Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Nov 29.
Published in final edited form as: J Immunol. 2010 Dec 22;186(3):1421–1431. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1002587

Functional redundancy between thymic CD8α+ and Sirpα+ conventional dendritic cells in presentation of blood-derived lysozyme by class II-MHC proteins

Danielle F Atibalentja *, Kenneth M Murphy *,, Emil R Unanue *
PMCID: PMC3509769  NIHMSID: NIHMS422609  PMID: 21178002

Abstract

We evaluated the presentation of blood-derived protein antigens by antigen presenting cells (APC) in the thymus. Two conventional dendritic cells (cDC), the CD8α+SirpαCD11chi (CD8α+cDC) and the CD8αSirpα+ CD11chi cells (Sirpα+cDC), were previously identified as presenting class II-MHC bound peptides from hen egg-white lysozyme (HEL) injected intravenously. All thymic APC acquired the injected HEL, with the plasmacytoid DC (pDC) being the best, followed by the Sirpα+ cDC and the CD8α+cDC. Both cDC induced to similar extent negative selection and Tregs in HEL T cell receptor (TCR) transgenic mice, indicating a redundant role of the two cDC subsets in the presentation of blood-borne HEL. Immature DC or pDC were considerably less efficient. Batf3−/− mice, with significantly reduced numbers of CD8α+cDC, were not impaired in HEL presentation by I-Ak molecules of thymic APC. Lastly, clodronate-liposome (CLOD-LIP) treatment of TCR transgenic mice depleted blood APC including Sirpα+ cDC, without affecting the number of thymic APC. In such treated mice there was no effect on negative selection or Tregs in mice when administering HEL, indicating that the T cell responses were mediated primarily by the cDC localized in the thymus.

INTRODUCTION

Thymic architecture determines the access of blood circulating proteins to the cellular components that mediate tolerance induction. The blood-thymic barrier restricted access to large molecular-weight proteins, indicating a well-regulated process (13). Studies using peroxidase as a tracer revealed that the cortico-medullary junction was the site of leakage for blood-borne Ags, while the cortex was largely impermeable (4). Further, a conduit system was identified in the medulla of the human thymus that allowed access to small molecules excluding larger molecular weight molecules (5). Several other studies provided evidence that blood-borne Ags had access to the thymic parenchyma (6, 7): their entry resulted in both presentation (810) and negative selection upon capture and presentation by thymic APC (1118). But aside from the direct leakage of blood-borne Ags into the thymus, peripheral Ag-bearing DC were shown to enter the thymus and mediate clonal deletion of T cells (19, 20).

The mouse thymic DC population is comprised of cDC and pDC (2123). The cDC subsets include the resident intra-thymically derived CD8α+SirpαCD11chi (CD8α+ cDC) set which makes up more than two-thirds of thymic cDC, and a minor transient set, the CD8αSirpα+CD11chi (Sirpα+ cDC) (21, 23). Both pDC and Sirpα+ cDC originate in the bone-marrow and are home to the thymus in the steady-state (24). A disproportionate uptake of blood-borne Ag by Sirpα+ cDC led to the interpretation that these are the DC that mediated tolerance to blood-borne Ags due to their localization next to blood vessels (18). Moreover, in one study, Sirpα+ cDC in the thymus induced Tregs more efficiently compared to CD8α+cDC, pDC and splenic DC when cultured with thymocytes in the presence of IL-7 (25).

Our previous report indicated the high sensitivity of intravenously-injected HEL in inducing negative selection of CD4 T cells including Tregs. Blood-borne HEL was effectively captured by medullary CD11c+ cells and induced both negative selection and Tregs, depending on the density of the peptide-MHC complexes presented (17). Presentation by medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTEC) was minimal, and there was no detectable presentation by cortical thymic epithelial cells (cTEC), even when higher doses of HEL were provided. These results suggested that the access of circulating HEL to thymic APC at the cortico-medullary junction, the primary site of leakage in the thymus, was a major factor in presentation by class II-MHC molecules. Two unresolved issues concerning thymic APC and their role in modulating CD4 T cells are now examined: i) the relative contribution of Sirpα+ cDC compared to CD8α+cDC to blood-borne HEL presentation; and, ii) importantly, whether the entrance into the thymus of intravenously-injected HEL occurred independent of peripheral APC.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Mice

Mice were maintained under pathogen-free conditions in accordance with institutional animal care guidelines. B10.BR mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, Maine) or bred in our facility. 3A9 TCR transgenic mice against the major HEL48–62 peptide were a kind gift from Dr. Mark Davis (Stanford University, Stanford, CA). mHEL mice expressing HEL under the I-Eα promoter (26), LB11.3 mice expressing a TCR against the minor HEL: 20–35 peptide (17), and Batf3−/− mice (27) were generated at our institution. LB11.3 and 3A9 mice were mated to Foxp3.GFP mice generated in the laboratory of Dr. Alexander Rudensky (University of Washington, Seattle, WA).

Flow Cytometry

Flow cytometry data were acquired using a FACSCalibur or LSRII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using FlowJo software (TreeStar). Cell sorting was performed using a BD FACSAria II cell sorter (BD). In all DC sorting experiments, thymic DC subsets were identified using the following mAbs: anti-CD45RA (14.8)biotin (BD Bioscience), anti-Sirpα (P84) PE (BDBiosciences), anti-CD8α (53-6.7) Alexa 700 (Biolegend), anti-CD11c (N418) APC-Alexa 750 (Biolegend) or anti-CD11c (N418) APC-efluor® 780 (eBioscience). In T-cell sorting experiments, thymocytes were stained with anti-CD4 (GK1.5) APC (eBioscience), anti-CD25 (PC61) PE (BD Pharmingen) anti-CD8α (53-6.7) Alexa 700 (Biolegend). In the in vitro thymocyte antigen assays, thymocytes were stained with anti-CD4 (RM4-5) efluor® 450 (eBioscience), anti-CD8α (53.6.7) Alexa 700 (eBioscience), anti-CD69 (H1-2F3) FITC (eBioscience). mTEC and cTEC were identified using anti-CD45 (30-F11) (eBioscience), anti-EpCAM (G8.8) (BD Bioscience or Biolegend), anti-BP-1 (6C3) (eBioscience), anti-UEA-1 (Biomeda). Anti-I-Aαk (11-5.2) Alexa 488 or FITC (Biolegend) was used to detect MHC class II. 3A9 TCR transgenic T-cells were identified either using anti-Vβ8.1/8.2 (MR5-2) (BD Pharmingen) or 1G12 mAb (26). LB11.3 TCR transgenic T-cells were identified using anti-Vα2 (B20.1) (eBioscience). Intracellular staining with anti-Foxp3 (FKJ-16S) (eBioscience) was performed using the Foxp3 staining buffer set according to the manufacturer's instructions (eBioscience).

Isolation and Testing of Thymic APC

Thymic DC were isolated from groups of 5–20 mice (5–8 weeks of age) injected with HEL and sacrificed at the relevant time-point for the experiment. DC from un-injected mice were isolated side by side. DC were purified as previously described (28) by Nycodenz density gradient fractionation using Nycoprep™ Universal (Accurate Chemical). Briefly, thymic fragments were digested for 30–45 min at room temperature in media supplemented with collagenase D and DNAse (Roche). DC–T cell complexes were further disrupted by the addition of 0.1 M EDTA. Cells were overlaid on a 14% Nycodenz solution (1.077 g/ml). The low density layer enriched for DC was collected after centrifugation at 4C. Low density cells were further segregated by cell sorting into the following subsets: CD45RAhiCD11cint (pDC), CD45RAloCD11cint (immature DC), CD45RAloCD8α Sirpα+CD11chi (Sirpα+ cDC), CD45RAloCD8α+SirpαCD11chi (CD8α+ cDC). In some instances, CD45 TECs were also enriched from the thymi of 5–8 week B10.BR mice injected with or without HEL (29, 30).

Presentation Assays

In experiments evaluating the ability of thymic APC to present HEL, 5×104 3A9 T-cell hybridoma were cultured with titrating numbers of sorted DC isolated from mice injected with 50µg HEL 30min. Thymic DC subsets isolated from uninjected mice were tested for presentation of HEL or 10µM peptide added continuously to the culture, or HEL added for only one hour. After 24 hours, IL-2 production was measured in the supernatant using the CTLL-2 T-cell line.

In vitro Thymocyte Assay

To assay different DC subsets for their capacity to induce negative selection, an in vitro thymocyte antigen assay was adapted from previously described methods (3135). Briefly, 5×104 whole 3A9 thymocytes were cultured for 14–16 hours in 96-well round bottom-plates in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum in the presence of either, i) sorted DC (starting with 5×104 DC/well) isolated from B10.BR mice 30 min after injection of 150 µg HEL i.v., or, ii) 2×104 sorted DC from un-injected mice in the presence of different amounts of HEL, starting with 30µM HEL. The DC subsets were: Sirpα+ cDC, CD8α+ cDC, immature DC, and pDC. Cells were washed and stained with anti-CD4, anti-CD8 and anti-CD69 mAbs. To determine the number of cells per well, a known concentration of countbright™ absolute counting beads (Molecular Probes) was added to each well prior to analysis by flow-cytometry. The number of CD4hiCD8hi (DPhi) and CD69+CD4SP was determined by multiplying the percentage of these subsets by the total number of lymphocytes in each well.

In vitro Treg Differentiation Assay

The assay testing different thymic APC for induction of Tregs was adapted from a previously described method (25). Briefly, 5×104 sorted Foxp3CD25CD4SP from LB11.3 Foxp3GFP were cultured with 1.5×104 APC in the presence of 250U/ml IL-2 in a 96-well round bottom plate for 5 days. APC were isolated and sorted, either from B10.BR mice 30 min after injection of 50µg HEL or from untreated B10.BR mice. In experiments comparing the effectiveness of TECs relative to DC at inducing Tregs in response to in vivo captured Ag, DC and TECs were isolated by sequential magnetic bead isolation using anti-CD11c beads, followed by anti-CD45 beads to deplete CD45+ cells (Miltenyi Biotec). In experiments comparing the effectiveness of different DC subsets at inducing Tregs, DC were enriched first using Nycodenz gradient fractionation followed by cell sorting to further segregate the DC populations. In some experiments DC subsets from untreated mice were cultured with T-cells in the presence of titrating levels of HEL, starting with 30µM HEL.

HEL Uptake

Endotoxin-free HEL was labeled using an AnaTag™ HilytePlus™ 647 protein labeling kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Anaspec). 5–8 week B10.BR mice were injected intravenously with 500µg HEL HilytePlus 647™ or saline. One group was bled and sacrificed from 1 to 30 min later: their blood leukocytes were analyzed by flow-cytometry to determine uptake. A second group was sacrificed at 5 and 30 min post-injection and thymic DC subsets were isolated by Nycodenz gradient fractionation and stained with DC-specific markers to determine extent of HEL uptake. 1×106 total events were acquired by flow-cytometry to identify HEL positive cells.

Liposome Depletion of Blood Sirpα+ cDC

PBS liposomes (PBS-LIP) and dichloromethylene-bisphosphonate (Clodronate) liposomes (CLOD-LIP) were encapsulated as previously described (36). B10.BR mice were injected i.v. with 250 µl of either PBS-LIP or CLOD-LIP. At 12 and 24 hours, mice were bled to evaluate depletion of phagocytic cells in the blood by flow-cytometry. At 24 hours, thymi and spleen were also examined. To analyze the effect of blood monocytes including Sirpα+ cDC depletion on thymic selection, 3A9 mice were injected i.v. with 250ul PBS or CLOD liposomes. At 16 hours, mice were injected with either 50µg HEL or pyrogen-free saline (PFS). Twenty hours later, thymi were harvested, single-cell suspensions were made, and the effect on thymic cellularity, CD4SP, and Foxp3+ CD4SP was evaluated by flow-cytometry.

DC Transfer

DC were isolated from B10.BR mice injected i.p. for three consecutive days with 10µg/ml FLT3L (37). Eight days after the first injection, spleens were harvested and diced into small fragments which were digested with 0.14U/ml Liberase Blendzyme 3 (Roche). After ACK lysis to remove red blood cells, DC were positively selected by magnetic bead isolation using anti-CD11c beads (Miltenyi Biotec). DC were recovered at ≥ 95% purity as determined by flow cytometry. 2×107 DC were transferred i.v. into 3A9 TCR transgenic mice. Thymi were evaluated 24 hours later for effect on total cellularity, CD4SP, and Foxp3+CD4SP.

