Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 2011 Aug;193(15):3842–3850. doi: 10.1128/JB.00221-11

Compromised Factor-Dependent Transcription Termination in a nusA Mutant of Escherichia coli: Spectrum of Termination Efficiencies Generated by Perturbations of Rho, NusG, NusA, and H-NS Family Proteins

Shivalika Saxena 1, J Gowrishankar 1,*
PMCID: PMC3147515  PMID: 21602355

Abstract

The proteins NusA and NusG, which are essential for the viability of wild-type Escherichia coli, participate in various postinitiation steps of transcription including elongation, antitermination, and termination. NusG is required, along with the essential Rho protein, for factor-dependent transcription termination (also referred to as polarity), but the role of NusA is less clear, with conflicting reports that it both promotes and inhibits the process. In this study, we found that a recessive missense nusA mutant [nusA(R258C)] exhibits a transcription termination-defective (that is, polarity-relieved) phenotype, much like missense mutants in rho or nusG, but is unaffected for either the rate of transcription elongation or antitermination in λ phage. Various combinations of the rho, nusG, and nusA mutations were synthetically lethal, and the lethality was suppressed by expression of the N-terminal half of nucleoid protein H-NS. Our results suggest that NusA function is indeed needed for factor-dependent transcription termination and that an entire spectrum of termination efficiencies can be generated by perturbations of the Rho, NusG, NusA, and H-NS family of proteins, with the corresponding phenotypes extending from polarity through polarity relief to lethality.

INTRODUCTION

The Nus proteins of Escherichia coli were initially identified as host factors needed for N-mediated transcription antitermination during lytic growth of λ phage, and they were subsequently also shown to participate in antitermination of transcription in the rRNA operons. Antitermination in both these instances is dependent on presence of specific “box” sequences that mediate assembly of a transcription elongation complex which is resistant to normal transcription termination signals (reviewed in references 17, 25, 40, 44, 48, and 55).

Of the various Nus proteins, NusA and NusG also function as general transcription accessory factors, serving to modulate both elongation and termination of transcription elsewhere in the genome (6, 40, 44, 48). The two proteins (both essential for viability in wild-type E. coli) have been reported to exert antagonistic effects on the rate of transcription elongation (increased by NusG and decreased by NusA), and they have also been implicated in the two different processes of transcription termination, namely, intrinsic or factor independent (NusA) and factor dependent (NusA and NusG). The latter is further described below. Recently, NusA has also been shown to be involved in mutagenesis and transcription-coupled repair of DNA damage, the detailed mechanisms for which remain to be elucidated (15, 16).

Factor-dependent (also known as Rho-dependent) transcription termination underlies the phenomenon of transcriptional polarity and refers to the process by which synthesis of untranslated nascent transcripts (such as, for example, downstream of either a premature stop codon within, or a normal stop codon at the end of, the coding sequence of a gene) is terminated. The mechanism is absolutely dependent on the essential Rho protein that binds the nascent transcript and is then believed to signal RNA polymerase to terminate transcription, but there is no consensus as yet on its details (reviewed in references 1, 3, 14, 40, 41, 43, and 48; see also references 21 and 31). As with their effects on transcription elongation, NusA and NusG have been reported to function antagonistically for Rho-dependent transcription termination as well, with NusG increasing its efficiency (7, 8, 11, 29, 35, 38, 52) and NusA decreasing it (8, 27, 3234); indeed, it has been reported that mutations in rho can suppress the inviability associated with the loss of NusA (58). On the other hand, Gottesman and coworkers (9, 5254) have suggested that both NusA and NusG act cooperatively to promote Rho-dependent termination.

NusA is a 55-kDa conserved bacterial protein comprised of an N-terminal domain; the three domains S1, KH1, and KH2 with RNA-binding motifs; and two C-terminal acidic repeat domains AR1 and AR2 (5, 6, 24, 44, 48, 49, 57). In the present study, we identified a recessive substitution mutation in nusA that confers relief of transcriptional polarity (much like missense mutations in rho or nusG) but has no apparent effect on transcription elongation or λ antitermination in vivo. The nusA(R258C) mutation (in the KH1 domain) was synthetically lethal with rho or nusG mutations, and the lethality could be suppressed by certain perturbations of the H-NS family of nucleoid proteins that have earlier been shown (29, 47) to restore the efficiency of transcription termination in rho and nusG mutants (for reviews of the H-NS family proteins, see references 19, 20, 22, and 36). Our data lend support to the findings of Cardinale et al. (9) that NusA promotes factor-dependent transcription termination. Furthermore, our findings suggest that a spectrum of efficiencies of termination exists that extends from polarity at one extreme, through polarity relief, to lethality at the other extreme and that the position in this spectrum of any strain is determined by its complement of Rho, NusG, NusA, and H-NS family proteins.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and growth media.

The strains of E. coli used in the present study are listed in Table 1. Phage λNK1324, used for Tn10dCm transposition, has been described earlier (37), and phage λcI857 was from our lab stock. Media and growth conditions were largely as described in the accompanying study (47). Where necessary, the medium was supplemented with ampicillin (Amp), tetracycline (Tet), chloramphenicol (Cm), kanamycin (Kan), and IPTG (isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside) at the described concentrations (47). Spectinomycin (Sp) supplementation was at 50 μg/ml.

Table 1.

