Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1980 Jul;12(1):88–94. doi: 10.1128/jcm.12.1.88-94.1980

Unusual groups of Morganella ("Proteus") morganii isolated from clinical specimens: lysine-positive and ornithine-negative biogroups.

F W Hickman, J J Framer 3rd, A G Steigerwalt, D J Brenner
PMCID: PMC273527  PMID: 6775010

Abstract

Morganella ("Proteus") morganii is the only species in the recently proposed genus Morganella, but we suspect there are yet undescribed species in the genus. Two candidates for new species were recently investigated. Nineteen strains isolated from clinical specimens resembled M. morganii but were lysine positive and nonmotile and fermented glycerol within 24 h. Typical M. morganii are lysine negative and motile and ferment glycerol slowly or not at all. The three-test variance from typical M. morganii suggested that this new group might be a new Morganella species; however, strains of the group were closely related to typical M. morganii by deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-DNA hybridization. A second group of 14 strains isolated from clinical specimens was ornithine negative but was otherwise very similar to M. morganii. This group was also closely related to M. morganii by DNA hybridization. Both sets of strains clearly belong in the species Morganella morganii as distinct biogroups; they are not separate species as originally suspected. Initially both biogroups posed a problem in identification until their true relationship to M. morganii was determined.

Full text

PDF
88

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BARBER M., WATERWORTH P. M. ANTIBIOTIC SENSITIVITY OF PROTEUS SPECIES. J Clin Pathol. 1964 Jan;17:69–74. doi: 10.1136/jcp.17.1.69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brenner D. J., Fanning G. R., Johnson K. E., Citarella R. V., Falkow S. Polynucleotide sequence relationships among members of Enterobacteriaceae. J Bacteriol. 1969 May;98(2):637–650. doi: 10.1128/jb.98.2.637-650.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brenner D. J., Fanning G. R., Rake A. V., Johnson K. E. Batch procedure for thermal elution of DNA from hydroxyapatite. Anal Biochem. 1969 Apr 4;28(1):447–459. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(69)90199-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. CHIU V. S., HOEPRICH P. D. Susceptibility of Proteus and Providence bacilli to 10 antibacterial agents. Am J Med Sci. 1961 Mar;241:309–321. doi: 10.1097/00000441-196103000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hickman F. W., Farmer J. J., 3rd Salmonella typhi: identification, antibiograms, serology, and bacteriophage typing. Am J Med Technol. 1978 Dec;44(12):1149–1159. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Johnson J. G., Kunz L. J., Barron W., Ewing W. H. Biochemical differentiation of the Enterobacteriaceae with the aid of lysine-iron-agar. Appl Microbiol. 1966 Mar;14(2):212–217. doi: 10.1128/am.14.2.212-217.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Matsen J. M., Blazevic D. J., Ryan J. A., Ewing W. H. Characterization of indole-positive Proteus mirabilis. Appl Microbiol. 1972 Mar;23(3):592–594. doi: 10.1128/am.23.3.592-594.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McKell J., Jones D. A numerical taxonomic study of Proteus-Providence bacteria. J Appl Bacteriol. 1976 Aug;41(1):143–161. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1976.tb00614.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. MØLLER V. Distribution of amino acid decarboxylases in Enterobacteriaceae. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1954;35(3):259–277. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1954.tb00869.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. POTEE K. G., WRIGHT S. S., FINLAND M. In vitro susceptibility of recently isolated strains of Proteus to ten antibiotics. J Lab Clin Med. 1954 Sep;44(3):463–477. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Penner J. L., Hinton N. A., Hennessy J. Biotypes of Proteus rettgeri. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Feb;1(2):136–142. doi: 10.1128/jcm.1.2.136-142.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. RAUSS K., VOEROES S., KONTROHR T. NEW OBSERVATIONS ON HYDROGEN SULPHIDE PRODUCTION BY ENTERIC BACTERIA. Acta Microbiol Acad Sci Hung. 1964;11:35–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. RAUSS K., VOROS S. The biochemical and serological properties of Proteus morganii. Acta Microbiol Acad Sci Hung. 1959;6:233–248. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sheth N. K., Kurup V. P. Evaluation of tyrosine medium for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 May;1(5):483–485. doi: 10.1128/jcm.1.5.483-485.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Siboni K. Correlation of the characters fermentation of trehalose, non-transmissible resistance to tetracycline, and relatively long flagellar wavelength in Proteus morganii. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B. 1976 Dec;84B(6):421–427. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1976.tb01961.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Tierno P. M., Jr, Steinberg P. Isolation and characterization of a lactose-positive strain of Proteus morganii. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Jan;1(1):108–109. doi: 10.1128/jcm.1.1.108-109.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Traub W. H., Craddock M. E., Raymond E. A., Fox M., McCall C. E. Characterization of an unusual strain of proteus rettgeri associated with an outbreak of nosocomial urinary-tract infection. Appl Microbiol. 1971 Sep;22(3):278–283. doi: 10.1128/am.22.3.278-283.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Von Graevenitz A., Spector H. Observations on indol-positive Proteus. Yale J Biol Med. 1969 Jun;41(6):434–445. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. von Graevenitz A., Nourbakhsh M. Antimicrobial resistance of the genera Proteus, Providencia and Serratia with special reference to multiple resistance patterns. Med Microbiol Immunol. 1972;157(2):142–148. doi: 10.1007/BF02124474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES