Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 22.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Aging. 2011 Dec;32(0 1):S48–S57. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.09.011

Table 3.

Predicting Progression from Mild Cognitive Impairment to AD

Study Subjects Source of subjects Measurement Method Results
(Bakkour et al., 2009) 49 CDR 0.5 Referral sample Cortical thickness in temporal and parietal ROIs Predict MCI progression to AD, 83% sensitivity and 65% specificity
(Brys et al., 2009) 24 MCI Referral sample Medial temporal lobe grey matter concentration Accuracy, predict MCI progression to AD: 74%
(Convit et al., 2000) 46 Normal or MCI Referral sample Hippocampal volume Declining subjects had 11.3% of reduction in HC compared to non-decliners
(DeCarli et al., 2007) 190 MCI ADCS Vit E donepezil trial Visual assessment of hippocampal atrophy Atrophy score > 2.0 increased likelihood of progression, HR 2.30
(Desikan et al., 2009) 129 MCI Referral sample ADNI Hippocampal volume Predict MCI progression to AD, adjusted HR 0.73 (0.51-1.04)
(Desikan et al., 2008) 47 MCI Referral sample Temporal –parietal regions of interest Combination of entorhinal cortex (HR = 0.60) and the inferior parietal lobule (HR = 0.62) was best predictor of time to progression to AD
(Devanand et al., 2007) 139 MCI Referral sample Hippocampal volume Predict MCI progression to AD, HR: 2.84 (1.47 – 5.49)
(Eckerstrom et al., 2008) 42 MCI Referral sample Hippocampal volume Hippocampal volumes smaller in converters to AD vs. non-converters
(Fleisher et al., 2008) 129 aMCI ADCS Vit E donepezil trial Ventricular volumes and hippocampal volumes Ventricular volumes and hippocampal volumes predicted progression to AD
(Galluzzi et al., 2010) 90 MCI Referral sample Medial temporal atrophy Predict MCI progression to AD, AUC: 0.73
(Galton et al., 2005) 31 CDR 0.5 Referral sample Hippocampal volume Converters had a greater atrophy compared to non-converters.
(Henneman et al., 2009) 39 MCI Referral sample Hippocampal volume adjusted for age, sex, baseline MMSE Predict MCI progression to AD, HR: 10.4 (3.1-34.8)
(Herukka et al., 2008) 21 MCI Referral sample Hippocampal volume Predict MCI progression to AD, right HC: 15.8 (1.4-174.2)
(Jack et al., 2010b) 218 MCI ADNI plus Mayo community sample Hippocampal volume Predict MCI progression to AD, HR: 2.6 (1.8-3.8) 25% vs. 75%
(Jack et al., 2008) 131 MCI ADCS Vit E donepezil trial Volumes of hippocampus, entorhincal cortex, brain, ventricle Rates of change in all volumes were greater in converters than nonconverters
(Jack et al., 2005) 72 MCI Community sample Hippocampal volume Predict MCI progression to AD, HC volume OR: 1.51 (1.1-2.0)
(Jack et al., 2000) 43 MCI Community sample Hippocampal volume Rates of hippocampal atrophy were greater in converters than nonconverters
(Jack et al., 1999) 80 MCI Community sample Hippocampal W score Relative risk 0.69 – for each 1 unit increase in W score (less atrophy) risk of progression to AD decreased by 31%
(Kantarci et al., 2005) 21 MCI Referral sample Hippocampal volume Predict MCI progression to AD OR: 2.5 (1.0-6.2)
(Killiany et al., 2002) 94 CDR 0.5 Referral sample Hippocampal volume Predict MCI progression to AD OR: 1.5 (1.0-2.31)
(Landau et al., 2010) 85 MCI Referral sample Hippocampal volume Predict MCI progression to AD OR: 2.49 (1.02-5.96)
(Leung et al., 2010) 335 MCI ADNI Hippocampal volume Rates higher in converters compared with stable and reverter groups
(Risacher et al., 2009) 227 MCI ADNI Hippocampal volume Effect size for separating MCI stable vs. converter Cohen's d= 0.60
(Stoub et al., 2010) 29 aMCI Referral sample Entorhinal cortex and hippocampus Atrophy rate of entorhinal cortex and hippocampus in controls less than MCI converters
(Tapiola et al., 2008) 60 MCI Referral sample Hippocampal volume Predict MCI progression to AD OR: Total HC 0.815 (0.69-0.97)
(Vemuri, P. et al., 2009) 192 MCI Referral sample ADNI STAND score HR for time to conversion from MCI to AD 25th vs. 75th percentile 2.6
(Visser et al., 1999) 13 MCI Community sample Hippocampal volume Predict MCI progression to AD OR 0.21 (0.05-0.99)
(Visser et al., 2002) 30 MCI Community sample Hippocampal volume Hippocampal volume predicts MCI progression to AD
(Wang et al., 2009) 58 aMCI Referral sample Hippocampal volume Predict MCI progression to AD Left HC HR 0.38 (0.10-0.88)

Key: AD, Alzheimer's disease; ADNI, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative; aMCI, amnestic mild cognitive impairment; AUC, area under the curve; CDR, Clinical Dementia Rating; HR, hazard ratio; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; MMSE, Mini Mental State Examination; OR, odds ratio; ROI, regions of interest; STAND, STructural Abnormality iNDex.