Statistical Analysis of Data

All data were analyzed with GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Software). Statistical significance was assessed by the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. Differences with P values less than 0.05 were considered significant and are indicated in the figures.

RESULTS

Presentation of HEL in Culture by Thymic Subsets

Thymic APC were isolated either from mice injected with HEL intravenously or not injected. The APC were examined for their presentation of the HEL epitopes 48–62, or 20–35 to the CD4 T cells 3A9 or LB11.3, respectively.

The experiment presented in Figure 1 compared presentation by the various thymic DC subsets. Thymic DC were isolated and sorted into cDC (Sirpα+cDC and CD8α+cDC) and CD11cintCD45RAhi (pDC) subsets (21, 23, 28) (Figure 1A). CD11cintCD45RAlo (immature DC), expressing intermediate levels of CD11c and lower levels of MHC Class II and co-stimulatory molecules (Figure S1), were also sorted (Figure 1A). A small but variable percentage of cDC that expressed CD8α also expressed Sirpα (CD172a). These double-positive CD11chi cells could represent Sirpα+ cDC that passively acquired surface CD8α from other cells, a phenomenon previously described (22). These double-positive cells were excluded from the sorting analyses shown next and in Figures 3 and 4.

Figure 1. All thymic DC subsets present HEL.

Figure 1

HEL presentation was assayed on thymic DCs isolated from B10.BR mice. A) Shows the criteria for identifying the various DC subsets, based on expression of CD45RA, CD11c, CD8α and Sirpα. Post-sort indicates the purity of the DC sorted into Sirpα+ cDC (■), CD8α+cDC (▲), immature DC (▼) and pDC (◆). B) DC were isolated from B10.BR mice injected with 50µg HEL, 30min before. Cells were cultured for 24h with the 3A9 T-cell hybridoma, after which IL-2 was measured. C) Thymic DC isolated from un-injected mice were cultured with 3A9 T-cell hybridoma in the presence of continuous HEL, or D), with 10µM HEL 48–62 peptide. E) As in panel C, but HEL was pulsed for 1h and washed away. IL-2 production was measured by CTLL proliferation as indicated by [3H] thymidine incorporation. Data in B is representative of three experiments with each APC concentration tested in triplicate. Data in C–D and E is representative of two and four experiments respectively with each point or individual bar representing duplicate or triplicate samples. Error bars indicate SD.

Figure 3. Induction of thymocyte negative selection or activation by thymic DC subsets.

Figure 3

A) Deletion of DPhi thymocytes in response to titrated DC from mice injected i.v. with 150µg HEL and isolated 30 min later. B) CD69 up-regulation on CD4SP thymocytes cultured with DC as in (A). C) (top), 3A9 thymocytes were cultured either alone (No Antigen) or with sorted DC subsets in the presence of 30µM HEL. (bottom) CD4SP T-cells were examined for CD69 up-regulation in response to culture with the DC. D) Deletion of DPhi thymocytes in response to titrated HEL when 3A9 thymocytes were cultured with sorted DC subsets. (E) CD69 upregulation on CD4SP cultured with DC as in (D). The DC subsets evaluated were Sirpα+ cDC (■), CD8α+cDC (▲), Immature DC (▼) and pDC (◆). Data is representative of two (Figures 3A–B) and six (Figures C–E) experiments with each antigen dose or APC concentration tested in duplicate or triplicate. Error bars indicate SD.

Figure 4. Treg induction to blood-borne HEL by thymic DC subsets.

Figure 4

A) Percentage and B) absolute number of Foxp3+CD25+CD4+ cells induced after culture of Foxp3CD25CD4SP thymocytes from LB11.3 foxp3GFP mice with the indicated sorted DC subsets. APC were isolated and enriched from B10.BR mice injected i.v. with 50µg HEL 30min before (black bars) or un-injected (white bars). Data is representative of three experiments with error bars denoting SD.

In the experiment of panel B, mice were injected with HEL, the thymic DC were isolated 30min later, and tested for presentation of the HEL 48–62 peptide to the 3A9 T-cell hybridoma. Confirming our previous results (17), both Sirpα+cDC and CD8α+cDC effectively presented in vivo captured HEL with low level presentation by pDC and none by immature DC (Figure 1B).

This result was compared to presentation by DCs isolated from un-injected mice and assayed upon addition of HEL or the HEL 48–62 peptide. Regardless of the DC subsets tested, there was no difference in the presentation of HEL or peptide (Figure 1C, D). However, when the availability of HEL was limited by incubating APCs with HEL for 1 hour, then washing it away before adding T-cells, presentation by pDC and immature DC was about 2 logs less than that with cDC (Figure 1E).

Thymic APC were examined from Batf3−/− mice which have a significantly reduced number of CD8α+cDC in the thymus and peripheral tissues (27). Their cDC were primarily Sirpα+ cDC (Figure 2A). There was normal MHC class II expression among the DC subsets (data not shown). Thymic DC were isolated from Batf3−/− mice and B10.BR mice injected with HEL 30min before, sorted to CD11chi MHC IIhi cells and cultured with the 3A9 T-cell hybridoma. There was no difference in both groups in the presentation of HEL acquired in vivo (Figure 2B). Thus, presentation of blood-borne HEL by class II-MHC molecules of thymic APC can take place in the Batf3−/− mice by the remaining Sirpα+ cDC cells.

Figure 2. Presentation by thymic cDC from Batf3−/− mice.

Figure 2

A) DCs were isolated from B10.BR or Batf3−/− thymi. Left, gated DC subsets with pDC (CD45RAhiCD11cint), immature DC (CD45RAloCD11cint) and cDC (CD45RAloCD11chi). Right, Sirpα vs. CD8α expression gating on cDC. B) 3A9 T-cell hybridoma cultured for 24 hours with thymic CD11chi MHC II+ DC isolated and sorted from B10.BR mice (▲) or Batf3−/− mice (■) injected i.v. with 50µg HEL and sacrificed 30 min after injection. IL-2 production was measured by CTLL proliferation as indicated by [3H] thymidine incorporation. Data is representative of two experiments, with each APC concentration tested in triplicate. Error bars indicate SD.

