Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Proteome Res. 2013 Feb 12;12(3):1419–1427. doi: 10.1021/pr301053d

Table 2.

Comparison of feature matching to known metabolites by m/z.

# features detected # features matched to MMCD * % matched to MMCD
apLCMS, hybrid $ 2441 (572)# 1156 (336)# 47.4% (58.7%)#
apLCMS, untargeted $ 2018 843 41.8%
apLCMS, untargeted, less stringent @ 4448 (2578)& 1577 (759)& 35.4% (29.4%)&
*

Allowed ion species: actual M, [M+H]+, [M+Na]+, [M+K]+, [M+NH4]+; 12C, 14N only; matching at 5 ppm tolerance level.

$

Key parameter settings: min.run=16, min.pres=0.6.

@

Key parameter settings: min.run=8, min.pres=0.4; other parameters unchanged.

#

Features not overlapping with those found by unsupervised, less stringent approach.

&

Features not overlapping with those found by hybrid approach.