E. coli K-12 strains

Straina Genotypeb
MC4100 Δ(argF-lac)U169 rpsL150 relA1 araD139 flbB5301 deoC1 ptsF25
RS445 MC4100 galEp3, λRS88 lysogen carrying PlaclacZYA
GJ3119 MC4100 nusA1
GJ5147 MC4100 galEp3, λRS45 lysogen carrying Plac-H-19BtR1-lacZYA
GJ6504 MG1655 lacI lacZU118 trpR55 trpE9777
GJ6509 GJ6504 rho(A243E)
GJ6511 GJ6504 nusG(G146D)
GJ6520 GJ6509 Δ(yefM-yoeB)::Cm
GJ6524 GJ6504 nusG(G146D) Δ(yefM-yoeB)::Cm
GJ7360 GJ6520 argE55::Tn10
GJ7361 GJ6520 ilv-500::Tn10
GJ7362 GJ6524 ilv-500::Tn10
GJ7363 GJ6524 argE55::Tn10
GJ7368c GJ6504 Δ(yefM-yoeB)::Cm rho(R102S, A243E) zif-909::Tn10dTet/pLG-H-NSΔ64
GJ7376* GJ6524 rho(Q32R)/pLG-H-NSΔ64
GJ7387* GJ6524 nusA(R258C)/pLG-H-NSΔ64
GJ7395*† GJ7387 Cms
GJ7417‡ GJ6509 nusA(R258C) truB::Tn10dCm
GJ7419‡ GJ6504 nusG(G146D) nusA(R258C) truB::Tn10dCm
GJ10524 GJ6504 nusA(R258C)
GJ10557 GJ6524 rho(Q32R)
GJ10572 GJ5147 nusA(R258C)
GJ10573 RS445 nusA(R258C)
GJ10581‡ GJ6504 rho(Q32R) nusA(R258C) Δ(yefM-yoeB)::Cm
GJ10591‡ GJ6524 rho(A243E)
GJ10668d GJ7419 rho(A243E)
GJ10669‡ GJ7419 rho(Q32R)
GJ10697 GJ10527 rpoB8 btuB::Tn10
GJ10699 rpoB8 btuB::Tn10
GJ10700 btuB::Tn10
GJ10702 GJ10527 btuB::Tn10
GJ10753† GJ6504 rho(Q32R) Δ(yefM-yoeB)
GJ10793§ GJ10572 rho(R102S, A243E) zif-909::Tn10dTet
GJ10794§ GJ10573 rho(R102S, A243E) zif-909::Tn10dTet
GJ10795 GJ5147 rho(Q32R)
GJ10796 GJ5147 nusG(G146D) rho(Q32R)
GJ10797 GJ10572 rho(Q32R)
GJ10798 RS445 rho(Q32R)
GJ10799 RS445 nusG(G146D) rho(Q32R)
GJ10800 GJ10573 rho(Q32R)
GJ10801 GJ5147 rho(R102S, A243E) zif-909::Tn10dTet
GJ10802 RS445 rho(R102S, A243E) zif-909::Tn10dTet
GJ10811§ GJ10572 nusG(G146D) argE55::Tn10
GJ10812§ GJ10573 nusG(G146D) argE55::Tn10
GJ10813§ GJ10572 rho(A243E) ilv-500::Tn10
GJ10814§ GJ10573 rho(A243E) ilv-500::Tn10
GJ10817§ GJ10799 nusA(R258C) truB::Tn10dCm
GJ10818§ GJ10796 nusA(R258C) truB::Tn10dCm
a

Strains MC4100, RS445, GJ5147, GJ6504, GJ6509, and GJ6511 have been described in the accompanying study (47), and strain GJ3119 was described by Harinarayanan and Gowrishankar (29). Strains GJ6520 and GJ6524 were constructed by S. Aisha (unpublished); all other strains were constructed in this study. *, the indicated strain also carries a Tn10dTet (37) insertion at undetermined chromosomal locations; †, the indicated strain was constructed from its ancestor by excision of the Cmr marker in Δ(yefM-yoeB)::Cm by site-specific recombination with the aid of plasmid pCP20, as described previously (18); ‡, the indicated strain was maintained as a derivative with plasmids pHYD751 (nusG+) or pHYD1201 (rho+), as appropriate; §, the indicated strain was maintained as a derivative with plasmid pLG-H-NSΔ64.

b

Genotype designations are as described previously (4). All strains are F. The rho(A243E) mutation is also interchangeably referred to as rho-4. References or sources for the mutations that were introduced by transduction into the strains are as follows: Δ(yefM-yoeB)::Cm (13); argE55::Tn10, ilv-500::Tn10, and btuB::Tn10 (50); and rpoB8 (51).

c

The zif-909::Tn10dTet insertion was obtained in this study and shown to be 76% cotransducible with rho.

d

Strain GJ10668 was maintained as a derivative with plasmids pHYD751 and pLG-H-NSΔ64.

Several plasmids were included (with salient features in parentheses): pACYC184 (p15A vector, Cmr Tetr [12]), pLG339 and pLG-H-NSΔ64 (pSC101 replicon vector and its derivative encoding H-NSΔ64, respectively, Kanr [56]), pCP20 (pSC101-based Ts replicon encoding Flp recombinase, Ampr [18]), pHYD2509 (pSC101 replicon encoding H-NSΔ64, Ampr [47]), pHYD2546 (p15A replicon carrying ydgT, Cmr [47]), and two plasmids that are IPTG dependent for replication (29), pHYD751 (nusG+, Ampr) and pHYD1201 (rho+, Ampr). The following three plasmids with nusA+ were used: pHYD2554 (Ampr, carrying the 10-kb EcoRI-HindIII fragment between kilobase coordinates 3310.06 and 3320.08 of the E. coli genome [45] cloned in a ColE1-based replicon, and obtained from Manjula Reddy); pHYD2557 (Cmr, carrying a 2.3-kb PCR-amplified region between genomic nucleotide coordinates 3314061 and 3316393 [45] cloned in a pSC101-based Ts replicon and obtained from Ranjan Sen); and pHYD2556 (Spr, carrying the minimal nusA+ open reading frame with its native ribosome-binding site between genomic nucleotide coordinates 3314061and 3315548 [45] cloned downstream of the ara regulatory region in a pSC101-based replicon and obtained from Ranjan Sen).

Isolation and genetic mapping of suppressors of rho and nusG derivatives expressing H-NSΔ64.

For the selection of suppressors in which transcriptional polarity relief was restored, the parental strains were pLG-H-NSΔ64 derivatives of GJ6520 and GJ6524 (rho and nusG, respectively, both carrying the lacZU118 [Am] and trpE9777 [Fr] mutations). (Although a procedure for Tn10dTet transposon mutagenesis [37] was attempted in obtaining the suppressors, subsequent experiments demonstrated that suppression was not caused by the transposon insertion [data not shown].) Selections were for Anth+ (utilization of anthranilate [Anth] at 20 μg/ml to satisfy the auxotrophic requirement for tryptophan [Trp]), Mel+ (utilization of melibiose as sole C source at 39°C), or both (47), that is, for restoration of transcriptional polarity relief of the rho and nusG derivatives even in the presence of H-NSΔ64.

