Skip to main content
International Journal of Vascular Medicine logoLink to International Journal of Vascular Medicine
. 2013 Dec 12;2013:629378. doi: 10.1155/2013/629378

Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound: A Review of the Physical Principles and Major Applications in Critical Care

Jawad Naqvi 1,*, Kok Hooi Yap 2, Gulraiz Ahmad 3, Jonathan Ghosh 1
PMCID: PMC3876587  PMID: 24455270

Abstract

Transcranial Doppler (TCD) is a noninvasive ultrasound (US) study used to measure cerebral blood flow velocity (CBF-V) in the major intracranial arteries. It involves use of low-frequency (≤2 MHz) US waves to insonate the basal cerebral arteries through relatively thin bone windows. TCD allows dynamic monitoring of CBF-V and vessel pulsatility, with a high temporal resolution. It is relatively inexpensive, repeatable, and portable. However, the performance of TCD is highly operator dependent and can be difficult, with approximately 10–20% of patients having inadequate transtemporal acoustic windows. Current applications of TCD include vasospasm in sickle cell disease, subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH), and intra- and extracranial arterial stenosis and occlusion. TCD is also used in brain stem death, head injury, raised intracranial pressure (ICP), intraoperative monitoring, cerebral microembolism, and autoregulatory testing.

1. Introduction

Transcranial Doppler (TCD), first described in 1982 [1], is a noninvasive ultrasound (US) study that involves the use of a low-frequency (≤2 MHz) transducer probe to insonate the basal cerebral arteries through relatively thin bone windows. TCD allows dynamic monitoring of cerebral blood flow velocity (CBF-V) and vessel pulsatility over extended time periods with a high temporal resolution. It is relatively inexpensive, repeatable, and its portability offers increased convenience over other imaging methods, allowing continuous bedside monitoring of CBF-V, which is particularly useful in the intensive care setting [2]. The technique is however highly operator dependent, which can significantly limit its utility [36]. It also has a long learning curve to acquire the three-dimensional understanding of cerebrovascular anatomy necessary for competency [3]. Furthermore, approximately 10–20% of patients have inadequate transtemporal acoustic windows [2, 4, 7].

Current applications of TCD in adults and children include vasospasm in sickle cell disease [8], subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) [9], intra- and extracranial arterial stenosis and occlusion [10, 11], brain stem death [12], head injury, raised intracranial pressure (ICP) [13], intraoperative monitoring [14], impaired vasomotor function [15], and cerebral microembolism in right to left cardiac shunts [16]. TCD has also been widely used to investigate cerebral pressure autoregulation [17]. Combined with waveform morphology, indices derived from flow velocity readings such as Gosling's pulsatility index (PI) and the Lindegaard ratio (LR) allow identification of increased cerebrovascular resistance, vasospasm, and hyperdynamic flow states, which characterise the above clinical conditions.

This paper will review the underlying physical principles of TCD, flow indices frequently used in clinical care, and critical care indications for TCD in adults and children (discussion of neonatal TCD applications is beyond the scope of this paper).

2. Methods

A MEDLINE search performed by the authors in March 2013 of “Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound” in all fields yielded 7134 results. A further search combined with the descriptor AND ““acute care” OR “critical care” OR “intensive care” OR “neuro-critical care”” yielded 514 results. Filtering for English language review articles retrieved 72 articles. Eleven articles focusing on critical care applications of TCD in adults published in the last 10 years were retrieved [2, 4, 5, 9, 1824]. Abstracts were screened to deem final appropriateness before the article and its references were consulted in depth to gather information for this current review.

3. Review

3.1. Physical Principles

The Doppler effect states that where a sound wave strikes a moving object, such as an erythrocyte, the reflected wave undergoes a change in frequency (the Doppler shift f d) directly proportional to the velocity (v) of the reflector. The following equation derived from this principle is the basis for calculating CBF-V with TCD:

v=(c×fd)2×f0×cos  θ, (1)

where c is the speed of the incident wave, f 0 is the incident pulse frequency, and θ is the angle of the reflector relative to the US probe [25].

TCD relies on pulsed wave Doppler to image vessels at various depths [3]. Received echoes generate an electrical impulse in the US probe and are processed to calculate f d and v, to produce a spectral waveform with peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end diastolic velocity (EDV) values (see Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Right MCA TCD waveform (bottom) with colour Doppler (top).

An ultrasound (US) frequency of ≤2 MHz is required to penetrate the skull and reach the intracranial vasculature. Depending on procedure duration, the US probe is fixed in a headset or manually applied (see Figures 2(a) and 2(b)).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

TCD headset and TCD handheld probe applied over the transtemporal window. Figure 2(b) is adapted from Nicoletto and Burkman [3]. Permission obtained. The copyright owner for the original image from which Figure 2(b) is adapted, is ASET (American Society of Electroneurodiagnostic Technologists), the Neurodiagnostic Society.

Acoustic windows are skull regions, either foramina or thin bone, that transmit US waves to the basal cerebral circulation [3]. There are four acoustic windows, namely, the transtemporal, suboccipital (transforaminal), transorbital, and submandibular (retromandibular). The transtemporal window, located above the zygomatic ridge between the lateral canthus of the eye and auricular pinna, is most frequently used and can insonate the middle (MCA), anterior (ACA), posterior cerebral arteries (PCA), and terminal internal carotid artery (ICA) [2, 3]. However, between 10% and 20% of patients have inadequate transtemporal windows [2, 4, 7].

The target artery is insonated by selecting an appropriate acoustic window, probe angle, and sample volume depth [3]. The artery is recognized through flow direction, resistance (pulsatility), and velocity in addition to waveform changes induced by dynamic manoeuvres such as proximal carotid artery compression and tapping over bony landmarks [2, 3]. Table 1 provides a summary of the insonation characteristics of the cerebral vasculature. Procedural techniques for tracing each artery are described elsewhere [2, 3].

Table 1.

Insonation characteristics of the cerebral vasculature. Adapted from Nicoletto and Burkman [3]. Permission obtained; copyright owner ASET (American Society of Electroneurodiagnostic Technologists), the Neurodiagnostic Society.

Artery Acoustic window Probe angle Depth
(mm)
Flow direction Resistance Adult MFV
(cm/sec)
ECICA Retromandibular Superior-medial 45–50 Away Low 30 ± 9
MCA Middle transtemporal Straight/Anterior-superior 30–65 Toward Low 55 ± 12
ACA Middle transtemporal Straight/Anterior-superior 60–75 Away Low 50 ± 11
PCA—segment 1 Posterior transtemporal Straight/Posterior 60–70 Toward Low 39 ± 10
PCA—segment 2 Posterior transtemporal Straight/Posterior-superior 60–70 Away Low 40 ± 10
BA Suboccipital Superior 80–120 Away Low 41 ± 10
VA Suboccipital Superior lateral 60–75 Away Low 38 ± 10
OA Transorbital Straight 45–55 Toward High 21 ± 5
Supraclinoid ICA Transorbital Superior 65–80 Away Low 41 ± 11
Parasellar ICA Transorbital Inferior 65–80 Toward Low 47 ± 14

(ECICA: extracranial internal carotid artery, MCA: middle cerebral artery, ACA: anterior cerebral artery, PCA: posterior cerebral artery, BA: basilar artery, OA: ophthalmic artery).

3.2. TCD Indices

Mean flow velocity (MFV) is a central parameter in TCD and is equal to (PSV + (EDV × 2))/3 [3]. A number of physiological factors may influence MFV, as described in Table 2.

Table 2.

Factors influencing MFV [18, 20].

Factor Change in MFV
Age Increases up to 6–10 years of age then decreases
(see [26] for a full range of values)
Sex Higher MFV in women than men
Pregnancy Decreased in the 3rd trimester
PCO2 Increases with increasing PCO2
Mean arterial Pressure (MAP) Increases with increasing MAP
(CBF autoregulates between CPP 50–150 mmHg)
Haematocrit Increases with decreasing haemotocrit

When MFV is increased, it may indicate stenosis, vasospasm, or hyperdynamic flow. A decreased value may indicate hypotension, decreased CBF, ICP, or brain stem death [18]. Focal arterial stenosis or vasospasm is represented by an increased MFV within a 5–10 mm segment, usually by >30 cm/s compared with the asymptomatic side [26].

Gosling's pulsatility index (PI) provides information on downstream cerebral vascular resistance and is equal to (PSV-EDV)/MFV [27]. PI is normally 0.5 to 1.19 [27]. Proximal stenosis or occlusion may lower the PI below 0.5 due to downstream arteriolar vasodilation whilst distal occlusion or constriction may increase the PI above 1.19 [26]. A PI less than 0.5 may also indicate an arteriovenous malformation as vessel resistance in proximal vessels is reduced due to continuous distal venous flow [28]. PI positively correlates with ICP; a PI change of 2.4% is reflected by a 1 mmHg change in ICP [29].

The Pourcelot resistivity index (RI) is equal to (PSV-EDV)/PSV with values >0.8 indicating increased downstream resistance. Derangements of RI reflect similar disease patterns as observed with an abnormal PI [18].

The Lindegaard ratio (LR) allows differentiation between hyperdynamic flow and vasospasm and is defined as MCA MFV/extracranial ICA MFV [30]. In the context of a high MFV, an LR <3 indicates hyperdynamic flow and >3 indicates vasospasm [31]. A modified LR (BA MFV/average of left and right extracranial VA MFV) and Sloan's hemispheric ratio (ACA MFV/ECICA MFV) can be similarly applied to the BA and ACA, respectively (see [5] for a summary of threshold values). MFV and LR measurements used to grade vasospasm severity are presented in Table 3 [31, 32].

Table 3.

Grading of vasospasm severity [31, 32].

Degree of MCA or ICA vasospasm MFV (cm/s) LR
Mild (<25%) 120–149 A
N
D
3–6
Moderate (25–50%) 150–199 3–6
Severe (>50%) >200 >6

Degree of BA vasospasm MFV (cm/s) Modified LR

May represent vasospasm 70–85 A
N
D
2–2.49
Moderate (25–50%) >85 2.5–2.99
Severe (>50%) >85 >3

3.3. Specialist Indices

Vasodilatory stimulation via breath holding and CO2-induced hypercapnia can detect an impaired cerebral vasomotor reserve (VMR) and impending stroke [15].

The breath-holding index (BHI) is equal to ((CBF-V max − CBF-V min)/time of breath hold) × 100 [33]. A BHI >0.6 is normal; between 0.21 and 0.60 is impaired VMR, whilst ≤0.20 is significantly impaired VMR [34].

The CO2 challenge VMR index is calculated using the average CBF-V at baseline, during hypercapnia and hypocapnia, and is equal to (Hypercapnia CBF-V − Hypocapnia CBF-V)/(Baseline CBF-V) × 100. A value greater than 70% is normal, 39–69% is mild to moderately reduced VMR, 16–38% is severely reduced VMR, and ≤15% is exhausted VMR [34].

Microembolic signal (MES) detection is useful in intra-operative monitoring, grading right to left shunts; and identifying patients with internal carotid stenosis who may benefit from endarterectomy [3537]. Basic identification criteria for MES include [38] the following:

  1. transient character (typically <300 ms), but duration is dependent on passage time through the sample volume;

  2. high intensity (amplitude >3 dB above background—appears bright);

  3. typically unidirectional and random appearance in the cardiac cycle;

  4. audible as “snaps, tonal chirps, or moans” [38].

3.4. Applications

Following a MEDLINE search, as described in Section 2, a wide range of TCD indications were identified, which are summarised in Table 4. The indications are subdivided into ischaemic cerebrovascular disease, periprocedural and neurointensive care categories as per the American Academy of Neurology [39].

Table 4.

TCD applications [2, 4, 18, 3941]. Categorised as per reference [39].

Ischaemic cerebrovascular disease
 Sickle cell disease
 Right to left cardiac shunts
 Intra and extra-cranial arterial steno-occlusive disease
 Arteriovenous malformations and fistulas
Peri-procedural/operative
 Cerebral thrombolysis in acute stroke
 Carotid endarterectomy
 Carotid angioplasty and stenting
 Coronary artery bypass surgery
 Coronary angioplasty
 Prosthetic heart valves
Neurological/Neurosurgical intensive care
 Vasospasm after subarachnoid haemorrhage
 Raised intracranial pressure
 Head injury
 Cerebral circulatory arrest and brain death
 Intracerebral aneurysm and parenchymal hematoma detection
Others
 Pharmacologic vasomotor testing
 Cerebral pressure autoregulation
 Liver failure/Hepatic encephalopathy
 Preeclampsia

Our discussion will focus on the main applications of TCD in critical care highlighted by our literature search including vasospasm in sickle cell disease, SAH, acute stroke, brain stem death, traumatic brain injury (TBI), raised ICP, cardiac shunts, and autoregulatory testing. (Discussion of peri-procedural TCD applications, including the evaluation of extracranial carotid disease [11, 36, 42], intracranial stenosis [6, 4345] and monitoring in carotid endarterectomy [14, 35, 4651] and other neurovascular [5255] and cardiac procedures [5658] are beyond the scope of this paper and the reader is directed to the referenced articles.)

3.5. Sickle Cell Disease

Patients with sickle cell disease are at risk from a spectrum of brain injuries that include subclinical infarction, acute stroke and haemorrhage; the prevalence of acute stroke in sickle cell disease is 600 per 100,000 patient-years [59]. The underlying pathology involves distal ICA, proximal MCA and ACA stenosis, and occlusion as a result of an increasing circulation of irreversibly sickled cells and their adherence to the vascular endothelium.

CBF-V >200 cm/s in asymptomatic children with sickle cell disease is associated with an increased risk of stroke of 10,000 per 100,000 patient-years [60]. Treatment with blood transfusion in such children can reduce the risk of stroke by >90% [61]. Therefore, TCD screening of children between 2- and 6-years old is recommended on a 6–12 monthly basis, involving measurement of the time-averaged mean maximum CBF-V in bilateral MCA, bifurcation, distal ICA, ACA, PCA, and BA [8]. Patients with a time averaged mean maximum CBF-V in all arteries of <170 cm/sec are deemed normal [8]. If a value >200 cm/s in any artery is observed, then blood transfusion is recommended to reduce sickle haemoglobin to less than 30% of total haemoglobin and prevent stroke [8, 59].

3.6. Subarachnoid Haemorrhage

The delayed vasospasm of the cerebral vasculature is angiographically proven in up to 70% of cases of SAH and usually occurs 4 to 17 days after haemorrhage [9, 62]. It has significant implications on mortality and morbidity with approximately 25% of SAH patients developing delayed ischemic deficits due to vasospasm [4, 18, 40, 62]. The pathogenesis is unclear but is thought to involve the breakdown of blood in the subarachnoid space and secondary cellular mechanisms which culminate in vasoconstriction of adjacent intracranial arteries [9, 63].

Angiography is the gold standard for detecting vasospasm but is an invasive technique and unsuited to dynamic monitoring [2, 41]. TCD, however, is non-invasive, portable, and able to dynamically assess vasospasm and monitor the effectiveness of intervention including triple-H therapy (hypertension, haemodilution, and hypervolaemia), transluminal balloon angioplasty, or pharmacologic vasodilation [9]. Additionally, TCD is a prognostic indicator and can guide initiation of triple H-therapy [2, 4]. Conventionally, serial TCD measurements are performed daily after SAH. Table 2 outlines the flow criteria used to grade vasospasm severity on TCD.

