Table 5.
Regions manifesting significant thickness or volume differences between ASD and VC groups.
A) Thickness-based | |||
---|---|---|---|
Regions1 | ASD (mm) | VC (mm) | p-value2 |
R entorhinal | 2.37 ± 0.38 | 2.87 ± 0.60 | 0.008** |
L entorhinal | 2.46 ± 0.50 | 2.83 ± 0.52 | 0.04 |
R lateral orbitofrontal | 2.65 ± 0.23 | 2.91 ± 0.20 | 0.0006** |
L lateral orbitofrontal | 2.71 ± 0.25 | 2.95 ± 0.14 | 0.0005** |
R medial orbitofrontal | 2.49 ± 0.29 | 2.86 ± 0.34 | 0.001** |
L medial orbitofrontal * | 2.64 ± 0.21 | 3.01 ± 0.26 | < 0.0001** |
R parahippocampal | 2.03 ± 0.26 | 2.24 ± 0.23 | 0.01 |
L parahippocampal * | 2.08±0.33 | 2.33 ± 0.34 | 0.03 |
R pars triangularis * | 2.61 ± 0.15 | 2.82 ± 0.21 | 0.002** |
L pars triangularis* | 2.64 ± 0.19 | 2.82 ± 0.22 | 0.01 |
R temporal pole | 2.67 ± 0.53 | 3.07 ± 0.54 | 0.03 |
L temporal pole | 2.77 ± 0.61 | 3.21 ± 0.52 | 0.02 |
R rostral middle frontal | 2.66 ± 0.15 | 2.76 ± 0.10 | 0.03 |
L caudal anterior cingulated* | 3.15 ± 0.41 | 2.75 ± 0.40 | 0.004** |
L precuneus * | 2.74 ± 0.13 | 2.64 ± 0.15 | 0.04 |
L superior parietal | 2.63 ± 0.19 | 2.51 ± 0.15 | 0.05 |
L frontal pole * | 3.38 ± 0.49 | 3.73 ± 0.27 | 0.008** |
B) Volume-based | |||
---|---|---|---|
Regions1 | ASD(mm3) | VC(mm3) | p- value2 |
R entorhinal | 1135 ± 345 | 1496 ± 515 | 0.02 |
L entorhinal | 1091 ± 476 | 1471 ± 448 | 0.02 |
R medial orbitofrontal | 4264 ± 861 | 5369 ± 1126 | 0.003 |
L medial orbitofrontal | 4454 ± 859 | 5319 ± 928 | 0.006 |
R lateral orbitofrontal | 6771 ± 1623 | 7881 ± 1316 | 0.03 |
R temporal pole | 1424 ± 654 | 1971 ± 651 | 0.02 |
L caudal anterior cingulate | 1860 ± 558 | 1388 ± 259 | 0.001 |
L parahippocampal | 1719 ± 322 | 1979 ± 385 | 0.04 |
L frontal pole | 1220 ± 337 | 1543 ± 421 | 0.02 |
Regions marked with “*” were predictor variables chosen by LMT. L: left hemisphere; R: right hemisphere.
Two-sample t-test. P-values marked with “**” were significant at false discovery rate (FDR) q < 0.05 (Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995).
All regions that were found to be significantly different with respect to volume were also found to be significantly different with respect to thickness. L: left hemisphere; R: right hemisphere.
Two-sample t-test. None was chosen using false discovery rate (FDR) q < 0.05 (Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995).