The suppressors obtained were then analyzed as follows. Plasmid preparations from them were transformed into GJ6520 or GJ6524, as appropriate, to determine whether any of the mutations was on the pLG-H-NSΔ64 plasmid itself. For the non-plasmid-borne suppressors, phage P1 lysates prepared on the mutants were used to transduce pLG-H-NSΔ64-bearing derivatives of GJ7361 (rho) and GJ7362 (nusG) to Ilv+, and GJ7360 (rho) and GJ7363 (nusG) to Arg+ followed by scoring for the polarity-relief phenotypes. The first pair of strains carries an ilv::Tn10 mutation and the second pair an argE::Tn10 mutation that are linked to the rho and nusG loci, respectively; in this manner, suppressors mapping to either rho or nusG were sought to be identified.

The suppressor mutation in nusA was mapped with the aid of a transposon-tagging approach, as follows. Random transpositions of Tn10dCm were generated in GJ7395 following infection with λNK1324, as described previously (37). (GJ7395 is the derivative of the original nusA suppressor GJ7387 in which the FRT-flanked Cmr insertion in Δ(yefM-yoeB) [13] was excised by site-specific recombination with the aid of plasmid pCP20, as described previously [18].) A P1 lysate prepared on a population of Cmr cells was used for transduction into GJ6511/pLG-H-NSΔ64, with double selection for Cmr Anth+ colonies. One such clone was shown in subsequent transduction experiments to have the Tn10dCm insertion ca. 86% linked to the suppressor mutation. Molecular mapping of the transposon insertion was undertaken with the aid of an inverse-PCR approach as described previously (30), and the insertion was shown to be located after bp coordinate 3310756 on the E. coli genome (45), downstream of codon 14 in the truB open reading frame at the 71-min region of the chromosome. In additional crosses, the suppressor mutation was also shown to be 92% cotransducible with an auxotrophic ΔargG::Kan mutation (2) in this region (data not shown).

Scoring for synthetic lethal phenotypes in rho and nusG derivatives.

Tests for synthetic lethality conferred by additional mutations in rho and nusG strains were performed with derivatives carrying the cognate rho+ or nusG+ genes on the IPTG-dependent replicons pHYD1201 or pHYD751, respectively, and then testing for growth on medium not supplemented with IPTG.

Other techniques.

Procedures for P1 transduction (37), in vitro DNA manipulations and transformation (46), and β-galactosidase assays (37) were as described. The scoring of phenotypes associated with transcriptional polarity and its relief (including quantitation of the extent of polarity relief with the aid of Plac-lacZ and Plac-tR1-lacZ fusion construct pairs wherein tR1 is a Rho-dependent terminator from lambdoid phage H19B), as well as determination of in vivo transcription elongation rates were undertaken as described in the accompanying study (47). The chromosomal rho and nusA genes were PCR amplified with the primer pairs 5′-TCCTCGACGCTAACCTGGC-3′/5′-ACATCGCCAGCGCGGCAT-3′ and 5′-TTACGCTTCGTCACC-3′/5′-GAAGGCGAAGCTTGTTCCCCACTT-3′, respectively, and sequenced on both strands with these primers, along with additional primers internal to the genes. The plasmid-borne hns gene was PCR amplified with a pair of flanking vector-based primers 5′-AAGTGCGGCGACGATAGT-3′ and 5′-CCGTCTTTCATTGCCATAC-3′ and sequenced on both strands with these primers.

RESULTS

Selection for suppressors restoring polarity relief in rho and nusG derivatives with H-NSΔ64.

As described earlier (29, 47), the dominant-negative H-NSΔ64 variant (that comprises the N-terminal segment of 63 amino acids, from the 137-amino-acid native protein) restores transcriptional polarity in the rho(A243E) or nusG(G146D) mutants. In the present study, we obtained suppressors of the hns effect on rho and nusG, by selection for mutants in these backgrounds in which polarity relief had been reestablished at trp and lac loci bearing polar mutations in the first genes of each of the two operons (trpE9777 [frameshift] and lacZU118 [amber], respectively). Derivatives exhibiting relief of transcriptional polarity at these loci were selected as Anth+ and Mel+ (at 39°C), respectively, as described above. A phenotype correlated with transcriptional polarity relief in the rho and nusG mutants is that of R-loop-dependent lethality with ColE1 family plasmids such as pACYC184, which is also reversed by H-NSΔ64 (26, 29, 47), and all of the Mel+ Anth+ suppressors obtained in the present study had also reverted to the pACYC184 lethality phenotype.

The rho and nusG strains used in the Anth+ selections above were hns+ on the chromosome and carried the gene encoding H-NSΔ64 on a pSC101-based plasmid (56). In several of the spontaneous Mel+ Anth+ derivatives that were obtained, the suppressor mutations were shown to be plasmid-borne, and sequencing of the hns gene on the plasmid revealed that the suppressor mutation in each of them had either (i) reverted the frameshift allele encoding H-NSΔ64 to hns+ or (ii) led to a total loss of hns function, including the dominant-negative effect of H-NSΔ64 (data not shown). That the two sets of mutant plasmids had now become wild type and null, respectively, for H-NS function and had lost their dominant-negative character was confirmed by measurements of expression from a proU-lac transcriptional fusion (which is known to be H-NS regulated [56]), in derivatives that were chromosomally hns+ or null hns and carrying the mutant plasmids (data not shown). These results served to reaffirm the strong effect of H-NSΔ64 in restoration of transcriptional polarity in the rho and nusG mutants.

