Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun;20(3):e233–e246. doi: 10.3747/co.20.1302

TABLE V.

Summary of external review survey results

Survey item Response [n (%)]
Strongly agree Agree Somewhat agree Othera
The overall objective of the fatigue guideline is specifically described. 6 (42.9) 6 (42.9) 0 (0.0) 2 (14.2)
The target population for the fatigue guideline is clearly described. 5 (35.7) 6 (42.9) 2 (14.2) 1 (7.1)
The target users of the fatigue guideline are clearly described. 6 (42.9) 6 (42.9) 0 (0.0) 2 (14.2)
Systematic search methods for identifying relevant guidelines for adaptation were used. 6 (42.9) 6 (42.9) 1 (7.1) 1 (7.1)
The methods for formulating the fatigue recommendations are clearly described. 5 (35.7) 5 (35.7) 2 (14.2) 2 (14.2)
The recommendations for fatigue are easily identifiable. 7 (50.0) 4 (28.6) 1 (7.1) 2 (14.2)
The recommendations for fatigue are appropriate. 3 (21.4) 10 (71.4) 0 (0.0) 1 (7.1)
The recommendations for fatigue are feasible. 2 (14.2) 8 (57.1) 2 (14.2) 2 (14.2)
When applied, the fatigue guideline will produce more benefits than harms. 8 (57.1) 4 (28.6) 1 (7.1) 1 (7.1)
The fatigue guideline is supported with tools for application. 3 (21.4) 5 (35.7) 4 (28.6) 2 (14.2)

Very likely Likely Somewhat likely Otherb

How likely would you be able to apply the recommendations in the fatigue guideline in clinical practice? 2 (14.2) 8 (57.1) 1 (7.1) 3 (21.4)
a

Respondents replied Disagree, Undecided, or Not Applicable.

b

Respondents replied Undecided or Not Applicable.