Table 7.
Comparison of the ICMFF loop prediction results with published works.
| Loop length | RMSD | 6 | 8 | 10 | 12 | 13 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICM | average | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 1.67 |
| median | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.74 | |
| HLPf | average | 0.7 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 1.2 | na |
| median | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.6 | na | |
| PLOP IIh | average | na | na | na | 1.15 | 1.28 |
| median | na | na | na | 0.60 | 0.72 |
f
Data taken from Table I of Sellers et al.5
h
Data taken from Table II of Zhu et al.4 1hxh and 1dpg from the original loop set were not considered in this work because these proteins are biological tetramer and dimer, respectively, with large interfaces in the loops regions. RMSD values for PLOP II were computed using data from Table II of Zhu et al.4