Three chromosomal mutants obtained as Anth+ Mel+ in the selections above (Fig. 1) were further characterized. One of these, obtained in the nusG derivative with H-NSΔ64, was mapped to the rho locus and then identified as a mutation leading to a Q32R substitution in Rho; when the single mutant rho(Q32R) was constructed and tested, it exhibited moderate polarity relief (Anth+ with trpE9777) and was killed with pACYC184, with both phenotypes being suppressed by H-NSΔ64 (Fig. 2). Another suppressor mutation, obtained in the parental rho-4, that is, rho(A243E), strain with H-NSΔ64, was also in rho, resulting in an additional R102S substitution in the protein (Fig. 1). These two results suggested that one method of achieving polarity relief in H-NSΔ64-bearing derivatives is to increase the severity of deficiency in transcription termination beyond that conferred by the rho-4 or nusG(G146D) mutations themselves. The rho(R102S, A243E) double mutant exhibited pronounced rich medium (LB) sensitivity that was not affected by the presence or absence of H-NSΔ64 (data not shown), and all experiments with this mutant were performed in minimal medium.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Restoration of transcriptional polarity relief in suppressor derivatives of rho(A243E) and nusG(G146D) mutants expressing H-NSΔ64. The results shown are for the original suppressor isolates GJ7368 [rho(R102S, A243E)], GJ7376 [rho(Q32R) nusG], and GJ7387 [nusA(R258C) nusG], all carrying plasmid pLG-H-NSΔ64, as well as for pLG-H-NSΔ64-bearing derivatives of GJ6520 [rho(A243E)] and GJ6524 (nusG) as controls. Cultures were plated at a suitable dilution on a set of four minimal A medium-based plates, as shown. Glu, glucose (C source); Mel, melibiose (C source). The Mel Trp plates were incubated at 39°C. Indicated on the last row is the phenotype of pACYC184 transformants of the strains, after 40 h: V, viable; and I, inviable.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Relief of transcriptional polarity in nusA(R258C) and rho(Q32R) single mutants GJ10524 and GJ10753, respectively, and their suppression by H-NSΔ64 and YdgT. H-NSΔ64 was provided from plasmids pHYD2509 and pLG-H-NSΔ64, respectively, in the nusA and rho(Q32R) mutants, while YdgT was expressed from plasmid pHYD2546 in both. The derivatives were plated at a suitable dilution on a pair of glucose-minimal A medium plates supplemented with Trp or Anth, as indicated. Given on the last row is the phenotype of pACYC184 transformants of the derivatives after 40 h: V, viable; and I, inviable. Also shown for the nusA mutant is suppression by rpoB8, for which strain GJ10598 was used.

Identification of a transcription termination-defective nusA mutation.

The third chromosomal suppressor mutation (that was obtained in the nusG parent with H-NSΔ64, Fig. 1) was shown by phage P1 crosses to be in neither rho nor nusG (data not shown). The mutation was then mapped, with the aid of a transposon-tagging approach as described in Materials and Methods, to the 71-min region of the E. coli chromosome, ca. 90% linked to argG. By transduction experiments, it was shown that the tagged mutation could also suppress the effects of H-NSΔ64 in a rho-4 background (GJ7417) for both polarity relief and plasmid pACYC184 lethality (data not shown). Since nusA is in this location, we tested whether the suppressor mutation was in nusA. Introduction of any of three plasmids carrying nusA+ (pHYD2554, -2557, or -2556, of which the last is a minimal nusA+ construct) reversed the phenotypes of polarity relief and lethality with plasmids of the ColE1 family in the suppressor-bearing strain GJ7395 (data not shown). The nusA locus of the suppressor was then PCR amplified and sequenced, which showed that the gene had a mutation resulting in an Arg-to-Cys substitution at amino acid residue 258 in the KH1 domain of the protein (R258C).

Single mutant derivatives of nusA (without concomitant expression of H-NSΔ64) were then constructed and they exhibited several phenotypes. At the tR1 terminator (of lambdoid phage H19B) positioned upstream of a lacZ reporter gene on the chromosome, the nusA(R258C) mutation conferred moderate transcriptional polarity relief (Table 2) compared to that by the rho(A243E) or nusG(G146D) mutations (47). The nusA strain was also polarity relieved at trpE9777 (Anth+) and killed following pACYC184 transformation (Fig. 2). All of these phenotypes were suppressed by expression of H-NSΔ64 (see Table 2 and Fig. 2), as had been shown earlier also for the rho and nusG mutants, and the strain was also complemented by plasmid pHYD2556 (carrying minimal nusA+ under Para) in an l-arabinose-dependent manner (Fig. 3).

Table 2.

Polarity relief at phage tR1 terminator in the nusA(R258C) mutant and its suppression by H-NSΔ64 or YdgT expression

Straina Mean ± SE
β-Galactosidase sp act
% B/A
tR1 (A) +tR1 (B)
Wild type 9,400 ± 2,151 425 ± 79 5 ± 1
nusA 7,045 ± 1,451 1,327 ± 207 19 ± 4
nusA/vector 7,853 ± 1,335 1,157 ± 22 15 ± 3
nusA/H-NSΔ64 9,995 ± 1,985 532 ± 21 5 ± 1
nusA/YdgT 4,000 ± 7 246 ± 1 6 ± 0
a

The strains (grown in LB medium) included those without (−tR1) or with (+tR1) the phage tR1 terminator upstream of the lacZ reporter gene and were, respectively: wild type, RS445 and GJ5147, and nusA, GJ10573 and GJ10572. Derivatives with vector, H-NSΔ64, and YdgT carried plasmids pLG339, pLG-H-NSΔ64, and pHYD2546, respectively.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Complementation of nusA(R258C) mutant by minimal nusA+ plasmid. The nusA(R258C) mutant GJ10524 carrying plasmid pHYD2556 (Para-nusA+) was plated at a suitable dilution on Trp- or Anth-supplemented plates with either glucose (Glu) or glycerol at 0.4% and l-arabinose at 0.2% (Gly Ara), as indicated.

As described in the accompanying study, overexpression of another protein of the H-NS family YdgT is associated with suppression of polarity relief and pACYC184 lethality phenotypes in rho and nusG strains (47) and, likewise, the nusA mutant phenotypes were also suppressed upon YdgT overexpression (Table 2, Fig. 2). These results established that the nusA(R258C) mutant is defective for Rho-dependent transcription termination.