TCD identifies MCA and BA vasospasm with a high sensitivity and specificity [39]. A systematic review of 26 studies comparing TCD with angiography found that MCA MFV >120 cm/s was 99% specific and 67% sensitive to angiographic vasospasm of ≥25% [64]. In a retrospective study of 101 patients, MCA MFV >120 cm/s was 72% specific and 88% sensitive for ≥33% angiographic vasospasm with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 94% for MFV <120 cm/s [65]. In the same study, MFV >200 cm/s was 98% specific and 27% sensitive with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 87% for angiographic vasospasm of ≥33% [65]. Therefore, MFV <120 cm/s and >200 cm/s may accurately predict absence and presence of angiographic MCA, vasospasm, respectively (Figure 3). The LR theoretically allows differentiation from hyperdynamic flow; however, its usefulness is limited as it fails to improve upon the identification of MCA vasospasm or development of delayed cerebral ischaemia (DCI) [20].

Figure 3.

Figure 3

A 70-year-old woman with SAH. TCD demonstrates an increased PSV and MFV in the right MCA, consistent with severe vasospasm.

For the detection of >50% BA vasospasm, by using concomitant thresholds of MFV >85 cm/s and modified LR >3, TCD has a sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 97% [32]. Specificity may rise to 100% with MFV >95 cm/s [66]. Additionally, the modified LR has a strong correlation with BA diameter, shown to be >3 in 100% of patients with >50% vasospasm in one study [32, 67].

However, for vasospasm of the ACA and PCA sensitivity of TCD is notably inferior [39]. In a cohort of 57 patients after SAH who underwent TCD within 24 hours of angiography ACA MFV ≥120 cm/s was 18% sensitive and 65% specific for vasospasm and PCA MFV ≥90 cm/s was 48% sensitive and 69% specific for vasospasm [68].

Despite the high sensitivity that may be achieved for MCA and BA vasospasm, the prognostic ability of TCD and potential to improve outcome in SAH are challenged [9, 18]. In a cohort of 580 SAH patients, only 84% of those with delayed cerebral ischaemia (DCI) had evidence of angiographic vasospasm [69]. Furthermore, DCI, and not vasospasm, was significantly associated with adverse outcome [69]. This may be due to additional pathogenic mechanisms such as reperfusion injury, hydrocephalus, and a disrupted blood-brain barrier contributing to neurological decline [20]. However, rate of MFV increase may predict DCI with a rise in MFV of >20% or >65 cm/s per day increase in MFV between days 3 and 7 predictive of poor outcome [4].

To summarise, TCD is useful for the identification of MCA and BA vasospasm in SAH; however, evidence for its prognostic value is limited. The American Heart Association (AHA) has accordingly recommended TCD as a reasonable tool to monitor for development of vasospasm in their evidence-based guidance on the management of SAH [70].

3.7. Acute Ischaemic Stroke: Diagnosis and Prognosis

3.7.1. Diagnosis

TCD is a convenient, low-cost, and rapidly repeatable test compared to MR and CT in suspected ischaemic stroke [5, 71]. However, as with stenoocclusive disease, high sensitivity and specificity are demonstrated only in the proximal anterior circulation. In a cohort of 48 patients with angiographic proven occlusion TCD had an overall sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 94%, with sensitivity optimal in the proximal ICA (94%) and MCA (93%), and significantly less in the terminal VA (56%) and BA (60%) [72].

3.7.2. Prognosis

The temporal resolution of TCD is a particular advantage over other techniques. By performing serial TCD examinations, haemodynamic changes following ischaemic stroke that would otherwise go undetected by a single MRA can be elicited [71]. Such haemodynamic changes have the potential to predict clinical outcome.

Haemodynamic changes before and after intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) administration in ischaemic stroke are classified by the thrombolysis in brain ischaemia (TIBI) grading system [73]. Residual flow is graded as either 0: absent, 1: minimal, 2: blunted, 3: dampened, 4: stenotic, or 5: normal [73]. TIBI grade and TIBI grade improvement are correlated with stroke severity, mortality, and clinical recovery based on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and modified Rankin Score (mRS) [4, 7376].

A meta-analysis has shown that recanalization observed on TCD within 6 hours of symptom onset is significantly associated with clinical improvement at 48 hours (OR 4.31, 95% CI: 2.67–6.97) and functional independence at 3 months (OR 6.75, 95% CI 3.47–13.12) [77]. To add to this, an abrupt increase in TIBI grade or stepwise increase over 30 minutes indicates more complete recanalisation and is significantly associated with better short-term outcome on the NIHSS, compared with recanalisation taking more than 30 minutes [75]. Mortality is significantly increased in MCA occlusion versus MCA patency on admission treated without thrombolysis (odds ratio 2.46 95% CI: 1.33–4.52) and also in persisting MCA occlusion at two hours after tPA bolus [76, 77].

In addition, using the TIBI grading system TCD can detect early (<2 hours) reocclusion (flow decrease ≥1 TIBI grade) following tPA which may occur in up to 34% patients with initial recanalization [76]. Early re-occlusion is associated with a significantly poorer outcome at 3 months and a higher in-hospital mortality compared to sustained recanalization [76].

Aside from TIBI grading, the site and severity of occlusion observed on TCD may help predict outcome. In a study of 335 patients with acute stroke who received tPa and underwent TCD, distal MCA occlusions had the greatest chance of early recanalisation at 44%, compared with 30% in the proximal MCA, 30% in the BA, and <10% in the terminal ICA [21]. However, an unknown number of patients were excluded from this study due to inadequate acoustic windows, and very few posterior circulation occlusions were present in the sample. In the multicenter Neurosonology in Acute Ischaemic Stroke (NAIS) trial, the extent of MCA occlusion observed on TCD was significantly associated with functional outcome at 3 months [78]. Out of those with a patent MCA, 71% had a good functional outcome whereas of those with a main stem occlusion, 88% were dead or functionally dependent at 3 months after stroke [78].

3.7.3. Treatment

Discussion of the treatment of acute ischemic stroke with TCD is beyond the scope of this paper and the reader is directed to the following dedicated review articles [6, 7983].

In conclusion, TCD is highly sensitive and specific (>80%) for ICA and MCA occlusion [72, 74]. By monitoring recanalisation via TIBI grading, TCD is also a reliable prognostic indicator in MCA occlusive stroke [73, 75, 76]. However, CTA and MRA are preferable as firstline imaging techniques in ischaemic stroke due to the operator dependence of TCD and poor ability to access the posterior circulation [6].

3.8. Brain Stem Death

Brain stem death is usually diagnosed by clinical examination and extended observation [84]. Confirmatory tests such as EEG can be employed to facilitate a rapid diagnosis in cases where organ preservation is needed in preparation for possible transplant surgery [19, 84]. However, brain stem injury, paralysis, pharmacological sedation with barbiturates, or hypothermia may prevent diagnosis based on clinical examination and EEG [19]. TCD is an alternative confirmatory test in such scenarios.

Criteria for the diagnosis of cerebral circulatory arrest (which precedes brain stem death) on TCD state that one of the following waveforms must be observed in the BA, bilateral ICA, and bilateral MCA on two examinations at least 30 minutes apart [12]:

  1. an oscillating waveform (equal systolic forward flow and diastolic reversed flow, i.e., zero net flow; see Figure 4), or

  2. small systolic spikes of <200 ms duration and <50 cm/s PSV with no diastolic flow (see Figure 5), or

  3. disappearance of intracranial flow with typical signals observed in the extracranial circulation.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The TCD waveform in raised ICP or brain stem death. This oscillating MCA waveform demonstrates antegrade systolic flow with retrograde diastolic flow, consistent with raised ICP or brain stem death. Reproduced from Nicoletto and Burkman [26]. Permission obtained. Copyright owner ASET (American Society of Electroneurodiagnostic Technologists), the Neurodiagnostic Society.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

The TCD waveform in raised ICP or brain stem death. This MCA waveform demonstrates absent diastolic flow and small systolic spikes consistent with the late stages of raised ICP or brain stem death. Reproduced from Nicoletto and Burkman [26]. Permission obtained. Copyright owner ASET (American Society of Electroneurodiagnostic Technologists), the Neurodiagnostic Society.

