Skip to main content
. 1999 Nov 15;13(22):2958–2970. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.22.2958

Table 2.

tam-1 effects on reporter transgene activity


Construct
Relative intensities of reporters
expression pattern
wild-type
tam-1
A myo-3::gfp body-wall muscle  vulval muscle ++++ +++ + +
unc-54::gfp body-wall muscle +++ +
hlh-1::gfp body-wall muscle ++
myo-2::gfp pharyngeal muscle ++++ ++
F22B7.9::gfp gut ++
egl-15::gfp vulval muscle +++
 gut +
 neurons near head +
lin-3::lacZ anchor cell +++ +
gpa-1::lacZ head neurons +++ +
 plasmid neurons +++ +
lin-11::lacZ 2° vulval lineages ++
 VC motor neurons +++
 ventral uterine π cells   and their progeny ++
mab-5::gfp posterior region  neurons near tail + + −−
B let-858::gfp all somatic nuclei +++ +++
rps-5::gfp all somatic nuclei +++ +++
glr-1::gfp subset of neurons +++ +++
unc-119::gfp many neurons +++ +++

Expression of tandemly repeated transgenes in wild-type and tam-1 mutants. GFP transgenes were examined in tam-1(cc567), and lacZ transgenes were examined in tam-1(sy272). Number of plus signs (+) indicate relative intensity of GFP fluorescence or lacZ signal. (−) No observable signal. In cases where no expression was observed in tam-1 mutants, an outcross was performed to confirm the reappearance of reporter expression. (A) tam-1 effects were seen on a number of different reporter constructs. (B) Other transgenes showed little or no effect in tam-1 mutants. Additional myo-3::gfp and rps-5::gfp transgenes (independently derived) were tested in wild-type and tam-1(cc567) backgrounds and showed similar results (data not shown).