We also tested the effect of the rpoB8 mutation in the nusA strain. RNA polymerase bearing the RpoB8 subunit exhibits a reduced rate of transcription elongation which is associated with suppression of transcription termination deficiency of rho mutants (31, 51). We found that, even in the nusA(R258C) strain, rpoB8 suppressed both the Anth+ phenotype associated with trpE9777 and plasmid pACYC184 lethality (Fig. 2).

The nusA(R258C) mutant exhibited a normal growth phenotype and also was unaffected in its ability to support the growth of phage λ at all temperatures tested (see Fig. 4 for 42°C, data not shown for 30 and 37°C), whereas the nusA1 mutant was λ resistant as previously reported (51).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Phage λ growth on nusA(R258C) mutant. A single suitable dilution of a λcI857 phage lysate was plated on a lawn of strains GJ6504 (wild type), GJ10524 [nusA(R258C)], or GJ3119 (nusA1) and incubated at 42°C for 5 h.

Synthetic lethal phenotypes between rho, nusG, and nusA mutations.

Our findings that the suppressor selection for polarity relief in the parental rho-4 or nusG derivatives with H-NSΔ64 yielded mutations that were themselves associated with defective transcription termination led us to examine the synthetic phenotypes, if any, of the various mutant combinations in absence or presence of H-NSΔ64. The mutant combinations were assembled by P1 transductions in strains carrying the cognate rho+ or nusG+ gene on an IPTG-dependent replicon, so that the synthetic phenotypes (of both viability and transcriptional polarity relief) could then be determined on growth media not supplemented with IPTG.

By this assay, the mutant combinations rho(A243E) nusA(R258C) and nusG(G146D) nusA(R258C) exhibited synthetic lethality, and furthermore, transformation of these strains with a plasmid encoding H-NSΔ64 restored viability, but the resultant derivatives exhibited relief of transcriptional polarity at trpE and lethality with plasmid pACYC184 (Fig. 5 A). Likewise, the rho(A243E) nusG(G146D) combination has previously been reported to be inviable (29), which was reproduced in the present study, and its H-NSΔ64 derivative was viable but polarity relieved (Fig. 5A). The combinations rho(R102S, A243E) nusG(G146D) and rho(R102S, A243E) nusA(R258C) were also inviable, and the latter was rescued by expression of H-NSΔ64 (data not shown). The rho(Q32R) mutation conferred a slow-growth phenotype with nusA(R258C) but not nusG(G146D), and the former was suppressed by H-NSΔ64 (Fig. 5A).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Synthetic lethal phenotypes of rho and nusG mutants. Non-Q32R mutants designated rho carry the rho-4 [that is, rho(A243E)] mutation. All strains also carry, as appropriate, the nusG+- or rho+-bearing plasmids (pHYD751 and pHYD1201, respectively) that are IPTG dependent for replication, so that the plasmids are retained only in growth medium supplemented with IPTG. Derivatives additionally expressing H-NSΔ64 from plasmid pLG-H-NSΔ64 are marked. (A) Cultures of the pHYD1201-bearing derivatives of strains GJ6509 (rho), GJ7417 (rho nusA), and GJ10581 [rho(Q32R) nusA] and of the pHYD751-bearing derivatives of strains GJ7419 (nusG nusA), GJ10591 (rho nusG) and GJ10557 [rho(Q32R) nusG] (including pLG-H-NSΔ64-carrying derivatives as indicated) were each plated at a suitable dilution on LB medium without or with IPTG supplementation and incubated for 20 h and on glucose-minimal A medium with Anth supplementation and incubated for 40 h. For the nusG nusA derivative without H-NSΔ64, small colonies were obtained on LB without IPTG, but they failed to grow upon subculturing, indicative of synthetic lethality. (B) Cultures of pHYD751- and pLG-H-NSΔ64-carrying derivatives of strains GJ10668 (rho nusG nusA) and GJ10669 [rho(Q32R) nusG nusA] were each plated as described above at a suitable dilution on LB without and with IPTG.

Two triple mutant combinations were tested (Fig. 5B): rho(Q32R) nusG(G146D) nusA(R258C) was viable only in the presence of H-NSΔ64, whereas rho(A243E) nusG(G146D) nusA(R258C) was inviable even with H-NSΔ64, that is, it could be maintained only in the simultaneous presence of both the IPTG-dependent replicon with rho+ or nusG+ and the plasmid expressing H-NSΔ64.

To quantitate the extent of polarity relief in many of the viable double and triple mutant combinations (with or without expression of H-NSΔ64), β-galactosidase activities were determined from pairs of Plac-lacZ fusion derivatives with or without the intervening Rho-dependent tR1 terminator of lambdoid phage H19B, as described previously (47). The data from these experiments, presented in Table 3, were consistent with the notions that combining the individual mutations leads to additive effects on polarity relief and that H-NSΔ64 expression is ameliorative in this regard. Thus, for example, the rho(Q32R) mutation conferred polarity relief to the extents of, respectively, 30, 34, and 53% by itself and in combination with the nusG and nusA mutations in the absence of H-NSΔ64, which were then reduced to 15, 18, and 32%, respectively, in the presence of H-NSΔ64. The rho(Q32R) nusA nusG triple mutant (which is lethal without H-NSΔ64) exhibited 34% polarity relief with H-NSΔ64. Likewise, the nusA rho(A243E) and nusA nusG mutants with H-NSΔ64 were more polarity relieved (40 and 30%, respectively) than any of the corresponding single mutants with H-NSΔ64 [nusA, 5%; rho(A243E), 18%; and nusG, 17%] (see Table 2 and reference 47). In strains bearing the rho(R102S, A243E) allele alone or in combination with nusA, the same trend was observed. However, since the corresponding derivatives without the tR1 terminator exhibited 2- to 3-fold lower levels of lac expression than those not carrying this rho allele, the calculated extent of transcriptional readthrough was apparently elevated in these strains. [As mentioned above, strains with rho(R102S, A243E) are LB sensitive, and hence the derivatives had been cultured in a different minimal A medium for the enzyme assays.]

Table 3.

