Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 8.
Published in final edited form as: Neurosci Lett. 2010 Jan 18;471(3):129–133. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.01.023

Table 1.

Clinical, demographic, and neuropathological characteristics by diagnosis category

Clinical Diagnosis
Comparison by diagnosis group
NCI (N=17) MCI (N=20) AD (N=21) Total (N=58)

Age at death (years): Mean ± SD (Range) 82.8 ± 6.8 (67–92) 83.6 ± 5.2 (72–92) 86.3 ± 6.0 (70–97) 84.3 ± 6.1 (67–97) p = 0.2a
Number (%) of males: 9 (53%) 11 (55%) 9 (43%) 29 (50%) p = 0.8b
Years of education: Mean ± SD (Range) 18.4 ± 3.5 (12–25) 18.6 ± 3.6 (8–24) 17.5 ± 2.9 (8–24) 18.1 ± 3.3 (8–25) p = 0.4a
Number (%) with ApoE ε4 allele: 3 (18%) 4 (20%) 8 (38%) 15 (26%) p = 0.4b
MMSE: Mean ± SD (Range) 28.1 ± 1.5 (25–30) 27.0 ± 2.4 (20–30) 15.5 ± 7.7 (0–25) 23.2 ± 7.6 (0–30) p < 0.0001a*
Global Cognitive Score (GCS)§: Mean ± SD (Range) 0.56 ± 0.28 (−0.08, 1.15) 0.26 ± 0.32 (−0.25, 0.83) −0.83 ± 0.55 (−2.22,−0.26) −0.02 ± 0.72 (−2.22, 1.15) p < 0.0001a**
Post-mortem interval (hours): Mean ± SD (Range) 5.0 ± 2.3 (2.3–11.0) 6.3 ± 3.7 (2.7–13.9) 6.5 ± 3.1 (2.7–12.4) 6.0 ± 3.1 (2.3–13.9) p = 0.3a
Distribution of Braak scores: I–II 4 3 1 8 p = 0.0008a*
III–IV 12 15 8 35
V–VI 1 2 12 15
Distribution of NIA Reagan diagnosis (likelihood of AD): No AD 0 0 0 0 p = 0.014a*
Low 7 8 4 19
Intermediate 9 11 8 28
High 1 1 9 11
Distribution of CERAD diagnosis (likelihood of AD): No AD 4 7 2 13 p = 0.060a
Low 2 1 1 4
Intermediate 9 6 8 23
High 2 6 10 18
a

Kruskal-Wallis test.

b

Fisher’s exact test.

*

Pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction revealed that there was no significant difference between NCI and MCI, but both were significantly different from AD.

**

Pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction showed significant difference between NCI, MCI, and AD.

§

GCS was unavailable for 2 MCI and 3 AD cases.