Negative Selection and Activation of Thymic Lymphocytes by the Various Thymic DC

Negative selection was assayed in an in vitro thymocyte culture system (3135) using 3A9 thymocytes, from the TCR transgenic mice. Deletion of DPhi and activation of CD4SP from 3A9 thymocytes was assayed by flow-cytometry after culturing for 16 hrs in the presence of the sorted DC subsets (Figure 3A, B). In the same culture, the absolute number of immature CD4hiCD8hi (DPhi) remaining was examined, while activation was determined by CD69 up-regulation in the CD4hiCD8 (CD4SP).

Thymic DC were isolated from mice injected with HEL 30–45min before. Both cDC subsets effectively deleted DPhi cells at all concentrations and were the best thymic APC in inducing negative selection (Figure 3A). Immature DC did not delete and pDC showed a modest effect.

Sorted cDC, immature DC, and pDC isolated from un-injected mice were cultured for 14 hours with 3A9 thymocytes and different HEL concentrations. Figure 3C is an example of thymocytes cultured with a high dose of HEL (30uM): DPhi cells were deleted by all the DC subsets, albeit to varying extent (Figure 3C, D). Figure 3D shows the response to titrated amounts of HEL represented as absolute numbers of DPhi cells. With cDC and pDC, DPhi cells were nearly ablated at the highest dose, while deletion by immature DC was less severe.

Regardless of whether HEL was captured in vivo or was provided in the cultures, there was activation of CD4SP by all DC subsets, although the CD8α+cDC were particularly effective (Figure 3B, C bottom, E). Both cDC subsets were better relative to immature DC and pDC at inducing CD4SP activation in response to in vivo captured HEL, causing CD69 up-regulation above background, even with the lowest number of APC tested (~800 cells/well) (Figure 3B).

In vitro Treg Induction by Thymic APC Subsets

Injection of low-dose HEL resulted in the induction of Tregs in both 3A9 and LB11.3 TCR transgenic mice (17). Treg induction was best found with the LB11.3 TCR transgenic mice specific for the minor HEL epitope, 20–35. To identify which APCs were capturing and presenting HEL for Treg induction (38, 39), thymic DC were isolated from mice injected 30 min before with HEL. The APCs were co-cultured in the presence of IL-2 with sorted Foxp3CD25CD4SP from LB11.3Foxp3.GFP mice (Figure 4A–C). There was an increase in the percentage and absolute number of Foxp3+CD4+ cells, whether the APC were Sirpα+ cDC or CD8α+cDC (Figure 4B, C). In contrast, there was minimal to no induction with pDC, immature DC (Figure 4B, C) or TECs (Figure S2). DC from uninjected mice did not induce Tregs, indicating that induction required cells to have acquired HEL in vivo (Figure 4A–C). We concluded that Treg induction in response to blood-borne HEL was mediated by cDC.

We compared Treg induction by DC isolated from un-injected mice in the presence of HEL (Figure S2). All DC induced a level of LB11.3Foxp3GFP+ cells. The most effective were the cDC. The cDC induced a response at the lowest level of HEL much better than at the higher dose.

Uptake of Blood-borne HEL by Intra-thymic cDC

The uptake of HEL by thymic APC was examined following injection of HEL labeled with HilytePlus™647. 0.28% and 0.41% of all thymic cells were HEL+ at 5 or 30 min after injection, respectively (Figure 5A). 21.3% and 27.4% of CD11c+ cells in the DC-enriched fraction contained HEL at 5min and 30min, respectively (Figure 5B). DC enriched cells were further analyzed gating on the different DC subsets (Figure 5C). HEL was acquired by all APC, but the proportion with HEL and their intensity varied. pDC had higher levels of HEL compared to the other DC subsets, while immature DC contained the least amount (Figure 5C). Among the cDC, the Sirpα+ cDC showed heterogeneity in uptake but higher on average than the uptake by CD8α+cDC (Figure 5C). As previously reported with ovalbumin (18), a higher percentage of Sirpα+ cDC acquired HEL compared to CD8α+cDC at both 5min and 30min (Figure 5C). [Of note, among the gated CD11chi cells expressing Sirpα, there was also HEL uptake by a subset of cells that co-expressed CD8α (Figure 5C).]

Figure 5. Uptake of blood-borne HEL by intra-thymic cDC.

Figure 5

(A) Uptake of HEL by thymocytes from B10.BR mice injected with saline or 500µg HEL HilytePlus™ 647. Mice were sacrificed at 5 min or 30 min post-injection. Graph shows the average percentage of HEL+ cells in the whole thymi fraction pooled from all the experiments with error bars indicating SEM. B) DC enriched fractions from mice injected with saline or HEL as in A. Left, total events of DC enriched fraction. Right, HEL fluorescence gating on total CD11c+ cells shown left: the saline injected, in solid gray, 5 min HEL in blue and 30 min HEL in green. C) Overlay of HEL Hilyte647 fluorescence by DC subsets gated on the DC enriched fraction shown in panel B. The numbers in each histogram represent the percentage of cells from the indicated subset that is positive for HEL and are from mice injected with saline (gray), HEL for 5 min (blue) or 30 min (green). Data is representative of three experiments, using DC isolated from seven (saline and 5 min) and eight mice (30 min).

Together, these results indicate uptake by all APC with some differences in degree. The differences in uptake between the two cDC subsets, about five fold, had little functional consequences: the presentation experiments showed that CD8α+ cDC and Sirpα+ cDC presented in vivo captured HEL to a similar extent (17) (Figure 1).

Role of Peripheral Sirpα+ cDC in the Establishment of Tolerance to Blood-borne Ags

We considered whether Sirpα+ cDC in the blood could take up some of the injected HEL, enter the thymus, and contribute to T-cell selection events. In addition to monocytes and granulocytes, mouse blood includes pDC and two types of myeloid DC subsets (40). Among peripheral DC, blood Sirpα+ cDC and pDC entered the thymus at low frequency (18, 19, 24, 25), and Sirpα+ cDC induced negative selection and Tregs (19, 25). Additionally, blood monocytes were shown not to migrate to the thymus in the steady state (24). To confirm in our experimental system that DC could enter the thymus and induce negative selection (19), FLT3L elicited CD11c from transgenic mice expressing HEL in all APCs (mHEL mice) that were injected into 3A9 TCR transgenic mice and the effect on thymocytes was evaluated. Injected mHEL DC induced negative selection of 3A9 thymocytes as indicated by significant reduction in cellularity (Figure 6A), number of CD4SP (Figure 6B) and number of Foxp3+CD4SP (Figure 6C). Participation of peripheral DC in thymic selection events could be due to direct presentation or transfer of antigen to resident DC in the thymus as previously described between migratory DC and lymph node resident DC (41, 42).