Polarity relief at phage tR1 terminator in viable double and triple mutantsa

Genotype Mean ± SE
Without H-NSΔ64
With H-NSΔ64
tR1 (A) +tR1 (B) % B/A tR1 (A) +tR1 (B) % B/A
rho(Q32R) 5,728 ± 559 1,732 ± 339 30 ± 3 5,325 ± 314 832 ± 207 15 ± 3
rho(R102S, A243E) 2,275 ± 360 1,648 ± 161 74 ± 5 1,994 ± 462 738 ± 171 37 ± 0
rho(Q32R) nusA(R258C) 5,301 ± 451 2,818 ± 388 53 ± 5 4,682 ± 424 1,468 ± 232 32 ± 6
rho(Q32R) nusG(G146D) 4,156 ± 137 1,439 ± 214 34 ± 5 4,541 ± 664 832 ± 155 18 ± 1
rho(A243E) nusA(R258C) NDb ND ND 4,465 ± 286 1,836 ± 425 40 ± 7
rho(R102S, A243E) nusA(R258C) ND ND ND 2,144 ± 605 1,033 ± 169 52 ± 7
nusG(G146D) nusA(R258C) ND ND ND 4,677 ± 546 1,370 ± 95 30 ± 4
rho(Q32R) nusG(G146D) nusA(R258C) ND ND ND 3,779 ± 47 1,295 ± 78 34 ± 2
a

The specific activities of β-galactosidase were determined for various pairs of strains without (-tR1 [A]) or with (+tR1 [A]) the phage tR1 terminator upstream of the lacZ reporter gene. The B/A ratios (%) given in the table are a measure of transcriptional readthrough or the polarity relief at the tR1 terminator. Where indicated, H-NSΔ64 expression was obtained by transformation of the strains with plasmid pLG-H-NSΔ64. The strain pairs (–tR1 and +tR1) used were as follows: rho(Q32R), GJ10798 and GJ10795; rho(R102S, A243E), GJ10802 and GJ10801; rho(Q32R) nusA(R258C), GJ10800 and GJ10797; rho(Q32R) nusG(G146D), GJ10799 and GJ10796; rho(A243E) nusA(R258C), GJ10814 and GJ10813; rho(R102S, A243E) nusA(R258C), GJ10794 and GJ10793; nusG(G146D) nusA(R258C), GJ10812 and GJ10813; and rho(Q32R) nusG(G146D) nusA(R258C), GJ10817 and GJ10818. Strains with the rho(R102S, A243E) mutation were grown in glucose-minimal A medium supplemented with Casamino Acids at 0.5%. All other strains were grown in LB medium.

b

ND, not determined because these mutant combinations exhibited synthetic lethality in the absence of H-NSΔ64.

H-NSΔ64 was not able to suppress either the sickness of ΔnusG or ΔnusA mutants in the reduced-genome E. coli strain MDS42 (9, 42) or the inviability associated with these mutations or with Δrho in wild-type E. coli (data not shown).

Transcription elongation rate is unaffected in nusA mutant.

The NusA protein has been implicated in modulating the rate of transcription elongation (40, 44, 48) and thus in ensuring the coupling of transcription and translation (58); furthermore, the kinetic coupling model (31) posits that the efficiency of Rho-dependent termination is inversely related to the elongation rate of transcription. Hence, we considered the possibility that the nusA(R258C) mutant is termination-defective because of an inappropriately increased transcription elongation rate in the mutant leading to a mismatch in coupling of RNA polymerase with the pioneer ribosome and with Rho, which would then also explain its suppression by the rpoB8 mutation (Fig. 2).

We therefore determined the rate of transcription elongation in vivo at the native lacZ locus following induction of the operon with IPTG, as previously described (31, 47), but no difference was observed between the pair of isogenic nusA+ and nusA(R258C) strains (Fig. 6). Transcription elongation rates in the rpoB8 nusA+ and rpoB8 nusA(R258C) pair of strains were also determined; although rpoB8 itself was associated with a decreased elongation rate as has been reported earlier (31), once again the nusA mutation had no additional effect (Fig. 6). We conclude that NusA(R258C) does not grossly alter the transcription elongation properties of RNA polymerase in vivo.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Transcription elongation rate measurements in vivo for nusA and rpoB8 mutants. For each culture grown in 0.4% glycerol-minimal A medium supplemented with Casamino Acids at 0.5%, the β-galactosidase specific activities were determined at various times after the addition of IPTG and the inflection point was identified on a curve plotting square root of enzyme specific activity against time, as described previously (31). The strains used were GJ10700 (wild type, □), GJ10702 [nusA(R258C), ▵], GJ10697 (rpoB8, ■), and GJ10699 [nusA(R258C) rpoB8, ▴].

DISCUSSION

A nusA missense mutant defective in Rho-dependent transcription termination.

By using a suppressor selection approach in rho or nusG strains expressing H-NSΔ64, we have identified new mutations that affect the efficiency of Rho-dependent transcription termination, including a recessive missense mutation (R258C) in the KH1 domain-encoding region of the nusA gene. The nusA mutant is specifically affected for Rho-dependent termination, without any other apparent phenotype, such as growth sensitivity at low or high temperatures, λ phage resistance, or alteration of transcription elongation rates in vivo.

An earlier study had shown that a G253D substitution in the same KH1 RNA-binding domain is associated with phenotypes of cold sensitivity and λ resistance (59). The nusA1 and nusA11 substitution mutations, both of which affect the S1 domain of the protein, confer transcriptional polarity relief, but they are associated with additional phenotypes such as λ resistance (nusA1) and temperature sensitivity (nusA11) (23, 39, 53). Our findings also support those of Cardinale et al. (9), who showed that a nusA insertion-deletion mutation, in the reduced-genome E. coli strain MDS42, renders transcription termination defective in the strain.

NusA in E. coli has been best studied as a transcription elongation factor and as a protein required for transcription antitermination in rrn operons and lambdoid phages (6, 17, 40, 44, 48). Previous reports have also suggested that NusA can indirectly affect Rho-dependent termination by its influence on the rate of transcription elongation and thereby on transcription-translation coupling (31, 58). However, we found that the nusA(R258C) mutant is unaltered for the rate of transcription elongation at the lacZ locus in vivo, which is consistent with recent findings that NusA's roles in transcriptional pausing and intrinsic termination are mediated solely by its N-terminal domain and are unaffected by substitutions in the KH1 or KH2 domains (28). Therefore, the simplest model to explain our results and those of Cardinale et al. (9) is that NusA participates directly in the process of Rho-dependent transcription termination, rather than indirectly through its effects on transcription elongation.

