Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jun 8.
Published in final edited form as: Sci Signal. 2008 Sep 16;1(37):ra4. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.1160755

Table 1.

CXCR4 activation by SDF-1 mutantsa

EC50 (nM)b Foldedc Fold Increase p38 contact
SDF-1 3.6 ± 1.4 +
Arg20Ala 4.3 ± 0.6 + 1.2 +
Val23Ala NA NA +
His25Arg 5.1 ± 0.9 + 1.4
Lys27Ala 10.1 ± 2.9 + 2.8 +
Lys27Glu 16.8 ± 1.1 + 4.7 +
Val39Ala 27.1 ± 0.2 + 7.5 +
Arg41Ala 4.3 ± 0.9 + 1.2
Arg47Ala 14.1 ± 0.6 + 3.9 +
Arg47Glu 654 ± 93 + 181.7 +
Val49Ala 8.6 ± 2.4 + 2.4 +
Glu60Ala 4.1 ± 0.1 + 1.1
Glu63Ala 3.7 ± 0.8 + 1.0
Lys64Ala 5.0 ± 1.1 + 1.4
a

The current two-step, two-state model for CXCR4 activation implicates the SDF-1:p38 interaction in binding affinity and receptor specificity, but not in CXCR4 activation (12, 26). A peptide consisting of SDF-1 residues 1–8 fully activates CXCR4 at micromolar concentrations (49), and because each SDF-1 variant retained the native N-terminus, the EC50 value in the Ca2+ mobilization assay should reflect its apparent affinity for CXCR4. Consequently, an amino acid substitution that alters the EC50 for Ca2+ mobilization relative to that of wild-type SDF-1 has necessarily disrupted an interaction between the chemokine and the N-terminus or extracellular loops of CXCR4.

b

Values are reported as mean ± the standard deviation for two or more replicate measurements.

c

The 1H−15N HSQC spectrum displays chemical shifts similar to wild-type SDF-1 except for residues adjacent to the site of mutation.