Figure 6. Induction of negative selection by FLT3L DC expressing membrane bound HEL.

Figure 6

A) Total cellularity, B) CD4SP and C) Foxp3+CD4SP cells in 3A9 mice injected with 2×107 FLT3L elicited DC from mHEL or B10.BR mice. Thymi were harvested 24 hours after injection. Graphs are from events gated on total lymphocytes with each bar representing pooled data from two experiments: B10.BR DC (7 mice), mHEL DC (11 mice). Statistical significance is indicated on graphs with (**), denoting p=0.0028, and (***) denoting p=0.006. Error bars indicate SEM.

Whether APCs in the blood could take up HEL and enter the thymus was next examined. Mice were injected either with saline or HEL HilytePlus™647, bled at different time-points and the cellular uptake assessed by flow-cytometry. As early as 1min after injection, both CD11c+ and CD11c cells were positive for HEL (Figure 7A–C). HEL+ CD11c subsets were cleared from the blood within five minutes post-injection (Figure 7B), but some HEL+CD11c+ cells were detected over time, albeit with decreasing frequency (Figure 7C). Most of the HEL was found in both CD11bhi and CD11bint/lo subsets within the CD11c negative population (Figure 7D). This population included cells that were CD11c Sirpα+CD11bhi, a phenotype consistent with the expression pattern for blood monocytes (21, 43, 44). Among CD11c positive cells, there was HEL uptake by both Sirpα+ and Sirpα subsets: the CD11c+Sirpα+ cells were CD11bhi, whereas the CD11c+Sirpα subset expressed intermediate levels of CD11b. Thus, while blood HEL is captured pre-dominantly by CD11c negative cells (CD11cSirpα+, and CD11cSirpα), CD11c+ cells, including CD11c+Sirpα+ cDC, the dominant cell that brings antigens into the thymus, also acquired HEL (Figure 7D). The expression of CD11b by blood Sirpα+ cDC is consistent with published reports (18, 24).

Figure 7. HEL is rapidly acquired by both CD11c positive and negative subsets in the blood and cleared.

Figure 7

A) Uptake of HEL HilytePlus™ 647 by blood CD11c+ and CD11c cells at different times post-injection. Percentage of HEL HilytePlus™ 647 staining by B) CD11c+ and C) CD11c cells in mice that were injected with HEL HilytePlus™ 647 (black bars) or saline (white bars) and sacrificed at the indicated times. D) (left), Sirpα and CD11c staining of peripheral blood cells from mice injected with saline (top) or HEL Hilyte647 (bottom) 1min after injection. (right) HEL uptake by CD11b positive and negative cells gating on the indicated subsets shown in the left panel. Data is representative of two experiments. Graphs are from events excluding red blood cells by SSC × FSC with each bar representing pooled data from two to three mice. Error bars indicate SD.

The effect on negative selection and Tregs when phagocytic cells were depleted from the blood prior to HEL administration was examined in the experiment shown in Figure 8. Phagocytes were depleted using CLOD-LIP (36, 44). Mice were injected with liposomes, either PBS-LIP or CLOD-LIP, and bled at 12 hours and 24 hours. At 12 and 24 hours there was major depletion of Sirpα+cDC (Figure 8A). In addition to Sirpα+cDC, other APCs were reduced (44), including cells that were CD11cSirpα+CD11bhiB220lo cells, consistent with the expression pattern for blood monocytes (40, 43) (Figure 8A and data not shown). At 24 hours these CD11cSirpα+CD11bhiB220lo cells decreased from 48.1% in PBS-LIP mice to 27.5% in CLOD-LIP treated mice (Figure 8A). Moreover, cells with the phenotype of pDC (CD11c+SirpαintCD11bloB220+) (45, 46) were reduced at 12 hours, but by 24 hours the percentages were comparable to the PBS-LIP control (Figure 8A and S3). Myeloid DC (CD11c+SirpαCD11b+)(40, 47) were variably depleted at 12h with normal levels by 24h (Figure 8A and S3). Examination of the thymus 24 hours post-injection showed that the proportion of thymic Sirpα+ cDC in CLOD-LIP injected mice was comparable to mice that received the PBS-LIP control (Figure 8A). This was in contrast to the spleen where there was depletion of not only Sirpα+ CD11c+ cells, but other populations as well in mice that were injected with CLOD-LIP (36) (data not shown). In brief, CLOD-LIP depleted only the circulating APCs.

Figure 8. Liposome depletion of blood Sirpα+CD11c+ cDC does not impair negative selection and Tregs in response to HEL in the thymus.

Figure 8

A) Depletion of blood Sirpα+ CD11c+ cDC by CLOD-LIP. Sirpα and CD11c staining of cells in peripheral blood and thymus at 12 and 24 hours in mice injected with PBS-LIP and CLOD-LIP. B) cellularity C) CD4SP and D) Foxp3+CD4SP cells in 3A9 mice injected with PBS-LIP or CLOD-LIP prior to injection with 50µg HEL (black) or PFS (white). Graphs are from events gated on total lymphocytes and pooled from two experiments: PBS-LIP+PFS (4 mice), PBS-LIP+HEL (6 mice), CLOD-LIP +PFS (4 mice), CLOD-LIP + HEL (7 mice). Statistical significance is indicated on graphs with (*), denoting p<0.05, and (**) denoting p<0.01. Error bars indicate SEM.

Based on these findings, we chose 16 hours as an appropriate time-point to examine effects of HEL in the absence of blood Sirpα+ cDC. 3A9 TCR transgenic mice were injected first with CLOD-LIP or PBS-LIP, and at 16 hours with 50µg HEL or PFS. Twenty hours later, T cells were examined by flow-cytometry. The HEL dose chosen resulted in near deletion of CD4SP and significant reduction in the number of Tregs in wild-type 3A9 TCR transgenic mice (17). 3A9 CD4SP thymocytes were negatively selected regardless of whether mice had received CLOD-LIP or PBS-LIP as indicated by reduced thymic cellularity (Figure 8B) and number of CD4SP thymocytes (Figure 8C). Further, there was also deletion of Tregs (Figure 8D) that occurred whether mice had been treated with PBS or CLOD LIP.