Spectrum of efficiencies of Rho-dependent termination and their associated phenotypes.

Our studies demonstrate that, by combining different mutations in rho, nusG, and nusA, along with expression of YdgT or of variants of H-NS such as H-NSΔ64, one can generate a wide spectrum of efficiencies of Rho-dependent termination in vivo. As depicted schematically in Fig. 7, the corresponding phenotypes would extend from viable cells exhibiting full transcriptional polarity (highest efficiency) through viable but polarity-relieved cells (intermediate efficiency) to inviable cells (lowest efficiency). Perturbations involving the H-NS family of proteins, as with expression of H-NSΔ64 or of YdgT, are associated with a shift in the spectrum from lower to higher efficiency, such as to convert synthetic lethal combinations to viable but polarity-relieved states, and polarity-relieved derivatives to those exhibiting full polarity. In the accompanying study (47), we suggested a model in which the polymeric H-NS scaffold is able to modulate Rho-dependent termination.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Spectrum of Rho-dependent transcription termination efficiencies in the different mutants described in text, and the effects of H-NSΔ64 or YdgT thereon. The designations rho, nusG, and nusA without suffixes in the figure refer, respectively, to the rho-4 [that is, rho(A243E)], nusG(G146D), and nusA(R258C) mutations.

Some workers have speculated that Rho's essential function in E. coli may be different from its role in transcription termination (10, 54), and the fact that Cardinale et al. (9) could obtain viable insertion-deletion mutants of nusA or nusG, but not of rho, in the background of strain MDS42 may be seen as lending support to this notion. On the other hand, the existence of a spectral continuum as depicted in Fig. 7 suggests that inviability is merely an extreme consequence of decreasing efficiency of Rho-dependent termination. This is supported also by the observation that ΔnusA and ΔnusG derivatives of MDS42 exhibit hypersensitivity to the Rho inhibitor bicyclomycin (9, 54).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Manjula Reddy, Sylvie Rimsky, Ranjan Sen, and Barry Wanner for the various strains and plasmids and members of the Laboratory of Bacterial Genetics for advice and discussions.

