Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 1977 Apr;16(1):136–144. doi: 10.1128/iai.16.1.136-144.1977

Comparative Effects of Host and Viral Factors on Early Pathogenesis of Marek's Disease

J Fabricant a, M Ianconescu a,1, B W Calnek a
PMCID: PMC421500  PMID: 194836

Abstract

A series of experiments on the early pathogenesis of Marek's disease was conducted according to a uniform scheme. In each experiment, there was a single variable-age, genetic strain, or virus strain. Virus assays from spleen, buffy coat, and bone marrow, and fluorescent antibody tests on spleen, bursa of Fabricius, and thymus were conducted on five birds per group daily from the 3rd through the 10th day postinoculation. From these data, it was apparent that the response could be divided into two periods: 4 to 6 days = early; 8 to 10 days = late. Serological tests showed all groups except the 1-day-old group to have neutralizing antibody by the end of the 10-day period. With few exceptions, none of the variables tested exerted any appreciable influence on the level of virus growth in spleen, bursa, or thymus during the early period. High levels of infection occurred in all birds during that period. Changes in infection pattern which occurred during the late period were significant and could be correlated with occurrence of Marek's disease in test samples of birds held until 7 weeks after infection. Infectivity levels dropped appreciably in the case of resistant N-line birds given JM virus, and, during the late period, infection levels were significantly higher in GA-infected birds than in those given viruses of lower virulence. Whereas the virus titers during the 8- to 10-day period usually reflected the eventual clinical pattern of Marek's disease, the levels of viral antigen (fluorescent antibody tests) were much less consistent. One further experiment conducted by the same uniform scheme demonstrated no significant effects on early pathogenesis or course of Marek's disease in birds given continuous oral medication with amino-ureido-sulfone.

Full text

PDF
136

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Addinger H. K., Calnek B. W. Pathogenesis of Marek's disease: early distribution of virus and viral antigens in infected chickens. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1973 May;50(5):1287–1298. doi: 10.1093/jnci/50.5.1287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Calnek B. W. Effects of passive antibody on early pathogenesis of Marek's disease. Infect Immun. 1972 Aug;6(2):193–198. doi: 10.1128/iai.6.2.193-198.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Calnek B. W., Higgins D. A., Fabricant J. Rous sarcoma regression in chickens resistant or susceptible to Marek's disease. Avian Dis. 1975 Jul-Sep;19(3):473–482. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Calnek B. W. Influence of age at exposure on the pathogenesis of Marek's disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1973 Sep;51(3):929–939. doi: 10.1093/jnci/51.3.929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Calnek B. W., Madin S. H. Characteristics of in vitro infection of chicken kidney cell cultures with a herpesvirus from Marek's disease. Am J Vet Res. 1969 Aug;30(8):1389–1402. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Calnek B. W., Ubertini T., Adldinger H. K. Viral antigen, virus particles, and infectivity of tissues from chickens with Marek's disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1970 Aug;45(2):341–351. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen J. H., Purchase H. G. Surface antigen on chick kidney cells infected with the herpesvirus of Marek's disease. Virology. 1970 Feb;40(2):410–412. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(70)90421-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chubb R. C., Churchill A. E. Effect of maternal antibody on Marek's disease. Vet Rec. 1969 Sep 13;85(11):303–305. doi: 10.1136/vr.85.11.303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cole R. K. Studies on genetic resistance to Marek's disease. Avian Dis. 1968 Feb;12(1):9–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Eidson C. S., Schmittle S. C. Studies on acute Marek's disease. I. Characteristics of isolate GA in chickens. Avian Dis. 1968 Aug;12(3):467–476. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Frazier J. A., Biggs P. M. Marek's disease herpesvirus particles in tissues from chickens free of precipitating antibodies. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1972 May;48(5):1519–1523. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fujimoto Y., Okada K., Kakihata K., Matsui T., Narita M. Initial lesions in chickens infected with JM strain of Marek's disease virus. Jpn J Vet Res. 1974 Jul;22(3):80–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hutt F. B., Cole R. K. Genetic Control of Lymphomatosis in the Fowl. Science. 1947 Oct 24;106(2756):379–384. doi: 10.1126/science.106.2756.379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lesnik F., Ross L. J. Immunization against Marek's disease using Marek's disease virus-specific antigens free from infectious virus. Int J Cancer. 1975 Jul 15;16(1):153–163. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910160117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Payne L. N., Rennie M. Pathogenesis of Marek's disease in chicks with and without maternal antibody. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1973 Nov;51(5):1559–1573. doi: 10.1093/jnci/51.5.1559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Phillips P. A., Biggs P. M. Course of infection in tissues of susceptible chickens after exposure to strains of Marek's disease virus and turkey herpesvirus. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1972 Nov;49(5):1367–1373. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Powell P. C. Immunity to Marek's disease induced by glutaraldehyde-treated cells of Marek's disease lymphoblastoid cell lines. Nature. 1975 Oct 23;257(5528):684–685. doi: 10.1038/257684a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Powell P. C., Payne L. N., Frazier J. A., Rennie M. T lymphoblastoid cell lines from Marek's disease lymphomas. Nature. 1974 Sep 6;251(5470):79–80. doi: 10.1038/251079a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sharma J. M., Witter R. L., Purchase H. G. Absence of age-resistance in neonatally thymectomised chickens as evidence for cell-mediated immune surveillance in Marek's disease. Nature. 1975 Feb 6;253(5491):477–479. doi: 10.1038/253477a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sharma J. M., Witter R. L. The effect of B-cell immunosuppression on age-related resistance of chickens to Marek's disease. Cancer Res. 1975 Mar;35(3):711–717. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Smith M. W., Calnek B. W. Effect of virus pathogenicity on antibody production in Marek's disease. Avian Dis. 1973 Oct-Dec;17(4):727–736. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Witter R. L., Stephens E. A., Sharma J. M., Nazerian K. Demonstration of a tumor-associated surface antigen in Marek's disease. J Immunol. 1975 Jul;115(1):177–183. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES