Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alzheimers Dement. 2015 Jun 18;11(12):1489–1499. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.01.010

Table 2.

Baseline rDAm for sample enrichment: Results of sample enrichment using baseline rDAm (constructed using all the three imaging modalities T1 MRI, FDG and florbetapir) in a 2 year trial with outcome measures being MMSE, ADAS, MOCA, RAVLT, PsychMEM, Hippocampal Volume, CDR-SOB and DxConv. All estimates at significance level of 0.05 and 80% statistical power with treatment effect of 0.25. Second column shows sample estimates with no enrichment (i.e. all clinically-diagnosed MCI subjects included), followed by using MCI subjects from bottom 20%, 25%, 33% and 50% percentiles on rDAm scores respectively. For eachpercentile, the cutoff on rDAm scale is shown and sample sizes smaller than 700 are in bold.

Outcome
measure
No
enrichment
Bottom 20%
rDAm ≤ 0.41
Bottom 25%
rDAm ≤ 0.46
Bottom 33%
rDAm ≤ 0.52
Bottom 50%
rDAm ≤ 0.65

MMSE 1367 200 239 371 566
ADAS >2000 775 945 >2000 >2000
MOCA >2000 449 674 960 1919
RAVLT >2000 591 1211 >2000 >2000
PsyMEM >2000 420 690 786 1164
PsyEF >2000 >2000 >2000 >2000 >2000
HippoVol >2000 543 1504 1560 1675
CDR-SB 1586 281 317 430 433
DxConv 895 230 267 352 448