S.S. and J.G. are recipients, respectively, of a doctoral Research Fellowship from the Department of Biotechnology and the J. C. Bose Fellowship from the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India. This study was supported by a Centre of Excellence in Microbial Biology research grant from the Department of Biotechnology.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 20 May 2011.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Adhya S., Gottesman M. 1978. Control of transcription termination. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 47:967–996 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Baba T., et al. 2006. Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2:1–11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Banerjee S., Chalissery J., Bandey I., Sen R. 2006. Rho-dependent transcription termination: more questions than answers. J. Microbiol. 44:11–22 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Berlyn M. K. 1998. Linkage map of Escherichia coli K-12, edition 10: the traditional map. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:814–984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Beuth B., Pennell S., Arnvig K. B., Martin S. R., Taylor I. A. 2005. Structure of a Mycobacterium tuberculosis NusA-RNA complex. EMBO J. 24:3576–3587 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Borukhov S., Lee J., Laptenko O. 2005. Bacterial transcription elongation factors: new insights into molecular mechanism of action. Mol. Microbiol. 55:1315–1324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Burns C. M., Nowatzke W. L., Richardson J. P. 1999. Activation of Rho-dependent transcription termination by NusG: dependence on terminator location and acceleration of RNA release. J. Biol. Chem. 274:5245–5251 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Burns C. M., Richardson L. V., Richardson J. P. 1998. Combinatorial effects of NusA and NusG on transcription elongation and Rho-dependent termination in Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 278:307–316 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Cardinale C. J., et al. 2008. Termination factor Rho and its cofactors NusA and NusG silence foreign DNA in Escherichia coli. Science 320:935–938 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Chalissery J., Banerjee S., Bandey I., Sen R. 2007. Transcription termination defective mutants of Rho: role of different functions of Rho in releasing RNA from the elongation complex. J. Mol. Biol. 371:855–872 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Chalissery J., et al. 2011. Interaction surface of the transcription terminator Rho required to form a complex with the C-terminal domain of the antiterminator NusG. J. Mol. Biol. 405:49–64 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Chang A. C., Cohen S. N. 1978. Construction and characterization of amplifiable multicopy DNA cloning vehicles derived from the P15A cryptic miniplasmid. J. Bacteriol. 134:1141–1156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Christensen S. K., et al. 2004. Overproduction of the Lon protease triggers inhibition of translation in Escherichia coli: involvement of the yefM-yoeB toxin-antitoxin system. Mol. Microbiol. 51:1705–1717 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Ciampi M. S. 2006. Rho-dependent terminators and transcription termination. Microbiology 152:2515–2528 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Cohen S. E., et al. 2010. Roles for the transcription elongation factor NusA in both DNA repair and damage tolerance pathways in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107:15517–15522 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Cohen S. E., Walker G. C. 2010. The transcription elongation factor NusA is required for stress-induced mutagenesis in Escherichia coli. Curr. Biol. 20:80–85 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Condon C., Squires C., Squires C. L. 1995. Control of rRNA transcription in Escherichia coli. Microbiol. Rev. 59:623–645 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Datsenko K. A., Wanner B. L. 2000. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97:6640–6645 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Dillon S. C., Dorman C. J. 2010. Bacterial nucleoid-associated proteins, nucleoid structure and gene expression. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8:185–195 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Dorman C. J. 2004. H-NS: a universal regulator for a dynamic genome. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2:391–400 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Epshtein V., Dutta D., Wade J., Nudler E. 2010. An allosteric mechanism of Rho-dependent transcription termination. Nature 463:245–249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Fang F. C., Rimsky S. 2008. New insights into transcriptional regulation by H-NS. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 11:113–120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Friedman D. I., Baron L. S. 1974. Genetic characterization of a bacterial locus involved in the activity of the N function of phage lambda. Virology 58:141–148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Gopal B., et al. 2001. Crystal structure of the transcription elongation/anti-termination factor NusA from Mycobacterium tuberculosis at 1.7 Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 314:1087–1095 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Gottesman M. E., Weisberg R. A. 2004. Little lambda, who made thee? Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 68:796–813 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Gowrishankar J., Harinarayanan R. 2004. Why is transcription coupled to translation in bacteria? Mol. Microbiol. 54:598–603 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Greenblatt J., et al. 1980. L factor that is required for beta-galactosidase synthesis is the nusA gene product involved in transcription termination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 77:1991–1994 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Ha K. S., Toulokhonov I., Vassylyev D. G., Landick R. 2010. The NusA N-terminal domain is necessary and sufficient for enhancement of transcriptional pausing via interaction with the RNA exit channel of RNA polymerase. J. Mol. Biol. 401:708–725 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Harinarayanan R., Gowrishankar J. 2003. Host factor titration by chromosomal R-loops as a mechanism for runaway plasmid replication in transcription termination-defective mutants of Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 332:31–46 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Higashitani A., Higashitani N., Yasuda S., Horiuchi K. 1994. A general and fast method for mapping mutations on the Escherichia coli chromosome. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:2426–2427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Jin D. J., Burgess R. R., Richardson J. P., Gross C. A. 1992. Termination efficiency at rho-dependent terminators depends on kinetic coupling between RNA polymerase and rho. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89:1453–1457 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Kung H., Spears C., Weissbach H. 1975. Purification and properties of a soluble factor required for the deoxyribonucleic acid-directed in vitro synthesis of β-galactosidase. J. Biol. Chem. 250:1556–1562 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Lau L. F., Roberts J. W. 1985. Rho-dependent transcription termination at lambda R1 requires upstream sequences. J. Biol. Chem. 260:574–584 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Lau L. F., Roberts J. W., Wu R. 1982. Transcription terminates at lambda tR1 in three clusters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 79:6171–6175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Li J., Mason S. W., Greenblatt J. 1993. Elongation factor NusG interacts with termination factor rho to regulate termination and antitermination of transcription. Genes Dev. 7:161–172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Madrid C., Balsalobre C., Garcia J., Juarez A. 2007. The novel Hha/YmoA family of nucleoid-associated proteins: use of structural mimicry to modulate the activity of the H-NS family of proteins. Mol. Microbiol. 63:7–14 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Miller J. H. 1992. A short course in bacterial genetics: a laboratory manual and handbook for Escherichia coli and related bacteria. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Mooney R. A., Schweimer K., Rosch P., Gottesman M., Landick R. 2009. Two structurally independent domains of E. coli NusG create regulatory plasticity via distinct interactions with RNA polymerase and regulators. J. Mol. Biol. 391:341–358 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Nakamura Y., Mizusawa S., Court D. L., Tsugawa A. 1986. Regulatory defects of a conditionally lethal nusA(Ts) mutant of Escherichia coli: positive and negative modulator roles of NusA protein in vivo. J. Mol. Biol. 189:103–111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Nudler E., Gottesman M. E. 2002. Transcription termination and anti-termination in Escherichia coli. Genes Cells 7:755–768 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Peters J. M., Vangeloff A. D., Landick R. 2011. Bacterial transcription terminators: the RNA 3′-end chronicles. J. Mol. Biol. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.03.036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Posfai G., et al. 2006. Emergent properties of reduced-genome Escherichia coli. Science 312:1044–1046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Richardson J. P. 2002. Rho-dependent termination and ATPases in transcript termination. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1577:251–260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Roberts J. W., Shankar S., Filter J. J. 2008. RNA polymerase elongation factors. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 62:211–233 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Rudd K. E. 1998. Linkage map of Escherichia coli K-12, edition 10: the physical map. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:985–1019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Sambrook J., Russell D. W. 2001. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 3rd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Saxena S., Gowrishankar J. 2011. Modulation of Rho-dependent transcription termination in Escherichia coli by the H-NS family of proteins. J. Bacteriol. 193:3832–3841 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Sen R., Challissery J., Muteeb G. 18 January 2008. Module 4.5.3.1, Nus factors of Escherichia coli. In Curtiss R., III, et al. (ed.), EcoSal—Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology. ASM Press, Washington, DC: http://www.ecosal.org/ [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Shin D. H., et al. 2003. Crystal structure of NusA from Thermotoga maritima and functional implication of the N-terminal domain. Biochemistry 42:13429–13437 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Singer M., et al. 1989. A collection of strains containing genetically linked alternating antibiotic resistance elements for genetic mapping of Escherichia coli. Microbiol. Rev. 53:1–24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Sparkowski J., Das A. 1992. Simultaneous gain and loss of functions caused by a single amino acid substitution in the beta subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase: suppression of nusA and rho mutations and conditional lethality. Genetics 130:411–428 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Sullivan S. L., Gottesman M. E. 1992. Requirement for Escherichia coli NusG protein in factor-dependent transcription termination. Cell 68:989–994 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Ward D. F., Gottesman M. E. 1981. The nus mutations affect transcription termination in Escherichia coli. Nature 292:212–215 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Washburn R. S., Gottesman M. E. 2011. Transcription termination maintains chromosome integrity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108:792–797 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Weisberg R. A., Gottesman M. E. 1999. Processive antitermination. J. Bacteriol. 181:359–367 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Williams R. M., Rimsky S., Buc H. 1996. Probing the structure, function, and interactions of the Escherichia coli H-NS and StpA proteins by using dominant-negative derivatives. J. Bacteriol. 178:4335–4343 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Worbs M., Bourenkov G. P., Bartunik H. D., Huber R., Wahl M. C. 2001. An extended RNA binding surface through arrayed S1 and KH domains in transcription factor NusA. Mol. Cell 7:1177–1189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Zheng C., Friedman D. I. 1994. Reduced Rho-dependent transcription termination permits NusA-independent growth of Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91:7543–7547 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Zhou Y., Mah T. F., Greenblatt J., Friedman D. I. 2002. Evidence that the KH RNA-binding domains influence the action of the Escherichia coli NusA protein. J. Mol. Biol. 318:1175–1188 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES