. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 8.

Published in final edited form as: Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2014;17(0 2):470–478. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-10470-6_59

Table 4.

Best rDAm and εMKm sample estimates perm arm (from Fig. 1) vs. MMSE and CSF levels.

Power	MMSE	τ	pτ	Aβ	τ/Aβ	pτ/Aβ	εMKm	rDAm

80%	> 2500	973	1447	> 2500	975	> 2000	431	193
85%	> 2500	1117	> 1500	> 2500	1120	> 2500	495	221
90%	> 2500	1303	> 1500	> 2500	1306	> 2500	577	258