These results indicate that blood Sirpα+ cDC are dispensable for the induction of thymic tolerance by class II-MHC molecules to blood-borne HEL. While CLOD-LIP treatment was most effective at depleting Sirpα+ cDC (Figure 8A), other circulating APC (monocytes, pDC) were not completely depleted (Figure 8A and S3). However, given the poor presentation of HEL by intra-thymic pDC (Figure 1) and the lack of entry of monocytes into the thymus (24), it is doubtful that these cells contributed to the negative selection observed here.

DISCUSSION

The findings highlighted here build on our previous publication that showed that injected HEL led to negative selection and Treg induction in response to presentation by cDC and not TECs (17). With HEL, as with other blood-borne proteins, uptake in the thymus was modulated by the anatomical features, which imposed constraints not only as to which APC had access to, but also the amount of, HEL that entered the thymus (17). We show here that both cDC subsets captured HEL and both induced negative selection and Tregs. Direct entry of circulating HEL into the thymus was sufficient for effective presentation to take place and did not require entry of HEL-bearing DC.

Based on these observations, we conclude that thymic Sirpα+ cDC and CD8α+cDC were equally competent in mediating presentation events to blood-borne HEL by class II-MHC molecules. A disproportionate uptake of blood-borne Ag by Sirpα+cDC was previously reported leading to the interpretation that these DCs have a unique function in mediating tolerance to blood-borne Ags (18). Our results also showed a higher level of HEL uptake by Sirpα+ cDC compared to CD8α+cDC, but this difference was not enough to impact the functional assays. In contrast to cDC, pDC were poor in inducing presentation, negative selection and Tregs, despite acquiring relatively higher levels of HEL than both cDC subsets and immature DC. pDC have consistently proven to be poor presenters of exogenous antigen (48, 49). The differences in uptake by the different DC subsets might be explained by their anatomical localization. Thymic Sirpα+cDC were recently reported to be localized near perivascular regions and small vessels in the thymic cortex (18) and we previously reported the association of CD11c+ cells next to HEL+ vessels in the medulla (17) . Further, co-staining the thymus with mAbs to CD11c and Sirpα shows staining of cells positioned next to blood vessels at the cortico-medullary junction and within the medulla (unpublished observations). These observations would suggest that localization is an important factor in determining what cells in the thymus have access to blood-derived proteins but not necessarily what cells present.

For presentation events by class II-MHC molecules to a blood-derived antigen – in our case, HEL injected intravenously – CD8α+cDC were dispensable. Their function was compensated by the presence of Sirpα+ cDC, indicating functional redundancy between them. CD8α+cDC are effective in cross-presentation (5052) and therefore may be the predominant cDC in the presentation of peptides by class I-MHC molecules to either blood proteins or to proteins transferred from TEC. Ag transfer was previously shown to occur between mTEC and DC (53, 54).

While we could not directly test a system where Sirpα+cDC are eliminated, work by others showed only a modest impairment in negative selection in CCR2−/− mice, which have reduced numbers of them (18). This data is also supported by a study showing no defect in the negative selection of thymocytes in 3A9 × RIP-HEL mice intercrossed with CD47−/− mice which lack the receptor for Sirpα (55). This was despite the altered proportions of the cDC population in the thymus, resulting in more CD8α+ cDC than Sirpα+ cDC due to a significant reduction of Sirpα+cDC (55). A caveat to this study however is that despite the documented small levels of HEL in the blood of RIP-HEL mice (56), the expression of HEL in the thymus of these mice has been shown to be under the control of AIRE (57), making it difficult to ascertain the true effect on blood-borne Ag presentation in this particular system.

The distribution of HEL among DC adds relevance to our previous estimates of the average numbers of peptide-MHC complexes required to affect thymic lymphocytes. Although there was some degree of heterogeneity in degrees of uptake by the cDC, there was no disproportionately high amount by any of them. Such results support our previous study in which the quantitation of peptide-MHC complexes was based on average uptake of radiolabeled HEL. It was estimated that less than 100 complexes per APC (17) induced negative selection and, or T reg induction. These numbers indicate the high sensitivity of thymic lymphocytes to TCR engagement (17, 58, 59), the efficiency of the antigen presentation process by thymic APC and the potential relevance of blood proteins in the control of autoreactivity to some autologous proteins.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (NIAID AI022033)

We thank Kathy Frederick, Shirley Petzold, Boris Calderon and Beverly Strong for their skillful technical assistance. We also thank Susanne Schloemann and Olga Malkova for their considerable assistance with flow cytometry and cell sorting.

