Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 11;10(3):e0118744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118744

Table 6. Comparison of AUCs for discriminating hepatic fibrosis stage in the whole cohort (N = 104).

Parameters Discrimination Cut-off Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) AUC (95% CI) P-value after Bonferroni correction
F1 vs F2/3/4 83 ng/mL 90.0 100 100 82.9 0.997 (0.965–1.000)
Osteopontin F1/2 vs F3/4 124 ng/mL 95.2 100 100 96.9 0.999 (0.965–1.000)
F1/2/3 vs F4 152 ng/mL 100 84.5 60.6 100 0.945 (0.879–0.979)
F1 vs F2/3/4 169×106/mL 75.7 88.2 93.0 63.8 0.827 (0.740–0.894) 0.0004*
Platelet count F1/2 vs F3/4 156×106/mL 78.6 72.6 66.0 83.3 0.802 (0.708–0.870) < 0.0001 #
F1/2/3 vs F4 135×106/mL 85.0 75.0 44.7 95.5 0.861 (0.784–0.924) 0.288 @
F1 vs F2/3/4 138 ng/mL 48.6 91.2 91.9 46.3 0.763 (0.666–0.838) < 0.0001*
Hyaluronic acid F1/2 vs F3/4 179 ng/mL 59.5 88.7 78.1 76.4 0.794 (0.708–0.870) < 0.0001 #
F1/2/3 vs F4 179 ng/mL 90.0 83.3 56.3 97.2 0.886 (0.807–0.939) 0.623 @
F1 vs F2/3/4 131 ng/mL 84.3 55.9 79.7 63.3 0.747 (0.656–0.830) < 0.0001*
Collagen type IV F1/2 vs F3/4 165 ng/mL 66.7 77.4 66.7 77.4 0.783 (0.687–0.854) < 0.0001 #
F1/2/3 vs F4 166 ng/mL 80.0 70.2 39.0 93.7 0.822 (0.730–0.886) 0.113 @

The AUC of serum OPN was compared with the AUCs of other serum markers.

F, fibrosis; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CI, confidence interval

(*, F1 vs F2/F3/F4

#, F1/F2 vs F3/F4

@, F1/F2/F3 vs F4)