Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;33(2):431–444. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2012-121156

Table 3.

Classification of FTLD and controls based on DR, GMV, and WMV measures from various ROIs using logistic regression and area under a receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC). Specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy were evaluated using 4-fold cross-validations of the logistic regression results. p values are adjusted by false discovery rate and indicate the significance of the logistic regressions

Measures Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Accuracy (%) AUC p
Measures in ROI_1
GMV 80.1 ±7.0 48.7 ±8.2 65.7 ±4.0b 0.655 0.004
WMV 77.2 ±7.2 34.6 ±7.6 59.2 ±4.1 0.627 0.03
DR 79.9 ±6.8 72.3 ±9.8 76.0± 4.2a 0.853 <0.001
Measures in ROI_2
GMV 77.0 ±7.0 46.6 ±8.9 63.9 ±4.5b 0.722 0.001
WMV 71.5±7.7 36.4 ±6.6 58.1 ±3.3 0.657 0.002
DR 80.7 ±8.4 80.5 ±9.8 81.4± 3.3a 0.877 <0.001
Measures in ROI_3
GMV 74.2 ±9.5 5.4± 3.1 45.7 ±4.2 0.566 0.22
WMV 79.8 ±8.2 5.3± 2.9 47.4 ±4.1 0.606 0.24
DR 73.3 ±6.9 58.6 ±8.6 67.6± 4.1a 0.722 <0.001

Bold: Differences in classification accuracy between modalities were significant by Wilcoxon signed rank tests.

a

DR showed better accuracy compared to GMV and WMV.

b

GMV showed better accuracy compared to WMV.