor cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008;28:1584–1595. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.155960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Holderfield MT, Hughes CC. Crosstalk between vascular endothelial growth factor, notch, and transforming growth factor-beta in vascular morphogenesis. Circ Res. 2008;102:637–652. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.167171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hong CC, Kume T, Peterson RT. Role of crosstalk between phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and extracellular signal-regulated kinase/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways in artery-vein specification. Circ Res. 2008;103:573–579. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.180745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Iida K, Koseki H, Kakinuma H, Kato N, Mizutani-Koseki Y, Ohuchi H, et al. Essential roles of the winged helix transcription factor MFH-1 in aortic arch patterning and skeletogenesis. Development. 1997;124:4627–4638. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.22.4627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kawamoto A, Losordo DW. Endothelial progenitor cells for cardiovascular regeneration. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2008;18:33–37. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2007.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kerbel RS. Tumor angiogenesis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2039–2049. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0706596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kriederman BM, Myloyde TL, Witte MH, Dagenais SL, Witte CL, Rennels M, et al. FOXC2 haploinsufficient mice are a model for human autosomal dominant lymphedema-distichiasis syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12:1179–1185. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddg123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kume T, Jiang H, Topczewska JM, Hogan BL. The murine winged helix transcription factors, Foxc1 and Foxc2, are both required for cardiovascular development and somitogenesis. Genes Dev. 2001;15:2470–2482. doi: 10.1101/gad.907301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kwon SM, Eguchi M, Wada M, Iwami Y, Hozumi K, Iwaguro H, et al. Specific Jagged-1 signal from bone marrow microenvironment is required for endothelial progenitor cell development for neovascularization. Circulation. 2008;118:157–165. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.754978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mani SA, Yang J, Brooks M, Schwaninger G, Zhou A, Miura N, et al. Mesenchyme Forkhead 1 (FOXC2) plays a key role in metastasis and is associated with aggressive basal-like breast cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 104:10069–10074. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703900104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mellor RH, Brice G, Stanton AW, French J, Smith A, Jeffery S, et al. Mutations in FOXC2 are strongly associated with primary valve failure in veins of the lower limb. Circulation. 2007;115:1912–1920. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.675348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Minami T, Aird WC. Endothelial cell gene regulation. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2005;15:174–184. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2005.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Papanicolaou KN, Izumiya Y, Walsh K. Forkhead transcription factors and cardiovascular biology. Circ Res. 2008;102:16–31. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.164186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Petit I, Jin D, Rafii S. The SDF-1-CXCR4 signaling pathway: a molecular hub modulating neo-angiogenesis. Trends Immunol. 2007;28:299–307. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2007.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Petrova TV, Karpanen T, Norrmen C, Mellor R, Tamakoshi T, Finegold D, et al. Defective valves and abnormal mural cell recruitment underlie lymphatic vascular failure in lymphedema distichiasis. Nat Med. 2004;10:974–981. doi: 10.1038/nm1094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Philip-Couderc P, Tavares NI, Roatti A, Lerch R, Montessuit C, Baertschi AJ. Forkhead transcription factors coordinate expression of myocardial KATP channel subunits and energy metabolism. Circ Res. 2008;102:e20–35. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.166744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Prater DN, Case J, Ingram DA, Yoder MC. Working hypothesis to redefine endothelial progenitor cells. Leukemia. 2007;21:1141–1149. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Red-Horse K, Crawford Y, Shojaei F, Ferrara N. Endothelium-microenvironment interactions in the developing embryo and in the adult. Dev Cell. 2007;12:181–194. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Seo S, Fujita H, Nakano A, Kang M, Duarte A, Kume T. The forkhead transcription factors, Foxc1 and Foxc2, are required for arterial specification and lymphatic sprouting during vascular development. Dev Biol. 2006;294:458–470. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.03.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Shimoda H, Bernas MJ, Witte MH, Gale NW, Yancopoulos GD, Kato S. Abnormal recruitment of periendothelial cells to lymphatic capillaries in digestive organs of angiopoietin-2-deficient mice. Cell Tissue Res. 2007;328:329–337. doi: 10.1007/s00441-006-0360-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Siekmann AF, Covassin L, Lawson ND. Modulation of VEGF signalling output by the Notch pathway. Bioessays. 2008;30:303–313. doi: 10.1002/bies.20736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Tait CR, Jones PF. Angiopoietins in tumours: the angiogenic switch. J Pathol. 2004;204:1–10. doi: 10.1002/path.1618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Thurston G, Noguera-Troise I, Yancopoulos GD. The Delta paradox: DLL4 blockade leads to more tumour vessels but less tumour growth. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:327–331. doi: 10.1038/nrc2130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Urbich C, Knau A, Fichtlscherer S, Walter DH, Bruhl T, Potente M, et al. FOXO-dependent expression of the proapoptotic protein Bim: pivotal role for apoptosis signaling in endothelial progenitor cells. FASEB J. 2005;19:974–976. doi: 10.1096/fj.04-2727fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Walter DH, Haendeler J, Reinhold J, Rochwalsky U, Seeger F, Honold J, et al. Impaired CXCR4 signaling contributes to the reduced neovascularization capacity of endothelial progenitor cells from patients with coronary artery disease. Circ Res. 2005;97:1142–1151. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000193596.94936.2c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Winnier GE, Kume T, Deng K, Rogers R, Bundy J, Raines C, et al. Roles for the winged helix transcription factors MF1 and MFH1 in cardiovascular development revealed by nonallelic noncomplementation of null alleles. Dev Biol. 1999;213:418–431. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1999.9382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Xue Y, Cao R, Nilsson D, Chen S, Westergren R, Hedlund EM, et al. FOXC2 controls Ang-2 expression and modulates angiogenesis, vascular patterning, remodeling, and functions in adipose tissue. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:10167–10172. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0802486105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES