Table 4. P Values of the 2-Tailed Comparisons Between the Posner and Clinical Tests.
Acute | Chronic | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Posner Average RT | Posner L-R Difference | Posner Average RT | Posner L-R Difference | |
Lines total misses | <.01* | <.01* | <.01* | <.01* |
Lines L-R difference | <.01* | <.01* | <.01* | <.01* |
Stars total misses | <.01* | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.01* |
Stars L-R difference | <.01* | <.01* | <.01* | <.01* |
Mesulam total misses | 0.08 | 0.91 | 0.61 | 0.31 |
Mesulam L-R difference | <.01* | 0.06 | <.01* | <.01* |
Reading total misses | <.01* | <.01* | 0.01* | <.01* |
Reading L-R difference | <.01* | <.01* | <.01* | <.01* |
Clock errors | <.01* | 0.02* | 0.17 | 0.01* |
Fluff L misses | <.01* | <.01* | 0.01* | <.01* |
Baking before total misses | <.01* | <.01* | <.01* | <.01* |
Baking before L-R difference | <.01* | <.01* | 0.01* | <.01* |
Baking after total misses | <.01* | 0.01* | 0.06 | 0.02* |
Baking after L-R difference | <.01* | <.01* | <.01* | <.01* |
Shapes v/nr total misses | <.01* | 0.02* | 0.18 | 0.04* |
Shapes v/nr L-R difference | <.01* | <.01* | <.01* | <.01* |
Shapes v/r total misses | <.01* | <.01* | 0.11 | 0.01* |
Shapes v/r L-R difference | <.01* | <.01* | <.01* | <.01* |
Shapes t/nr total misses | <.01* | <.01* | <.01* | <.01* |
Shapes t/nr L-R difference | <.01* | <.01* | <.01* | <.01* |
Shapes t/r total misses | <.01* | <.01* | <.01* | <.01* |
Shapes r/r, L-R difference | <.01* | <.01* | <.01* | <.01* |
Posner average RT | . | 0.06 | . | 0.53 |
Posner L-R difference | 0.06 | . | 0.53 | . |
Note. Displays the significance of differences between the Posner test and the clinical tests for acute and chronic patients. For the Shape test, v=visual, t=tactile, r=removal of touched targets, nr= no removal of touched targets.
P<.05.