Footnotes

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.CLARK SJ. The thymus in mice of strain 129/J, studied with the electron microscope. Am J Anat. 1963;112:1–33. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001120102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.WEISS L. Electron microscopic, observations on the vascular barrier in the cortex of the thymus of the mouse. Anat Rec. 1963;145:413–437. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091450306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.MARSHALL A, WHITE R. The immunological reactivity of the thymus. Br J Exp Pathol. 1961;42:379–385. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Raviola E, Karnovsky M. Evidence for a blood-thymus barrier using electron-opaque tracers. J Exp Med. 1972;136:466–498. doi: 10.1084/jem.136.3.466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Drumea-Mirancea M, Wessels J, Müller C, Essl M, Eble J, Tolosa E, Koch M, Reinhardt D, Sixt M, Sorokin L, Stierhof Y, Schwarz H, Klein G. Characterization of a conduit system containing laminin-5 in the human thymus: a potential transport system for small molecules. J Cell Sci. 2006;119:1396–1405. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.SAINTE-MARIE G. ANTIGEN PENETRATION INTO THE THYMUS. J Immunol. 1963;91:840–845. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.GREEN I, BLOCH K. UPTAKE OF PARTICULATE MATTER WITHIN THE THYMUS OF ADULT AND NEW-BORN MICE. Nature. 1963;200:1099–1101. doi: 10.1038/2001099a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Klein L, Kyewski B. Self-antigen presentation by thymic stromal cells: a subtle division of labor. Curr Opin Immunol. 2000;12:179–186. doi: 10.1016/s0952-7915(99)00069-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kyewski B, Fathman C, Kaplan H. Intrathymic presentation of circulating non-major histocompatibility complex antigens. Nature. 1984;308:196–199. doi: 10.1038/308196a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kyewski B, Fathman C, Rouse R. Intrathymic presentation of circulating non-MHC antigens by medullary dendritic cells. An antigen-dependent microenvironment for T cell differentiation. J Exp Med. 1986;163:231–246. doi: 10.1084/jem.163.2.231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Murphy K, Heimberger A, Loh D. Induction by antigen of intrathymic apoptosis of CD4+CD8+TCRlo thymocytes in vivo. Science. 1990;250:1720–1723. doi: 10.1126/science.2125367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Klein L, Roettinger B, Kyewski B. Sampling of complementing self-antigen pools by thymic stromal cells maximizes the scope of central T cell tolerance. Eur J Immunol. 2001;31:2476–2486. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(200108)31:8<2476::aid-immu2476>3.0.co;2-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Volkmann A, Zal T, Stockinger B. Antigen-presenting cells in the thymus that can negatively select MHC class II-restricted T cells recognizing a circulating self antigen. J Immunol. 1997;158:693–706. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zal T, Volkmann A, Stockinger B. Mechanisms of tolerance induction in major histocompatibility complex class II-restricted T cells specific for a blood-borne self-antigen. J Exp Med. 1994;180:2089–2099. doi: 10.1084/jem.180.6.2089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liblau R, Tisch R, Shokat K, Yang X, Dumont N, Goodnow C, McDevitt H. Intravenous injection of soluble antigen induces thymic and peripheral T-cells apoptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:3031–3036. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.7.3031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Klein L, Klein T, Rüther U, Kyewski B. CD4 T cell tolerance to human C-reactive protein, an inducible serum protein, is mediated by medullary thymic epithelium. J Exp Med. 1998;188:5–16. doi: 10.1084/jem.188.1.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Atibalentja D, Byersdorfer C, Unanue E. Thymus-blood protein interactions are highly effective in negative selection and regulatory T cell induction. J Immunol. 2009;183:7909–7918. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0902632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Baba T, Nakamoto Y, Mukaida N. Crucial contribution of thymic Sirp alpha+ conventional dendritic cells to central tolerance against blood-borne antigens in a CCR2-dependent manner. J Immunol. 2009;183:3053–3063. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0900438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bonasio R, Scimone M, Schaerli P, Grabie N, Lichtman A, von Andrian U. Clonal deletion of thymocytes by circulating dendritic cells homing to the thymus. Nat Immunol. 2006;7:1092–1100. doi: 10.1038/ni1385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Goldschneider I, Cone R. A central role for peripheral dendritic cells in the induction of acquired thymic tolerance. Trends Immunol. 2003;24:77–81. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4906(02)00038-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lahoud M, Proietto A, Gartlan K, Kitsoulis S, Curtis J, Wettenhall J, Sofi M, Daunt C, O'keeffe M, Caminschi I, Satterley K, Rizzitelli A, Schnorrer P, Hinohara A, Yamaguchi Y, Wu L, Smyth G, Handman E, Shortman K, Wright M. Signal regulatory protein molecules are differentially expressed by CD8− dendritic cells. J Immunol. 2006;177:372–382. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.1.372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Vremec D, Pooley J, Hochrein H, Wu L, Shortman K. CD4 and CD8 expression by dendritic cell subtypes in mouse thymus and spleen. J Immunol. 2000;164:2978–2986. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.6.2978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wu L, Shortman K. Heterogeneity of thymic dendritic cells. Semin Immunol. 2005;17:304–312. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2005.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Li J, Park J, Foss D, Goldschneider I. Thymus-homing peripheral dendritic cells constitute two of the three major subsets of dendritic cells in the steady-state thymus. J Exp Med. 2009;206:607–622. doi: 10.1084/jem.20082232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Proietto A, van Dommelen S, Zhou P, Rizzitelli A, D'Amico A, Steptoe R, Naik S, Lahoud M, Liu Y, Zheng P, Shortman K, Wu L. Dendritic cells in the thymus contribute to T-regulatory cell induction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:19869–19874. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810268105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Peterson D, DiPaolo R, Kanagawa O, Unanue E. Quantitative analysis of the T cell repertoire that escapes negative selection. Immunity. 1999;11:453–462. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80120-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hildner K, Edelson B, Purtha W, Diamond M, Matsushita H, Kohyama M, Calderon B, Schraml B, Unanue E, Diamond M, Schreiber R, Murphy T, Murphy K. Batf3 deficiency reveals a critical role for CD8alpha+ dendritic cells in cytotoxic T cell immunity. Science. 2008;322:1097–1100. doi: 10.1126/science.1164206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Vremec D, Shortman K. The isolation and identification of murine dendritic cell populations from lymphoid tissues and their production in culture. Methods Mol Biol. 2008;415:163–178. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-570-1_10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gray D, Chidgey A, Boyd R. Analysis of thymic stromal cell populations using flow cytometry. J Immunol Methods. 2002;260:15–28. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1759(01)00493-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gray D, Fletcher A, Hammett M, Seach N, Ueno T, Young L, Barbuto J, Boyd, and A. Chidgey R. Unbiased analysis, enrichment and purification of thymic stromal cells. J Immunol Methods. 2008;329:56–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2007.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Swat W, Ignatowicz L, von Boehmer H, Kisielow P. Clonal deletion of immature CD4+8+ thymocytes in suspension culture by extrathymic antigen-presenting cells. Nature. 