There are reports of TCD demonstrating a 100% agreement with the gold standard of arteriography for confirmation of brainstem death [85]. A meta-analysis and a technology assessment by the American Academy of Neurology have however shown that sensitivity and specificity range between 89% and 100% and 97% and 100%, respectively [19, 39]. Due to a certain proportion of patients having an inadequate acoustic window, the sensitivity is unlikely to ever reach 100%, but sensitivity and specificity may improve by repeated testing, which is a practical possibility given the noninvasiveness of TCD [84, 85].

As noted previously, TCD is an operator-dependent technique. It requires significant prior experience as well as knowledge of the underlying physiology of brain stem death and the diagnostic criteria to derive firm conclusions on the presence of cerebral circulatory arrest [19].

3.9. Traumatic Brain Injury and Raised Intracranial Pressure

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) may lead to hypoperfusion (day 0), hyperaemia (days 1–3), vasospasm (days 4–15), and raised ICP [86]. TCD can noninvasively identify such complications (see TCD indices above) and provide prognostic information [18, 39].

Previous work with invasive 133Xe clearance methods has shown that the extent of hypoperfusion in the acute setting after TBI correlates with outcome at 6 months based on the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) [87]. TCD can avoid use of invasive CBF measurement techniques and provide similar prognostic information. A low-flow velocity state defined as an MCA MFV of <35 cm/s within 72 hours of head injury has been shown to predict unfavourable outcome at 6 months (GOS score 1–3: death, vegetative state, or severe disability) with an odds ratio of 3.9 (CI 1.2–13) [88]. However, on multivariate analysis, this association was significantly less (OR 1.2 CI: 0.25–5.9), with initial GCS being a stronger predictor of outcome.

The severity of vasospasm may also predict outcome on the GOS; in a study of 116 SAH patients, moderate BA vasospasm (MFV >60 cm/s) was associated with permanent neurological deficit, and severe BA vasospasm (MFV >85 cm/s) was associated with vegetative state (P = 0.00019) [89]. However, no relationship between the severity of MCA vasospasm and clinical outcome was demonstrated [89]. In a separate study of 50 patients with head injury who underwent TCD insonation of the MCA, ACA, and BA in the first 7 days after TBI, significantly more patients in the vasospasm and hyperaemia groups experienced a poor outcome at 6 months (GOS 1–3) compared to those without any significant flow velocity change [90]. The highest MFV recorded, independent of vasospasm or hyperaemia, was also predictive of outcome with those in the poor outcome group (GOS 1–3) having a significantly greater highest MFV [90].

On TCD, raised ICP exhibits a sequential waveform, beginning with an increased PI and decreased MFV and EDV, followed by zero diastolic flow and criteria 1–3 listed in Section 3.8 [91]. A significant correlation between PI and ICP (correlation coefficient 0.938 P < 0.0001) was demonstrated in a group of 81 patients who underwent TCD MCA PI measurements combined with invasive ICP measurements [92]. A regression line was derived as ICP = (11.1 × PI) − 1.43, which could determine an ICP via the PI within ±4.2 mmHg of the actual ICP, which is reasonably accurate. Using this regression line, an ICP of >20 mmHg could also be determined with 89% sensitivity and 92% specificity [92]. Furthermore, in a study of 125 patients with severe TBI, poor outcomes (GOS 1–3) were associated with a significant rise in MCA PI (1.56 versus 1, P < 0.0001) within 24 hours of injury [13]. Additionally, a PI ≥1.56 predicted 83% of patients who had a poor outcome at 6 months, whereas a PI ≤1 identified 71% of patients with a good outcome (GOS 4–5) [13].

As mentioned above TCD can noninvasively estimate absolute ICP and CCP, avoiding the complications of invasive monitoring [2, 93]. However, there are various formulae proposed for this purpose, which demonstrate unacceptably wide confidence intervals and remain to be fully validated [2, 18, 93]. Hence, at present, TCD is reserved for assessing change, rather than absolute CPP, in TBI [2].

In summary, TCD can identify after-TBI haemodynamic changes, which can be used as early predictors of outcome at 6 months based on the GOS with a moderate degree of reliability. Noninvasive TCD estimates of ICP and CCP require further validation.

3.10. Cardiac Shunts

Paradoxical embolism through right to left cardiopulmonary shunts (e.g., patent foramen ovale) is an important cause of stroke in those under 55 years of age [94].

TCD offers a noninvasive method to assess and classify the grade of shunting via an MES grading scheme, which can also help stratify patients according to risk of stroke (Table 5) [95, 96]. A peripheral injection of agitated saline or Echovist (Schering AG, Germany; a microparticle contrast agent) is administered and the patient is asked to perform a Valsalva manoeuvre, with the TCD probe place over the MCA [95]. The number of microembolic signals (MES) observed up to 40 seconds after the end of the injection are counted [95].

Table 5.

Cardiopulmonary shunt grading based on microembolic signals [95, 97].

Grade of shunt Number of microembolic signals (MES)
No shunt 0
Low grade shunt 1–10
Medium grade shunt 11–25
High grade shunt >25 (shower) or uncountable (curtain effect)

Earlier reviews identify a sensitivity of approximately 70–100% for right-to-left shunts using TCD compared to the gold standard of transesophgeal ultrasound (TEU) [39, 98]. However, in a more recent study of 321 simultaneous TEU and TCD experiments, TCD detected right-to-left shunts with a sensitivity of only 38% and specificity of 99% compared to TEU [37]. TCD performance was better for detection of large PFOs (>30 microbubbles detected by TEU in the left atrium) with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 92.5% [37].

Transesophageal ultrasonography (TEU), although more invasive, holds further advantages over TCD as it can localise the shunt and identify presence of an atrial septal aneurysm, another risk factor for stroke in the young [20, 39, 94]. Therefore, TEU remains the first line tool in assessment of RLS where the patient is able to tolerate an invasive approach.

3.11. Cerebral Autoregulation

Cerebral pressure autoregulation refers to the maintenance of CBF despite changes in CPP between 50 and 150 mmHg [99]. An impairment of this autoregulatory response has been demonstrated in TBI [100], stroke [101], carotid disease [102], and more controversially syncope [103]. Impaired autoregulation may be of use in prognosticating such patients and determining treatment strategies [17].

Lassen first described the cerebral autoregulatory curve by collating the results of separate studies, which measured CBF using indicator dilution techniques under steady state conditions [99]. Indeed, the majority of initial research into cerebrovascular autoregulation focused on adopting a steady state (or static) approach to measuring CBF following a pharmacologic stimulus to alter CPP [17]. However, with the advent of TCD the time course of CBF changes following a pressure stimulus, using CBF-V as a surrogate marker could be dynamically monitored. This had the advantage of minimising the effect of confounding factors such as changes in PaCO2 and autonomic activity that may feature in CBF measurements taken hours apart under steady state conditions [17, 104].

TCD combined with thigh cuff deflation was pioneered by Aaslid in 1989 [105], and this has been followed by a variety of other nonpharmacologic methods to evoke the pressure response including carotid artery compression (transient hyperaemic response) [106], valsalva manoeuvres [107], head up-tilt [108], and lower body negative pressure [103, 109]. Such mechanical methods avoid the direct autoregulatory effects of pharmacologic pressure stimuli used more extensively in the past [18, 103, 110].

Despite the ability of TCD to observe a dynamic autoregulatory response, a large number of TCD studies adopt a static model to autoregulatory testing in patients [103]. In this context, the static autoregulatory index (sARI) or static rate of regulation (sROR), defined as the % change in CVR/% change in CPP, has been used [111]. This represents a useful tool to classify autoregulation ranging from 0, an absent response, to 1, a fully responsive autoregulatory system. Static methods however require pharmacologic or mechanical step changes in CPP, which may be inappropriate and unsafe in critically unwell patients [17, 101, 112]. The significant time interval between CBF-V measurements can also potentiate the effect of confounding factors, which shift the autoregulatory curve, producing misleading results [104]. Furthermore, there is a failure to capture the evolution and latency of the autoregulatory response [111].

