Table 2.

Peak voxels for fALFF predicting behavioral performance

Anatomical Structure	Hemisphere	Clustersize	max Z-stat	Peak Coordinates MNI (mm)
Anatomical Structure	Hemisphere	Clustersize	max Z-stat	x	y	z
fALFF → Behavior: Incongruent RT^a
Positive Relationship
Cerebellum	L	956	4.12	0	−70	−44
Inferior Temporal Gyrus	L	396	4.23	−46	−22	−34
Orbitofrontal Cortex	L	357	4.15	−10	22	−24
Postcentral Gyrus	L	349	3.77	−32	−34	46
Negative Relationship
Precuneus	R	815	4.06	8	−64	22
Anterior Cingulate Cortex	R	721	3.95	2	14	32
Insula	R	407	3.88	42	20	−10
Insula	L	404	3.54	−36	22	−8
fALFF → Behavior: Congruent CV^a
Positive Relationship
Cerebellum	R	2303	4.88	6	−66	−46
Temporal Fusiform Cortex	R	849	4.09	34	−16	−40
Inferior Temporal Gyrus	L	718	4.66	−44	−20	−34
Orbitofrontal Cortex	L	380	4.43	−14	38	−22
Negative Relationship
Precuneus	R	1890	4.32	4	−64	28
Paracingulate Gyrus	L	451	3.48	−4	18	44
Middle Frontal Gyrus	R	380	4.38	24	30	34
Orbitofrontal Cortex	R	333	4.36	42	20	−12
fALFF → Behavior: Incongruent CV^a
Positive Relationship
Postcentral Gyrus	L	2391	4.74	−26	−36	56
Negative Relationship
Precuneus	R	1642	4.77	14	−62	24
fALFF → Behavior: Congruency Effect^b,^c
Positive Relationship
Inferior Temporal Gyrus	R	796	4.03	40	0	−42
Cerebellum	R	682	4.19	48	−70	−44
Cerebellum	L	533	3.81	−38	−60	−46
Lateral Occipital Cortex	R	358	4.6	44	−68	26
Lateral Occipital Cortex	L	280	4.02	−36	−78	4
Negative Relationship
Precuneus	L	544	3.64	−2	−46	42
Anterior Cingulate Cortex	R	287	4.13	6	24	16

Regions correspond to those shown in Figure 2;

Regions correspond to those shown for fALFF in Figure 4;

Congruency effect = (mean RT incongruent – mean RT congruent)/ mean RT congruent.