Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Cogn. 2010 Jun 12;73(3):180–188. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.05.002

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Group differences in fractional anisotropy (FA), overlaid on white matter skeletonized template (green). Regions of significance were thickened and color-coded for visualization. The top panel shows regions where typically developing children presented increased FA compared to HFA participants (Purple). The bottom panel shows the opposite contrast, where FA was higher in HFA than in the CTRL group (Orange). Crosshairs indicate the orthogonal slices, in radiological view, chosen to capture a maximum number of regions of significant difference. All statistics were significant at a fully-corrected level of p < 0.05.