In the arena of dynamic testing, no gold standard index exists [113]. The Mx index defines the degree of correlation between CPP and MFV; a positive correlation indicates pressure-dependent blood flow and loss of autoregulation whereas an absent correlation is a sign of an intact autoregulatory system [112, 114]. A limitation of this index is that correlation may be significant but the slope negligible [17]. The dynamic autoregulatory index (dARI) initially proposed by Tiecks et al. involves fitting the observed CBF-V response, following a pressure stimulus, to one of 10 theoretical CBF-V response curves, which model absent autoregulation (curve 0) through to fully intact autoregulation (curve 9) [111].

The use of mechanical nonpharmacologic stimuli can however induce significant changes in PaCO2 and cerebral metabolic activity, which confound CBF [103, 115]. Hence, use of spontaneous fluctuations in CPP secondary to low-frequency respiratory waves to dynamically ascertain the presence of autoregulation has been proposed as an ideal method, which overcomes these shortcomings, and is applicable to nearly all patients due to its noninvasiveness [17]. Under this paradigm, not only can the Mx index and dARI be applied within the time domain, but autoregulation can also be determined in the frequency domain by transfer function analysis (TFA) [112]. In TFA, the phase shift between CBF-V and CPP changes is used as a marker of interest [116]. A zero-degree phase shift indicates absence of autoregulation and a negative phase shift (where FV changes before ABP described as a positive phase lead of FV relative to CPP) is presence of autoregulation [116].

In severe head injury impaired autoregulation, determined by the Mx index with use of spontaneous fluctuations of CPP and MFV, is strongly associated with poor outcome at 6 months based on the GOS [114]. Recently, the Sx index, which replaces MFV with SFV, has shown a stronger association than Mx with the GOS [117]. Furthermore, the dARI significantly correlates with the GOS, a threshold of 5.86 conferring a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 76% for death [118]. Although autoregulation-oriented therapy is advised following these results [114] there is a dearth of prospective trials to evaluate the efficacy of such strategies and hence the Brain Trauma Foundation has advised autoregulatory monitoring as an optional tool in TBI [119].

In ICA stenosis, impaired autoregulation is proposed as a tool to identify patients at highest risk of stroke and thus help optimise selection of surgical candidates [102, 120]. Evidence for this includes the significant decreases in dARI and significant increases in Mx observed ipsilateral to ICA stenoocclusive disease, which correlate with the degree of stenosis [102, 120]. However, significantly abnormal values of dARI and Mx, compared to the control value, were restricted to patients with severe (>80–90%) stenosis, and no clear difference in Mx, Sx, or Dx between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients was demonstrated [102, 120].

In stroke, TCD studies have consistently shown an impairment in ipsilateral cerebral autoregulation and an association with the need for decompressive surgery, neurological decline, and poor outcome [101]. However, the impairment in autoregulation in this population may be as a result of preexisting clinical conditions such as chronic hypertension rather than due to stroke [101].

In the investigation of syncope, the available evidence presents inconsistent conclusions as to whether autoregulatory impairment is a contributory factor [103]. This subset of evidence exemplifies the methodological shortcomings to the TCD assessment of cerebrovascular autoregulation, which limit translation into clinical practice. The wide variety of static and dynamic techniques employed with lack of a gold standard technique and lack of a standardised value to determine impaired autoregulation is critical to preventing the comparability and synthesis of the existing evidence [101, 103, 112]. The failure of studies to assess and control for confounding factors, in particular PaCO2, is potentially a major source of error [17, 101, 112]. Furthermore, a large number of studies consist of small patient numbers and are statistically underpowered [103].

The intrinsic technical limitations of TCD further compound the issue. TCD-based studies employ CBF-V as a surrogate measure of CBF. However, CBF-V is only proportional to CBF when vessel cross-sectional area remains constant [121]. Furthermore, since measurements are frequently only taken from the MCA, autoregulatory changes in the posterior circulation may not be realised in addition to specific cortical regional changes, highlighting the limited spatial resolution of TCD [101].

The investigation of cerebral autoregulation using TCD is an area of significant research given the high temporal resolution, noninvasiveness, and convenience of the technique. Significant autoregulatory impairment has been consistently demonstrated after TBI and stroke and is of prognostic importance. In syncope and ICA stenosis, the role of autoregulatory assessment is less clear. Carefully designed studies, which improve the uniformity and reliability of TCD-based cerebral autoregulatory testing across a range of clinical conditions, are warranted [17, 101, 103].

4. Conclusions

The portability, repeatability, noninvasiveness, and high temporal resolution of TCD have promoted its use, especially in bedside monitoring of CBF in the critically ill. The majority of supporting evidence pertains to prognostication and initiation of preventative measures in sickle cell disease, SAH, stroke, and TBI.

Further studies linking MES with clinical outcome are warranted in stroke. Carefully designed studies are needed to better determine quality standards in autoregulatory testing and to evaluate the benefit of autoregulation-oriented therapy in TBI.

Invasive techniques appear to remain the gold standard across the majority of clinical applications due to the limited spatial resolution and the assumptions made regarding vessel diameter on TCD. Furthermore, operator dependency is a significant limitation to its clinical utility. However, the temporal resolution and convenience of TCD make it a vital asset to observing the evolution of blood flow changes in the critically ill patient.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

Nicola Sedgwick, Vascular Scientist and Research Manager at Independent Vascular Service (IVS), University Hospital of South Manchester, provided access to and clarified operation of TCD equipment. Helen Carruthers, Medical Artist, University Hospital of South Manchester, produced Figure 2. Gowthaman Gunabushanam, Assistant Professor of Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University, provided Figures 1 and 3. ASET (American Society of Electroneurodiagnostic Technologists), The Neurodiagnostic Society, granted permission for reproduction of Figures 4 and 5 and Table 1 from Nicoletto and Burkman [3, 26].

References

  • 1.Aaslid R, Markwalder TM, Nornes H. Noninvasive transcranial Doppler ultrasound recording of flow velocity in basal cerebral arteries. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1982;57(6):769–774. doi: 10.3171/jns.1982.57.6.0769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Moppett IK, Mahajan RP. Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in anaesthesia and intensive care. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2004;93(5):710–724. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeh205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nicoletto HA, Burkman MH. Transcranial Doppler series part II: performing a transcranial Doppler. American Journal of Electroneurodiagnostic Technology. 2009;49(1):14–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tsivgoulis G, Alexandrov AV, Sloan MA. Advances in transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports. 2009;9(1):46–54. doi: 10.1007/s11910-009-0008-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Topcuoglu MA. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound in neurovascular diseases: diagnostic and therapeutic aspects. Journal of Neurochemistry. 2012;123(supplement 2):39–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2012.07942.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jauch EC, Saver JL, Adams HP, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013;44:870–947. doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e318284056a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Marinoni M, Ginanneschi A, Forleo P, Amaducci L. Technical limits in transcranial Doppler recording: inadequate acoustic windows. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 1997;23(8):1275–1277. doi: 10.1016/s0301-5629(97)00077-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Adams RJ. TCD in sickle cell disease: an important and useful test. Pediatric Radiology. 2005;35(3):229–234. doi: 10.1007/s00247-005-1409-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rigamonti A, Ackery A, Baker AJ. Transcranial Doppler monitoring in subarachnoid hemorrhage: a critical tool in critical care. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia. 2008;55(2):112–123. doi: 10.1007/BF03016323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Arenillas JF, Molina CA, Montaner J, Abilleira S, González-Sánchez MA, Álvarez-Sabín J. Progression and clinical recurrence of symptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis: a long-term follow-up transcranial Doppler ultrasound study. Stroke. 2001;32(12):2898–2904. doi: 10.1161/hs1201.099652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Christou I, Felberg RA, Demchuk AM, et al. A broad diagnostic battery for bedside transcranial Doppler to detect flow changes with internal carotid artery stenosis or occlusion. Journal of Neuroimaging. 2001;11(3):236–242. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2001.tb00040.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ducrocq X, Braun M, Debouverie M, Junges C, Hummer M, Vespignani H. Brain death and transcranial Doppler: experience in 130 cases of brain dead patients. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 1998;160(1):41–46. doi: 10.1016/s0022-510x(98)00188-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Moreno JA, Mesalles E, Gener J, et al. Evaluating the outcome of severe head injury with transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. Neurosurgical Focus. 2000;8(1):1–7. doi: 10.3171/foc.2000.8.1.1702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pennekamp CWA, Moll FL, de Borst GJ. The potential benefits and the role of cerebral monitoring in carotid endarterectomy. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. 2011;24(6):693–697. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32834c7aa1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Müller M, Voges M, Piepgras U, Schimrigk K. Assessment of cerebral vasomotor reactivity by transcranial Doppler ultrasound and breath-holding: a comparison with acetazolamide as vasodilatory stimulus. Stroke. 1995;26(1):96–100. doi: 10.1161/01.str.26.1.96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ringelstein EB, Droste DW, Babikian VL, et al. Consensus on microembolus detection by TCD: international consensus group on microembolus detection. Stroke. 1998;29(3):725–729. doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.3.725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Panerai RB. Assessment of cerebral pressure autoregulation in humans—a review of measurement methods. Physiological Measurement. 1998;19(3):305–338. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/19/3/001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.White H, Venkatesh B. Applications of transcranial Doppler in the ICU: a review. Intensive Care Medicine. 2006;32(7):981–994. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0173-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Monteiro LM, Bollen CW, van Huffelen AC, Ackerstaff RGA, Jansen NJG, van Vught AJ. Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography to confirm brain death: a meta-analysis. Intensive Care Medicine. 2006;32(12):1937–1944. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0353-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Schatlo B, Pluta RM. Clinical applications of transcranial Doppler sonography. Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials. 2007;2(1):49–57. doi: 10.2174/157488707779318125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Saqqur M, Uchino K, Demchuk AM, et al. Site of arterial occlusion identified by transcranial Doppler predicts the response to intravenous thrombolysis for stroke. Stroke. 2007;38(3):948–954. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000257304.21967.ba. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kaps M, Stolz E, Allendoerfer J. Prognostic value of transcranial sonography in acute stroke patients. European Neurology. 2008;59(supplement 1):9–16. doi: 10.1159/000114455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rasulo FA, de Peri E, Lavinio A. Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in intensive care. European Journal of Anaesthesiology. 2008;25(42):167–173. doi: 10.1017/S0265021507003341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kincaid MS. Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography: a diagnostic tool of increasing utility. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. 2008;21(5):552–559. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32830edc0b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Aaslid R. The Doppler principle applied to measurement of blood flow velocity in cerebral arteries. In: Vienna RA, editor. Transcranial Doppler Sonography. New York, NY, USA: Springer; 1986. pp. 22–38. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nicoletto HA, Burkman MH. Transcranial Doppler series part III: interpretation. American Journal of Electroneurodiagnostic Technology. 2009;49(3):244–259. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gosling RG, King DH. Arterial assessment by Doppler shift ultrasound. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine. 1974;67(6, part 1):447–449. doi: 10.1177/00359157740676P113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Nicoletto HA, Burkman MH. Transcranial Doppler series part IV: case studies. American Journal of Electroneurodiagnostic Technology. 2009;49(4):342–360. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Homburg A-M, Jakobsen M, Enevoldsen E. Transcranial Doppler recordings in raised intracranial pressure. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. 1993;87(6):488–493. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1993.tb04142.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lindegaard KF, Nornes H, Bakke SJ, Sorteberg W, Nakstad P. Cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid haemorrhage investigated by means of transcranial Doppler ultrasound. Acta Neurochirurgica. 1988;42:81–84. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-8975-7_16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Aaslid R, Huber P, Nornes H. Evaluation of cerebrovascular spasm with transcranial Doppler ultrasound. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1984;60(1):37–41. doi: 10.3171/jns.1984.60.1.0037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sviri GE, Ghodke B, Britz GW, et al. Transcranial Doppler grading criteria for basilar artery vasospasm. Neurosurgery. 2006;59(2):360–366. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000223502.93013.6E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Markus HS, Harrison MJG. Estimation of cerebrovascular reactivity using transcranial Doppler, including the use of breath-holding as the vasodilatory stimulus. Stroke. 1992;23(5):668–673. doi: 10.1161/01.str.23.5.668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nicoletto HA, Boland LS. Transcranial Doppler series part V: specialty applications. American Journal of Electroneurodiagnostic Technology. 2011;51(1):31–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Dunne VG, Besser M, Ma WJ. Transcranial Doppler in carotid endarterectomy. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2001;8(2):140–145. doi: 10.1054/jocn.2000.0752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.King A, Markus HS. Doppler embolic signals in cerebrovascular disease and prediction of stroke risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2009;40(12):3711–3717. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.563056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kobayashi K, Iguchi Y, Kimura K, et al. Contrast transcranial Doppler can diagnose large patent foramen ovale. Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2009;27(3):230–234. doi: 10.1159/000196820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Spencer MP, Ackerstaff RGA, Babikian VL, et al. Basic identification criteria of Doppler microembolic signals. Stroke. 1995;26(6, article 1123) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sloan MA, Alexandrov AV, Tegeler CH, et al. Assessment: transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2004;62(9):1468–1481. doi: 10.1212/wnl.62.9.1468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Papaioannou V, Dragoumanis C, Theodorou V, Konstantonis D, Pneumatikos I, Birbilis T. Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in intensive care unit. Report of a case with subarachnoid hemorrhage and brain death and review of the literature. Greek E-Journal of Perioperative Medicine. 2008;6:95–104. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Topcuoglu MA, Pryor J, Ogilvy C, Kistler JP. Cerebral vasospasm following subarachnoid hemorrhage. Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine . 2002;4(5):373–384. doi: 10.1007/s11936-002-0017-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Von Reutern G-M, Goertler M-W, Bornstein NM, et al. Grading carotid stenosis using ultrasonic methods. Stroke. 2012;43(3):916–921. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.636084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Navarro JC, Lao AY, Sharma VK, Tsivgoulis G, Alexandrov AV. The accuracy of transcranial Doppler in the diagnosis of middle cerebral artery stenosis. Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2007;23(5-6):325–330. doi: 10.1159/000099130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Feldmann E, Wilterdink JL, Kosinski A, et al. The Stroke Outcomes and Neuroimaging of Intracranial Atherosclerosis (SONIA) trial. Neurology. 2007;68(24):2099–2106. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000261488.05906.c1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhao L, Barlinn K, Sharma VK, et al. Velocity criteria for intracranial stenosis revisited: an international multicenter study of transcranial Doppler and digital subtraction angiography. Stroke. 2011;42(12):3429–3434. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.621235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Gaunt ME, Martin PJ, Smith JL, et al. Clinical relevance of intraoperative embolization detected by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography during carotid endarterectomy: a prospective study of 100 patients. British Journal of Surgery. 1994;81(10):1435–1439. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800811009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Spencer MP. Transcranial Doppler monitoring and causes of stroke from carotid endarterectomy. Stroke. 1997;28(4):685–691. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.4.685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ackerstaff RGA, Moons KGM, Van de Vlasakker CJW, et al. Association of intraoperative transcranial Doppler monitoring variables with stroke from carotid endarterectomy. Stroke. 2000;31(8):1817–1823. doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.8.1817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Cao P, Giordano G, Zannetti S, et al. Transcranial Doppler monitoring during carotid endarterectomy: is it appropriate for selecting patients in need of a shunt? Journal of Vascular Surgery. 1997;26(6):973–980. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(97)70009-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Pennekamp CWA, Tromp SC, Ackerstaff RGA, et al. Prediction of cerebral hyperperfusion after carotid endarterectomy with transcranial Doppler. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2012;43(4):371–376. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.12.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Newman JE, Ali M, Sharpe R, Bown MJ, Sayers RD, Naylor AR. Changes in middle cerebral artery velocity after carotid endarterectomy do not identify patients at high-risk of suffering intracranial haemorrhage or stroke due to hyperperfusion syndrome. European Journal of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery. 2013;45(6):562–571. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.02.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Fukui K, Negoro M, Takahashi I, Fukasaku K, Nakabayashi K, Yoshida J. Usefulness of intravascular Doppler flow measurements in cerebral endovascular treatment: a comparison with trans cranial Doppler. Interventional Neuroradiology. 1996;2(2):103–110. doi: 10.1177/159101999600200203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Simm RF, de Aguiar PHP, de Oliveira Lima M, Paiva BL. Transcranial Doppler as a routine in the treatment of vasospasm following subarachanoid hemorrhage (SAH) Acta Neurochirurgica. 2013;115:75–76. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-1192-5_16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Park S-H, Hwang S-K. Transcranial Doppler study of cerebral arteriovenous malformations after gamma knife radiosurgery. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2009;16(3):378–384. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2008.04.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Harders A, Gilsbach J. Transcranial Doppler sonography and its application in extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery. Neurological Research. 1985;7(3):129–141. doi: 10.1080/01616412.1985.11739711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Skjelland M, Krohg-Sørensen K, Tennøe B, Bakke SJ, Brucher R, Russell D. Cerebral microemboli and brain injury during carotid artery endarterectomy and stenting. Stroke. 2009;40(1):230–234. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.513341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Dittrich R, Ringelstein EB. Occurrence and clinical impact of microembolic signals during or after cardiosurgical procedures. Stroke. 2008;39(2):503–511. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.491241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Doblar DD. Intraoperative transcranial ultrasonic monitoring for cardiac and vascular surgery. Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2004;8(2):127–145. doi: 10.1177/108925320400800206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Platt OS. Prevention and management of stroke in sickle cell anemia. Hematology. 2006;2006(1):54–57. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2006.1.54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Adams RJ, McKie VC, Carl EM, et al. Long-term stroke risk in children with sickle cell disease screened with transcranial Doppler. Annals of Neurology. 1997;42(5):699–704. doi: 10.1002/ana.410420505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Adams RJ, McKie VC, Hsu L, et al. Prevention of a first stroke by transfusions in children with sickle cell anemia and abnormal results on transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1998;339(1):5–11. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199807023390102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Biller J, Godersky JC, Adams HP., Jr. Management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 1988;19(10):1300–1305. doi: 10.1161/01.str.19.10.1300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Dietrich HH, Dacey RG., Jr. Molecular keys to the problems of cerebral vasospasm. Neurosurgery. 2000;46(3):517–530. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200003000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Lysakowski C, Walder B, Costanza MC, Tramèr MR. Transcranial Doppler versus angiography in patients with vasospasm due to a ruptured cerebral aneurysm: a systematic review. Stroke. 2001;32(10):2292–2298. doi: 10.1161/hs1001.097108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Vora YY, Suarez-Almazor M, Steinke DE, Martin ML, Findlay JM. Role of transcranial Doppler monitoring in the diagnosis of cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 1999;44(6):1237–1248. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Sloan MA, Burch CM, Wozniak MA, et al. Transcranial Doppler detection of vertebrobasilar vasospasm following subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 1994;25(11):2187–2197. doi: 10.1161/01.str.25.11.2187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Soustiel JF, Shik V, Shreiber R, Tavor Y, Goldsher D. Basilar vasospasm diagnosis: investigation of a modified “Lindegaard index” based on imaging studies and blood velocity measurements of the basilar artery. Stroke. 2002;33(1):72–77. doi: 10.1161/hs0102.100484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Wozniak MA, Sloan MA, Rothman MI, et al. Detection of vasospasm by transcranial Doppler sonography: the challenges of the anterior and posterior cerebral arteries. Journal of Neuroimaging. 1996;6(2):87–93. doi: 10.1111/jon19966287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Frontera JA, Fernandez A, Schmidt JM, et al. Defining vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage: what is the most clinically relevant definition? Stroke. 2009;40(6):1963–1968. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.544700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Connolly JS, Rabinstein AA, Carhuapoma JR, et al. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2012 doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e3182587839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Akopov S, Whitman GT. Hemodynamic studies in early ischemic stroke: serial transcranial Doppler and magnetic resonance angiography evaluation. Stroke. 2002;33(5):1274–1279. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000013740.62456.a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Demchuk AM, Christou I, Wein TH, et al. Accuracy and criteria for localizing arterial occlusion with transcranial Doppler. Journal of Neuroimaging. 2000;10(1):1–12. doi: 10.1111/jon20001011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Demchuk AM, Scott Burgin W, Christou I, et al. Thrombolysis in Brain Ischemia (TIBI) transcranial Doppler flow grades predict clinical severity, early recovery, and mortality in patients treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator. Stroke. 2001;32(1):89–93. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.1.89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Christou I, Alexandrov AV, Burgin WS, et al. Timing of recanalization after tissue plasminogen activator therapy determined by transcranial Doppler correlates with clinical recovery from ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2000;31(8):1812–1816. doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.8.1812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Alexandrov AV, Burgin WS, Demchuk AM, El-Mitwalli A, Grotta JC. Speed of intracranial clot lysis with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator therapy: sonographic classification and short-term improvement. Circulation. 2001;103(24):2897–2902. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.24.2897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Alexandrov AV, Grotta JC. Arterial reocclusion in stroke patients treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator. Neurology. 2002;59(6):862–867. doi: 10.1212/wnl.59.6.862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Stolz E, Cioli F, Allendoerfer J, Gerriets T, Sette MD, Kaps M. Can early neurosonology predict outcome in acute stroke?: a metaanalysis of prognostic clinical effect sizes related to the vascular status. Stroke. 2008;39(12):3255–3261. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.522714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Allendoerfer J, Goertler M, von Reutern G-M. Prognostic relevance of ultra-early Doppler sonography in acute ischaemic stroke: a prospective multicentre study. The Lancet Neurology. 2006;5(10):835–840. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70551-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Alexandrov AV. Ultrasound identification and lysis of clots. Stroke. 2004;35(11):2722–2725. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000143321.37482.b3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Tsivgoulis G, Eggers J, Ribo M, et al. Safety and efficacy of ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized studies. Stroke. 2010;41(2):280–287. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.563304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Bor-Seng-Shu E, Nogueira RDC, Figueiredo EG, Evaristo EF, Conforto AB, Teixeira MJ. Sonothrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Neurosurgical Focus. 2012;32(1):p. E5. doi: 10.3171/2011.10.FOCUS11251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Ricci S, Dinia L, del Sette M, et al. Sonothrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012;(6) doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008348.pub2.CD008348 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Barlinn K, Alexandrov AV. Sonothrombolysis in ischemic stroke. Current Treatment Options in Neurology. 2013;15(2):91–103. doi: 10.1007/s11940-012-0214-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Llompart-Pou JA, Abadal JM, Güenther A, et al. Transcranial sonography and cerebral circulatory arrest in adults: a comprehensive review. ISRN Critical Care. 2013;2013:6 pages.167468 [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Poularas J, Karakitsos D, Kouraklis G, et al. Comparison between transcranial color Doppler ultrasonography and angiography in the confirmation of brain death. Transplantation Proceedings. 2006;38(5):1213–1217. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.02.127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Martin NA, Patwardhan RV, Alexander MJ, et al. Characterization of cerebral hemodynamic phases following severe head trauma: hypoperfusion, hyperemia, and vasospasm. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1997;87(1):9–19. doi: 10.3171/jns.1997.87.1.0009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Jaggi JL, Obrist WD, Gennarelli TA, Langfitt TW. Relationship of early cerebral blood flow and metabolism to outcome in acute head injury. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1990;72(2):176–182. doi: 10.3171/jns.1990.72.2.0176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.van Santbrink H, Schouten JW, Steyerberg EW, Avezaat CJJ, Maas AIR. Serial transcranial Doppler measurements in traumatic brain injury with special focus on the early posttraumatic period. Acta Neurochirurgica. 2002;144(11):1141–1149. doi: 10.1007/s00701-002-1012-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Soustiel JF, Shik V, Feinsod M. Basilar vasospasm following spontaneous and traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage: clinical implications. Acta Neurochirurgica. 2002;144(2):137–144. doi: 10.1007/s007010200016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Zurynski YA, Dorsch NWC, Fearnside MR. Incidence and effects of increased cerebral blood flow velocity after severe head injury: a transcranial Doppler ultrasound study II. Effect of vasospasm and hyperemia on outcome. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 1995;134(1-2):41–46. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(95)00178-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Hassler W, Steinmetz H, Gawlowski J. Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in raised intracranial pressure and in intracranial circulatory arrest. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1988;68(5):745–751. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Bellner J, Romner B, Reinstrup P, Kristiansson K-A, Ryding E, Brandt L. Transcranial Doppler sonography pulsatility index (PI) reflects intracranial pressure (ICP) Surgical Neurology. 2004;62(1):45–51. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2003.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Saqqur M, Zygun D, Demchuk A. Role of transcranial Doppler in neurocritical care. Critical Care Medicine. 2007;35(supplement 5):S216–S223. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000260633.66384.FB. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Cabanes L, Mas JL, Cohen A, et al. Atrial septal aneurysm and patent foramen ovale as risk factors for cryptogenic stroke in patients less than 55 years of age. A study using transesophageal echocardiography. Stroke. 1993;24(12):1865–1873. doi: 10.1161/01.str.24.12.1865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Sarkar S, Ghosh S, Ghosh SK, Collier A. Role of transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in stroke. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 2007;83(985):683–689. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2007.058602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Kerut EK, Norfleet WT, Plotnick GD, Giles TD. Patent foramen ovale: a review of associated conditions and the impact of physiological size. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2001;38(3):613–623. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01427-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Serena J, Segura T, Perez-Ayuso MJ, Bassaganyas J, Molins A, Dávalos A. The need to quantify right-to-left shunt in acute ischemic stroke a case-control study. Stroke. 1998;29(7):1322–1328. doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.7.1322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Droste DW, Knete J-U, Stypmann J, et al. Contrast transcranial Doppler ultrasound in the detection of right-to- left shunts: comparison of different procedures and different contrast agents. Stroke. 1999;30(9):1827–1832. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.9.1827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Lassen NA. Cerebral blood flow and oxygen consumption in man. Physiological Reviews. 1959;39(2):183–238. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1959.39.2.183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Puppo C, López L, Caragna E, Biestro A. One-minute dynamic cerebral autoregulation in severe head injury patients and its comparison with static autoregulation. A transcranial Doppler study. Neurocritical Care. 2008;8(3):344–352. doi: 10.1007/s12028-008-9069-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Aries MJH, Elting JW, de Keyser J, Kremer BPH, Vroomen PCAJ. Cerebral autoregulation in stroke: a review of transcranial Doppler studies. Stroke. 2010;41(11):2697–2704. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.594168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Reinhard M, Roth M, Müller T, Czosnyka M, Timmer J, Hetzel A. Cerebral autoregulation in carotid artery occlusive disease assessed from spontaneous blood pressure fluctuations by the correlation coefficient index. Stroke. 2003;34(9):2138–2144. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000087788.65566.AC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Panerai RB. Transcranial Doppler for evaluation of cerebral autoregulation. Clinical Autonomic Research. 2009;19(4):197–211. doi: 10.1007/s10286-009-0011-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Paulson OB, Strandgaard S, Edvinsson L. Cerebral autoregulation. Cerebrovascular and Brain Metabolism Reviews. 1990;2(2):161–192. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Aaslid R, Lindegaard K-F, Sorteberg W, Nornes H. Cerebral autoregulation dynamics in humans. Stroke. 1989;20(1):45–52. doi: 10.1161/01.str.20.1.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Giller CA. A bedside test for cerebral autoregulation using transcranial Doppler ultrasound. Acta Neurochirurgica. 1991;108(1-2):7–14. doi: 10.1007/BF01407660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Tiecks FP, Douville C, Byrd S, Lam AM, Newell DW. Evaluation of impaired cerebral autoregulation by the valsalva maneuver. Stroke. 1996;27(7):1177–1182. doi: 10.1161/01.str.27.7.1177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Schondorf R, Stein R, Roberts R, Benoit J, Cupples W. Dynamic cerebral autoregulation is preserved in neurally mediated syncope. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2001;91(6):2493–2502. doi: 10.1152/jappl.2001.91.6.2493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Levine BD, Giller CA, Lane LD, Buckey JC, Blomqvist CG. Cerebral versus systemic hemodynamics during graded orthostatic stress in humans. Circulation. 1994;90(1):298–306. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.90.1.298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Dagal A, Lam AM. Cerebral autoregulation and anesthesia. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. 2009;22(5):547–552. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32833020be. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Tiecks FP, Lam AM, Aaslid R, Newell DW. Comparison of static and dynamic cerebral autoregulation measurements. Stroke. 1995;26(6):1014–1019. doi: 10.1161/01.str.26.6.1014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Czosnyka M, Brady K, Reinhard M, Smielewski P, Steiner LA. Monitoring of cerebrovascular autoregulation: facts, myths, and missing links. Neurocritical Care. 2009;10(3):373–386. doi: 10.1007/s12028-008-9175-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Panerai RB. Cerebral autoregulation: from models to clinical applications. Cardiovascular Engineering. 2008;8(1):42–59. doi: 10.1007/s10558-007-9044-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Kirkpatrick P, Menon DK, Pickard JD. Monitoring of cerebral autoregulation in head-injured patients. Stroke. 1996;27(10):1829–1834. doi: 10.1161/01.str.27.10.1829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Cencetti S, Bandinelli G, Lagi A. Effect of PCO2 changes induced by head-upright tilt on transcranial Doppler recordings. Stroke. 1997;28(6):1195–1197. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.6.1195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Diehl RR, Linden D, Lucke D, Berlit P. Phase relationship between cerebral blood flow velocity and blood pressure: a clinical test of autoregulation. Stroke. 1995;26(10):1801–1804. doi: 10.1161/01.str.26.10.1801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Budohoski KP, Reinhard M, Aries MJH, et al. Monitoring cerebral autoregulation after head injury. Which component of transcranial Doppler flow velocity is optimal? Neurocritical Care. 2012;17(2):211–218. doi: 10.1007/s12028-011-9572-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Panerai RB, Kerins V, Fan L, Yeoman PM, Hope T, Evans DH. Association between dynamic cerebral autoregulation and mortality in severe head injury. British Journal of Neurosurgery. 2004;18(5):471–479. doi: 10.1080/02688690400012343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Brain Trauma Foundation. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. IX. Cerebral perfusion thresholds. Journal of Neurotrauma. 2007;24(supplement 1):S59–S64. doi: 10.1089/neu.2007.9987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.White RP, Markus HS. Impaired dynamic cerebral autoregulation in carotid artery stenosis. Stroke. 1997;28(7):1340–1344. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.7.1340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Clark JM, Skolnick BE, Gelfand R, et al. Relationship of 133Xe cerebral blood flow to middle cerebral arterial flow velocity in men at rest. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism. 1996;16(6):1255–1262. doi: 10.1097/00004647-199611000-00021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Vascular Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES