Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 14;3(4):799–838. doi: 10.3390/jfb3040799

Table 3.

Merits and demerits of electrospinning and bioplotter fabrication techniques for design-based scaffold fabrication.

Merits and demerits Electrospinning Bioplotter-additive manufacturing
Merits
  • Fine fibers (25–100 µm), ECM-like structure (good for cellular activities) [34,106]

  • Use of minimum amount of material [202], minimizing material–cell/tissue interaction [171]

  • Potential biofabrication capacity [106,203]

  • Capable of incorporating multiple polymers [204,205]

  • Reproducible fabrication [69,209]

  • Computer controlled

  • Building of designed, specified structures; patient-specific grafts [169,209]

  • Processing the widest range of biomaterials: hydrogels to polymer melts and hard substances [85,196]

  • Design-based biofabrication capacity [195]

Demerits
  • Densely packed structure, small pore size, nonuniform cell infiltration/tissue formation [206,207]

  • Need of postfabrication process, e.g., direct perfusion [105] and dynamic culturing [173,208]

  • Limited design-based architectural/properties

  • Limited at high spatial resolution [69,192]