1991;351:150–153. doi: 10.1038/351150a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Iwabuchi K, Nakayama K, McCoy R, Wang F, Nishimura T, Habu S, Murphy K, Loh D. Cellular and peptide requirements for in vitro clonal deletion of immature thymocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89:9000–9004. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.19.9000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pircher H, Müller K, Kyewski B, Hengartner H. Thymocytes can tolerize thymocytes by clonal deletion in vitro. Int Immunol. 1992;4:1065–1069. doi: 10.1093/intimm/4.9.1065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Vasquez N, Kaye J, Hedrick S. In vivo and in vitro clonal deletion of double-positive thymocytes. J Exp Med. 1992;175:1307–1316. doi: 10.1084/jem.175.5.1307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ferrero I, Anjuère F, MacDonald H, Ardavín C. In vitro negative selection of viral superantigen-reactive thymocytes by thymic dendritic cells. Blood. 1997;90:1943–1951. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Van Rooijen N, Sanders A. Liposome mediated depletion of macrophages: mechanism of action, preparation of liposomes and applications. J Immunol Methods. 1994;174:83–93. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(94)90012-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Maraskovsky E, Pulendran B, Brasel K, Teepe M, Roux E, Shortman K, Lyman, and H. McKenna S. Dramatic numerical increase of functionally mature dendritic cells in FLT3 ligand-treated mice. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1997;417:33–40. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-9966-8_6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Aschenbrenner K, D'Cruz L, Vollmann E, Hinterberger M, Emmerich J, Swee L, Rolink A, Klein L. Selection of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells specific for self antigen expressed and presented by Aire+ medullary thymic epithelial cells. Nat Immunol. 2007;8:351–358. doi: 10.1038/ni1444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bensinger S, Bandeira A, Jordan M, Caton A, Laufer T. Major histocompatibility complex class II-positive cortical epithelium mediates the selection of CD4(+)25(+) immunoregulatory T cells. J Exp Med. 2001;194:427–438. doi: 10.1084/jem.194.4.427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ziegler-Heitbrock L, Ancuta P, Crowe S, Dalod M, Grau V, Hart D, Leenen P, Liu Y, Macpherson G, Randolph G, Scherberich J, Schmitz J, Shortman K, Sozzani S, Strobl H, Zembala M, Austyn J, Lutz M. Nomenclature of monocytes and dendritic cells in blood. Blood. 2010 doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-02-258558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Knight S, Iqball S, Roberts M, Macatonia S, Bedford P. Transfer of antigen between dendritic cells in the stimulation of primary T cell proliferation. Eur J Immunol. 1998;28:1636–1644. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199805)28:05<1636::AID-IMMU1636>3.0.CO;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Allan R, Waithman J, Bedoui S, Jones C, Villadangos J, Zhan Y, Lew A, Shortman K, Heath W, Carbone F. Migratory dendritic cells transfer antigen to a lymph node-resident dendritic cell population for efficient CTL priming. Immunity. 2006;25:153–162. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Naik S, Metcalf D, van Nieuwenhuijze A, Wicks I, Wu L, O'Keeffe M, Shortman K. Intrasplenic steady-state dendritic cell precursors that are distinct from monocytes. Nat Immunol. 2006;7:663–671. doi: 10.1038/ni1340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sunderkötter C, Nikolic T, Dillon M, Van Rooijen N, Stehling M, Drevets D, Leenen P. Subpopulations of mouse blood monocytes differ in maturation stage and inflammatory response. J Immunol. 2004;172:4410–4417. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.7.4410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Nakano H, Yanagita M, Gunn M. CD11c(+)B220(+)Gr-1(+) cells in mouse lymph nodes and spleen display characteristics of plasmacytoid dendritic cells. J Exp Med. 2001;194:1171–1178. doi: 10.1084/jem.194.8.1171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Asselin-Paturel C, Boonstra A, Dalod M, Durand I, Yessaad N, Dezutter-Dambuyant C, Vicari A, O'Garra A, Biron C, Brière F, Trinchieri G. Mouse type I IFN-producing cells are immature APCs with plasmacytoid morphology. Nat Immunol. 2001;2:1144–1150. doi: 10.1038/ni736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Adachi Y, Toki J, Ikebukuro K, Tomita M, Kaneda H, Tanabe A, Jun L, Minamino K, Suzuki Y, Taketani S, Ikehara S. Immature dendritic cells (CD11c+ CD3− B220− cells) present in mouse peripheral blood. Immunobiology. 2002;206:354–367. doi: 10.1078/0171-2985-00186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Veeraswamy R, Cella M, Colonna M, Unanue E. Dendritic cells process and present antigens across a range of maturation states. J Immunol. 2003;170:5367–5372. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.11.5367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Young L, Wilson N, Schnorrer P, Proietto A, ten Broeke T, Matsuki Y, Mount A, Belz G, O'Keeffe M, Ohmura-Hoshino M, Ishido S, Stoorvogel W, Heath W, Shortman, and J. Villadangos K. Differential MHC class II synthesis and ubiquitination confers distinct antigen-presenting properties on conventional and plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Nat Immunol. 2008;9:1244–1252. doi: 10.1038/ni.1665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.den Haan J, Lehar S, Bevan M. CD8(+) but not CD8(−) dendritic cells cross-prime cytotoxic T cells in vivo. J Exp Med. 2000;192:1685–1696. doi: 10.1084/jem.192.12.1685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Pooley J, Heath W, Shortman K. Cutting edge: intravenous soluble antigen is presented to CD4 T cells by CD8− dendritic cells, but cross-presented to CD8 T cells by CD8+ dendritic cells. J Immunol. 2001;166:5327–5330. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.9.5327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Proietto A, Lahoud M, Wu L. Distinct functional capacities of mouse thymic and splenic dendritic cell populations. Immunol Cell Biol. 2008;86:700–708. doi: 10.1038/icb.2008.63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Koble C, Kyewski B. The thymic medulla: a unique microenvironment for intercellular self-antigen transfer. J Exp Med. 2009;206:1505–1513. doi: 10.1084/jem.20082449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Gallegos A, Bevan M. Central tolerance to tissue-specific antigens mediated by direct and indirect antigen presentation. J Exp Med. 2004;200:1039–1049. doi: 10.1084/jem.20041457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Guimont-Desrochers F, Beauchamp C, Chabot-Roy G, Dugas V, Hillhouse E, Dusseault J, Langlois G, Gautier-Ethier P, Darwiche J, Sarfati M, Lesage S. Absence of CD47 in vivo influences thymic dendritic cell subset proportions but not negative selection of thymocytes. Int Immunol. 2009;21:167–177. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxn135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Akkaraju S, Ho W, Leong D, Canaan K, Davis M, Goodnow C. A range of CD4 T cell tolerance: partial inactivation to organ-specific antigen allows nondestructive thyroiditis or insulitis. Immunity. 1997;7:255–271. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80528-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Liston A, Lesage S, Wilson J, Peltonen L, Goodnow C. Aire regulates negative selection of organ-specific T cells. Nat Immunol. 2003;4:350–354. doi: 10.1038/ni906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Peterson D, DiPaolo R, Kanagawa O, Unanue E. Cutting edge: negative selection of immature thymocytes by a few peptide-MHC complexes: differential sensitivity of immature and mature T cells. J Immunol. 1999;162:3117–3120. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ebert P, Ehrlich L, Davis M. Low ligand requirement for deletion and lack of synapses in positive selection enforce the gauntlet of thymic T cell maturation. Immunity. 2008;29:734–745. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.09.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES